Exploring student response systems in nursing education

CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 265-270

  Zurmehly, Joyce ^a   Leadingham, Camille ^b  

^a WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Education; Evaluation; Learning; Nursing; Technology

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EVALUATION; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MASS COMMUNICATION; METHODOLOGY; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING STUDENT; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PUBLIC RELATIONS; STANDARD; TEACHING;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; EDUCATION, NURSING, BACCALAUREATE; FACULTY, NURSING; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; NURSING EDUCATION RESEARCH; SOFTWARE; STUDENTS, NURSING; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 58149140375     PISSN: 15382931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.NCN.0000304840.36960.b5     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Eggart C, West C, Thomas KG. Impact of an audience response system. Med Educ. 2004;38:545-576.
2. Deyoung S. Teaching Strategies for Nurse Educators. Upper Saddle, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2003.
3. Bastable S. Nurse as Educator: Principles of Teaching and Learning for Nursing Practice. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett; 2003.
4. Lowenstein AJ, Bradshaw MJ. Fuszard's Innovative Teaching Strategies in Nursing. 3rd ed. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett; 2004.
5. King PE, Young MJ. An information processing perspective on the efficiency of instructional feedback. Am Commun J. 2002;5(1):1-9.
6. Svinicki MD. New Directions in Learning and Motivation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1999.
7. Kulhavy RW, Stock WA. Feedback and written instruction: the place of response certitude. Educ Psychol Rev. 1989;1(4):279-308.
8. Meltzer DE, Manivannian K. Promotion interactivity in physics lecture classes. Phys Technol. 1996;34:72.
9. Duncan MJ, Biddle BJ. The Study of Teaching. New York, NY: Holt Rinehart & Winston; 1974.
10. A student response system in an electronic classroom: technology aids for large classroom instruction. 2006. http://web.bsu.edu/tla/ resources/news/1997- 98/Nov1997A1/htm. Accessed July 6, 2006.
11. University of Milwaukee-Learning Technology Center. Student response systems-exploring potential and assessing impact. 2006. http://www.uwm.edu/Dept/ LTC/docs/SRSProposal.pdf. Accessed July 6, 2006.
12. Homme J, Asay G, Morgenstern B. Utilization of an audience response system. Med Educ. 2004;38:545-576.
13. Burnstein RA, Lederman LM. Using wireless keypads in lecture classes. The Physics Teacher. 2001;31:8. http://www. replysystems.com/pdfs/ benefits/24.pdf. Accessed July 6, 2006.
14. Robertson LJ. Twelve tips for using computerized interactive audience response system. Med Teach. 2000;22(3):237-239.
15. Classroom interaction using wireless technology. http://www.ph. utexas.edu/~ctalk/wireless/talk/jan31-02htm. Accessed July 15,2006.
16. Keeler A. Classroom performance system. 2006. http://www. findarticles.com/p/articles/mi-qa4145/is-200601/ai-n16028177. Accessed July 5, 2006.
17. Wireless response systems. 2005. http://www.findarticles.com/p/ articles/mi-qa4145/is-200601. Accessed July 5, 2006.
18. An overview of student response systems. 2006. http://clte.asu.edu/ wakonse/ENewsletter/studentresponse-idea.htm. Accessed July 6, 2006.
19. Bunz U. Using Scantron versus an audience response system for survey research: does methodology matter when measuring computer- mediated communication competence? Comput Human Behav. 2005;21:343-359