Socio-cultural aspects of prompting student reflection in Web-based inquiry learning environments: Original article

Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 397-409

  Furberg, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Interaction analysis; Prompting student reflection; Socio cultural theory; Web based inquiry learning environments

Indexed keywords

EID: 68149139478     PISSN: 02664909     EISSN: 13652729     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00320.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aleven V. Koedinger K.R. (2000) Limitations of student control: do students know when they need help? In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring systems, ITS 2000 (eds C.F.G. Gauthier K. VanLehn pp. 292 303. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
2. Aleven V., Stahl E., Schworm S., Fischer F. Wallace R. (2003) Help seeking and help design in interactive learning environments. Review of Educational Research 73, 277 320. (Pubitemid 37239927)
3. Brown A.L., Bransford J.D., Ferrara R.A. Campione J.C. (1983) Learning, remembering, and understanding. In The Handbook of Child Psychology: Cognitive Development, Vol. III (ed. P.H. Mussen pp. 77 166. Wiley, New York.
4. Chinn C.A. Malhotra B.A. (2002) Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: a theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education 86, 175 218. (Pubitemid 37230332)
5. Clarebout G. Elen J. (2006) Tool use in computer-based learning environments: towards a research framework. Computers in Human Behaviour 22, 389 411. (Pubitemid 43052709)
6. Cole M. (1996) Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future. Discipline. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
7. Davis E.A. (2003) Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection: generic and directed prompts. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 12, 91 142.
8. Davis E.A. (2004) Creating critique projects. In Internet Environments for Science Education (eds M.C. Linn, E.A. Davis P. Bell pp. 215 229. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
9. Davis E.A. Linn M.C. (2000) Scaffolding students' knowledge integration: prompts for reflection in KIE. International Journal of Science Education 22, 819 837.
10. Furberg A. Arnseth H.C. (2009) Reconsidering conceptual change from a socio-cultural perspective: analyzing students' meaning making in genetics in collaborative learning activities. Cultural Studies of Science Education 4, 157 191.
11. Furberg A. Ludvigsen S.R. (2008) Students' meaning-making is socio-scientific issues in computer mediated settings: exploring learning through interaction trajectories. International Journal of Science Education 30, 1775 1799.
12. de Jong T. (2006) Scaffolds for computer simulation based scientific discovery learning. In Dealing with Complexity in Learning Environments (eds J. Elen R.E. Clark pp. 107 128. Elsevier Science Publishers, London.
13. van Joolingen W.R., de Jong T. Dimitrakopoulout A. (2007) Issues in computer supported inquiry learning in science. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 23, 111 119.
14. Jorde D., Strømme A., Sørborg Ø., Erlien W. Mork S. (2003) Virtual environments in science. Viten.no (No. 17). Unipub, Oslo.
15. Lin X. Lehman J.D. (1999) Supporting learning of variable control in computer-based biology environment: effects of prompting college students to reflect on their own thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36, 837 858. (Pubitemid 129542161)
16. Linell P. (1998) Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
17. Linn M. Eylon B.-S. (2006) Science education: integrating views of learning and instruction. In The Handbook of Educational Psychology, 2nd edition (eds P.A. Alexander P.H. Winne pp. 511 544. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
18. Linn M., Davis E. Bell P. (2004a) Inquiry and technology. In Internet Environments for Science Education (eds M.C. Linn, E.A. Davis P. Bell pp. 3 28. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
19. Linn M., Eylon B-S. Davis E.A. (2004b) The knowledge integration perspective on learning. In Internet Environments for Science Education (eds M.C. Linn, E.A. Davis P. Bell pp. 29 46. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
20. Mäkitalo Å. (2003) Accounting practices as situated learning: dilemmas and dynamics in institutional categorization. Discourse Studies 5, 495 516. (Pubitemid 37311775)
21. Manlove S., Lazonder A.W. de Jong T. (2006) Regulative support for collaborative scientific inquiry learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 22, 87 98. (Pubitemid 44058600)
22. Mercer N. (2004) Sociocultural discourse analysis: analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics 1, 137 168.
23. Oliver K.M. Hannafin M.J. (2000) Student management of web-based hypermedia resources during open-ended problem solving. The Journal of Educational Research 94, 75 92.
24. Quintana C., Reiser B.J., Davis E.A., Krajcik J., Fretz E., Duncan R.G., Kyza E., Edelson D. Soloway E. (2004) A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 13, 337 386. (Pubitemid 39057719)
25. Reid D.J., Zhang J. Chen Q. (2003) Supporting scientific discovery learning in a simulation environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 19, 9 20.
26. Renkl A. (2002) Learning from worked-out examples: instructional explanations supplement self-explanations. Learning & Instruction 12, 529 556.
27. Säljö R. (2000) Lärande i Praktiken: Ett Sociokulturellt Perspektiv [Learning in Practice: A Sociocultural Perspective]. Prisma, Stockholm, Sweden.
28. Sandoval W.A. Reiser B.J. (2004) Explanation-driven inquiry: integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education 88, 345 372. (Pubitemid 38652408)
29. Scott M. Lyman S. (1968) Accounts. American Sociological Review 33, 46 62.
30. Slotta J.D. (2004) The Web-based Inquiry Science Environment (WISE): scaffolding knowledge integration in the science classroom. In Internet Environments for Science Education (eds M.C. Linn, E.A. Davis P. Bell pp. 203 232. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
31. Vygotsky L.S. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Social Processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
32. Wertsch J.V. (1991) Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
33. White B.Y. Frederiksen J. (1998) Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction 16, 3 118. (Pubitemid 128343737)
34. Wood D. (2001) Scaffolding, contingent tutoring, and computer-supported learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 12, 280 292.
35. Wood H. Wood D. (1999) Help seeking, learning and contingent tutoring. Computers and Education, 33, 153 169. (Pubitemid 129620117)
36. Zhang J., Chen Q., Sun Y. Reid D.J. (2004) Triple scheme of learning support design for scientific discovery learning based on computer simulation: experimental research. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20, 269 292.