Wake Up! THe effectiveness of a student response system in large packaging classes

Packaging Technology and Science

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 183-195

  Auras, Rafael ^a   Bix, Laura ^a  

^a Michigan State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Active learning; Clickers; Packaging education; Student response systems; Teaching

Indexed keywords

PACKAGING; RESPONSE TIME (COMPUTER SYSTEMS); STUDENTS;

ACTIVE LEARNING; CLICKERS; PACKAGING EDUCATION; STUDENT RESPONSE SYSTEMS;

INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

PACKAGING; RESPONSE TIME;

EID: 34250877096     PISSN: 08943214     EISSN: 10991522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pts.753     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Petr DW. Experience with a multiple-choice audience response system in an engineering classroom. In 35th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Indianopolis, IN, 2005.
2. Rice RE, Bunz U. Evaluating a wireless course feedback system: the role of demographics, expertise, fluency, competency, and usage. http://bunz.comm. fsu.edu/NCA2003cps.PDF [accessed 1 December 2005].
3. Judson E, Sawada D. Learning from past and present: electronic response systems in college lecture halls. J. Comput. Math. Sci. Teaching 2002; 21(2): 167-181.
4. Guthrie RW, Carlin A. Waking the dead: using interactive technology to engage passive listeners in the classroom. In 10th Americas Conference on Information Systems, New York, 2004: http://www.mhhe.com/cps/docs/CPSWP_ Wakin dDead082003.pdf [accessed 1 December 2005].
5. Mazur E. Peer Instruction: A User's Manual and Concept Test. Prentice Hall. New York, NY, 1996.
6. Paschal CB. Formative assessment in physiology teaching using a wireless classroom communication system. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 2002; 26: 299-308.
7. Meltzer DE, Manivannan K. Transforming the lecture-hall environment: the fully interactive physics lecture. Am. J. Phys. 2002; 70(6): 639-654.
8. Liu T-C, Liang JK, Wang H-Y, Chan T-W. The features and potential of interactive response system: http://ccv.src.ncu.edu.tw/ccv/ 2003_ICCE_The%20Features%20and%20Pote ntial%20of%20Interactive%20Response%20System.pdf [accessed 1 December 2005].
9. Lowery RC. Teaching and learning with interactive student response systems: a comparison of commercial products in the higher-education market. In Southwestern Social Science Association, New Orleans, LA, 2005.
10. Turning Technologies, LLC. Turning Attendance into Involvement into Assessment Potential into Success. 2005, Turning Point LLC, http://www. turningtechnologies.com [accessed 1 December 2005].
11. Hämäläinen H, Ikonen J, Porras J. Applying wireless technology to the teaching environment. Lappeenranta University of Technology, 2005: http://www.it.lut.fi/WAWC/WAWC03/presentations/WAWC_paper3.pdf [accessed 17 December 2005].
12. Burnstein RA, Lederman LM. Using wireless keypads in lecture classes. Physics Teacher 2001; 39: 8-11.
13. Mestre JP, Wenk L. Classtalk: a classroom communication system for active learning. J. Comput. Higher Educ. 1996; 7: 3-47.
14. Elliott C. Using a personal response system in economics teaching. Int. Rev. Econ. Educ. 2003; 1(1): 80-86.
15. Caron PL, Gely R. Taking back the law school classroom: using technology to foster active student learning. HeinOnline 2004; 54: 551-569.
16. Slain D et al. An interactive respense system to promote active learning in the Doctor of Pharmacy curriculum. Am. J. Pharmaceut. Educ. 2004; 68(5): 1-9.
17. Salmon TP, Stahl JN. Wireless audience response system: does it make a difference? J. Extens. on 2005; 43(3): 7.
18. Blanton P. Tips for using a peer response system in a large introductory physics class. Physics Teacher 2004; 42: 253-254.
19. Duncan D. Clickers in the Classroom: How to Enhance Science. Teaching Using Classroom Response Systems. New York, Pearson Addison Wesley, 2005.
20. Woods AH, Chiu C. Wireless Response Technology in College Classrooms. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, http://www.mnhe.com/cps/docs/ (IPSWP_Woods. Chiu.pdf [accessed 1 December 2005)].
21. Bix L, Auras R. Feedback regardirg the use of a student response system in two packaging classes. Human Subject Approval IRB#X05-1005, Michigan State University, 2005.
22. Svinicki MD. How do they work? A deeper look at innovations in teaching. Lilly Seminar, Kellog Center, East Lansing, MI, October 2303.
23. Svinicki MD. Learning and Motivation in the Postsecondary Classroom. Anker: Bolton, MA, 2005; 273.