Students' meaning-making of socioscientific issues in computer mediated settings: Exploring learning through interaction trajectories

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 30, Issue 13, 2008, Pages 1775-1799

  Furberg, Anniken ^a   Ludvigsen, Sten ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 53649085458     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500690701543617     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Arnseth, H. C. (2004) Discourse and artifacts in learning to argue. Analyzing the practical management of computer supported collaborative learning, University of Oslo, Norway
2. Arnseth, H. C. and Ludvigsen[0], S. (2006) Approaching institutional contexts: Systemic versus dialogic research in CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1:2, pp. 167-185.
3. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986) The problem of speech genres. Speech genres and other later essays, pp. 61-102. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX
4. Bell, P. and Linn, M. C. (2000) Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22:8, pp. 781-796.
5. Brown, A. L. (1992) Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2:2, pp. 141-178.
6. Collins, A. (1992) Towards a design science of education. New directions in educational technology, pp. 15-22. Springer-Verlag, New York
7. Collins, A. (2001) The balance between task focus and understanding focus: Education as apprenticeship versus education as research. CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
8. Collins, A., Joseph, D. and Bielaczyc, K. (2004) Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13:1, pp. 15-42.
9. Dawes, L. (2004) Talk and learning in classroom science. International Journal of Science Education, 26:6, pp. 677-695.
10. de Jong, T. (2006) Scaffolds for scientific discovery learning. Handling complexity in learning environments: Research and theory, pp. 107-128. Elsevier Science Publishers, London
11. Dreier, O. (1999) Personal trajectories of participation across contexts of social practice. Outlines. Critical Social Studies, 1, pp. 5-32.
12. Driver, R., Newton, P. and Osborne, J. (2000) Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84:3, pp. 287-312.
13. Engle, R. A. and Conant, F. R. (2002) Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20:4, pp. 399-483.
14. Erduran, S., Simon, S. and Osborne, J. (2004) TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88:6, pp. 915-933.
15. Fugelli, P. (2004) Grounding interaction in a CSCL environment, Institute of Educational Research, University of Oslo, Norway
16. (2003) Collaborative learning in networked 3D environments, ITU skriftserie, Oslo, Norway
17. Garfinkel, H. (1984) Studies in ethnomethodology, Polity Press, Cambridge, MA
18. Hakkarainen, K., Lipponen, L. and Järvelä, S. (2002) Epistemology of inquiry and computer-supported collaborative learning. CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation, pp. 129-156. Lawrence Erlbaum Ass, Mahwah, NJ
19. Heritage, J. (1984) Garfinkel and ethnomethodology, Polity Press, Cambridge, UK
20. Hewitt, J. (2002) From a focus on task to a focus on understanding: The cultural transformation of a Toronto classroom. CSCL2: Carrying forward the conversation, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
21. Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., Bugallo Rodríguez, A. and Duschl, R. A. (2000) "Doing the lesson" or "doing science": Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84:6, pp. 757-792.
22. Jonassen, D. H. and Land, S. M. (2000) Theoretical foundations of learning environments, LEA, Mahwah, NJ
23. Jorde, D., Strømme, A., Sørborg, Erlien W. and Mork, S. (2003) Virtual environments in science, ITU.[0], Oslo, Norway
24. Kolstø, S. D. (2001) "To trust or not to trust,..." - pupils' ways of judging information encountered in a socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 23:9, pp. 877-901.
25. Krange, I. (2007) Students' conceptual practices in science education-Productive disciplinary interaction in a participation trajectory. Cultural Studies in Science Education, 2:1, pp. 171-203.
26. Kress, G. (2003) Literacy in the new media age, Routledge, London
27. Lave, J. (1997) Learning, apprenticeship, social practice. Nordisk Pedagogikk, 17, pp. 140-151.
28. Lawson, A. E. (2003) The nature and development of hyothetico-predictive argumentation with implications for science reaching. International Journal of Science Education, 25:11, pp. 1387-1408.
29. Lemke, J. L. (1990) Talking science. Language, learning, and values, Ablex, Norwood, NJ
30. Ludvigsen, S. What counts as knowledge: Learning to use categories in computer environments. ICT and transformation of learning practices, Pergamon Press, Amsterdam
31. Ludvigsen, S. and Mørch, A. (2003) Categorisation in knowledge building. Designing for change in networked learning environments. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL), pp. 67-76. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
32. Ludvigsen, S. R. (1998) Læring av klinisk resonnering i medisinsk utdannings- og arbeidskontekst [Learning clinical reasoning in the medical educational- and work context], Universitetet i Oslo, Norway
33. Makitalo, Å., Jakobsson, A. and Säljö, R. Learning to reason in the context of socioscientific problems: Exploring the demands on students in "new" classroom activities.
34. Mäkitalo, Å. and Säljö, R. (2002) Talk in institutional context and institutional context in talk: Categories as situated practices. TEXT[0], 22:1, pp. 57-82.
35. Mehan, H. (1991) The schools' work of sorting students. Talk and social structure, Polity Press, Cambridge, UK
36. Mercer, N. (2000) Words and minds, Routlege, London
37. Mercer, N. (2004) Sociocultural discourse analysis: Analysing classroom talk as s social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1:2
38. Mercer, N. and Wegerif, R. (1999) Is "exploratory talk" productive talk?. Learning with computers. Analysing productive interaction, pp. 137-168. Routledge, London
39. Mork, S. (2006) ICT in science education. Exploring the digital learning materials at Viten.no, University of Oslo, Norway
40. Mortimer, E. F. and Scott, P. H. (2003) Meaning making in secondary science classrooms, Open University Press, Philadelphia
41. Muukkonen, H., Hakkarainen, K. and Lakkala, M. (1999) Collaborative technology for facilitating progressive inquiry: Future learning environment tools. Proceedings of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning. Designing New Media for a New Millennium: Collaborative technology for learning, pp. 406-415. Education and Training, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
42. Newton, P., Driver, R. and Osborne, J. (1999) The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21:5, pp. 553-576.
43. Osborne, J., Erduran, S. and Simon, S. (2004) Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41:10, pp. 994-1020.
44. Osborne, J. and Hennessy, S. (2003) Literature review in science education and the role of ICT: Promise, problems and future directions, (No. 6). Nesta Futurelab, Bristol, UK
45. Oulton, C., Dillon, J. and Grace, M. M. (2004) Reconceptualizing the teaching of controversial issues. International Journal of Science Education, 6:4, pp. 411-423.
46. Rasmussen, I. (2005) Learning trajectories and the use of multimedia in group work, University of Oslo, Norway
47. Ratcliffe, M. and Grace, M. M. (2003) Science education for citizenship. Teaching socioscientific issues, Open University Press, Maidenhead, UK
48. Roth, W. (2005) Talking science. Language and learning in science classrooms, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, MD
49. Roth, W. and McRobbie, C. J. (2001) Students' talk about rotational motion within and across contexts, and implications for future learning. International Journal of Science Education, 23:2, pp. 151-179.
50. Sadler, T. D., Chambers, F. W. and Zeidler, D. L. (2004) Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 26:4, pp. 387-409.
51. Scardamalia, M. and Bereiter, C. (1994) Computer support for knowledge building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3:3, pp. 265-283.
52. Säljö, R. (2000) Larande i praktiken. Ett sociokulturelt perspectiv. [Learning as social practice. A sociocultural perspective], Prisma, Stockholm, Sweden
53. Scott, P. H. (1998) Teacher talk and meaning making in science classrooms: A Vygotskian analysis and review. Studies in Science education, 32, pp. 45-80.
54. Seethaler, S. and Linn, M. (2004) Genetically modified food in perspective: An inquiry-based curriculum to help middle school students make sense of tradeoffs. International Journal of Science Education, 26:14, pp. 1765-1785.
55. Simonneaux, L. (2000) A study of pupils' conceptions and reasoning in connection with "microbes", as a contribution to research in biotechnology education. International Journal of Science Education, 22:6, pp. 619-644.
56. Simonneaux, L. (2001) Role-play or debate to promote students' argumentation and justification on an issue in animal transgenesis. International Journal of Science Education, 23:9, pp. 903-927.
57. Suppe, F. (1998) The structure of a scientific article. Philosophy of Science, 65, pp. 381-405.
58. Toulmin, S. (1958) The uses of argument, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
59. Vosniadou, S., Ioannides, C. and Papademetriou, E. (2001) Designing learning environments to promote conceptual change in science. Learning and Instruction, 11, pp. 381-419.
60. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher social processes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
61. Wasson, B. and Ludvigsen, S. (2003) Designing for knowledge building, ITU, Oslo, Norway
62. Wells, G. (1999) Dialogic inquiry. Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
63. Wray, D. (1985) Teaching information skills through project work, Hodder and Stoughton, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
64. Zohar, A. and Nemet, F. (2002) Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39:1, pp. 35-62.