Auditory context effects in picture naming investigated with event-related fMRI

Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 260-269

  De Zubicaray, Greig I ^a   Mcmahon, Katie L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FRONTAL CORTEX; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MALE; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; SEMANTIC MEMORY; SEMANTICS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL CORTEX; WORD RECOGNITION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; NAMES; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 68949096512     PISSN: 15307026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/CABN.9.3.260     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. ABDEL RAHMAN, R., & MELINGER, A. (2009). Semantic context effects in language production: A swinging lexical network proposal and a review. Language & Cognitive Processes, 24, 713-734. doi:10.1080/01690960802597250
2. ABEL, S., DRESSEL, K., BITZER, R., KÜMMERER, D., MADER, I., WEILLER, C., & HUBER, W. (2009). The separation of processing stages in a lexical interference fMRI-paradigm. NeuroImage, 44, 1113-1124.
3. AMARO, E., JR., WILLIAMS, S. C., SHERGILL, S. S., FU, C. H., MAC- SWEENEY, M., PICCHIONI, M., ET AL. (2002). Acoustic noise and functional magnetic resonance imaging: Current strategies and future prospects. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 16, 497-510.
4. BAAYEN, R. H., PIEPENBROCK, R., & GULIKERS, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
5. BAIER, B., KLEINSCHMIDT, A., & MÜLLER, N. G. (2006). Cross-modal processing in early visual and auditory cortices depends on expected statistical relationship of multisensory information. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 12260-12265. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1457-06.2006
6. BERG, T., & SCHADE, U. (1992). The role of inhibition in a spreading activation model of language production, Part 1: The psycholinguistic perspective. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, 405-434.
7. BLES, M., & JANSMA, B. M. (2008). Phonological processing of ignored distractor pictures: An fMRI investigation. BMC Neuroscience, 9, 20.
8. BOTVINICK, M., COHEN, J. D., & CARTER, C. S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 539-546. (Pubitemid 39536251)
9. DAMIAN, M. F., & ALS, L. C. (2005). Long-lasting semantic context effects in the spoken production of object names. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 1372-1384.
10. DAMIAN, M. F., & BOWERS, J. S. (2009). Assessing the role of orthography in speech perception and production: Evidence from picture- word interference tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 581-598. doi:10.1080/09541440801896007
11. DAMIAN, M. F., & MARTIN, R. C. (1999). Semantic and phonological Modelcodes interact in single word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 345-361.
12. DAVIS, C. J. (2005). N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 65-70.
13. DELL, G. S. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283-321.
14. DELL, G. S., & O'SEAGHDHA, P. G. (1991). Mediated and convergent lexical priming in language production: A comment on Levelt et al. (1991). Psychological Review, 98, 604-614.
15. DELL, G. S., & O'SEAGHDHA, P. G. (1994). Inhibition in interactive activation models of linguistic selection and sequencing. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, & language (pp. 409-451). San Diego: Academic Press.
16. DELL'ACQUA, R., JOB, R., PERESSOTTI, F., & PASCALI, A. (2007). The picture-word interference effect is not a Stroop effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 717-722.
17. DE ZUBICARAY, G. I. (2006). Cognitive neuroimaging: Cognitive science out of the armchair. Brain & Cognition, 60, 272-281.
18. DE ZUBICARAY, G. I., MCMAHON, K. L., EASTBURN, M. M., & PRINGLE, A. (2006). Top-down influences on lexical selection during spoken word production: A 4T fMRI investigation of refractory effects in picture naming. Human Brain Mapping, 27, 864-873.
19. DE ZUBICARAY, G. I., MCMAHON, K. L., EASTBURN, M. M., & WILSON, S. J. (2002). Orthographic/phonological facilitation of naming responses in the picture-word task: An event-related fMRI study using overt vocal responding. NeuroImage, 16, 1084-1093.
20. DE ZUBICARAY, G. I., WILSON, S. J., MCMAHON, K. L., & MUTHIAH, S. (2001). The semantic interference effect in the picture-word paradigm: An event-related fMRI study employing overt responses. Human Brain Mapping, 14, 218-227.
21. DUFFAU, H., GATIGNOL, P., MANDONNET, E., PERUZZI, P., TZOURIO- MAZOYER, N., & CAPELLE, L. (2005). New insights into the anatomofunctional connectivity of the semantic system: A study using corticosubcortical electrostimulations. Brain, 128, 797-810.
22. EDEN, G. F., JOSEPH, J. E., BROWN, H. E., BROWN, C. P., & ZEFFIRO, T. A. (1999). Utilizing hemodynamic delay and dispersion to detect fMRI signal change without auditory interference: The behavioral interleaved gradients technique. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 41, 13-20.
23. ELLIOTT, M. R., BOWTELL, R. W., & MORRIS, P. G. (1999). The effect of scanner sound in visual, motor, and auditory functional MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 41, 1230-1235. (Pubitemid 29247292)
24. FREIRE, L., ROCHE, A., & MANGIN, J. F. (2002). What is the best similarity measure for motion correction in fMRI time series? IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 21, 470-484. (Pubitemid 34979824)
25. FRISTON, K. J., GLASER, D. E., HENSON, R. N. A., KIEBEL, S., PHILLIPS, C., & ASHBURNER, J. (2002). Classical and Bayesian inference in neuroimaging: Applications. NeuroImage, 16, 484-512. (Pubitemid 34852463)
26. GANUSHCHAK, L. Y., & SCHILLER, N. O. (2008). Brain error-monitoring activity is affected by semantic relatedness: An event-related brain potentials study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 927-940. (Pubitemid 351657347)
27. GENOVESE, C. R., LAZAR, N. A., & NICHOLS, T. (2002). Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. NeuroImage, 15, 870-878.
28. GOLDRICK, M. (2006). Limited interaction in speech production: Chronometric, speech error, and neuropsychological evidence. Language & Cognitive Processes, 21, 817-855.
29. GOLDRICK, M. (2007). Connectionist principles in theories of speech production. In M. G. Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 515-530). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. HANTSCH, A., JESCHENIAK, J. D., & SCHRIEFERS, H. J. (2005). Semantic competition between hierarchically related words during speech planning. Memory & Cognition, 33, 984-1000.
31. HARLEY, T. A. (1993). Phonological activation of semantic competitors during lexical access in speech production. Language & Cognitive Processes, 8, 291-309.
32. HARLEY, T. A., & MACANDREW, S. B. G. (2001). Constraints upon word substitution speech errors. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 395-418.
33. HARM, M. W., & SEIDENBERG, M. S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111, 662-720.
34. HEIM, S., FRIEDERICI, A. D., SCHILLER, N. O., RÜSCHEMEYER, S. A., & AMUNTS, K. (2009). The determiner congruency effect in language production investigated with functional MRI. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 928-940. doi:10.1002/hbm.20556
35. HIRSCHFELD, G. H. F., JANSMA, B., BOELTE, J., & ZWITSERLOOD, P. (2008). Interference and facilitation in overt speech production investigated with ERPs. NeuroReport, 19, 1227-1230.
36. INDEFREY, P., & LEVELT, W. J. M. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92, 101-144. (Pubitemid 38270264)
37. JESCHENIAK, J. D., HANTSCH, A., & SCHRIEFERS, H. J. (2005). Context effects on lexical choice and lexical activation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 905-920.
38. JESCHENIAK, J. D., & SCHRIEFERS, H. J. (1998). Serial versus cascaded processing in lexical access in language production: Further evidence from the coactivation of near-synonyms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 1256-1274. (Pubitemid 128129754)
39. KAN, I. P., & THOMPSON-SCHILL, S. L. (2004). Effect of name agreement on prefrontal activity during overt and covert picture naming. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 4, 43-57.
40. KUIPERS, J.-R., LA HEIJ, W., & COSTA, A. (2006). A further look at semantic context effects in language production: The role of response congruency. Language & Cognitive Processes, 21, 892-919.
41. LAIRD, A. R., MCMILLAN, K. M., LANCASTER, J. L., KOCHUNOV, P., TURKELTAUB, P. E., PARDO, J. V., & FOX, P. T. (2005). A comparison of label-based review and ALE meta-analysis in the Stroop task. Human Brain Mapping, 25, 6-21.
42. LAURIENTI, P. J., BURDETTE, J. H., WALLACE, M. T., YEN, Y. F., FIELD, A. S., & STEIN, B. E. (2002). Deactivation of sensory-specific cortex by cross-modal stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 420-429.
43. LEVELT, W. J. M., ROELOFS, A., & MEYER, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 1-38.
44. MAHON, B. Z., COSTA, A., PETERSON, R., VARGAS, K. A., & CARAMAZZA, A. (2007). Lexical selection is not by competition: A reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 503-535.
45. MCMAHON, K., PRINGLE, A., EASTBURN, M., & MAILLET, D. (2004). Improving EPI imaging quality and sound levels with bandwidth selection [Abstract]. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Kyoto, 1033. http://cds.ismrm.org/ ismrm-2004.
46. MECHELLI, A., JOSEPHS, O., LAMBON RALPH, M. A., MCCLELLAND, J. L., & PRICE, C. J. (2007). Dissociating stimulus-driven semantic and phonological effects during reading and naming. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 205-217.
47. MEYER, A. S., & DAMIAN, M. F. (2007). Activation of distractor names in the picture-picture interference paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 35, 494-503.
48. MEYER, A. S., & SCHRIEFERS, H. (1991). Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 1146-1160.
49. NAVARRETE, E., & COSTA, A. (2005). Phonological activation of ignored pictures: Further evidence for a cascade model of lexical access. Journal of Memory & Language, 53, 359-377.
50. OJEMANN, J. G., AKBUDAK, E., SNYDER, A. Z., MCKINSTRY, R. C., RAICHLE, M. E., & CONTURO, T. E. (1997). Anatomic localization and quantitative analysis of gradient refocused echo-planar fMRI susceptibility artifacts. NeuroImage, 6, 156-167.
51. PETERSON, R. R., & SAVOY, P. (1998). Lexical selection and phonological encoding during language production: Evidence for cascaded processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 539-557. (Pubitemid 128073333)
52. RAPP, B., & GOLDRICK, M. (2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107, 460-499.
53. ROELOFS, A. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42, 107-142.
54. ROELOFS, A. (2003). Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: Modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. Psychological Review, 110, 88-125.
55. ROELOFS, A. (2008a). Attention to spoken word planning: Chronometric and neuroimaging evidence. Language & Linguistics Compass, 2/3, 389-405. doi:10.111/j.1749-818x.2008.00060.x
56. ROELOFS, A. (2008b). Tracing attention and the activation flow in spoken word planning using eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 353-368.
57. ROSINKSI, R. R., GOLINKOFF, R. M., & KUKISH, K. S. (1975). Automatic semantic processing in a picture-word interference task. Child Development, 46, 247-253.
58. SCHRIEFERS, H., MEYER, A. S., & LEVELT, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory & Language, 29, 86-102.
59. SHATTUCK, D. W., MIRZA, M., ADISETIYO, V., HOJATKASHANI, C., SALAMON, G., NARR, K. L., ET AL. (2008). Construction of a 3D probabilistic atlas of human cortical structures. NeuroImage, 39, 1064-1080.
60. SNODGRASS, J. G., & VANDERWART, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6, 174-215.
61. SPALEK, K., & THOMPSON-SCHILL, S. L. (2008). Task-dependent semantic interference in language production: An fMRI study. Brain & Language, 107, 220-228.
62. STARREVELD, P. A. (2000). On the interpretation of onsets of auditory context effects in word production. Journal of Memory & Language, 42, 497-525.
63. STARREVELD, P. A., & LA HEIJ, W. (1995). Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation, and their interaction in naming tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 686-698.
64. VAUGHAN, J. T., ADRIANY, G., GARWOOD, M., YACOUB, E., DUONG, T., DELABARRE, L., ET AL. (2002). Detunable transverse electromagnetic (TEM) volume coil for high-field NMR. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 47, 990-1000.
65. VITKOVITCH, M., RUTTER, M., & READ, A. (2001). Inhibitory effects during object name retrieval: The effect of interval between prime and target on picture naming responses. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 483-506.
66. WEISSMAN, D. H., WARNER, L. M., & WOLDORFF, M. G. (2004). The neural mechanisms for minimizing cross-modal distraction. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 10941-10949.
67. ZAITSEV, M., HENNIG, J., & SPECK, O. (2003). Automated online EPI distortion correction for fMRI applications [Abstract]. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1042. http://cds.ismrm.org/ismrm-2003.