Molecular Docking for Substrate Identification: The Short-Chain Dehydrogenases/Reductases

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 375, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 855-874

  Favia, Angelo D ^a   Nobeli, Irene ^b   Glaser, Fabian ^a   Thornton, Janet M ^a  

^a WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

chemoinformatics; docking; protein substrate interaction; short chain dehydrogenases reductases; substrate identification

Indexed keywords

OXIDOREDUCTASE;

ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; ENZYME ANALYSIS; ENZYME METABOLISM; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR DOCKING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; SCORING SYSTEM;

RUMEX;

EID: 37449004656     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.10.065     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Chance M.R., Bresnick A.R., Burley S.K., Jiang J.S., Lima C.D., Sali A., et al. Structural genomics: a pipeline for providing structures for the biologist. Protein Sci. 11 (2002) 723-738
2. Stevens R.C., Yokoyama S., and Wilson I.A. Global efforts in structural genomics. Science 294 (2001) 89-92
3. Brenner S.E. A tour of structural genomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2 (2001) 801-809
4. Burley S.K. An overview of structural genomics. Nat. Struct. Biol. (2000) 932-934
5. Burley S.K., Almo S.C., Bonanno J.B., Capel M., Chance M.R., Gaasterland T., et al. Structural genomics: beyond the human genome project. Nat. Genet. 23 (1999) 151-157
6. Watson J.D., Laskowski R.A., and Thornton J.M. Predicting protein function from sequence and structural data. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 15 (2005) 275-284
7. Jorgensen W.L. The many roles of computation in drug discovery. Science 303 (2004) 1813-1818
8. Brooijmans N., and Kuntz I.D. Molecular recognition and docking algorithms. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 32 (2003) 335-373
9. Shoichet B.K., McGovern S.L., Wei B., and Irwin J.J. Lead discovery using molecular docking. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 6 (2002) 439-446
10. Hermann J.C., Ghanem E., Li Y., Raushel F.M., Irwin J.J., and Shoichet B.K. Predicting substrates by docking high-energy intermediates to enzyme structures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128 (2006) 15882-15891
11. Kalyanaraman C., Bernacki K., and Jacobson M.P. Virtual screening against highly charged active sites: identifying substrates of alpha-beta barrel enzymes. Biochemistry 44 (2005) 2059-2071
12. Bernacki K., Kalyanaraman C., and Jacobson M.P. Virtual ligand screening against Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase: improving docking enrichment using physics-based methods. J. Biomol. Screening 10 (2005) 675-681
13. Macchiarulo A., Nobeli I., and Thornton J.M. Ligand selectivity and competition between enzymes in silico. Nat. Biotechnol. 22 (2004) 1039-1045
14. Hermann J.C., Marti-Arbona R., Fedorov A.A., Fedorov E., Almo S.C., Shoichet B.K., and Raushel F.M. Structure-based activity prediction for an enzyme of unknown function. Nature 448 (2007) 775-779
15. Cummings M.D., DesJarlais R.L., Gibbs A.C., Mohan V., and Jaeger E.P. Comparison of automated docking programs as virtual screening tools. J. Med. Chem. 48 (2005) 962-976
16. Cole J.C., Murray C.W., Nissink J.W., Taylor R.D., and Taylor R. Comparing protein-ligand docking programs is difficult. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 60 (2005) 325-332
17. Perola E., Walters W.P., and Charifson P.S. A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 56 (2004) 235-249
18. Bursulaya B.D., Totrov M., Abagyan R., and Brooks III C.L. Comparative study of several algorithms for flexible ligand docking. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 17 (2003) 755-763
19. Wang R., Lu Y., and Wang S. Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking. J. Med. Chem. 46 (2003) 2287-2303
20. Warren G.L., Andrews C.W., Capelli A.M., Clarke B., LaLonde J., Lambert M.H., et al. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. J. Med. Chem. 49 (2006) 5912-5931
21. Persson B., Kallberg Y., Oppermann U., and Jornvall H. Coenzyme-based functional assignments of short-chain dehydrogenases/reductases (SDRs). Chem. Biol. Interact. 143-144 (2003) 271-278
22. Oppermann U., Filling C., Hult M., Shafqat N., Wu X., Lindh M., et al. Short-chain dehydrogenases/reductases (SDR): the 2002 update. Chem. Biol. Interact. 143-144 (2003) 247-253
23. Kallberg Y., Oppermann U., Jornvall H., and Persson B. Short-chain dehydrogenases/reductases (SDRs). Eur. J. Biochem. 269 (2002) 4409-4417
24. Kallberg Y., Oppermann U., Jornvall H., and Persson B. Short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR) relationships: a large family with eight clusters common to human, animal, and plant genomes. Protein Sci. 11 (2002) 636-641
25. Morris G.M., Goodsell D.S., Halliday R.S., Huey R., Hart W.E., Belew R.K., and Olson A.J. Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. J. Comput. Chem. 19 (1998) 1639-1662
26. Glide, Version 4.5. (2007). Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY.
27. Su A.I., Lorber D.M., Weston G.S., Baase W.A., Matthews B.W., and Shoichet B.K. Docking molecules by families to increase the diversity of hits in database screens: computational strategy and experimental evaluation. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 42 (2001) 279-293
28. Berman H.M., Westbrook J., Feng Z., Gilliland G., Bhat T.N., Weissig H., et al. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28 (2000) 235-242
29. + and inhibitor mercaptoethanol at 1.7 A resolution for understanding of chiral substrate recognition mechanisms. J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 129 (2001) 205-208
30. Koropatkin N.M., Liu H.W., and Holden H.M. High resolution X-ray structure of tyvelose epimerase from Salmonella typhi. J. Biol. Chem. 278 (2003) 20874-20881
31. Benach J., Atrian S., Gonzalez-Duarte R., and Ladenstein R. The refined crystal structure of Drosophila lebanonensis alcohol dehydrogenase at 1.9 A resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 282 (1998) 383-399
32. Benach J., Winberg J.O., Svendsen J.S., Atrian S., Gonzalez-Duarte R., and Ladenstein R. Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenase: acetate-enzymeinteractions and novel insights into the effects of electrostatics on catalysis. J. Mol. Biol. 345 (2005) 579-598
33. Edgar R.C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32 (2004) 1792-1797
34. Jung J., and Lee B. Protein structure alignment using environmental profiles. Protein Eng. 13 (2000) 535-543
35. Somers W.S., Stahl M.L., and Sullivan F.X. GDP-fucose synthetase from Escherichia coli: structure of a unique member of the short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase family that catalyzes two distinct reactions at the same active site. Structure 6 (1998) 1601-1612
36. Thoden J.B., Wohlers T.M., Fridovich-Keil J.L., and Holden H.M. Crystallographic evidence for Tyr 157 functioning as the active site base in human UDP-galactose 4-epimerase. Biochemistry 39 (2000) 5691-5701
37. 2 +-dependent dimerization mode. Structure 10 (2002) 773-786
38. Allard S.T., Beis K., Giraud M.F., Hegeman A.D., Gross J.W., Wilmouth R.C., et al. Toward a structural understanding of the dehydratase mechanism. Structure 10 (2002) 81-92
39. Thoden J.B., Hegeman A.D., Wesenberg G., Chapeau M.C., Frey P.A., and Holden H.M. Structural analysis of UDP-sugar binding to UDP-galactose 4-epimerase from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 36 (1997) 6294-6304
40. Hadfield A.T., Limpkin C., Teartasin W., Simpson T.J., Crosby J., and Crump M.P. The crystal structure of the actIII actinorhodin polyketide reductase: proposed mechanism for ACP and polyketide binding. Structure 12 (2004) 1865-1875
41. Orengo C.A., Pearl F.M., and Thornton J.M. The CATH domain structure database. Methods Biochem. Anal. 44 (2003) 249-271
42. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (2005), R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria ISBN 3-900051-07-0
43. LigPrep, Version 2.0 (2005), Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY
44. Tanaka N., Nonaka T., Nakanishi M., Deyashiki Y., Hara A., and Mitsui Y. Crystal structure of the ternary complex of mouse lung carbonyl reductase at 1.8 A resolution: the structural origin of coenzyme specificity in the short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase family. Structure 4 (1996) 33-45
45. Gunasekaran K., and Nussinov R. How different are structurally flexible and rigid binding sites? Sequence and structural features discriminating proteins that do and do not undergo conformational change upon ligand binding. J. Mol. Biol. 365 (2007) 257-273
46. Hammes G.G. Multiple conformational changes in enzyme catalysis. Biochemistry 41 (2002) 8221-8228
47. Joseph D., Petsko G.A., and Karplus M. Anatomy of a conformational change: hinged "lid" motion of the triosephosphate isomerase loop. Science 249 (1990) 1425-1428
48. Koshland Jr. D.E. Correlation of Structure and Function in Enzyme Action. Science 142 (1963) 1533-1541
49. Sherman W., Day T., Jacobson M.P., Friesner R.A., and Farid R. Novel procedure for modeling ligand/receptor induced fit effects. J. Med. Chem. 49 (2006) 534-553
50. + binary complex from Agaricus bisporus. J. Biol. Chem. 276 (2001) 27555-27561
51. + and a C16 fatty acyl substrate. J. Biol. Chem. 274 (1999) 15582-15589
52. El-Kabbani O., Ishikura S., Darmanin C., Carbone V., Chung R.P., Usami N., and Hara A. Crystal structure of human l-xylulose reductase holoenzyme: probing the role of Asn107 with site-directed mutagenesis. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 55 (2004) 724-732
53. Prime, Version 1.6 (2007), Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY
54. Bostrom J., Hogner A., and Schmitt S. Do structurally similar ligands bind in a similar fashion?. J. Med. Chem. 49 (2006) 6716-6725
55. Tyagi S., and Pleiss J. Biochemical profiling in silico-predicting substrate specificities of large enzyme families. J. Biotechnol. 124 (2006) 108-116
56. Hartshorn M.J., Verdonk M.L., Chessari G., Brewerton S.C., Mooij W.T., Mortenson P.N., and Murray C.W. Diverse, high-quality test set for the validation of protein-ligand docking performance. J. Med. Chem. 50 (2007) 726-741
57. Huey R., Morris G.M., Olson A.J., and Goodsell D.S. A semiempirical free energy force field with charge-based desolvation. J. Comput. Chem. 28 (2007) 1145-1152
58. Borrelli K.W., Vitalis A., Alcantara R., and Guallar V. PELE: Protein Energy Landscape Exploration. A novel Monte Carlo based technique. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 1 (2005) 1304-1311
59. Gervasio F.L., Laio A., and Parrinello M. Flexible docking in solution using metadynamics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 (2005) 2600-2607
60. Kanehisa M., Goto S., Kawashima S., and Nakaya A. The KEGG databases at GenomeNet. Nucleic Acids Res. 30 (2002) 42-46
61. Schomburg I., Chang A., Ebeling C., Gremse M., Heldt C., Huhn G., and Schomburg D. BRENDA, the enzyme database: updates and major new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 32 (2004) D431-D433
62. Gasteiger J., Rudolph C., and Sadowski J. Automatic generation of 3D-atomic coordinates for organic molecules. Tetrahedron Comput. Methodol. 3 (1990) 537-547
63. Steinbeck C., Han Y., Kuhn S., Horlacher O., Luttmann E., and Willighagen E. The Chemistry Development Kit (CDK): an open-source Java library for chemo- and bioinformatics. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 43 (2003) 493-500
64. Sanner M.F. Python: a programming language for software integration and development. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 17 (1999) 57-61
65. Schuttelkopf A.W., and van Aalten D.M. PRODRG: a tool for high-throughput crystallography of protein-ligand complexes. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 60 (2004) 1355-1363
66. Solis F.J., and Wets R.J.B. Minimization by random search techniques. Math. Oper. Res. 6 (1981) 19-30
67. Schrödinger Suite 2006 Induced Fit Docking Protocol (Glide version 4.0, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2005; Prime version 1.5, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2005).
68. Maestro, Version 8.0. (2007). Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY.