The picture-word interference effect is not a Stroop effect

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 717-722

  Dell'Acqua, R ^a,d   Job, R ^b   Peressotti, F ^a   Pascali, A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FERRARA   (Italy)

^d Dipartimento di Psicologia Dello Sviluppo e della Socializzazione   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35348906915     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196827     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. BLOEM, I., VAN DEN BOOGAARD, S., & LA HEIJ, W. (2004). Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in language production: Further evidence for the conceptual selection model of lexical access. Journal of Memory & Language, 51, 307-323.
2. CARRIER, L. M., & PASHLER, H. (1995). Attentional limits in memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1339-1348.
3. COSTA, A., ALARIO, F.-X., & CARAMAZZA, A. (2005). On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 125-131.
4. DELL'ACQUA, R., JOLICŒUR, P., PASCALI, A., & PLUCHINO, P. (2007). Short-term consolidation of individual identities leads to lag-1 sparing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 593-609.
5. DELL'ACQUA, R., LOTTO, L., & JOB, R. (2000). Naming times and standardized norms for the Italian PD/DPSS set of pictures: Direct comparisons with American, English, French, and Spanish published databases. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 588-615.
6. FAGOT, C., & PASHLER, H. (1992). Making two responses to a single object: Implications for the central attentional bottleneck Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 1058-1059.
7. FERREIRA, V. S., & PASHLER, H. (2002). Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 28, 1187-1199.
8. FINKBEINER, M., & CARAMAZZA, A. (2006). Now you see it, now you don't: On turning semantic interference into facilitation in a Strooptike task Cortex, 42, 790-796.
9. GLASER, W. R., & DÜNGELHOFF, F.-J. (1984). The time course of picture-word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 640-654.
10. JOLICŒUR, P., & DELL'ACQUA, R. (1998). The demonstration of shortterm consolidation. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 138-202.
11. LEVELT, W. J. M., ROELOFS, A., & MEYER, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 1-75.
12. MACLEOD, C. M. (1991). Haifa century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
13. MEYER, D. E., & KIERAS, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and human multiple-task performance: Part II. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review, 104, 749-791.
14. MIOZZO, M., & CARAMAZZA, A. (2003). When more is less: A counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 228-252.
15. PASHLER, H. (1994a). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Date and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244.
16. PASHLER, H. (1994b). Graded capacity-sharing in dual-task interference? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 330-342.
17. PASHLER, H., & JOHNSTON, J. C. (1989). Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 19-45.
18. POTTER, M. C., DELL'ACQUA, R., PESCIARELLI, F., JOB, R., PERESSOTTI, F., & O'CONNOR, D. (2005). Bidirectional semantic priming in the attentional blink Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 460-465.
19. ROELOFS, A. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42, 107-142.
20. ROELOFS, A. (2003). Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: Modeling attentional control in the Stroop task Psychological Review, 110, 88-125.
21. RUTHRUFF, E., JOHNSTON, J. C., & VAN SELST, M. (2001). Why practice reduces dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 3-21.
22. SNODGRASS, J. G., & YUDITSKY, T. (1996). Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 516-536.
23. TOMBU, M., & JOLICŒUR, P. (2003). A central capacity sharing model of dual task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 3-18.
24. TOMBU, M., & JOLICŒUR, P. (2004). Virtually no evidence for virtually perfect time-sharing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 30, 795-810.
25. TOMBU, M., & JOLICŒUR, P. (2005). Testing the predictions of the central capacity sharing model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 790-802.
26. VAN SELST, M., & JOLICŒUR, P. (1994a). Can mental rotation occur before the dual-task bottleneck? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 905-921.
27. VAN SELST, M., & JOLICŒUR, P. (1994b). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 631-650.