Student management of web-based hypermedia resources during open-ended problem solving

Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 94, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 75-92

  Oliver, Kevin ^a   Hannafin, Michael J ^b  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive tools; Constructivism; Hypermedia; Qualitative research; Science education

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038413107     PISSN: 00220671     EISSN: 19400675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220670009598746     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Ausubel, D. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune and Stratton
2. Beed, P. L., Hawkins, H. M., & Roller, C. M. (1991). Moving learners toward independence: The power of scaffolded instruction. The Reading Teacher, 44(9), 648-655
3. Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay
4. Bransford, J. D., & Stein, B. S. (1993). The ideal problem solver: A guide for improving thinking (2nd ed.). New York: W. H. Freeman
5. Burning, R. H., Schraw, G. J., & Ronning, R. R. (1995). Cognitive psychology and instruction (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
6. Carey, S. (1985). Are children fundamentally different kinds of thinkers and learners than adults? In S. E Chipman, J. W. Segal, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and Learning Skills (pp. 485-517). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
7. Carver, S. M., Lehrer, R., Connell, T., & Erickson, J. (1992). Learning by hypermedia design: Issues of assessment and implementation. Educational Psychologist, 27(3), 385-304
8. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1992). The Jasper experiment: An exploration of issues in learning and instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(1), 65-80
9. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 15(3) 6-11, 38-41
10. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
11. Crews, T. R. Jr. (1995). Adventureplayer: A microworld anchored in a macrocontext. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University
12. Dede, C. J. (1987). Empowering environments, hypermedia and microworlds. The Computing Teacher, 75(3), 20-24, 61
13. Dede, C. J. (1992). The future of multimedia: Bridging to virtual worlds. Educational Technology, 32(5), 54-60
14. Dunbar, K. (1993). Concept discovery in a scientific domain. Cognitive Science. 17, 397-434
15. Edelson, D. C, Pea, R. D., & Gomez, L. (1996), Constructivism in the collaborator. In B. G. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments (pp. 151-164). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology
16. Ennis, R. H. (1991). Goals for a critical thinking curriculum. In A. L, Costa (Ed.), Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking (pp. 68-71). Washington, DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
17. Goetz, J. P., & LeCompte, M D. (1984), Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research, Orlando, FL: Academic Press
18. Grant, W. C. (1994). An investigation of the properties of computer tools and interfaces designed to scaffold scientific inquiry. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University
19. Hammond, N. (1992). Tailoring hypertext for the learner. In K. A. M Said, W. H. Newton-Smith, R. Viale, & K, V. Wilkes (Eds.), Modelling the mind (pp. 149-160). New York: Oxford University Press
20. Hannafin, M. J., Hall, C., Land, S. M., & Hill, J. R. (1994). Learning in open-ended environments: Assumptions, methods, and implications. Educational Technology; 34(8), 48-55
21. Hannafin, M. J., Hill, J., & Land, S. (1997). Student-centered learning and interactive multimedia: Status, issues, and implications. Contemporary Education, 68(2), 94-99
22. Hannafin, M. J., & Land, S. (1997). The foundations and assumptions of technology-enhanced, student-centered learning environments. Instructional Science, 25, 167-202
23. Hannafin, M. J., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: Volume 2 (pp. 115-140). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
24. Harel, L, & Papert, S. (1993). Software design as a learning environment. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 41-84). Norwood, NJ: Ablex
25. Hay, K. E., Guzdial, M., Jackson, S., Boyle, R. A., Soloway, E. (1994). Students as multimedia composers. Computers and Education, 23(4), 301-317
26. Hill, J., & Hannafin, M. J. (1997). Cognitive strategies and learning from the World-Wide Web. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(4), 37-64
27. liyoshi, T., & Hannafin, M. (1996, February), Cognitive tools for learning from hypermedia: Empowering learners. Paper presented at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Indianapolis, IN
28. Jacobson, M. J., & Spiro, R. J, (1995). Hypertext learning environments, cognitive flexibility, and the transfer of complex knowledge: An empirical investigation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 72(4), 301-333
29. Jacques, R., Nonnecke, B., & Preece, J. (1993). Current designs in hyper-card: What can we learn? Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 2(3), 219-237
30. Jih, H. J., & Reeves, T. C. (1992). Mental models: A research focus for interactive learning systems. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(3), 39-53
31. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1990). Human thinking and mental models. In K, A. M. Said, W. H. Newton-Smith, R. Viale, & K. V. Wilkes (Eds.), Modelling the mind (pp. 155-170). New York: Oxford University Press
32. Jonassen, D. H. (1988). Designing structured hypertext and structuring access to hypertext. Educational Technology; 25(11), 13-16
33. Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Hypertext as cognitive tools. In P. A. M. Kommers, D. H. Jonassen, & J. T, Mayes (Eds.), Cognitive tools for learning (pp. 147-48). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag
34. Kearsley, G. (1988). Researching considerations for hypertext. Educational Technology, 28(11), 21-24
35. Kozma, R. B. (1992). Constructing knowledge with learning tool. In P. A. M. Kommers, D. H. Jonassen, & J. T. Mayes (Eds.), Cognitive tools for learning (pp. 23-32). Heidelberg, Germany; Springer-Verlag
36. Laffey, J., Tupper, T., Musser, D., & Wedman, J. (1998). A computer-mediated support system for project-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46(1), 73-86
37. Land, S., & Hannafin, M. J. (1997). Patterns of understanding with openended learning environments: A qualitative study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(2), 47-73
38. Land, S., & Hannafin, M. J. (1996). A conceptual framework for the development of theories-in-action with open learning environments. Educationai Technology Research and Development, 44(3), 37-53
39. Land, S., & Hannafin, M. J. (2000). Student-centered learning environments. In D. H. Jonassen, & S. M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 1-23). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
40. LeCompte, M. D., & Preissle, P. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press
41. Lehrer, R. (1993). Researchers of knowledge: Patterns of hypermedia design. In S. P. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 197-227). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
42. Levin, J. A., Kauwell, D. A. (1999, April). Visualization of Web-based information and sense making. In F. R. Rusch (Chair), Technology based tools for learning: Analysis and synthesis in the 21st century: Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec
43. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hilts, CA: Sage
44. Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. H. (1995). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth
45. Marchionini, G. (1988). Hypermedia and learning: Freedom and chaos. Educational Technology, 25(11), 8-12
46. Marzano, R. J., Brandt, R. S., Hughes, C. S., Jones, B. F., Presseisen, B., Rankin, S. C., & Suhor, C. (1991). Dimensions of thinking: A framework for curriculum and instruction. In A. L. Costa (Ed). Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking (pp. 89-93). Washington DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
47. Mayes, T., Kibby, M. R., & Anderson, T. (1990). Signposts for conceptual orientation: Some requirements for learning from hypertext. In R. McAlesse & C. Green (Eds.), Hypertext: State of the art (pp. 121-129). Norwood, NJ: Ablex
48. McGee, S. M. (1996), Designing curricula based on science communities of practice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University
49. McKerlie, D., & Preece, J. (1993). The hype and the media: Issues concerned with designing hypermedia. Journal of Microcomputer Applications, 76(1), 33-47
50. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
51. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
52. Morariu, J. M, (1988). Hypermedia in instruction and training: The power and the promise. Educational Technology, 25(11), 17-20
53. Myers, R. J. (1993). Problem-based learning: A case study in integrating teachers, students, methods, and hypermedia data bases. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
54. Newman, D. R., Webb, B., & Cochrane, C. (1995, April), A content analysis method to measure critical thinking in face-to-face and computer supported group learning. IPCT [On-line serial], 3(2), Available: http://www.helsinki.fi/science/optek/1995/n2/newman.txt
55. Oliver, R., & Omari, A. (1999). Using online technologies to support problem based learning: Learners' responses and perceptions. Australian Journal of Educational Technology; 75(1), 58-79
56. Perkins, D. N., Goodrich, H., Tishman, S., & Owen, J. M. (1994). Thinking connections: Learning to think and thinking to learn. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley
57. Postlethwait, S. N., Novak, J., & Murray, H. T. Jr. (1972). The audio-tutorial approach to learning: Through independent study and integrated experiences (3rd. ed,). Minneapolis, MN: Burgess
58. Reitman, J. S., & Rueter, H. H. (1980). Organization revealed by recall orders and confirmed by pauses. Cognitive Psychology; 72, 554-581
59. Ryan, C., & Koschmann, T. (1994). The collaborative learning laboratory: A technology enriched environment to support problem-based learning. In recreating the revolution: Proceedings of the annual National Educational Computing Conference (pp. 160-167). Boston, MA
60. Savenye, W. C., & Robinson, R. S. (1996). Qualitative research issues and methods: An introduction for educational technologists. In handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 1171-1195). New York: Macmillan
61. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Adaptation and understanding: A case for new cultures of schooling. In S. Vosniadou, E. DeCorte, R. Glaser, & H. Mandl (Eds.), International perspectives on the design of technology-supported learning environments (pp. 149-163). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
62. Search, P. (1993). HyperGlyphs: Using design and language to define hypermedia navigation. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 2(4), 369-380
63. Sherman, J. GM & Ruskin, R. S. (1978), The personalized system of instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology
64. Slotta, J. D., & Linn, M. C. (2000). The Knowledge Integration Environment: Helping students use the Internet effectively. In M. J. Jacobson & R. J. Kozma (Eds,), Innovations in science and mathematics education: Advanced designs for technologies of learning (pp. 193-226), Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
65. Snir, J., & Smith, C. (1995). Constructing understanding in the science classroom: Integrating laboratory experiments, student and computer models, and class discussion in learning scientific concepts. In D. N. Perkins, J. L. Schwartz, M. M. West, & M. S. Wiske (Eds,), Software goes to school: Teaching for understanding with new technologies (pp. 233-254). New York: Oxford University Press
66. Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston
67. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
68. Stanton, N. A., & Baber, C. (1994). The myth of navigating in hypertext: How a "bandwagon1' has lost its course! Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 3(3/4), 235-249
69. Tobin, K., Tippins, D., & Hook, K. (1995). Students beliefs about epistemology, science, and classroom learning: A question of fit. In S. M. Glynn & R. Duit (Eds.), Learning science in the schools (pp. 85-108). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
70. Wild, M. (1996), Mental models and computer modelling. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 72(1), 10-21
71. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage