Teaching "science teaching" through inquiry

Elementary Science Teacher Education: International Perspectives on Contemporary Issues and Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 239-257

  Van Zee, Emily H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650164422     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315045443     Document Type: Chapter

References (79)

1. Abell, S, George, M., & Martini, M. (2002). The moon investigation: Instructional strategies for elementary science methods. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 85-100.
2. Allen, S. (1997). Using scientific inquiry activities in exhibit explanations. Science Education, 81, 715-734.
3. Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 1-12.
4. Appleton, K., & Kindt, I. (2002). Beginning elementary teachers’ development as teachers of science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 43-61.
5. Barton, A. C, Hindin, T. J., Contento, I. R., Trudeau, M, Yang, K., Hagiwara, S., & Koch, P. D. (2001). Underprivileged urban mothers’ perspectives on science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 688-711.
6. Brickhouse, N., & Bodner, G. M. (1992). The beginning science teacher: Classroom narratives of convictions and constraints. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 471-485.
7. Briscoe, C, & Wells, E. (2002). Reforming primary science assessment practices: A case study of one teacher’s professional development through action research. Science Education, 86, 417-435.
8. Bybee, R. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
9. Cennamo, K. S., & Eriksson, S. C. (2001). Supporting scientific inquiry through museum websites. Educational Technology, 41(3), 50-55.
10. Chang, C. Y., & Mao, S. L. (1999). Comparison of Taiwan science students’ outcomes with inquiry-group versus traditional instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 92, 340-346.
11. Chirm, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175-218.
12. Cochran-Smith, Mv & Lytle, S. L. (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.
13. Crawford, B. A. (1999). Is it realistic to expect a preservice teacher to create an inquiry-based classroom? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10, 175-194.
14. Dewey, J. (1900). The school and the life of the child. In J. Dewey (Ed.), The school and society (Rev. ed., pp. 30-62). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Doris, E. (1991). Doing what scientists do: Children learn to investigate their world. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
16. Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287-312.
17. Duckworth, E. (1987). The having of wonderful ideas and other essays on teaching and learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
18. Edelson, D. C. (2001). Learning-for-use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 355-385.
19. Erickson, G. L. (1991). Collaborative inquiry and the professional development of teachers. Journal of Educational Thought, 25, 228-245.
20. Flick, L. (2000). Cognitive scaffolding that fosters scientific inquiry in middle level science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11, 109-129.
21. Fradd, S. H., & Lee, O. (1999). Teachers’ roles in promoting science inquiry with students from diverse language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 28(6), 14-20.
22. Gallas, K. (1995). Talking their way into science: Hearing children’s questions and theories, responding with curricula. New York: Teachers College Press.
23. Gess-Newsome, J. (2002). The use and impact of explicit instruction about the nature of science and science inquiry in an elementary science methods course. Science and Education, 11, 55-67.
24. Hammer, D. (1995). Student inquiry in a physics class discussion. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 401-430.
25. Herrenkohl, L., Palinscar, A. S., DeWater, L. S., & Kawasaki, K. (1999). Developing scientific communities in classrooms: A sociocognitive approach. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 451-93.
26. Hogan, K. (1999). Thinking aloud together: A test of an intervention to foster students’ collaborative scientific reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 1085-1109.
27. Hubbard, R. S., & Power, B. M. (1993). The art of classroom inquiry: A handbook for teacher research. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
28. Hubbard, R. S., & Power, B. M. (1999). Living the questions: A guide for teacher-researchers. York, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
29. Huber, R. A., & Moore, C. J. (2001). A model for extending hands-on science to be inquiry based. School Science and Mathematics, 10, 32-41.
30. Iwasyk, M. (1997). Kids questioning kids: "Experts" sharing. Science and Children, 35(1), 42-6.
31. Keys, C. W., & Bryan, L. A. (2001). Co-constructing inquiry-based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 631-645.
32. Keys, C. W., & Kennedy, V. (1999). Understanding inquiry science teaching in context: A case study of an elementary teacher. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10, 315-333.
33. Krajcik, J., Czerniak, C. M., & Berger, C. F. (1999). Teaching children science: A project-based approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.
34. Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77, 319-337.
35. Kurose, A. (2000). Eyes on science: Asking questions about the moon on the playground, in class, and at home. In J. Minstrell & E. H. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 139-147). Washington, DC: American Association for Advancement of Science.
36. Layman, J., Ochoa, G., & Heikkinen, H. (1996). Inquiry and learning: Realizing science standards in the classroom. New York: The College Board.
37. Lederman, N. G., & Niess, M. L. (1998). Survival of the fittest. School Science and Mathematics, 98, 169-172.
38. Loughran, J. J. (2002). Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 33-43.
39. Lowery, L., Schoenfeld, A., & White, B. (1990). Master’s and credential in science and mathematics education (MACSME) program (National Science Foundation TPE91-50028). Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley.
40. Luft, J. A. (1999). Assessing science teachers as they implement inquiry lessons: The extended inquiry observational rubric. Science Educator, 8(1), 9-18.
41. Luft, J. A. (2001). Changing inquiry practices and beliefs: The impact of an inquiry-based professional development programme on beginning and experienced secondary science teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 517-534.
42. Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., & Boon, R. (2001). Correlates of inquiry learning in science: Constructing concepts of density and buoyancy. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 130-137.
43. McDermott, L. C. (1990). A perspective on teacher preparation in physics and other sciences: The need for special science courses for teachers. American Journal of Physics, 58,734-742.
44. McDermott, L. C. (1996). Physics by inquiry. New York: Wiley.
45. McGilly, K. (Ed.). (1994). Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. McGonigal, J. A. (1999). How learning to become a teacher researcher prepared an educator to do science inquiry with elementary grade students. Research in Science Education, 29, 5-23.
47. Minstrell, J. (1989). Teaching science for understanding. In L. Resnick & L. Klopfer (Eds.), ASCD 1989 Yearbook: Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research (pp. 131-149). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
48. Minstrell, J., & van Zee, E. H. (Eds.). (2000). Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
49. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Retrieved September 1, 2004, from http://www.nap.edu/catalog/ 4962.html
50. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Retrieved September 1, 2004, from http://www. nap.edu/catalog/9596.html
51. Pearce, C. (1999). Nurturing inquiry. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
52. Polman, J. L., & Pea, R. D. (2001). Transformative communication as a cultural tool for guiding inquiry science. Science Education, 85, 223-238.
53. Roberts, D. (1999). The sky’s the limit: Parents and first-grade students observe the sky. Science and Children, 37, 33-37.
54. Roth, W. M., & Bowen, M. (1995). Knowing and interacting: A study of culture, practices, and resources in a grade 8 open-inquiry science classroom guided by a cognitive apprenticeship metaphor. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 73-128.
55. Saul, W., & Reardon, J. (1996). Beyond the science kit: Inquiry in action. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
56. Saul, W., Reardon, J., Schmidt, A., Pearce, C, Blackwood, D., & Bird, M. (1993). Science workshop. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
57. Schwab, J. J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. In J. J. Schwab & P. F. Brandwein (Eds.), The teaching of science (pp. 1-103). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
58. Scott, C. (1994). Project-based science: Reflections of a middle school teacher. The Elementary School Journal, 95, 75-94.
59. Shulman, L. (1998). Course anatomy: The dissection and analysis of knowledge through teaching. In P. Hutchings (Ed.), The course portfolio: How faculty can examine their teaching to advance practice and improve student learning (pp. 5-12). Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
60. Simpson, D. (1997). Collaborative conversations: Strategies for engaging students in productive dialogues. The Science Teacher, 64(8), 40-43.
61. Smith, D., & Anderson, C. W. (1999). Appropriating scientific practices and discourses with future elementary teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 755-76.
62. Songer, N. B., Lee, H. S., & Kam, R. (2002). Technology-rich inquiry science in urban classrooms: What are the barriers to inquiry pedagogy? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 128-150.
63. Tippins, D. J., Koballa, T. R., & Payne, B. D. (Eds.). (2002). Learning from cases: Unraveling the complexities of elementary science teaching. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
64. Tobin, K. G., & McRobbie, C. J. (1996). Cultural myths as constraints to the enacted science curriculum. Science Education, 80, 223-241.
65. van Zee, E. H. (1998a). Fostering elementary teachers’ research on their science teaching practices. Journal of Teacher Education, 49, 245-254.
66. van Zee, E. H. (1998b). Preparing teachers as researchers in courses on methods of teaching science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 791-809.
67. van Zee, E. H. (2000). Analysis of a student-generated inquiry discussion. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 115-142.
68. van Zee, E. H., Iwasyk, M., Kurose, A., Simpson, D., & Wild, J. (2001). Student and teacher questioning during conversations about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 159-190.
69. van Zee, E. H., Lay, D., & Roberts, D. (2003). Fostering collaborative inquiries by prospective and practicing elementary and middle school teachers. Science Education, 87, 588-612.
70. van Zee, E. H., & Minstrell, J. (1997a). Reflective discourse: Developing shared understandings in a high school physics classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 209-228.
71. van Zee, E. H., & Minstrell, J. (1997b). Using questioning to guide student thinking. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 229-271.
72. van Zee, E. H., & Roberts, D. (2001). Using pedagogical inquiries for the basis for learning: Analysis of prospective teachers perceptions of positive science learning experiences. Science Education, 85, 733-757.
73. Wells, G. (1993). Changing schools from within: Creating communities of inquiry. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
74. Wells, G. (2001). Action, talk & text: Learning and teaching through inquiry. New York: Teachers College Press.
75. White, B., & Frederiksen, J. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition & Instruction, 16, 3-118.
76. White, R., & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing understanding. London: Falmer.
77. Whitin, P., & Whitin, D. J. (1996). Inquiry at the window: Pursuing the wonders of learners. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
78. Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Education, 87, 112-143.
79. Yerrick, R. K. (2000). Lower track science students’ argumentation and open inquiry instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 807-838.