Fine-scale genetic pattern and evidence for sex-biased dispersal in the túngara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 12, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 3325-3334

  Lampert, Kathrin P ^a   Rand, A Stanley ^b   Mueller, Ulrich G ^a,b   Ryan, Michael J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b Smithsonian Tropical Research Institution   (Panama)

Author keywords

Gene flow barrier; Male biased dispersal; Metapopulation; Microsatellite marker; Population genetics

Indexed keywords

ANIMALS; ANURA; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; GEOGRAPHY; MALE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MOVEMENT; PANAMA; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SELECTION (GENETICS); SEX FACTORS; VARIATION (GENETICS);

AMPHIBIA; ANIMALIA; ANURA; PHYSALAEMUS; PHYSALAEMUS PUSTULOSUS; REPTILIA;

EID: 0345099446     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.02016.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Alford RA, Richards SJ (1999) Global amphibian declines: a problem in applied ecology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 30, 133-165.
2. Avise JC (2000) Phylogeography: the History and Formation of Species. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, USA.
3. Barber PH (1999) Patterns of gene flow and population genetic structure in the canyon treefrog, Hyla arenicolor. Molecular Ecology, 8, 563-576.
4. Breden F (1987) The effect of post-metamorphic dispersal on the population genetic structure of Fowler's toad, Bufo woodhousei fowleri. Copeia, 1987, 386-395.
5. Dobson F (1982) Competition for mates and predominant juvenile male dispersal in mammals. Animal Behaviour, 30, 1183-1192.
6. Driscoll DA (1998a) Genetic structure, metapopulation processes and evolution influence the conservation strategies for two endangered frog species. Biological Conservation, 83, 43-54.
7. Driscoll DA (1998b) Genetic structure of the frog Geocrinia lutea and Geocrinia rosea reflects extreme population divergence and range changes, not dispersal barriers. Evolution, 52, 1147-1157.
8. Favre L, Balloux F, Goudet J, Perrin N (1997) Female-biased dispersal in the monogamous mammal Crocidura russula: evidence from field data and microsatellite patterns. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B, 264, 127-132.
9. Goudet J (1999) PCA-GEN, Version 1.2. Institute of Ecology, Biology Building, UNIL, Lausanne, Switzerland.
10. Goudet J (2001) Fstat, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (Version 2.9.3). Available from http:// www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/fstat.html. Updated from Goudet (1995).
11. Goudet J, Perrin N, Waser P (2002) Tests for sex-biased dispersal using bi-parentally inherited genetic markers. Molecular Ecology, 11, 1103-1114.
12. Greenwood P (1980) Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Animal Behaviour, 28, 1140-1162.
13. Hanski I, Gilpin M (1991) Metapopulation dynamics: a brief history and conceptual domain. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 42, 3-16.
14. Hartl DL, Clark GC (1997) Principles of Population Genetics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
15. Hitchings SP, Beebee TJC (1997) Genetic substructuring as a result of barriers to gene flow in urban Rana temporaria (common frog) populations: implications for biodiversity conservation. Heredity, 79, 117-127.
16. Knight ME, Van Oppen MJH, Smith HL et al. (1999) Evidence for male-biased dispersal in lake Malawi cichlids from microsatellites. Molecular Ecology, 8, 1521-1527.
17. Legendre P, Legendre L (2000) Numerical Ecology. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
18. Liedloff A (1999) Mantel, Version 2, Mantel nonparametric test calculator. http://www.sci.qut.edu.au/nrs/mantel.htm.
19. Marsh DM, Fegraus EH, Harrison S (1999) Effects of breeding pond isolation on the spatial and temporal dynamics of pond use by the túngara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus. Journal of Animal Ecology, 68, 804-814.
20. Marsh DM, Rand AS, Ryan MJ (2000) Effects of inter-pond distance on the breeding ecology of túngara frogs. Oecologia, 122, 505-513.
21. Mossman CA, Waser PM (1999) Genetic detection of sex-biased dispersal. Molecular Ecology, 8, 1063-1067.
22. Newman RA, Squire T (2001) Microsatellite variation and fine-scale population structure in the wood frog (Rana sylvatica). Molecular Ecology, 10, 1087-1100.
23. Paetkau D, Calvert W, Stirling I, Strobect C (1995) Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears. Molecular Ecology, 4, 347-354.
24. Pannell JR, Charlesworth B (2000) Effects of metapopulation processes on measures of genetic diversity. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society of London Series B, 355, 1851-1864.
25. Perrin N, Mazalov V (2000) Local competition, inbreeding, and the evolution of sex-biased dispersal. American Naturalist, 155, 116-127.
26. Phillips CA (1994) Geographic variation of mitochondrial DNA variants and the historical biogeography of the spotted salamander, Ambystoma maculatum. Evolution, 48, 567-607.
27. Piertney SB, MacColl ADC, Bacon PJ, Dallas JF (1998) Local genetic structure in red grouse (Lagopus lagopus scoticus): evidence from microsatellite DNA markers. Molecular Ecology, 7, 1645-1654.
28. Pröhl H, Adams RMM, Mueller U, Rand AS, Ryan MJ (2002) Polymerase chain reaction primers for polymorphic microsatellite loci from the túngara frog Physalaemus pustulosus. Molecular Ecology Notes, 2, 341-343.
29. Prugnolle F, de Meeus T (2002) Inferring sex-biased dispersal from population genetic tools: a review. Heredity, 88, 161-165.
30. Pusey AE (1987) Sex-biased dispersal and inbreeding avoidance in birds and mammals. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 2, 295-299.
31. Rowe G, Beebee TJC, Burke T (1998) Phylogeography of the natterjack toad Bufo calamita in Britain: genetic differentiation of native and translocated populations. Molecular Ecology, 7, 751-760.
32. Rowe G, Beebee TJC, Burke T (2000) A microsatellite analysis of natterjack toad, Bufo calamita, metapopulations. Oikos, 88, 641-651.
33. Ryan MJ (1985) The Túngara Frog, a Study in Sexual Selection and Communication University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
34. Ryan MJ (1998) Sexual selection, receiver biases, and the evolution of sex differences. Science, 181, 1999-2003.
35. Ryan MJ, Rand AS, Weigt LA (1996) Allozyme and advertisement call variation in the túngara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus. Evolution, 50, 2435-2453.
36. Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L (2000) Arlequin, Version 2.000: Software for Population Genetic Data Analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
37. Seppä P, Laurila A (1999) Genetic structure of island populations of the anurans Rana temporaria and Bufo bufo. Heredity, 82, 309-317.
38. Shaffer HB, Fellers GM, Magee A, Voss SR (2000) The genetics of amphibian declines: population substructure and molecular differentiation in the Yosemite toad, Bufo canorus (Anura, Bufonidae) based on single-strand conformation polymorphism analyis (SSCP) and mitochondrial DNA sequence data. Molecular Ecology, 9, 245-257.
39. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry: the Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 3rd edn. W. H. Freeman, New York.
40. Stenton AG, Malhorta A, Thorpe RS (2002) Population differentiation and nuclear gene flow in the Dominican anole (Anolis oculatus). Molecular Ecology, 11, 1679-1688.
41. Surridge AK, Ibrahim KM, Bell DJ et al. (1999) Fine-scale genetic structuring in a natural population of European wild rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Molecular Ecology, 8, 299-307.
42. Wright S (1943) Isolation by distance. Genetics, 28, 139-156.