A Model for Extending Hands-On Science to Be Inquiry Based

School Science and Mathematics

Volumn 101, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 32-42

  Huber, Richard A ^a   Moore, Christopher J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA WILMINGTON   (United States)

^b Saint Mary Catholic School   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037658168     PISSN: 00366803     EISSN: 19498594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2001.tb18187.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abd-El-Khalick F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82. 417–436.
2. Abell, S. K. (1989). The effect of a problem solving inservice program on the classroom behaviors and attitudes of middle school science teachers. San Francisco: National Association for Research in Science Teaching. (ERIC Document No. ED306094).
3. Bellen, J. J., Bellen, E. C., & Blank, M. A. (1992). Teaching from a research knowledge base: A development and renewal process. New York: Macmillan.
4. Chiappetta, E. L. (1997). Inquiry-based science. Science Teacher, 64(7), 22–26.
5. Crawford, B. A. (1998). The poisons project: Motivate your students with an inquiry-based unit. Science Scope, 21(5), 18–21.
6. Crawford, B. A. (1999). Is it realistic to expect a pre-service teacher to create an inquiry-based classroom? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10(3), 175–194.
7. Dawson-Galle, P. (1990). Philosophy of science done in the “philosophy for children” manner in lower-secondary schools. In D. E. Herget (Ed.), More history and philosophy of the science in science teaching (pp. 223–230). Tallahassee: Florida State University.
8. Deal, D. (1994). A look at Project AIMS. School Science and Mathematics, 94(1), 11–17.
9. Edwards, C. H. (1997). Promoting student inquiry. Science Teacher, 64(7), 18–21.
10. Eick, C. J. (1998). Growing with the standards. Science Scope, 21(7), 10–13.
11. Eick, C., & Samford, K. (1999). Techniques for new teachers. The Science Teacher, 66(8), 34–38.
12. Elstgeest, J. (1985). The right question at the right time. In W. Harlen, (Ed.), Primary science, taking the plunge. Oxford: Heinemann Educational.
13. Greene, S. N. (1998). Take off with scientific methodology. Science and Children, 36(3), 38–43, 71.
14. Huber, R. A., & Burton, G. M. (1995). What do students think scientists are like? School Science and Mathematics, 95(7), 371–376.
15. Huber, R. A., & Probst, C. (1995). Hands on science. Grand Rapids: Instructional Fair, Inc.
16. Lederman, N. G. (1999). Teachers' understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: Factors that impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), 916–929.
17. Lederman, N. G., & Niess, M. L. (1998). Survival of the fittest. School Science and Mathematics, 98(4), 169–172.
18. Liem, T. L. (1987). Invitation to science inquiry, (2nd ed.). Chino Hills: Science Inquiry Enterprises.
19. Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Lipman, M., & Sharp, A. M. (Eds.) (1978). Growing up with philosophy. Philadelphia: University Press.
21. Luft, J. (1999). Challenging myths. The Science Teacher, 66(4), 40–43.
22. Martin, D. J. (2000). Elementary science methods: A constructivist approach. Albany: Delmar Publishers.
23. Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.
24. Matthews, M. R. (1998). In defense of modest goals when teaching about the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(2), 161–174.
25. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
26. Pizzini, E. L., Abell, S. K., & Shepardson, D. P. (1988). Rethinking thinking in the science classroom. The Science Teacher, 55(9), 22–25.
27. Pizzini, E., Shepardson, D., & Abell, S. (1992). The inquiry level of junior high activities: Implications to science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(2), 111–112.
28. Roth, W. M., Roffie, C. J., Lucas, K. B., & Boutonné, S. (1997). Why may students fail to learn from demonstrations? A social practice perspective on learning physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(5), 509–533.
29. Sánchez, G., & Valcarcel, M. V. (1999). Science teachers' views and practices in planning for teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(4), 493–513.
30. Science Media Group. (1995). Minds of our own [videotape]. South Burlington, VT: Public Broadcasting Service.
31. Smith, R.W., Huber, R. A., & Shotsberger, P. G. (in press). The impact of Standards guided equity and problem solving institute on participating science teachers and their students. North Carolina Journal of Teacher Education.
32. Wong, H. K. (1998). The effective teacher [videotape]. Mountain View State: Harry K. Wong Publications, Inc.
33. Wong, H. K. & Wong, R. T. (1998). How to be an effective teacher: The first days of school. Mountain View State: Harry K. Wong Publications, Inc.
34. Yager, R. E., Ed. (1993). What research says to the science teacher: The science, technology, society movement. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.