Three decades of lay epistemics: The why, how, and who of knowledge formation

European Review of Social Psychology

Volumn 20, Issue , 2009, Pages 146-191

  Kruglanski, Arie W ^a   Dechesne, Mark ^a   Orehek, Edward ^a   Pierro, Antonio ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Epistemic authority; Need for closure; Rule following; Seizing; Unimodel

Indexed keywords

EID: 68149107606     PISSN: 10463283     EISSN: 1479277X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10463280902860037     Document Type: Article

References (133)

1. Abelson, R. P. (1968). Psychological implication. In R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. M. Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg, & R. H. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook (pp. 112-139). Chicago: Rand McNally.
2. Andersen, S. M., & Cole, S. W. (1990). "Do I know you?" The role of significant others in general social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 384-399.
3. Andersen, S. M., Glassman, N. S., Chen, S., & Cole, S. W. (1995). Transference in social perception: The role of chronic accessibility in significant-other representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 41-57.
4. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The structure of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Baeyens, F., Crombez, G., Van den Bergh, O., & Eelen, P. (1988). Once in contact always in contact: Evaluative conditioning is resistant to extinction. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 10, 179-199.
6. Bar, R. (1983). Hierarchy of Epistemic Authority Test. Unpublished Master's thesis, Tel-Aviv University.
7. Bar, R. (1999). The impact of epistemic needs and authorities on judgement and decision making. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tel Aviv University.
8. Bar-Tal, D. (1990). Group beliefs: A conception for analyzing group structure, processes, and behaviour. New York: Springer-Verlag.
9. Bar-Tal, D. (2000). Shared beliefs in a society: A social psychological analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
10. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Boudreau, L. A., Baron, R. M., & Oliver, P. V. (1992). Effects of expected communication target expertise and timing of set on trait use in person description. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 447-451.
12. Brewer, M. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
13. Bruner, J. S. (1973). Beyond the information given: Studies in the psychology of knowing. Oxford, UK: Norton.
14. Cattell, R. B., & Epstein, A. R. (1975). Comprehensive ability battery. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
15. Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought. New York: Guilford Press.
16. Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford Press.
17. Chirumbolo, A. (2002). The relationship between need for cognitive closure and political orientation: The mediating role of authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 603-610.
18. Chirumbolo, A., Areni, A., & Sensales, G. (2004). Need for closure and politics: Voting, political attitudes and attributional style. International Journal of Psychology, 39, 245-253.
19. Chirumbolo, A., & Leone, L. (2008). Individual differences in need for closure and voting behaviour. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1279-1288.
20. Chun W. Y., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2006). The role of task demands and processing resources in the use of base-rate and individuating information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 205-217.
21. Chun, W. Y., Spiegel, S., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2002). Assimilative behaviour identification can also be resource dependent: A unimodel perspective on personal-attribution phases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 542-555.
22. Dechesne, M., Schultz, J. M., Kruglanski, A. W., Orehek, E., & Fishman, S. (2008). A psychology of borders: Need for closure and the allure of group impermeability. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Maryland, MD, USA.
23. Dechesne, M., & Wigboldus, D. (2008). Unpublished data. University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
24. DeDreu, C. K. V., & Koole, S. L. (1997). Motivated use of heuristics in negotiation. Unpublished raw data.
25. DeDreu, C. K. W., Koole, S. L., & Oldersma, F. L. (1999). On the seizing and freezing of negotiator inferences: Need for cognitive closure moderates the use of heuristics in negotiation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 348-362.
26. De Grada, E., Kruglanski, A. W., Mannetti, L., & Pierro, A. (1999). Motivated cognition and group interaction: Need for closure affects the contents and processes of collective negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 346-365.
27. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Free Press.
28. Dewey, J. (1958). Experience and nature. New York: Collier Macmillan.
29. Dijksterhuis, A. P., Van Knippenberg, A. D., Kruglanski, A. W., & Schaper, C. (1996). Motivated social cognition: Need for closure effects on memory and judgement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 254-270.
30. Ellis, S., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1992). Self as epistemic authority: Effects on experiential and instructional learning. Social Cognition, 10, 357-375.
31. Erb, H. P., Kruglanski, A. W., Chun, W. Y., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., & Spiegel, S. (2003). Searching for commonalities in human judgement: The parametric unimodel and its dual mode alternatives. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 1-47). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
32. Evans, J. St. B. T. (1989). Bias in human reasoning: Causes and consequences. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
33. Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 75-109). New York: Academic Press.
34. Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1981). Direct experience and attitude - behaviour consistency. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. (Vol. 14, pp. 161-203). New York: Academic Press.
35. Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum model of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). New York: Academic Press.
36. Ford, T. E., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1995). Effects of epistemic motivations on the use of accessible constructs in social judgements. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 950-962.
37. Freud, A. (1965). Normality and pathology in childhood: Assessments of development. New York: International Universities Press.
38. Freund, T., Kruglanski, A., & Schpitzajzen, A. (1985). The freezing and unfreezing of impressional primacy: Effects of the need for structure and the fear of invalidity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 479-487.
39. Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692-731.
40. Gelfand, M. (2008). Situated culture: A multilevel analysis of situational constraint across 35 nations. Paper presented at the Social Psychology Winter Conference, Park City, Utah.
41. Gregory, R. L. (1997). Eye and brain: The psychology of seeing (5th ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42. Hardin, C. D., & Higgins, E. T. (1996). Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 28-84). New York: Guilford Press.
43. Helmholtz, H. v. (1910/2000). Helmholtz's treatise on physiological optics. Bristol, UK: Themmes Press.
44. Hempel, C. (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science. New York: Free Press.
45. Hempel, C., & Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15, 135-175. [Reprinted in Hempel (1965), pp. 245-290.].
46. Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. (pp. 133-168). New York: Guilford Press.
47. Hilton, D. (2007). Causal explanation: From social perception to knowledge-based causal attribution. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: A handbook of basic principles (Vol. 2). New York: Guilford Press.
48. Holyoak, K. J., Kohl, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (1989). A theory of conditioned reasoning: Inductive learning within rule-based hierarchies. Psychological Review, 96, 315-340.
49. Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. Newhaven, CT: Yale University Press.
50. Igou, E. R., Fishbach, A., & Kruglanski, A. W. (20080. An epistemic analysis of retrieval effects on judgement. Unpublished manuscript, Tilburg University.
51. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Henry Colt & Co.
52. Jamieson, D. W., & Zanna, M. P. (1989). Need for structure in attitude formation and expression. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
53. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sullaway, F. J. (2003a). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.
54. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sullaway, F. J. (2003b). Exceptions that prove the rule: Using a theory of motivated social cognition to account for ideological incongruities and political anomalies. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 383-393.
55. Jost, J. T., Kruglanski, A. W., & Nelson, T. T. O. (1998). Social metacognition: An expansionist review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 137-154.
56. Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgement and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697-720.
57. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237-251.
58. Kosic, A., Kruglanski, A. W., Pierro, A., & Mannetti, L. (2004). Social cognition of immigrants' acculturation: Effects of the need for closure and the reference group at entry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 796-813.
59. Kruglanski, A. (1980). Lay epistemologic process and contents: Another look at attribution theory. Psychological Review, 87, 70-87.
60. Kruglanski, A., & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and un-freezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 448-468.
61. Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational bases. New York: Plenum.
62. Kruglanski, A. W. (2004). The psychology of closed mindedness. New York: Psychology Press.
63. Kruglanski, A. W., Erb, H. P., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., & Chun. W. Y. (2006a). On parametric continuities in the world of binary either ors [target article]. Psychological Inquiry, 17, 153-165.
64. Kruglanski, A. W., & Orehek, E. (2007). Partitioning the domain of social inference: Dual mode and systems models and their alternatives. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 291-316.
65. Kruglanski, A. W., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., & DeGrada, E. (2006b). Groups as epistemic providers: Need for closure and the unfolding of group-centrism. Psychological Review, 113, 84-100.
66. Kruglanski, A. W., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., Erb, H. P., & Chun, W. Y. (2007). On the parameters of social judgement. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 39, pp. 255-296). New York: Academic Press.
67. Kruglanski, A. W., Raviv, A., Bar-Tal, D., Raviv, A., Sharvit, K., Ellis, S., et al. (2005). Says who? Epistemic authority effects in social judgement. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 345-392). New York: Academic Press.
68. Kruglanski, A. W., Shah, J. Y., Pierro, A., & Mannetti, L. (2002). When similarity breeds content: Need for closure and the allure of homogeneous and self-resembling groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 648-662.
69. Kruglanski, A. W., & Thomson, E. P. (1999a). Persuasion by a single route: A view from the unimodel. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 83-109.
70. Kruglanski, A. W., & Thomson, E. P. (1999b). The illusory second mode or, the cue is the message. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 182-193.
71. Kruglanski, A. W., Thomson, E. P., & Spiegel, S. (1999). Separate or equal?: Bimodal notions of persuasion and a single process "unimodel". In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dualprocess theories in social psychology (pp. 293-313). New York: Guilford Press.
72. Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1991). Group members' reactions to opinion deviates and conformists at varying degrees of proximity to decision deadline and of environmental noise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 212-225.
73. Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: "Seizing" and "freezing". Psychological Review, 103, 263-283.
74. Kruglanski, A. W., Webster, D. M., & Klem, A. (1993). Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 861-876.
75. Livi, S. (2003). Il bisogno di chiusura cognitiva e la transmissione delle norme nei piccoli gruppi. [The need for cognitive closure and normtransmission in small groups]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Italy.
76. Logan, G. D. (1992). Attention and preattention in theories of automaticity. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 317-339.
77. Maio, G. R., & Haddock, G. G. (2007). Attitude change. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 565-586). New York: Guilford Press.
78. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246-268.
79. Mitchell, C. J., De Houwer, J., & Lovibond, P. F. (in press). The propositional nature of human associative learning. Behavioural and Brain Sciences.
80. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
81. Newman, L. S., & Uleman, J. S. (1989). Spontaneous trait inference. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought. New York: Guilford Press.
82. Orehek, E., Fishman, S., Dechesne, M., Doosje, B., Kruglanski, A. W., Cole, A. P., et al. (2007). Certainty quest and the social response to terrorism. Unpublished manuscript. University of Maryland.
83. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
84. Petty, R. E., Brinol, P., Tormala, Z. L., & Wegener, D. T. (2007). The role of metacognition in social judgement. In A. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: A handbook of basic principles. New York: Guilford Press.
85. Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1999). The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process models in social psychology. New York: Guilford Press.
86. Pierro, A., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2005). Revised Need for Cognitive Closure Scale. Unpublished manuscript. Università di Roma, "La Sapienza", Italy.
87. Pierro, A. & Kruglanski, A. W. (in press). "Seizing and freezing" on a significant-person schema: Need for closure and the transference effect in social judgement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
88. Pierro, A., & Mannetti, L. (2004). Motivated consumer search behaviour: The effects of epistemic authority. Unpublished manuscript. University of Rome "La Sapienza", Italy.
89. Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., DeGrada, E., Livi, S., & Kruglanski A. W. (2003). Autocracy bias in groups under need for closure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 405-417.
90. Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., Erb, H. P., Spiegel, S., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2005). Informational length and order of presentation as determinants of persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 458-469.
91. Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sleeth-Keppler, D. (2004). Relevance override: On the reduced impact of "cues" under high motivation conditions of persuasion studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 251-264.
92. Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., Orehek, E., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2008). Persistence of attitude change and attitude-behaviour correspondence based on extensive processing of source information. Unpublished manuscript. University of Rome, "La Sapienza", Italy.
93. Pizlo, Z. (2001). Perception viewed as an inverse problem. Vision Research, 41, 3145-3161.
94. Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Basic Books.
95. Raviv, A., Bar-Tal, D., Raviv, A., & Houminer, D (1990). Development in children's perception of epistemic authorities. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8, 157-169.
96. Rescorla, R. A. (1985). Conditioned inhibition and facilitation. In R. R. Miller & N. E. Spear (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Conditioned inhibition (pp. 299-326). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
97. Rescorla, R. A., & Holland, P. C. (1982). Behavioural studies of social learning in animals. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 265-308.
98. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
99. Richter, L., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1998). Seizing on the latest: Motivationally driven recency effects in impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279-301.
100. Richter, L., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1999). Motivated search for common ground: Need for closure effects on audience design in interpersonal communication. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1101-1114.
101. Rock, I. (1983). The logic of perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
102. Roets, A., & van Hiel, A. (2006). Need for closure relations with authoritarianism, conservative beliefs and racism: The impact of urgency and permanence tendencies. Psychologica Belgica, 46, 235-252.
103. Roets, A., & van Hiel, A. (2007). Separating ability from need: Clarifying the dimensional structure of the Need for Closure Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 266-280.
104. Roets, A., & van Hiel, A. (2008). Why some hate to dilly-dally and others do not: The arousal-invoking capacity of decision-making for low and high scoring need for closure individuals. Social Cognition, 26, 259-272.
105. Roets, A., van Hiel, A., Cornelis, I., & Soetens, B. (2008). Determinants of task performance and invested effort: A need for closure by relative cognitive capacity interaction analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 779-792.
106. Rogers, C. R. (1951). Client-centred therapy: Its current practice, implications, and theory. Oxford, UK: Houghton Mifflin.
107. Rogers, C. R. (1967). The therapeutic relationship and its impact: A study of psychotherapy with schizophrenics. Oxford, UK: Wisconsin Press.
108. Rubini, M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1997). Brief encounters ending in estrangement: Motivated language-use and interpersonaI rapport. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 1047-1060.
109. Schteynberg, G., Gelfand, M., Imai, L., Mayer, D., & Bell, C. (2008). [Unpublished data.] University of Maryland, College Park, USA.
110. Schwarz, N. (2004). Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgement and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 332-348.
111. Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195-202.
112. Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgements of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513-523.
113. Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1996). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 433-465). New York: Guilford Press.
114. Schwarz, N., Servay, W., & Kumpf, M. (1985). Attribution of arousal as a mediator of the effectiveness of fear-arousing communications. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 178-188.
115. Semin, G. R., & Fiedler, K. (1991). The linguistic category model, its bases, applications and range. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1-30). London: Wiley.
116. Shafer, J. B. P. (1978). Humanistic psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
117. Shah, J. Y., Kruglanski, A. W., & Thompson, E. P. (1998). Membership has its (epistemic) rewards: Need for closure effects on ingroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 383-393.
118. Smith, E. R. (1984). Model of social inference processes. Psychological Review, 91, 392-413.
119. Smith, E. R. (1989). Procedural efficiency: General and specific components and effects on social judgement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 500-523.
120. Smith, E. R., & Branscombe, N. R. (1988). Category accessibility as implicit memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 490-504.
121. Smith, E. R., Branscombe, N. R., & Bormann, C. (1988). Generality of the effects of practice on social judgement tasks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 385-395.
122. Tetlock, P. E. (1992). The impact of accountability on judgement and choice: Toward a social contingency model. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 331-376). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
123. Trope, Y., & Alfieri, T. (1997). Effortfulness and flexibility of dispositional judgement processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 662-674.
124. Trope, Y., & Gaunt, R. (2000). Processing alternative explanations of behaviour: Correction of integration? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 344-354.
125. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207-232.
126. Uleman, J. S. (1987). Consciousness and control: The case of spontaneous trait inferences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 337-354.
127. Van Hiel, A., Pandelaere, M., & Duriez, B. (2004). The impact of need for closure on conservative beliefs and racism: Differential mediation by authoritarian submission and authoritarian dominance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 824-837.
128. Walther, E., Nagengast, B., & Trasselli, C. (2005). Evaluative conditioning in social psychology: Facts and speculations. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 175-196.
129. Wason, P. C. (1966). Reasoning. In B. M. Foss (Ed.), New horizons in psychology (pp. 113-135). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
130. Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual Differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049-1062.
131. Webster, D. M., Kruglanski, A. W., & Pattison, D. A. (1997). Motivated language use in intergroup contexts: Need for closure effects on the linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1122-1131.
132. Webster, D. M., Richter, L., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1996). On leaping to conclusions when feeling tired: Mental fatigue effects on impressional primacy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 181-195.
133. Webster-Nelson, D., Klein, C. T., & Irvin, J. E. (2003). Motivational antecedents of empathy: Inhibiting effects of fatigue. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 37-50.