Microsatellite variation and population structure of the moor frog (Rana arvalis) in scandinavia

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 18, Issue 14, 2009, Pages 2996-3005

  Knopp, Theresa ^a   MerilÄ, Juha ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Amphibian; FST; Genetic diversity; Microsatellite; Scandinavia

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; DNA SEQUENCE; FEMALE; FROG; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; GEOGRAPHY; MALE; POPULATION GENETICS; SCANDINAVIA;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; GENETIC MARKERS; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOTYPE; GEOGRAPHY; MALE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; RANIDAE; SCANDINAVIA; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

AMPHIBIA; ANURA; RANA ARVALIS; RANA TEMPORARIA;

EID: 67649669581     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: 1365294X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04252.x     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Alho JS, Herczeg G, Merilä J (2008) Female-biased sex ratios in subarctic common frogs. Journal of Zoology, 275, 57 63.
2. Andersen LW, Fog K, Damgaard C (2004) Habitat fragmentation causes bottlenecks and inbreeding in the European tree frog (Hyla arborea). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 271, 1293 1302.
3. Andrén C, Henrikson L, Olson M, Nilsson G (1988) Effects of pH and aluminium on embryonic and early larval stages of Swedish brown frogs Rana arvalis, R. temporaria and R. dalmatina. Holarctic Ecology, 11, 127 135.
4. Austerlitz F, JungMuller B, Godelle B, Gouyon PH (1997) Evolution of coalescence times, genetic diversity and structure during colonization. Theoretical Population Biology, 51, 148 164.
5. Austin JD, Dávila JA, Lougheed SC, Boag PT (2003) Genetic evidence for female-biased dispersal in the bullfrog, Rana catesbiana (Ranidae). Molecular Ecology, 12, 3165 3172.
6. Avise JC (2000) Phylogeography: The History and Formation of Species. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
7. Babik W, Branicki W, Sandera M et al. (2004) Mitochondial phylogeography of the moor frog, Rana arvalis. Molecular Ecology, 13, 1469 1480.
8. Beebee TJC, Rowe G (2000) Microsatellite analysis of natterjack toad Bufo calamita Laurenti populations: consequences of dispersal from a Pleistocene refugium. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 69, 367 381.
9. Berven KA, Grudzien TA (1990) Dispersal in the Wood frog (Rana sylvatica): implications for genetic population structure. Evolution, 44, 2047 2056.
10. Brede EG, Beebee TJC (2004) Contrasting population structures in two sympatric anurans: implications for species conservation. Heredity, 92, 110 117.
11. Bruford MW, Hanotte O, Brookefield JFY, Burke T (1992) Single-locus and multi-locus DNA fingerprinting. In : Molecular Genetic Analysis of Populations (ed. Hoelzel AR pp 225 269. IRL press, Oxford.
12. Burns EL, Eldridge MDB, Houlden BA (2004) Microsatellite variation and population structure in a declining Australian Hylid Litoria aurea. Molecular Ecology, 13, 1745 1757.
13. Cabe PR, Page RB, Hanlon TJ, Aldrich ME, Connors L, Marsh DM (2007) Fine-scale population differentiation and gene flow in a terrestrial salamander (Plethodon cinereus) living in continuous habitat. Heredity, 98, 53 60.
14. Cornuet JM, Luikart G (1996) Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics, 144, 2001 2014.
15. Crandall KA, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Mace GM, Wayne RK (2000) Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 15, 290 295.
16. Elmberg J (1984) Åkergrodan Rana arvalis i norra Sverige. Fauna och Flora, 79, 69 77.
17. Elphinstone MS, Hinten GN, Anderson MJ (2003) An inexpensive and high-throughput procedure to extract and purify total genomic DNA for population studies. Molecular Ecology Notes, 3, 317 320.
18. Fog K, Schmedes A, Rosenørn de Lasson D (1997) Nordens padder og krybdyr. Gads Forlag, Copenhagen.
19. Garner TWJ, Tomio G (2002) Microsatellites for use in studies of the Italian Agile Frog, Rana latastei (Boulenger). Conservation Genetics, 2, 77 80.
20. Goudet J (2001) fstat, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (Version 2.9.3). Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
21. Goudet J, Perrin N, Waser P (2002) Tests for sex-biased dispersal using bi-parentally inherited genetic markers. Molecular Ecology, 11, 1103 1114.
22. Green DM, Sharbel TF, Kearsley J, Kaiser H (1996) Postglacial range fluctuation, genetic subdivision and speciation in the western North American spotted frog complex, Rana pretiosa. Evolution, 50, 374 390.
23. Gyllensten U (1985) Temporal allele frequency changes in density fluctuating populations of willow grouse (Lagopus lagopus L.). Evolution, 39, 115 121.
24. Haapanen A (1970) Site tenacity of the common frog (Rana temporaria L.) and the moor frog (R. arvalis Nilss.). Annales Zoologici Fennici, 7, 61 66.
25. Hewitt GM (1996) Some genetic consequences of ice ages, and their role in divergence and speciation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 58, 247 276.
26. Hewitt GM (1999) Post-glacial re-colonization of European biota. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 68, 87 112.
27. Hitchings SP, Beebee TJC (1996) Persistence of British natterjack toad Bufo calamita Laurenti (Anura: Bufonidae) populations despite low genetic diversity. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 57, 69 80.
28. Hitchings SP, Beebee TJC (1997) Genetic substructuring as a result of barriers to geneflow in urban Rana temporaria (common frog) populations: implications for biodiversity conservation. Heredity, 79, 117 127.
29. Hitchings SP, Beebee TJC (1998) Loss of genetic diversity and fitness in Common Toad (Bufo bufo) populations isolated by inimical habitat. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 11, 269 283.
30. Hutchinson DW, Templeton AR (1999) Correlation of pairwise genetic and geographic distance measures: inferring the relative influences of geneflow and drift on the distribution of genetic variability. Evolution, 53, 1898 1914.
31. Johansson M, Primmer CR, Sahlsten J, Merilä J (2005) The influence of landscape structure on occurrence, abundance and genetic diversity of the common frog, Rana temporaria. Global Change Biology, 11, 1664 1679.
32. Johansson M, Primmer CR, Merilä J (2006) History vs. current demography: explaining the genetic population structure of the common frog (Rana temporaria). Molecular Ecology, 15, 975 983.
33. Keller I, Nentwig W, Largiader CR (2004) Recent habitat fragmentation due to roads can lead to significant genetic differentiation in an abundant flightless ground beetle. Molecular Ecology, 13, 2983 2994.
34. Knopp T, Merilä J (2009) The postglacial recolonization of Northern Europe by Rana arvalis as revealed by microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA analyses. Heredity, 102, 174 181.
35. Knopp T, Cano JM, Crochét P-A, Merilä J (2007) Contrasting levels of variation in neutral and quantitative genetic loci on island populations of moor frogs (Rana arvalis). Conservation Genetics, 8, 45 56.
36. Lampert PK, Ulrich SR, Mueller UG, Ryan MJ (2003) Fine-scale genetic pattern and evidence for sex-biased dispersal in the túngara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus. Molecular Ecology, 12, 3325 3334.
37. Leinonen T, O'Hara RB, Cano JM, Merilä J (2008) Comparative studies of quantitative trait and neutral marker divergence: a meta-analysis. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21, 1 17.
38. Loman J, Andersson G (2007) Monitoring brown frogs Rana arvalis and Rana temporaria in 120 south Swedish ponds 1989-2005. Mixed trends in different habitats. Biological conservation, 135, 46 56.
39. Loman J, Lardner B (2006) Does pond quality limit frogs Rana arvalis and Rana temporaria in agricultural landscapes? A field experiment. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43, 690 700.
40. Lundqvist J, Mejdahl V (1995) Luminescence dating of the deglaciation in northern Sweden. Quaternary International, 28, 193 197.
41. Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research, 27, 209 220.
42. Merilä J, Crnokrak P (2001) Comparison of genetic differentiation at marker loci and quantitative traits. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 14, 892 903.
43. Mikko S, Andersson L (1995) Low major histocompatibility complex class II diversity in European and North American moose. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 92, 4259 4263.
44. Monsen KJ, Blouin MS (2003) Genetic structure in a montane ranid frog: restricted gene flow and nuclear-mitochondrial discordance. Molecular Ecology, 12, 3275 3286.
45. Moritz C (1994) Defining 'evolutionary significant units' for conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 9, 373 375.
46. Palo JU, Schmeller DS, Laurila A, Primmer CR, Kuzmins SL, Merilä J (2004a) High degree of population subdivision in a widespread amphibian. Molecular Ecology, 13, 2631 2644.
47. Palo JU, Lesbarrères D, Schmeller DS, Primmer CR, Merilä J (2004b) Microsatellite marker data suggest sex-biased dispersal in the common frog Rana temporaria. Molecular Ecology, 13, 2865 2869.
48. Pamilo P, Savolainen O (1999) Post-glacial colonization, drift, local selection and conservation value of populations: a northern perspective. Hereditas, 130, 229 238.
49. Räsänen K (2002) Evolutionary implications of acidification - a frog's eye view. PhD thesis, Uppsala University, Sweden.
50. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) genepop version 1.2: population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity, 86, 248 249.
51. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution, 43, 223 225.
52. Ridley M (1996) Evolution, 2nd edn. Blackwell Science, Inc, Cambridge.
53. Rowe G, Beebee TJC, Burke T (1998) Phylogeography of the natterjack toad Bufo calamita in Britain: genetic differentiation of native and translocated populations. Molecular Ecology, 7, 751 760.
54. Severtsov AS, Lyapkov SM, Surova GS (1998) Comparative analysis of ecological niches of common frog (Rana temporaria L.) and moor frog (Rana arvalis Nilss.) (Anura, Amphibia). Zhurnal Obshcei Biologii, 59, 279 301.
55. Smith MA, Green DM (2005) Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation: are all amphibian populations metapopulations? Ecography, 28, 110 128.
56. Smith MA, Green DM (2006) Sex, isolation and fidelity: unbiased long-distance dispersal in a terrestrial amphibian. Ecography, 29, 649 658.
57. Squire T, Newman RA (2002) Fine-scale population structure in the wood frog (Rana sylvatica) in a northern woodland. Herpetologica, 58, 119 130.
58. Vieites DR, Chiari Y, Vences M et al. (2006) Mitochondrial evidence for distinct phylogeographic units in the endangered Malagasy poison frog Mantella bernhardi. Molecular Ecology, 15, 1617 1625.
59. Vos CC, Chardon JP (1998) Effects of habitat fragmentation and road density on the distribution pattern of the moor frog Rana arvalis. Journal of Applied Ecology, 35, 44 56.
60. Vos CC, Antonisse-De Jong AG, Goedhart PW, Smulders MJM (2001) Genetic similarity as a measure for connectivity between fragmented populations of the moor frog (Rana arvalis). Heredity, 86, 598 608.
61. Ward RD, Skibinski DOF, Woodwark M (1992) Protein heterozygosity, protein structure, and taxonomic differentiation. Evolutionary Biology, 26, 73 159.
62. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution, 38, 1358 1370.
63. Zeisset I, Beebee TJC (2003) Population genetics of a successful invader: the marsh frog Rana ridibunda in Britain. Molecular Ecology, 12, 639 646.