Effectiveness, challenges, and perceptions of classroom participation systems

Nurse Educator

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 156-161

  Smith, Deborah Ann ^a   Rosenkoetter, Marlene M ^a  

^a MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERNET; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOBILE PHONE; MOTIVATION; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING STUDENT; PROBLEM BASED LEARNING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; TEACHING; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; CELLULAR PHONE; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION, NURSING, BACCALAUREATE; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MOTIVATION; NURSING EDUCATION RESEARCH; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; STUDENTS, NURSING; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 68549132552     PISSN: 03633624     EISSN: 15389855     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NNE.0b013e3181aab7e3     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Auras R, Bix L. Wake up! The effectiveness of a student response system in large packaging classes. Packag Technol Sci. 2007;20: 183-195.
2. Johnson J. Pediatric dentistry education. J Dent Educ. 2005; 69:378-381.
3. Graham C, Tripp T, Seawright L, Joeckel G. Empowering or compelling reluctant participators using audience response systems. Active Learn Higher Educ. 2007;8(3):233-258.
4. Trees AR, Jackson MH. The learning environment in clicker classrooms: student processes of learning and involvement in large university-level courses using student response systems. Learn Media Technol. 2007;32(1):21-40.
5. Miller R, Ashar B, Getz K. Evaluation of an audience response system for the continuing education of health professionals. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2005;23(2):109-115.
6. Freeman S, O'Connor E, Parks J, et al. Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2007;6:132-139.
7. Crossgove K, Curran K. Using clickers in nonmajors- and majorslevel biology courses: student opinion, learning, and long-term retention of course material. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2008;7:146-154.
8. Latessa R, Mouw D. Use of an audience response system to augment interactive learning. Fam Med. 2005;37:12-14.
9. Chiu C, Sathasivan K. A new classroom teaching tool: wireless classroom participation system (CPS), Google seminar, Experienced Faculty Seminar. University of Texas at Austin, Department of Physics. January 2003. Available at http://www.ph.utexas.edu/ ∼ctalk/talks/chiusataweb-files/frame.htm. Accessed January 23, 2009.
10. Beebe KR, Bailey N, Phillips W. Efficacy of a handheld response device to improve classroom interaction and learning outcomes. Paper presented at Emerging Technologies in Nurse Education Conference; July 14-15, 2008; Seattle, WA.
11. Parent M, Neufeld D, Gallupe R. An exploratory longitudinal analysis of GSS use in the case method classroom. J Comput Inf Syst. 2002;43:70-80.
12. Leidner D, Jarvenpaa S. The use of information technology to enhance management school education: a theoretical view. MIS Q. 1995;29:265-291.
13. Siau K, Sheng H, Nah F. Use of a classroom response system to enhance classroom interactivity. IEEE Trans Educ. 2006;49:398-403.
14. Bruff D. Classroom response systems ("clickers"). Vanderbilt University: Center for Teaching. Available at www.vanderbilt. edu/cft/resources/teaching-resources/technology/crs.htm#. Accessed January 23, 2009.
15. Lopez-Herrijon R, Schulman M. Using interactive technology in a short Java course: an experience report. June 28-30, 2004. Available at www.utexas.edu/academic/cit/gallery/utprofiles/ cps/java.html. Accessed January 23, 2009.
16. Morris DG, Bakewell MA, Buzila SM, et al. The enhancement of audience participation in telemedicine education by the use of electronic voting. J Telemed Telecare. 1999;5(suppl 1):12-14.
17. Palmer EJ, Devitt PG, Young NJD, Morris D. Assessment of an electronic voting system within the tutorial setting: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2005;5(24):24-34.
18. Caron P, Gely R. Taking back the law school classroom: using technology to foster active student learning. J Legal Educ. 2004;54:551.
19. Cato J, Abbott P. Collaborating for a cause - creating partnerships between IT and academia. Consumer-centered computersupported care for healthy people [abstract]. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;122:1014.
20. Caldwell J. Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2007;6:9-20.
21. Draper SW, Brown MI. Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system. J Comput Assist Learn. 2004; 20:81-94.
22. Beatty ID, Gerace WJ, Leonard WJ, Dufresne RJ. Designing effective questions for classroom response system teaching. Am J Phys. 2006;74(1):31-39.
23. Zurmehly J, Leadingham C. Exploring student response systems in nursing education. Comput Inform Nurs. 2008;26(5): 265-270.
24. Fies C, Marshall J. Classroom response systems: a review of the literature [abstract]. J Sci Educ Technol. 2006;15:101-109.
25. Moredich C, Moore E. Engaging students through the use of classroom response systems. Nurse Educ. 2007;32(3):113-116.
26. Cummings B. i>Clicker classroom response system [electronic supplement]. Pearson Higher Education Web site. Published October 1, 2007. Available at http://pearsonhighered.com:8081/ educator/academic/product/0,3110, 032153705X,00.html. Accessed January 23, 2009.
27. DeBourgh G. Use of classroom "clickers" to promote acquisition of advanced reasoning skills. Nurse Educ Pract. 2007;8:76-87.
28. Skiba DJ. Got large lecture hall classes? Use clickers. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2006;27(5):278-280.
29. Stein PS, Challman SD, Brueckner JK. The University of Adelaide student experience of learning and teaching - standard teaching evaluation using audience response technology for pretest reviews in an undergraduate nursing course. J Nurs Educ. 2006;45(11):469-473.
30. Blackboard Web site. Available at blackboard.com. Accessed January 23, 2009.
31. i>Clicker Web site. Available at iClicker.com. Accessed January 23, 2009.
32. Barnett J. Implementation of personal response units in very large lecture classes: student perceptions. Australas J Educ Technol. 2006;22:474-494.
33. King PE, Young MJ. An information processing perspective on the efficacy of instructional feedback. Am Commun J. 2002;5(2):1-10.