Appropriating scientific practices and discourses with future elementary teachers

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 36, Issue 7, 1999, Pages 755-776

  Smith, Deborah C ^a   Anderson, Charles W ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040814356     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199909)36:7<755::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-9     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Abell, S., & Roth, M. (1994). Constructing science teaching in the elementary school: The socialization of a science enthusiast student teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 77-90.
2. Abell, S., & Smith, D. (1994). What is science? Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 16, 475-487.
3. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Anderson, C.W., Holland, J., & Palincsar, A. (1997). Canonical and sociocultural approaches to research and reform in science education: The story of Juan and his group. Elementary School Journal, 97, 357-381.
5. Asch, F. (1985). Bear shadow. New York: Aladdin Paperbacks.
6. Carey, S., Evans, R., Honda, M., Jay, E., & Unger, C. (1988). What junior high school students do, can, and should know about the nature of science and scientific inquiry (Tech. Rep.). Cambridge, MA: Educational Technology Center.
7. Chinn, C., & Brewer, W. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63, 1-49.
8. Cobb, P., & Bauersfeld, H. (Eds.) (1995). The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's images of science. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
10. Gallagher, J. (1991). Uses of interpretive research in science education. In J. Gallagher (Ed.), Interpretive research in science education (pp. 3-18). Manhattan, KS: National Association for Research in Science Teaching.
11. Gallas, K. (1995). Talking their way into science: Hearing children's questions and theories, responding with curricula. New York: Teachers College Press.
12. Gee, J. (1997, April). Science talk: Language and knowledge in classroom discussion. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Chicago, Il.
13. Gould, S. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York: W.W. Norton.
14. Gruber, H. (1974). Courage and cognitive growth in children and scientists. In M. Schwebel & J. Raph (Eds.), Piaget in the classroom. New York: Basic Books.
15. Hawkins, D. (1990). Defining and bridging the gap. In E. Duckworth, J. Easley, D. Hawkins, & A. Henriques (eds.), Science education: A minds-on approach for the elementary years (pp. 97-140). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Hofer, B., & Pintrich, P. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88-140.
17. Keats, E.J. (1992). Dreams. New York: Macmillan.
18. Keller, E.F. (1983). A feeling for the organism: The life and work of Barbara McClintock. New York: W.H. Freeman.
19. Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
20. Kurth, L., Anderson, C.W., & Palincsar, A. (1994). The case of Carla: Dilemmas of helping all students to understand science. Unpublished manuscript, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
21. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23. Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (n.d.). Modeling in mathematics and science. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
24. Lederman, N. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331-359.
25. Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
26. Longino, H. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27. McKenzie, A. (1988). The major achievements of science: The development of science from ancient times to the present. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
28. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
29. Piaget, J. (1983). Le possible et le necessaire: L'evolution du necessaire chez l'enfant. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
30. Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P., & Gertzog, W. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-227.
31. Rice, J. (1999). Science for elementary education: A proposal for developing and implementing a science education course for elementary education majors. Unpublished manuscript, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
32. Richmond, G., & Kurth, L. (1997). Scientific apprenticeship and community-embedded opportunities for conceptual growth. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Chicago, Illinois.
33. Rosebery, A., Warren, B., & Conant, F. (1992). Appropriating scientific discourse: Findings from language minority classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 61-94.
34. Smith, D.C. (1998, March). Bridging the gap: Links between elementary science teacher preparation and the first years of teaching. Paper presented at the National Center for the Improvement of Science Education/National Science Foundation conference, Washington, DC.
35. Smith, D., Conway, P., & Levine-Rose, S. (1995). The re-construction of preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of the nature of science. Paper presented at the 1995 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, California.
36. Songer, N., & Linn, M. (1991). How do students' views of science influence knowledge integration? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 761-784.
37. Strike, K., & Posner, G. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R.A. Duschl & R.J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice (pp. 147-176). Albany: State University of New York Press.
38. Suzuki, D. (1990). David Suzuki asks: Did you know about light and sight? Toronto: General Paperbacks.
39. Third International Study of Science and Mathematics. (1997). A splintered vision: An investigation of United States science and mathematics education. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
40. Tobias, S. (1993). What makes science hard? A Karplus lecture. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2, 297-304.
41. Traweek, S. (1988) Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42. Wenham, M. (1995). Understanding primary science. London: Paul Chapman.
43. White, B. (1993). Thinker tools: Causal models, conceptual change, and science education. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 1-100.