Modelling substrate specificity and enantioselectivity for lipases and esterases by substrate-imprinted docking

BMC Structural Biology

Volumn 9, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Juhl, P Benjamin ^a   Trodler, Peter ^a   Tyagi, Sadhna ^a   Pleiss, Jürgen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETYLCHOLINESTERASE; CHOLINESTERASE; ESTERASE; LIPASE B; TRIACYLGLYCEROL LIPASE;

ARTICLE; BURKHOLDERIA CEPACIA; CANDIDA ANTARCTICA; CANDIDA RUGOSA; ENANTIOSELECTIVITY; ENZYME STRUCTURE; GEOMETRY; MOLECULAR DOCKING; BINDING SITE; BIOLOGY; CANDIDA; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; ENZYMOLOGY; METHODOLOGY;

BURKHOLDERIA CEPACIA; CANDIDA ANTARCTICA; CANDIDA RUGOSA;

BINDING SITES; BURKHOLDERIA CEPACIA; CANDIDA; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; ESTERASES; LIPASE; MODELS, CHEMICAL; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY;

EID: 67649544350     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726807     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6807-9-39     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. The Protein Data Bank. HM Berman J Westbrook Z Feng G Gilliland TN Bhat H Weissig IN Shindyalov PE Bourne, Nucleic Acids Res 2000 28 235 242 10592235 (Pubitemid 30047768)
2. MODBASE: a database of annotated comparative protein structure models and associated resources. U Pieper N Eswar FP Davis H Braberg MS Madhusudhan A Rossi M Marti-Renom R Karchin BM Webb D Eramian MY Shen L Kelly F Melo A Sali, Nucleic Acids Res 2006 34 Database D291 D295 16381869
3. Computational approaches to model ligand selectivity in drug design. AR Ortiz P Gomez-Puertas A Leo-Macias P Lopez-Romero ELV nas A Morreale M Murcia K Wang, Curr Top Med Chem 2006 6 41 55 16454757
4. Ligand docking and structure-based virtual screening in drug discovery. CN Cavasotto AJW Orry, Curr Top Med Chem 2007 7 1006 1014 17508934 (Pubitemid 47040528)
5. Prediction and assignment of function for a divergent N-succinyl amino acid racemase. L Song C Kalyanaraman AA Fedorov EV Fedorov ME Glasner S Brown HJ Imker PC Babbitt SC Almo MP Jacobson JA Gerlt, Nat Chem Biol 2007 3 486 491 17603539 (Pubitemid 47080369)
6. Structure-based activity prediction for an enzyme of unknown function. JC Hermann R Marti-Arbona AA Fedorov E Fedorov SC Almo BK Shoichet FM Raushel, Nature 2007 448 775 779 17603473 (Pubitemid 47266333)
7. Ligand selectivity and competition between enzymes in silico. A Macchiarulo I Nobeli JM Thornton, Nat Biotechnol 2004 22 1039 1045 15286657 (Pubitemid 39014486)
8. Molecular docking for substrate identification: the short-chain dehydrogenases/reductases. AD Favia I Nobeli F Glaser JM Thornton, J Mol Biol 2008 375 855 874 18036612
9. Virtual screening against metalloenzymes for inhibitors and substrates. JJ Irwin FM Raushel BK Shoichet, Biochemistry 2005 44 12316 12328 16156645 (Pubitemid 41324325)
10. Virtual screening against highly charged active sites: identifying substrates of alpha-beta barrel enzymes. C Kalyanaraman K Bernacki MP Jacobson, Biochemistry 2005 44 2059 2071 15697231 (Pubitemid 40223633)
11. Predicting substrates by docking high-energy intermediates to enzyme structures. JC Hermann E Ghanem Y Li FM Raushel JJ Irwin BK Shoichet, J Am Chem Soc 2006 128 15882 15891 17147401 (Pubitemid 44894131)
12. Transition-State Docking of Flunitrazepam and Progesterone in Cytochrome P450. P Rydberg SM Hansen J Kongsted PO Norrby L Olsen U Ryde, J Chem Theory Comput 2008 4 673 681
13. Lipases: Interfacial Enzymes with Attractive Applications. RD Schmid R Verger, Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 1998 37 1608 1633
14. Production and applications of esterases. T Panda BS Gowrishankar, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2005 67 160 169 15630579 (Pubitemid 40598020)
15. UT Bornscheuer RJ Kazlauskas, Hydrolases in Organic Synthesis Weinheim: WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA 2 2006
16. A serine protease triad forms the catalytic centre of a triacylglycerol lipase. L Brady AM Brzozowski ZS Derewenda E Dodson G Dodson S Tolley JP Turkenburg L Christiansen B Huge-Jensen L Norskov, Nature 1990 343 767 770 2304552
17. Structure of human pancreatic lipase. FK Winkler A D'Arcy W Hunziker, Nature 1990 343 771 774 2106079
18. Computer simulations of enzyme catalysis: finding out what has been optimized by evolution. A Warshel J Florián, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998 95 5950 5955 9600897 (Pubitemid 28248944)
19. Structural reorganization and preorganization in enzyme active sites: comparisons of experimental and theoretically ideal active site geometries in the multistep serine esterase reaction cycle. AJT Smith R Müller MD Toscano P Kast HW Hellinga D Hilvert KN Houk, J Am Chem Soc 2008 130 15361 15373 18939839
20. Stereoselectivity of Pseudomonas cepacia lipase toward secondary alcohols: a quantitative model. T Schulz J Pleiss RD Schmid, Protein Sci 2000 9 1053 1062 10892799 (Pubitemid 30419141)
21. Biochemical profiling in silico-predicting substrate specificities of large enzyme families. S Tyagi J Pleiss, J Biotechnol 2006 124 108 116 16519956 (Pubitemid 43816138)
22. Flexible docking allowing induced fit in proteins: Insights from an open to closed conformational isomers. B Sandak HJ Wolfson R Nussinov, Proteins 1998 32 159 174 9714156 (Pubitemid 28363898)
23. Target flexibility: an emerging consideration in drug discovery and design. P Cozzini GE Kellogg F Spyrakis DJ Abraham G Costantino A Emerson F Fanelli H Gohlke LA Kuhn GM Morris M Orozco TA Pertinhez M Rizzi CA Sotriffer, J Med Chem 2008 51 6237 6255 18785728
24. Ligand Docking to Proteins with Discrete Side-Chain Flexibility. AR Leach, J Mol Biol 1994 235 345 356 8289255 (Pubitemid 24049519)
25. Receptor flexibility in de novo ligand design and docking. IL Alberts NP Todorov PM Dean, J Med Chem 2005 48 6585 6596 16220975 (Pubitemid 41504716)
26. Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. HA Gabb RM Jackson MJE Sternberg, J Mol Biol 1997 272 106 120 9299341 (Pubitemid 27395541)
27. Fully automated flexible docking of ligands into flexible synthetic receptors using forward and inverse docking strategies. A Kamper J Apostolakis M Rarey CM Marian T Lengauer, J Chem Inf Model 2006 46 903 911 16563022
28. Unveiling the full potential of flexible receptor docking using multiple crystallographic structures. X Barril SD Morley, J Med Chem 2005 48 4432 4443 15974595 (Pubitemid 40884945)
29. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: Considering protein structural variations in molecular docking. SY Huang XQ Zou, Proteins 2007 66 399 421 17096427
30. FlexE: Efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations. H Claussen C Buning M Rarey T Lengauer, J Mol Biol 2001 308 377 395 11327774 (Pubitemid 33043576)
31. The sensitivity of the results of molecular docking to induced fit effects: Application to thrombin, thermolysin and neuraminidase. CW Murray CA Baxter AD Frenkel, J Comput Aided Mol Des 1999 13 547 562 10584214 (Pubitemid 29524912)
32. Flexible relaxation of rigid-body docking solutions. M Krl AL Tournier PA Bates, Proteins 2007 68 159 169 17397060 (Pubitemid 46871590)
33. Molecular flexibility in ab initio drug docking to DNA: binding-site and binding-mode transitions in all-atom Monte Carlo simulations. R Rohs I Bloch H Sklenar Z Shakked, Nucleic Acids Res 2005 33 7048 7057 16352865 (Pubitemid 43125074)
34. A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. M Rarey B Kramer T Lengauer G Klebe, J Mol Biol 1996 261 470 489 8780787 (Pubitemid 26335901)
35. Evaluation of the FLEXX incremental construction algorithm for protein-ligand docking. B Kramer M Rarey T Lengauer, Proteins 1999 37 228 241 10584068 (Pubitemid 29503004)
36. An S-selective lipase was created by rational redesign and the enantioselectivity increased with temperature. AO Magnusson M Takwa A Hamberg K Hult, Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2005 44 4582 4585 15973755 (Pubitemid 41026397)
37. Information decay in molecular docking screens against holo, apo, and modeled conformations of enzymes. SL McGovern BK Shoichet, J Med Chem 2003 46 2895 2907 12825931 (Pubitemid 36775915)
38. Lessons in molecular recognition: The effects of ligand and protein flexibility on molecular docking accuracy. JA Erickson M Jalaie DH Robertson RA Lewis M Vieth, J Med Chem 2004 47 45 55 14695819 (Pubitemid 38040489)
39. Hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic interactions, and failure of the rigid receptor hypothesis. AM Davis SJ Teague, Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 1999 38 737 749 (Pubitemid 129701960)
40. Structure selection for protein kinase docking and virtual screening: Homology models or crystal structures? WM Rockey AH Elcock, Curr Protein Pept Sci 2006 7 437 457 17073695 (Pubitemid 44524492)
41. Do enzymes recognise remotely located stereocentres? Highly enantioselective Candida rugosa lipase-catalysed esterification of the 2- to 8-methyldecanoic acids. E Hedenström BV Nguyen A Louis I Silks, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2002 13 835 844 (Pubitemid 34607038)
42. Optical resolution of racemic 2-hydroxy octanoic acid using biphasic enzyme membrane reactor. K Sakaki S Hara N Itoh, Desalination 2002 149 247 252 (Pubitemid 35162072)
43. Ester sythesis from alpha-substituted carboxylic acid catalyzed by polyethylene glycol-modified lipase from Candida cylindracea in benzene. Y Kodera K Takahashi H Nishimura A Matsushima Y Saito Y Inada, Biotechnol Lett 1986 8 881 884 (Pubitemid 17214522)
44. Analogs of reaction intermediates identify a unique substrate binding site in Candida rugosa lipase. P Grochulski F Bouthillier RJ Kazlauskas AN Serreqi JD Schrag E Ziomek M Cygler, Biochemistry 1994 33 3494 3500 8142346 (Pubitemid 24115996)
45. Parallel Mechanisms in Acetylcholinesterase-Catalyzed Hydrolysis of Choline Esters. T Selwood SR Feaster MJ States AN Pryor DM Quinn, J Am Chem Soc 1993 115 10477 10482 (Pubitemid 23955148)
46. S Moralev E Rozengart, Comparative Enzymology of Cholinesterases La Jolla: International University Line; 2007
47. Crystal structure of human butyrylcholinesterase and of its complexes with substrate and products. Y Nicolet O Lockridge P Masson JC Fontecilla-Camps F Nachon, J Biol Chem 2003 278 41141 41147 12869558 (Pubitemid 37280939)
48. Substrate entropy in enzyme enantioselectivity: an experimental and molecular modeling study of a lipase. J Ottosson L Fransson K Hult, Protein Sci 2002 11 1462 1471 12021445 (Pubitemid 34547218)
49. Solvent effect on lipase enantioselectivity. Evidence for the presence of two thermodynamic states. PL Overbeeke JA Jongejan JJ Heijnen, Biotechnol Bioeng 2000 70 278 290 10992232 (Pubitemid 30796149)
50. Size as a parameter for solvent effects on Candida antarctica lipase B enantioselectivity. J Ottosson L Fransson JW King K Hult, Biochim Biophys Acta 2002 1594 325 334 11904228 (Pubitemid 34251227)
51. Side-chain flexibility in protein-ligand binding: the minimal rotation hypothesis. MI Zavodszky LA Kuhn, Protein Sci 2005 14 1104 1114 15772311 (Pubitemid 40389381)
52. Strain in protein structures as viewed through nonrotameric side chains: II. effects upon ligand binding. J Heringa P Argos, Proteins 1999 37 44 55 10451549 (Pubitemid 29408918)
53. Rapid computational identification of the targets of protein kinase inhibitors. WM Rockey AH Elcock, J Med Chem 2005 48 4138 4152 15943486 (Pubitemid 40800621)
54. Comparative Protein Structure Modeling and Its Applications to Drug Discovery. M Jacobson A Sali, Annu Rep Med Chem 2004 39 259 276
55. Reaction products of acetylcholinesterase and VX reveal a mobile histidine in the catalytic triad. C Millard G Koellner A Ordentlich A Shafferman I Silman J Sussman, J Am Chem Soc 1999 121 9883 9884 (Pubitemid 29517432)
56. SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling. N Guex MC Peitsch, Electrophoresis 1997 18 2714 2723 9504803 (Pubitemid 28059943)
57. Comparative Protein Modelling by Satisfaction of Spatial Restraints. A Sali TL Blundell, J Mol Biol 1993 234 779 815 8254673
58. Rapid Comparison of Protein Structures. AD McLachlan, Acta Crystallogr A 1982 38 871 873
59. Surface and electrostatics of cutinases. MT Petersen P Martel EI Petersen F Drabløs SB Petersen, Methods Enzymol 1997 284 130 154 9379931 (Pubitemid 27381572)
60. PCE: web tools to compute protein continuum electrostatics. MA Miteva P Tufféry BO Villoutreix, Nucleic Acids Res 2005 33 Web Server W372 W375 15980492
61. The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure. HJ Böhm, J Comput Aided Mol Des 1994 8 243 256 7964925
62. A 2nd generation force-field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic-acids, and organic-molecule. WD Cornell P Cieplak CI Baylb KM Merz DM Ferguson DC Spellmeyer T Fox JW Caldwell PA Kollmann, J Am Chem Soc 1995 117 5179 5197
63. A well-behaved electrostatic potential based method using charge restraints for determining atom-centered charges: The RESP model. C Bayly P Cieplak W Cornell P Kollman, J Phys Chem 1993 97 10269 10280
64. An approach to computing electrostatic charges for molecules. UC Singh PA Kollman, J Comput Chem 1984 5 129 145
65. Atomic charges derived from semiempirical methods. BH Besler KMM Jr PA Kollman, J Comput Chem 1990 11 431 439
66. AMBER 9. D Case T Darden T Cheatham C Simmerling J Wang R Duke R Luo K Merz D Pearlman M Crowley R Walker W Zhang B Wang S Hayik A Roitberg G Seabra K Wong F Paesani X Wu S Brozell V Tsui H Gohlke L Yang C Tan J Mongan V Homak G Cui P Beroza D Mathews C Schafmeister W Ross P Kollman, Tech. rep., University of California, San Francisco 2006
67. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. W Jorgensen J Chandrasekhar J Madura R Impey M Klein, J Chem Phys 1983 79 926 935