Breakpoint graphs and ancestral genome reconstructions

Genome Research

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 943-957

  Alekseyev, Max A ^a   Pevzner, Pavel A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE REARRANGEMENT; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MAMMALIAN GENETICS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE REARRANGEMENT; GENOME; PHYLOGENY;

CANIS FAMILIARIS; DIDELPHIDAE; MAMMALIA; PAN; RATTUS;

EID: 66049158304     PISSN: 10889051     EISSN: 15495469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gr.082784.108     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Alekseyev, M.A. 2008. Multi-break rearrangements and breakpoint reuses: From circular to linear genomes. J. Comput. Biol. 15: 1117-1131.
2. Alekseyev, M.A. and Pevzner, P.A. 2007. Whole genome duplications, multibreak rearrangements, and genome halving theorem. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pp. 665-679. SIAM, Philadelphia.
3. Alekseyev, M.A. and Pevzner, P.A. 2008. Multi-break rearrangements and chromosomal evolution. Theor. Comput. Sci. 395: 193-202.
4. Amrine-Madsen, H., Koepfli, K.-P., Wayne, R.K., and Springer, M.S. 2003. A new phylogenetic marker, apolipoprotein B, provides compelling evidence for eutherian relationships. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 28: 225-240.
5. Arnason, U., Adegoke, J.A., Bodin, K., Born, E.W., Esa, Y.B., Gullberg, A., Nilsson, M., Short, R.V., Xu, X., Janke, A., et al. 2002. Mammalian mitogenomic relationships and the root of the eutherian tree. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99: 8151-8156.
6. Bafna, V. and Pevzner, P.A. 1996. Genome rearrangement and sorting by reversals. SIAM J. Comput. 25: 272-289.
7. Bafna, V. and Pevzner, P.A. 1998. Sorting permutations by transpositions. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 11: 224-240.
8. Bailey, J., Baertsch, R., Kent, W., Haussler, D., and Eichler, E. 2004. Hotspots of mammalian chromosomal evolution. Genome Biol. 5: R23. doi: 10.1186/gb-2004-5-4-r23.
9. Bergeron, A., Mixtacki, J., and Stoye, J. 2006. A unifying view of genome rearrangements. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 4175: 163-173. (Pubitemid 44609667)
10. Blanchette, M. and Tompa, M. 2002. Discovery of regulatory elements by a computational method for phylogenetic footprinting. Genome Res. 12: 739-748. (Pubitemid 34546461)
11. Blanchette, M., Bourque, G., and Sankoff, D. 1997. Breakpoint phylogenies. Genome Inform. Ser. Workshop Genome Inform. 8: 25-34.
12. Bourque, G. and Pevzner, P.A. 2002. Genome-scale evolution: Reconstructing gene orders in the ancestral species. Genome Res. 12: 26-36.
13. Bourque, G., Pevzner, P.A., and Tesler, G. 2004. Reconstructing the genomic architecture of ancestral mammals: Lessons from human, mouse, and rat genomes. Genome Res. 14: 507-516.
14. Bourque, G., Zdobnov, E.M., Bork, P., Pevzner, P.A., and Tesler, G. 2005. Comparative architectures of mammalian and chicken genomes reveal highly variable rates of genomic rearrangements across different lineages. Genome Res. 15: 98-110.
15. Bourque, G., Tesler, G., and Pevzner, P.A. 2006. The convergence of cytogenetics and rearrangement-based models for ancestral genome reconstruction. Genome Res. 16: 311-313. (Pubitemid 43327499)
16. Bulazel, K., Ferreri, G., Eldridge, M., and O'Neill, R. 2007. Species-specific shifts in centromere sequence composition are coincident with breakpoint reuse in karyotypically divergent lineages. Genome Biol. 8: R170. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-8-r170.
17. Caceres, M., Sullivan, R.T., and Thomas, J.W. 2007. A recurrent inversion on the eutherian X chromosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104: 18571-18576. (Pubitemid 350210738)
18. Cannarozzi, G., Schneider, A., and Gonnet, G. 2007. A phylogenomic study of human, dog, and mouse. PLoS Comput. Biol. 3: e2. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi. 0030002.
19. Caprara, A. 1999a. Formulations and hardness of multiple sorting by reversals. In RECOMB 99: Proceedings of the Third Annual International Conference on Computational Molecular Biology, pp. 84-93. ACM, NewYork.
20. Caprara, A. 1999b. On the tightness of the alternating-cycle lower bound for sorting by reversals. J. Comb. Optim. 3: 149-182. (Pubitemid 129575312)
21. Cardone, M., Jiang, Z., D'Addabbo, P., Archidiacono, N., Rocchi, M., Eichler, E., and Ventura, M. 2008. Hominoid chromosomal rearrangements on 17q map to complex regions of segmental duplication. Genome Biol. 9: R28. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-2-r28.
22. Chaisson, M.J., Raphael, B.J., and Pevzner, P.A. 2006. Microinversions in mammalian evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103: 19824-19829. (Pubitemid 46037515)
23. Chauve, C. and Tannier, E. 2008. A methodological framework for the reconstruction of contiguous regions of ancestral genomes and its application to mammalian genomes. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4: e1000234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi. 1000234.
24. Deuve, J., Bennett, N., Britton-Davidian, J., and Robinson, T. 2008. Chromosomal phylogeny and evolution of the African mole-rats (Bathyergidae). Chromosome Res. 16: 57-74.
25. Froenicke, L., Caldes, M.G., Graphodatsky, A., Muller, S., Lyons, L.A., Robinson, T.J., Volleth, M., Yang, F., and Wienberg, J. 2006. Are molecular cytogenetics and bioinformatics suggesting diverging models of ancestral mammalian genomes? Genome Res. 16: 306-310.
26. Gordon, L., Yang, S., Tran-Gyamfi, M., Baggott, D., Christensen, M., Hamilton, A., Crooijmans, R., Groenen, M., Lucas, S., Ovcharenko, I., et al. 2007. Comparative analysis of chicken chromosome 28 provides new clues to the evolutionary fragility of gene-rich vertebrate regions. Genome Res. 17: 1603-1613.
27. Graur, D. 1993. Towards a molecular resolution of the ordinal phylogeny of the eutherian mammals. FEBS Lett. 325: 152-159. (Pubitemid 223028304)
28. Hannenhalli, S. and Pevzner, P. 1995. Transforming men into mouse (polynomial algorithm for genomic distance problem). In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 581-592.
29. Hannenhalli, S. and Pevzner, P. 1999. Transforming cabbage into turnip (polynomial algorithm for sorting signed permutations by reversals). JACM 46: 1-27.
30. Hinsch, H. and Hannenhalli, S. 2006. Recurring genomic breaks in independent lineages support genomic fragility. BMC Evol. Biol. 6: 90. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-6-90.
31. Huerta-Cepas, J., Dopazo, H., Dopazo, J., and Gabaldon, T. 2007. The human phylome. Genome Biol. 8: R109. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-6-r109.
32. Huttley, G.A., Wakefield, M.J., and Easteal, S. 2007. Rates of genome evolution and branching order from whole genome analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24: 1722-1730. (Pubitemid 47236694)
33. Janke, A., Feldmaier-Fuchs, G., Thomas, W.K., von Haeseler, A., and Paabo, S. 1994. The marsupial mitochondrial genome and the evolution of placental mammals. Genetics 137: 243-256.
34. Jorgensen, F., Hobolth, A., Hornshoj, H., Bendixen, C., Fredholm, M., and Schierup, M. 2005. Comparative analysis of protein coding sequences from human, mouse and the domesticated pig. BMC Biol. 3: 2. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-3-12
35. Kellis, M., Patterson, N., Endrizzi, M., Birren, B., and Lander, E.S. 2003. Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements. Nature 423: 241-254.
36. Kemkemer, C., Kohn, M., Kehrer-Sawatzki, H., Minich, P., Högel, J., Froenicke, L., and Hameister, H. 2006. Reconstruction of the ancestral ferungulate karyotype by electronic chromosome painting (E-painting). Chromosome Res. 14: 899-907. (Pubitemid 46144232)
37. Kikuta, H., Laplante, M., Navratilova, P., Komisarczuk, A.Z., Engstrom, P.G., Fredman, D., Akalin, A., Caccamo, M., Sealy, I., Howe, K., et al. 2007. Genomic regulatory blocks encompass multiple neighboring genes and maintain conserved synteny in vertebrates. Genome Res. 17: 545-555.
38. Kumar, S. and Hedges, S.B. 1998. A molecular timescale for vertebrate evolution. Nature 392: 917-920.
39. Lin, Y. and Moret, B.M. 2008. Estimating true evolutionary distances under the DCJ model. Bioinformatics 24: i114-i122.
40. Lunter, G. 2007. Dog as an outgroup to human and mouse. PLoS Comput. Biol. 3: e74. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030074.
41. Ma, J., Zhang, L., Suh, B.B., Raney, B.J., Burhans, R.C., Kent, J.W., Blanchette, M., Haussler, D., and Miller, W. 2006. Reconstructing contiguous regions of an ancestral genome. Genome Res. 16: 1557-1565.
42. Ma, J., Ratan, A., Raney, B.J., Suh, B.B., Miller, W., and Haussler, D. 2008. The infinite sites model of genome evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105: 14254-14261.
43. Madsen, O., Scally, M., Douady, C.J., Kao, D.J., DeBry, R.W., Adkins, R., Amrine, H.M., Stanhope, M.J., de Jong,W.W., Springer, M.S., et al. 2001. Parallel adaptive radiations in two major clades of placental mammals. Nature 409: 610-614.
44. Mehan, M.R., Almonte, M., Slaten, E., Freimer, N.B., Rao, P.N., and Ophoff, R.A. 2007. Analysis of segmental duplications reveals a distinct pattern of continuation-of-synteny between human and mouse genomes. Hum. Genet. 121: 93-100. (Pubitemid 46421145)
45. Mikkelsen, T.S.,Wakefield, M.J., Aken, B., Amemiya, C.T., Chang, J.L., Duke, S., Garber, M., Gentles, A.J., Goodstadt, L., Heger, A., et al. 2007. Genome of the marsupial Monodelphis domestica reveals innovation in non-coding sequences. Nature 447: 167-177.
46. Misawa, K. and Janke, A. 2003. Revisiting the Glires concept-Phylogenetic analysis of nuclear sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 28: 320-327. (Pubitemid 37435997)
47. Moret, B., Wyman, S., Bader, D.A., Warnow, T., and Yan, M. 2001. A new implementation and detailed study of breakpoint analysis. In Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, pp. 583-594. Hawaii.
48. Moret, B.M.E., Siepel, A.C., Tang, J., and Liu, T. 2002. Inversion medians outperform breakpoint medians in phylogeny reconstruction from gene-order data. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2452: 521-536.
49. Murphy, W.J., Eizirik, E., Johnson, W.E., Zhang, Y.P., Ryder, O.A., and O'Brien, S.J. 2001. Molecular phylogenetics and the origins of placental mammals. Nature 409: 614-618.
50. Murphy, W.J., Larkin, D.M., van der Wind, A.E., Bourque, G., Tesler, G., Auvil, L., Beever, J.E., Chowdhary, B.P., Galibert, F., Gatzke, L., et al. 2005. Dynamics of mammalian chromosome evolution inferred from multispecies comparative map. Science 309: 613-617.
51. Niimura, Y. and Nei, M. 2007. Extensive gains and losses of olfactory receptor genes in mammalian evolution. PLoS One 2: e708. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000708.
52. Ozery-Flato, M. and Shamir, R. 2003. Two notes on genome rearrangement. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol. 1: 71-94.
53. Pevzner, P.A. 2000. Computational molecular biology: An algorithmic approach. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
54. Pevzner, P.A. and Tesler, G. 2003. Human and mouse genomic sequences reveal extensive breakpoint reuse in mammalian evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100: 7672-7677. (Pubitemid 36760028)
55. Pontius, J.U., Mullikin, J.C., Smith, D.R., Lindblad-Toh, K., Gnerre, S., Clamp, M., Chang, J., Stephens, R., Neelam, B., Volfovsky, N., et al. 2007. Initial sequence and comparative analysis of the cat genome. Genome Res. 17: 1675-1689.
56. Poux, C., van Rheede, T., Madsen, O., and de Jong, W.W. 2002. Sequence gaps join mice and men: Phylogenetic evidence from deletions in two proteins. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19: 2035-2037.
57. Reyes, A., Gissi, C., Pesole, G., Catzeflis, F.M., and Saccone, C. 2000. Where do rodents fit? Evidence from the complete mitochondrial genome of Sciurus vulgaris. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17: 979-983. (Pubitemid 30346558)
58. Reyes, A., Gissi, C., Catzeflis, F., Nevo, E., Pesole, G., and Saccone, C. 2004. Congruent mammalian trees from mitochondrial and nuclear genes using Bayesian methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21: 397-403. (Pubitemid 38314627)
59. Rocchi, M., Archidiacono, N., and Stanyon, R. 2006. Ancestral genomes reconstruction: An integrated, multi-disciplinary approach is needed. Genome Res. 16: 1441-1444.
60. Ruiz-Herrera, A., Castresana, J., and Robinson, T.J. 2006. Is mammalian chromosomal evolution driven by regions of genome fragility? Genome Biol. 7: R115. doi: 10.1186/gb-2006-7-12-r115.
61. Sankoff, D. and Blanchette, M. 1998. Multiple genome rearrangement and breakpoint phylogeny. J. Comput. Biol. 5: 555-570. (Pubitemid 28436301)
62. Sankoff, D., Leduc, G., Antoine, N., Paquin, B., Lang, B.F., and Cedergren, R. 1992. Gene order comparisons for phylogenetic inference: Evolution of the mitochondrial genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 89: 6575-6579.
63. Shoshani, J. and McKenna, M.C. 1998. Higher taxonomic relationships among extant mammals based on morphology, with selected comparisons of results from molecular data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9: 572-584.
64. Tang, J. and Moret, B.M. 2003. Scaling up accurate phylogenetic reconstruction from gene-order data. Bioinformatics 19: i305-i312.
65. Tannier, E. and Sagot, M.-F. 2004. Sorting by reversals in subquadratic time. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 3109: 1-13. (Pubitemid 38945531)
66. Tannier, E., Zheng, C., and Sankoff, D. 2008. Multichromosomal genome median and halving problems. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics 5251: 1-13.
67. Tesler, G. 2002a. Efficient algorithms for multichromosomal genome rearrangements. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 65: 587-609.
68. Tesler, G. 2002b. GRIMM: Genome rearrangements web server. Bioinformatics 18: 492-493.
69. Thomas, J.W., Touchman, J.W., Blakesley, R.W., Bouffard, G.G., Beckstrom-Sternberg, S.M., Margulies, E.H., Blanchette, M., Siepel, A.C., Thomas, P.J., McDowell, J.C., et al. 2003. Comparative analyses of multispecies sequences from targeted genomic regions. Nature 424: 788-793.
70. van der Wind, A.E., Kata, S.R., Band, M.R., Rebeiz, M., Larkin, D.M., Everts, R.E., Green, C.A., Liu, L., Natarajan, S., Goldammer, T., et al. 2004. A 1463 gene cattle-human comparative map with anchor points defined by human genome sequence coordinates. Genome Res. 14: 1424-1437.
71. Webber, C. and Ponting, C.P. 2005. Hotspots of mutation and breakage in dog and human chromosomes. Genome Res. 15: 1787-1797. (Pubitemid 41780409)
72. Wienberg, J. and Stanyon, R. 1997. Comparative painting of mammalian chromosomes. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 7: 784-791. (Pubitemid 28051021)
73. Xia, A., Sharakhova, M., and Sharakhov, I. 2007. Reconstructing an inversion history in the Anopheles gambiae complex. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics 4751: 136-148.
74. Yancopoulos, S., Attie, O., and Friedberg, R. 2005. Efficient sorting of genomic permutations by translocation, inversion and block interchange. Bioinformatics 21: 3340-3346.
75. Yue, Y. and Haaf, T. 2006. 7E olfactory receptor gene clusters and evolutionary chromosome rearrangements. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 112: 6-10. (Pubitemid 41579449)
76. Zhao, H. and Bourque, G. 2007. Recovering true rearrangement events on phylogenetic trees. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics 4751: 149-161.
77. Zhao, H. and Bourque, G. 2009. Recovering genome rearrangements in the mammalian phylogeny. Genome Res. (this issue). doi: 10.1101/gr.086009.108.
78. Zhao, S., Shetty, J., Hou, L., Delcher, A., Zhu, B., Osoegawa, K., de Jong, P., Nierman, W.C., Strausberg, R.L., Fraser, C.M., et al. 2004. Human, mouse, and rat genome large-scale rearrangements: Stability versus speciation. Genome Res. 14: 1851-1860.