Exceptions That Prove the Rule - Using a Theory of Motivated Social Cognition to Account for Ideological Incongruities and Political Anomalies: Reply to Greenberg and Jonas (2003)

Psychological Bulletin

Volumn 129, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 383-393

  Jost, John T ^a   Glaser, Jack ^b   Kruglanski, Arie W ^c   Sulloway, Frank J ^d  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141865598     PISSN: 00332909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.383     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.
2. Altemeyer, R. A. (1998). The other "authoritarian personality. " In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47-91). New York: Academic Press.
3. Barker, E. N. (1963). Authoritarianism of the political right, center, and left. Journal of Social Issues, 19, 63-74.
4. Billig, M. (1984). Political ideology: Social psychological aspects. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension (Vol. 2, pp. 446-470). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
5. Blinder, A. (1987). Hard heads, soft hearts: Tough-minded economics for a just society, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
6. Brown, R. (1965). The authoritarian personality and the organization of attitudes. In R. Brown (Ed.), Social psychology (pp. 477-546). New York: Free Press.
7. Buckley, W. F., Jr. (1955). Mission statement of The National Review. Retrieved August 14, 2002 from http://gort.ucsd.edu/newjour/n/ msg01402.html (Original work published 1955)
8. Burke, E. (1982a). Reflections on the revolution in France. In R. Kirk (Ed.), The portable conservative reader (pp. 7-40). New York: Penguin Books. (Original work publised 1789)
9. Burke, E. (1982b). A vindication of natural society: Or, a view of the miseries and evils arising to mankind from every species of artificial society. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Classics. (Original work published 1756)
10. Chirumbolo, A. (2002). The relationship between need for cognitive closure and political orientation: The mediating role of authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 603-610.
11. Christie, R. (1991). Authoritarianism and related constructs. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 501-571). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
12. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41-113). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
14. Eysenck, H. J. (1954). The psychology of politics, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
15. Fibert, Z., & Ressler, W. H. (1998). Intolerance of ambiguity and political orientation among Israeli university students. Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 33-40.
16. Greenberg, J., & Jonas, E. (2003). Psychological motives and political orientation - The left, the right, and the rigid: Comment on Jost et al. (2003). Psychological Bulletin, 129, 376-382.
17. Huntington,S. (1957). Conservatism as an ideology. American Political Science Review, 51, 454-473.
18. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.
19. Jost, J. T., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2002). The estrangement of social constructionism and experimental social psychology: History of the rift and prospects for reconciliation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 168-187.
20. Kemmelmeier, M. (1997). Need for closure and political orientation among German university students. Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 787-789.
21. Kerlinger, F. M. (1984). Liberalism and conservatism; The nature and structure of social attitudes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Kohn, P. M. (1974). Authoritarianism, rebelliousness, and their correlates among British undergraduates. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 13, 245-255.
23. Kruglanski, A. W., Shah, J. Y., Pierro, A., & Mannetti, L. (2002). When similarity breeds content: Need for closure and the allure of homogeneous and self-resembling groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 648-662.
24. Krugman, P. (2002a, July 26). The private interest. The New York Times, p. A21.
25. Krugman, P. (2002b, March 29). The smoke machine. The New York Times, p. A29.
26. Lincoln, A. (2002). "Right makes might," Speech at the Cooper Union, February 27, 1860. In W.E. Gienapp (Ed.), This fiery trial: The speeches and writings of Abraham Lincoln (pp. 71-81). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
27. Mannheim, K. (1986). Conservatism: A contribution to the sociology of knowledge. (D. Kettler, V. Meja, & N. Stehr, Trans.). New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1927)
28. McClosky, H., & Chong, D. (1985). Similarities and differences between left-wing and right-wing radicals. British Journal of Political Science, 15, 329-363.
29. McFarland, S., Ageyev, V. S., & Abalakina-Paap, M. A. (1992). Authoritarianism in the former Soviet Union. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 1004-1010.
30. McFarland, S., Ageyev, V. S., & Djintcharadze, N. (1996). Russian authoritarianism two years after communism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 210-217.
31. Muller, J. Z. (2001). Conservatism: Historical aspects. In N. J. Smelser & P. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 2624-2628). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
32. Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Books.
33. Schaller, M., Boyd, C., Yohannes, J., & O'Brien, N. (1995). The prejudiced personality revisited: Personal need for structure and formation of erroneous group stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 544-555.
34. Shils, E. A. (1954). Authoritarianism: "Right" and "left." In R. Christie & M. Jahoda (Eds.), Studies in the scope and method of "The Authoritarian Personality" (pp. 24-49). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
35. Sidanius, J. (1978). Intolerance of ambiguity and socio-politico ideology: A multidimensional analysis. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 215-235.
36. Sidanius, J. (1985). Cognitive functioning and sociopolitical ideology revisited. Political Psychology, 6, 637-661.
37. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1993). Racism and support of free-market capitalism: A cross-cultural analysis. Political Psychology, 14, 381-401.
38. Smithers, A. G., & Lobley, D. M. (1978). Dogmatism, social attitudes and personality. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 135-142.
39. Stone, W. F. (1980). The myth of left-wing authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 2, 3-19.
40. Stone, W. F. (1994). Conservatism/liberalism. Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, 1, 701-707.
41. Tetlock, P. E. (1983). Cognitive style and political ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 118-126.
42. Tetlock, P. E. (1984). Cognitive style and political belief systems in the British House of Commons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 365-375.
43. Tetlock, P. E., Bernzweig, J., & Gallant, J. L. (1985). Supreme Court decision making: Cognitive style as a predictor of ideological consistency of voting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1227-1239.
44. Tetlock, P. E., & Boettger, R. (1989). Cognitive and rhetorical styles of traditionalist and reformist Soviet politicians: A content analysis study. Political Psychology, 10, 209-232.
45. Tetlock, P. E., Hannum, K. A., & Micheletti, P. M. (1984). Stability and change in the complexity of senatorial debate: Testing the cognitive versus rhetorical style hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 979-990.
46. Wilson, G. D. (Ed.). (1973). The psychology of conservatism. London: Academic Press.