Genetic structure in a montane ranid frog: Restricted gene flow and nuclear-mitochondrial discordance

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 12, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 3275-3286

  Monsen, Kirsten J ^a,b   Blouin, Michael S ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Amphibian conservation; Discordant molecular markers; DPS; Gene flow; Ranidae

Indexed keywords

ALLELES; ANIMALS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DNA PRIMERS; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETICS, POPULATION; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; PACIFIC STATES; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE-STRANDED CONFORMATIONAL; RANIDAE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; VARIATION (GENETICS);

AMPHIBIA; ANIMALIA; ANURA; RANIDAE; REPTILIA;

EID: 0345530943     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.02001.x     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Angers B, Bernatchez L (1998) Combined use of SMM and non SMM methods to infer fine structure and evolutionary history of closely related brook char (Salvelinus fontinalis, Salmonidae) populations from microsatellites. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 15, 143-159.
2. Arbogast BS, Browne RA, Weigl PD (2001) Evolutionary genetics and Pleistocene biogeography of North American tree squirrels (Tamiascirus). Journal of Mammalogy, 82, 302-319.
3. Avise J, Arnold J, Ball R et al. (1987) Intraspecific phylogeography: the mitochondrial DNA bridge between population genetics and systematics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 18, 489-522.
4. Avise J, Neigel J, Arnold J (1984) Demographic influences on mitochondrial DNA lineage survivorship in animal populations. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 20, 99-105.
5. Baverstock P, Moritz C (1996) Project design. In: Molecular Systematics (eds Hillis DM, Moritz C, Mable BK), pp. 17-27. Sinauer Associates Inc., Publishers, Sunderland, MA, USA.
6. Birky C, Maruyama T, Fuerst P (1983) An approach to population and evolutionary genetic theory for genes in mitochondria and chloroplasts, and some results. Genetics, 103, 513-527.
7. Blaustein A, Wake D, Sousa W (1994) Amphibian declines: judging stability, persistence, and susceptibility of populations to local and global extinctions. Conservation Biology, 8, 60-71.
8. Bowcock A, Ruiz-Linares A, Tomfohrde J, Minch E, Kidd J (1994) High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites. Nature, 368, 455-457.
9. Bowen B (1998) What is wrong with ESUs?: the gap between evolutionary theory and conservation principles. Journal of Shellfish Research, 17, 1355-1358.
10. Briggs J, Storm R (1970) Growth and population structure of the cascades frog, Rana cascadae Slater. Herpetologica, 26, 283-300.
11. Brown JM, LeebensMack JH, Thompson JN, Pellmyr O, Harrison RG (1997) Phylogeography and host association in a pollinating seed parasite Greya politella (Lepidoptera: Prodoxidae). Molecular Ecology, 6, 215-224.
12. Buonaccorsi V, Reece K, Morgan L, Graves J (1999) Geographic distribution of molecular variance within the blue marlin (Makaira nigricans): a hierarchical analysis of allozyme, single-copy nuclear, and mitochondrial DNA markers. Evolution, 53, 568-579.
13. Bury R, Pearl C (1999) Klamath-Siskiyou herpetofauna: biogeographic patterns and conservation strategies. Natural Areas Journal, 19, 341-350.
14. Cavalli-Sforza LL, Edwards AWF (1967) Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures. American Journal of Human Genetics, 19, 233-257.
15. Clement M, Posada D, Crandall K (2000) TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Molecular Ecology, 9, 1657-1659.
16. Crandall K, Templeton A (1993) Empirical tests of some predictions from coalescent theory with applications to intraspecific phylogeny reconstruction. Genetics, 134, 959-969.
17. Daugherty CH, Allendorf FW, Dunlap WW, Knudsen KL (1983) Systematic implications of geographic patterns of genetic variation in the genus Dicamptodon. Copeia, 1983, 679-691.
18. Demboski JR, Cook JA (2001) Phylogeography of the dusky shrew Sorex monticolus (Insectivora, Soricidae): insight into deep and shallow history in northwestern North America. Molecular Ecology, 10, 1227-1240.
19. Driscoll D (1999) Skeletochronological assessment of age structure and population stability for two threatened frog species. Australian Journal of Ecology, 24, 182-189.
20. Estoup A, Angers B (1998) Microsatellites and minisatellites for molecular ecology: theoretical and empirical considerations. In: Advances in Molecular Ecology (ed. G Carvalho), p. 55. IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
21. Evans B, Morales J, Picker M, Kelley D, Melnick J (1997) Comparative molecular phylogeography of two Xenopus species, X. gilli and X. laevis, in the south-western Cape Province, South Africa. Molecular Ecology, 6, 333-343.
22. Excoffier L, Smouse P, Quattro J (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics, 131, 479-491.
23. Fellers G, Drost C (1993) Disappearance of the cascades frog Rana-cascadae at the southern end of its range, California USA. Biological Conservation, 65, 177-181.
24. Franck P, Garnery L, Loiseau A et al. (2001) Genetic diversity of the honeybee in Africa: microsatellite and mitochondrial data. Heredity, 86, 420-430.
25. Friedl T, Klump G (1997) Some aspects of population biology in the European tree frog, Hyla arborea. Herpetologica, 31, 52-59.
26. Garza J, Slatkin M, Freimer N (1995) Microsatellite allele frequencies in humans and chimpanzees, with implications for constraints on allele size. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 12, 594-603.
27. Good DA (1989) Hybridization and cryptic species in Dicamptodon. Evolution, 43, 728-744.
28. Good DA, Wake DB (1992) Geographic variation and speciation in the torrent salamanders of the genus Rhyacotriton (Caudata: Rhyacotritinudae). University of California Publications in Zoology, 126, 1-91.
29. Goudet J (1995) FSTAT (version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. Journal of Heredity, 86, 485-486.
30. Green D (1986) Systematics and evolution of western North American frogs allied to Rana aurora and Rana boylii: electrophoretic evidence. Systematic Zoology, 35, 283-296.
31. Greenwood PJ (1980) Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Animal Behavior, 28, 1140-1162.
32. Gubitz T, Thorpe RS, Malhotra A (2000) Phylogeography and natural selection in the Tenerife gecko Tarentola delalandii: testing historical and adaptive hypotheses. Molecular Ecology, 9, 1213-1221.
33. Hare MP, Avise JC (1998) Population structure in the American oyster as inferred by nuclear gene genealogies. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 15, 119-128.
34. Hillis D, Mable BK, Larson A, Davis S, Zimmer E (1996) Nucleic acids IV: sequencing and cloning. In: Molecular Systematics (eds Hillis D, Moritz C, Mable B), pp. 342-343. Sinauer Associates Inc., Publishers, Sunderland, MA, USA.
35. Hoelzer G (1997) Inferring phylogenies from mtDNA variation: mitochondrial-gene trees versus nuclear-gene trees revisited. Evolution, 51, 622-626.
36. Howard JH, Seeb LW, Wallace R (1993) Genetic variation and population divergence in the Plethodon vandykei species group. Herpetologica, 49, 238-247.
37. Hutchison DW, Templeton AR (1999) Correlation of pairwise generic and geographic distance measures: inferring the relative influences of gene flow and drift on the distribution of genetic variability. Evolution, 53, 1898-1914.
38. Jack PL, Dimitrijevic T, Mayes S (1995) assessment of nuclear, mitochondrial and chloroplast RFLP markers in oil palm (Elaeis-guineensis jacq). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 90, 643-649.
39. Janzen FJ, Krenz JG, Haselkorn TS, Brodie ED (2002) Molecular phylogeography of common garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis) in western North America: implications for regional historical forces. Molecular Ecology, 11, 1739-1751.
40. Kimura M, Crow J (1963) The measurement of effective population number. Evolution, 17, 279-288.
41. Kosuch J, Vences M, Dubois A, Ohler A, Bohme W (2001) Out of Asia: mitochondrial DNA evidence for an oriental origin of tiger frogs, genus Hoplobatrachus. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 21, 398-407.
42. Lande R (1995) Breeding plans for small populations based on the dynamics of quantitative genetic variance. In: Population Management for Survival and Recovery: Analytical Methods and Strategies in Small Population Conservation (eds Ballou J, Gilpin M, Foose T), pp. 318-340. Columbia University Press, New York.
43. Macey J, Schulte J II, Larson A et al. (1998a) Phylogenetic relationships of toads in the Bufo bufo species group from the eastern escarpment of the Tibetan Plateau: a case of vicariance and dispersal. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 9, 80-87.
44. Macey J, Schulte IIJ, Ananjeva N et al. (1998b) Phylogenetic relationships among agamid lizards of the Laudakia caucasia species group: testing hypotheses of biogeographic fragmentation and an area cladogram for the Iranian Plateau. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 10, 118-131.
45. Macey J, Strasburg J, Brisson J, Vredenburg V, Jennings M, Larson A (2001) Molecular phylogenetics of western North American frogs of the Rana boylii species group. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 19, 131-143.
46. McKay JK, Latta RG (2002) Adaptive population divergence: markers, QTL and traits. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 17, 285-291.
47. Measey G (2001) Growth and ageing of feral Xenopus laevis (Daudin) in South Wales, UK. Journal of Zoology, 254, 547-555.
48. Melnick DJ, Hoelzer GA (1992) Differences in male and female macaque dispersal lead to contrasting distributions of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA variation. International Journal of Primatolgoy, 13, 1-25.
49. Moore W (1995) Inferring phylogenies from mtDNA variation: mitochondrial-gene trees versus nuclear-gene trees. Evolution, 49, 718-726.
50. Moritz C (1994) Defining 'evolutionarily significant units' for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 373-375.
51. Mulcahy DG, Mendelson JR (2000) Phylogeography and speciation of the morphologically variable, widespread species Bufo valliceps, based on molecular evidence from mtDNA. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 17, 173-189.
52. Nagae Y (1988) The primary and secondary structures of the ribosomal RNAs of Rana catesbeiana mitochondrion. Journal of the Nippon Medical School, 55, 417-430.
53. Nei M (1972) Genetic distance between populations. American Naturalist, 106, 283-292.
54. Nei M, Takahata N (1993) Effective population size, genetic diversity, and coalescence time in subdivided populations. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 37, 240-244.
55. Neigel J, Avise J (1986) Phylogenetic relationships of mitochondrial DNA under various demographic models of speciation. In: Evolutionary Processes and Theory (eds Nevo E, Karlin S). Academic Press, New York.
56. Nielson M, Lohman K, Sullivan J (2001) Evolution and phylogeography of the tailed frog (Ascaphus truei): insights on the biogeography of the Pacific Northwest. Evolution, 55, 147-160.
57. Nyakaana S, Arctander P (1999) Population genetic structure of the African elephant in Uganda based on variation at mitochondrial and nuclear loci: evidence for male-biased gene flow. Molecular Ecology, 8, 1105-1115.
58. Orita M, Iwahana H, Kanazawa H, Hayashi K, Sekiya T (1989) Detection of polymorphisms of human DNA by gel electrophoresis as single-strand conformation polymorphisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 86, 2766-2770.
59. Ostrander E, Sprague G, Rine J (1993) Identification and characterization of dinucleotide repeat (CA)n markers for genetic mapping in dog. Genomics, 16, 207-213.
60. Paetkau D (1999) Using genetics to identify intraspecific conservation units: a critique of current methods. Conservation Biology, 13, 1507-1509.
61. Paetkau D, Waits L, Clarkson P, Craighead L, Strobeck C (1997) An empirical evaluation of genetic distance statistics using microsatellite data from bear (Ursidae) populations. Genetics, 147, 1943-1957.
62. Page R (1996) TREEVIEW: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Computer Applications in the Biosciences, 12, 357-358.
63. Pennock D, Dimmick W (1997) Critique of the evolutionarily significant unit as a definition for 'distinct population segments' under the US endangered species act. Conservation Biology, 11, 611-619.
64. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP version 1.2: population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity, 86, 248-249.
65. Reaser J (2000) Demographic analysis of the Columbia spotted frog (Rana luteiventris): case study in spatiotemporal variation. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 78, 1158-1167.
66. Robertson A (1964) The effect of non-random mating within inbred lines on the rate of inbreeding. Genetic Research, 5, 164-167.
67. Ryder O (1986) Species conservation and systematics: the dilemma of subspecies. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 1, 9-10.
68. Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L (2000) ARLEQUIN, version 2.000: a Software for Population Genetic Data Analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
69. Shaffer HB, Fellers G, Magee A, Voss R (2000) The genetics of amphibian declines: population substructure and molecular differentiation in the Yosemite toad, Bufo canorus (Anura, Bufonidae) based on single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis (SSCP) and mitochondrial DNA sequence data. Molecular Ecology, 9, 245-257.
70. Slatkin M (1985) Rare alleles as indicators of gene flow. Evolution, 39, 53-65.
71. Slatkin M (1995) A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics, 139, 457-462.
72. Slatkin M, Barton NH (1989) A comparison of three indirect methods for estimating average levels of gene flow. Evolution, 43, 1349-1368.
73. Soltis D, Gitzendanner M, Strenge D, Soltis P (1997) Chloroplast DNA intraspecific phylogeography of plants from the Pacific Northwest of North America. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 206, 353-373.
74. Spolsky C, Phillips C, Uzzell T (1992) Antiquity of clonal salamander lineages revealed by mitochondrial DNA. Nature, 356, 706-708.
75. Spruell P, Hemmingsen AR, Howell PJ, Kanda N, Allendorf FW (2003) Conservation genetics of bull trout: geographic distribution of variation at microsatellite loci. Conservation Genetics, 4, 17-29.
76. Steinhoff RJ, Joyce DG, Fins L (1983) Isozyme variation in Pinus monticola. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 13, 122-1132.
77. Strenge D (1994) The intraspecific phylogeography of Polystichum munitum and Alnus rubra. MSc Thesis, Washington State University.
78. Takezaki N, Nei M (1996) Genetic distance and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite DNA. Genetics, 144, 389-399.
79. Taylor B, Dizon E (1999) First policy then science: why a management unit based solely on genetic criteria cannot work. Molecular Ecology, 8, S11-S16.
80. Templeton A, Crandall K, Sing C (1992) A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics, 132, 619-633.
81. US Department of the Interior and US Department of Commerce (1996) Policy regarding the recognition of distinct vertebrate population segments under the endangered species act. Federal Register, 61, 4722-4725.
82. Waitt R, Thorson R (1983) The Cordilleran ice sheet in Washington, Idaho, and Montana. In: Late Quaternary Environments of the United States, vol. 1. The Late Pleistocene (eds Wright H Jr, Porter S), pp. 53-70. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
83. Waldman B, McKinnon J (1993) Inbreeding and outbreeding in fishes, amphibians, and reptiles. In: A Natural History of Inbreeding and Outbreeding, Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives (ed. Wilmsen Thornhill N), pp. 250-282. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.
84. Waples R (1991) Pacific salmon, Oncorhynchus spp. and the definition of 'species' under the endangered species act. US National Marine Fisheries Service Marine Fisheries Review, 53, 11-22.
85. Waples R (1995) Evolutionarily significant units and the conservation of biological diversity under the endangered species act. American Fisheries Society Symposium, 17, 8-27.
86. Waples R (1998) Evolutionarily significant units, distinct population segments, and the endangered species act: reply to Pennock and Dimmick. Conservation Biology, 12, 718-721.
87. Weir B, Cockerham C (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution, 38, 1358-1370.
88. ST does not equal 1/4Nm + 1. Heredity, 82, 117-125.
89. Wilkinson J, Matsui M, Terachi T (1996) Geographic variation in a Japanese tree frog (Rhacophorus arboreus) revealed by PCR-aided restriction site analysis of mtDNA. Journal of Herpetology, 30, 418-423.
90. Wright S (1951) The genetical structure of populations. Annals of Eugenetics, 15, 323-354.
91. Wright S (1965) The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution, 19, 395-420.
92. Yang Y, Yao-Sung L, Wu J, Hui C (1994) Variation in mitochondrial DNA and population structure of the Taipei tree frog Rhacophorus taipeinus Taiwan. Molecular Ecology, 3, 219-228.
93. Yoneyama Y (1987) The nucleotide sequences of the heavy and light strand replication origins of the Rana catesbeiana mitochondrial genome. Nippon Ika Daigaku Zasshi, 54, 429-440.
94. Zamudio K, Greene H (1997) Phylogeography of the bushmaster (Lachesis muta: Viperidae): implications for neotropical biogeography, systematics, and conservation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 62, 421-442.