HOT Blogging: A Framework for Blogging to Promote Higher Order Thinking

Reading Teacher

Volumn 62, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 650-661

  Zawilinski, Lisa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650178443     PISSN: 00340561     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/RT.62.8.3     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Afflerbach, P.P. (1990). The influence of prior knowledge on expert readers' main idea construction strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25(1), 31-46. doi: 10.2307/747986
2. Alvermann, D.E. (2002). Effective literacy instruction for adolescents. Journal of Literacy Research, 34(2), 189-208.
3. Alvermann, D.E., Huddleston, A., & Hagood, M.C. (2004). What could professional wrestling and school literacy practices possibly have in common? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 47(1), 532-540.
4. Anderson, L.W. (2005). Objectives, evaluation, and the improvement of education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 3/(1-2), 102-113. doi:10.I016/j.stueduc.2005.05.004
5. Atwell, N. (1998). In the middle: New understandings about writing, reading, and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
6. Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York: Longman.
7. Boling, E., Castek, J., Zawilinski, L., Barton, K., & Nierlich, T. (2008). Collaborative literacy: Blogs and Internet projects. The Reading Teacher, 6/(6), 504-506. doi:10.1598/RT.61.6.10
8. Castek, J., Leu, D.J., Jr., Coiro, J., Gort, M., Henry, L.A., & Lima, C. (2007). Developing new literacies among multilingual learners in the elementary grades. In L.L. Parker (Ed.), Technology- mediated learning environments for young English learners: In and out of school connections, (pp. 111-153). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Coiro, J. (2003). Reading comprehension on the Internet: Expanding our understanding of reading comprehension to encompass new literacies. The Reading Teacher, 56(6). Retrieved February 13, 2009, from www.readingonline.org/ electronic/elec-index.asp?HREF=/electronic/RT/2-03- column/index.html
10. Coiro, J., & Dobler, E. (2007). Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), 214-257. doi:10.1598/RRQ.42.2.2
11. Duke, N.K., & Pearson, P.D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A.E. Farstrup & S.J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 205-242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
12. Friedman, T.L. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
13. Harvey, S., & Goudvis, A. (2000). A study guide: Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension to enhance understanding. Retrieved February 23, 2009, from www.stenhouse.com/ pdfs/0310guid.pdf
14. Henry, L.A. (2006). SEARCHing for an answer: The critical role of new literacies while reading on the Internet. The Reading Teacher, 59(7), 614-627. doi:10.1598/RT.59.7.1
15. Hinchman, K.A., Alvermann, D.E., Boyd, F.B., Brozo, W.G., & Vacca, R.T. (2003). Supporting older students' in- and out-of-school literacies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 47(4), 304-310.
16. Hull, G.A., & Schultz, K. (Eds.). (2002). Schools out! Bridging out-of-school literacies with classroom practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
17. International Reading Association & National Council of Teachers of English. (1996). Standards for the English language arts. Newark, DE; Urbana, IL: Authors.
18. Langer, J., & Close, E. (2001). Improving literary understanding through classroom conversation. Retrieved February 13, 2009, from www.albany.edu/cela/publication/ilu.htm
19. Lankshear, C, & Knobel, M. (2003, April). Do-it-yourself broadcasting: Writing weblogs in a knowledge society. Paper presented at the AERA conference, Chicago, IL.
20. Lankshear, C, & Knobel, M. (2006). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning (2nd ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
21. Lenhart, A.M., & Madden, M. (2005). Teen content creators and consumers. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
22. Leu, D.J., Jr., Kinzer, C.K., Coiro, J.L., & Cammack, D.W. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. In R.B. Ruddell & N. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1570-1613). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. Retrieved February 13, 2009, from www.readingonline.org/newliteracies/Iit-index.asp?HREF=leu/
23. Leu, D.J., Leu, D.D., & Coiro, J. (2004). Teaching with the Internet K-12: New literacies for new times. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers.
24. Leu, D.J., Zawilinski, L., Castek, J" Banerjee, M., Housand, B., Liu, Y., et al. (2007). What is new about the new literacies of online reading comprehension? In A. Berger, L. Rush, & J. Eakle (Eds.), Secondary school reading and writing: What research reveals for classroom practices, (pp. 37-68). Chicago: NCTE/ NCRL.
25. Lewis, C, & Fabos, B. (2005). Instant messaging, literacies, and social identities. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(4), 470-501. doi:10.1598/RRQ.40.4.5
26. McLaughlin, M., & DeVoogd, G. (2004). Critical literacy as comprehension: Expanding reader response. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48(\), 52-62. doi:10.1598/JAAL.48.1.5
27. Mortensen, T.E. (2008). Of a divided mind: Weblog literacy. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D.J. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research in new literacies (pp. 449-466). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Negroponte, N. (2006). Nicholas Negroponte: The vision behind one laptop per child. Technology, Entertainment, Design (TED). Retrieved February 13, 2009, from www.ted.com/ index.php/talks/nicholas-negroponte-on-one- laptop-per-child.html
29. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(\), 60-92.
30. Palincsar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175. doi:10.1207/ sl532690xci0102-l
31. Palincsar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. (1989). Classroom dialogues to promote self-regulated comprehension. In J.E. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: A research manual (Vol. 1, pp. 35-71). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
32. Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 545-562). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
35. Reingold, H. (2006). Howard Reingold, Second life: Symposium on impact of digital learning. [Podcast] Retrieved February 13, 2009, from www.nmc.org/podcast/pedagogy-civic- participation
36. Richardson, W. (2006). Blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other powerful web tools for classrooms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
37. Williams, B.T. (2005). Leading double lives: Literacy and technology in and out of school. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48(8), 702-706. doi: 10.1598/JAAL.48.8.7