2D molecular graphics: A flattened world of chemistry and biology

Briefings in Bioinformatics

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 247-258

  Zhou, Peng ^a   Shang, Zhicai ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

2D molecular graphics; Bioinformatics; Chemical and biological system; Schematic diagram

Indexed keywords

MEMBRANE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; DNA SEQUENCE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; MOLECULAR IMAGING; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN NUCLEIC ACID INTERACTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; RNA STRUCTURE; STRUCTURAL BIOINFORMATICS;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PROTEINS; RNA; SOFTWARE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 65549165516     PISSN: 14675463     EISSN: 14774054     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbp013     Document Type: Article

References (142)

1. Ernesto Z. The Theory of Graphs in Linguistics. The Hague: Mouton Press, 1970.
2. Goodsell DS. Visual methods from atoms to cells. Structure 2005; 13:347-54.
3. Leach AR. Molecular Modelling: Principles and Applications (2nd Ed) UK: Pearson Education EMA, 2001.
4. Bensaude-Vincent B, Stengers I. A History of Chemistry. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997.
5. Chem Draw. CambridgeSoft Corp., MA, USA.
6. Symyx/Draw. Symyx Technologies, Inc., CA, USA.
7. Ogham. OpenEye Scientific Software, Inc., NM, USA.
8. Ihlenfeldt WD, Takahashi Y, Abe H, et al. Computation and management of chemical-properties in CACTVS: An extensible networked approach toward modularity and compatibility. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1994;34:109-16.
9. Clark AM, Labute P, Santavy M. 2D structure depiction. J Chem Inf Model 2006;46:1107-23.
10. Zimmerman BL. Computer-Generated Chemical Structural Formulas with Standard Ring Orientations, PhD Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 1971.
11. Wipke WT, Heller S, Feldmann R, et al. Computer Representation and Manipulation of Chemical Information. New York: Wiley, 1974.
12. Carhart RE. A model-based approach to the teletype printing of chemical structures.. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1976; 16:82-8.
13. Dittmar PG, Mockus J, Couvreur KM. An algorithmic computer graphics program for generating chemical structure diagrams. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1977;17:186-92.
14. Blake JE, Farmer NA, Haines RC. An interactive computer graphics system for processing chemical structure diagrams. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1977;17:223-8.
15. Shelley CA. Heuristic approach for displaying chemical structures. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1983;23:61-5.
16. Hibbert DB. Generation and display of chemical structures by genetic algorithms. Chemometr Intel Lab Syst 1993;20: 35-43.
17. Weininger D. SMILES. 3. DEPICT. Graphical depiction of chemical structures. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 1990;30:237-43.
18. Helson HE. Structure diagram generation. Rev Comput Chem 1999; 13:313-98.
19. Boissonnat JD, Cazals F, Flötotto J. 2D-structure drawings of similar molecules. Proc 8th Int Symp Graph Draw 2000; 115-126.
20. Fricker PC, Gastreich M, Rarey M. Automated drawing of structural molecular formulas under constraints. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2004;44:1065-78.
21. Maehr H. Graphic representation of configuration in two-dimensional space, current conventions, clarifications, and proposed extensions. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2002;42: 894-902.
22. Schüttelkopf AW, van Aalten DMF. PRODRG: A tool for high-throughput crystallography of protein-ligand complexes. Acta Cryst 2004; D60:1355-63.
23. Krause S, Willighagen E, Steinbeck C. JChemPaint, using the collaborative forces of the internet to develop a free editor for 2D chemical structures. Molecules 2000;5:93-8.
24. Trepalin SV, Yarkov AV, Pletnev IV, et al. A Java chemical structure editor supporting the modular chemical descriptor language (MCDL). Molecules 2006;11:219-231.
25. Crippen GM. Topology of globular proteins. J Theor Biol 1974;45 327-38.
26. Crippen GM. Topology of globular proteins. II. J Theor Biol 1975;51:495-500.
27. Gilbert D, Westhead D, Nagano N, et al. Motif-based searching in TOPS protein topology databases. Bioinformatics 1999;15 317-26.
28. Martin AC. The ups and downs of protein topology; rapid comparison of protein structure. Protein Eng 2000;13: 829-37.
29. Johannissen LO, Taylor WR. Protein fold comparison by the alignment of topological strings. Protein Eng 2003;12: 949-55.
30. Schulz GE, Schirmer RH. Topological comparison of adenyl kinase with other proteins. Nature 1974;250: 142-4.
31. Rossmann MG, Moras D, Olsen KW. Chemical and biological evolution of a nucleotide-binding protein. Nature 1974;250:194-9.
32. Levitt M, Chothia C. Structural patterns in globular proteins. Nature 1976;261:552-7.
33. Naganoa K. Logical analysis of the mechanism of protein folding. IV. Super-secondary structures. J Mol Biol 1977;109: 235-50.
34. Sternberga MJE, Thorntona JM. On the conformation of proteins: The handedness of the connection between parallel β-strands. J Mol Biol 1977;110:269-83.
35. Flores TP, Moss DS, Thornton JM. An algorithm for automatically generating protein topology cartoons. Protein Eng 1994;7 31-7.
36. Westhead DR, Hatton DC, Thornton JM. An atlas of protein topology cartoons available over the world wide web. Trends Biochem Sci 1998;23:35-6.
37. Westhead DR, Slidel TW, Flores TP, et al. Protein structural topology: Automated analysis and diagrammatic representation. Protein Sci 1999;8:897-904.
38. Michalopoulos I, Torrance GM, Gilbert DR, et al. TOPS: An enhanced database of protein structural topology. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:D251-4.
39. May P, Barthel S, Koch I. PTGL - a web-based database application for protein topologies. Bioinformatics 2004;20: 3277-9.
40. Jayaram H, Taraporewala Z, Patton JT, et al. Rotavirus protein involved in genome replication and packaging exhibits a HIT-like fold. Nature 2002;417:311-5.
41. Bewley MC, Graziano V, Jiang J, et al. Structures of wild-type and mutant human spermidine/spermine N1-acetyltransferase, a potential therapeutic drug target. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103 2063-8.
42. He X, Zhou J, Bartlam M, et al. Crystal structure of the polymerase PAC-PB1N complex from an avian influenza H5N1 virus. Nature 2008;454:1123-6.
43. Collaborative Computational Project. The CCP4 suite: Programs for protein crystallography. Acta Cryst 1994;D50: 760-3.
44. Bond CS. TopDraw: A sketchpad for protein structure topology cartoons. Bioinformatics 2003;19:311-2.
45. Richardson JS. β-sheet topology and the relatedness of proteins. Nature 1977;268:495-500.
46. Koch I, Kaden F, Selbig J. Analysis of protein sheet topologies by graph-theoretical methods. Proteins 1992;12: 314-23.
47. Flower DR. β-sheet topology. A new system of nomenclature. FEBS Lett 1994;344:247-50.
48. Grigoriev I, Mironov A, Rakhmaninova A. Inter-helical contacts determining the architecture of α-helical globular proteins. J Biomol Struct Dyn 1994;12:559-72.
49. Zhang C, Kim S-H. A comprehensive analysis of the Greek key motifs in protein β-barrels and β-sandwiches 2000;40: 409-19.
50. DeLano WL (2002), The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. DeLano Scientific, San Carlos, CA, USA.
51. Laskowski RA, Hutchinson EG, Michie AD, et al. PDBsum: A web-based database of summaries and analyses of all PDB structures. Trends Biochem Sci 1997;22: 488-90.
52. Luscombe NM, Laskowski RA, Westhead DR, et al. New tools and resources for analysing protein structures and their interactions. Acta Cryst 1998;D54:1132-8.
53. Delamarche C. Color and graphic display (CGD): Programs for multiple Sequence alignment analysis in spreadsheet software. BioTechniques 2000;29:100-7.
54. Li W, Godzik A. VISSA: A program to visualize structural features from structure sequence alignment. Bioinformatics 2006;22:887-8.
55. Kyte J, Doolittle RF. A simple method for displaying the hydrophathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol 1982;157: 105-32.
56. Ragone R, Facchiano F, Facchiano A, et al. Flexibility plot of proteins. Protein Eng 1989;2:497-504.
57. Laskowski RA, MacArthur MW, Moss DS, et al. PROCHECK - a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J Appl Crystallogr 1993;26: 283-91.
58. Genetics Computer Group, Science Drive, Madison, WI, USA.
59. Raghava GPS. A graphical web server for the analysis of protein sequences and alignment. Biotech Software Internet Rep 2001;2 255-8.
60. Todd AE, Orengo CA, Thornton JM. DOMPLOT: A program to generate schematic diagrams of the structural domain organization within proteins, annotated by ligand contacts. Protein Eng 1999;12 375-9.
61. Sipos B, Somogyi K, Andó I, et al. t2prhd: A tool to study the patterns of repeat evolution. BMC Bioinformatics 2008;9:27.
62. Kolodny R, Honig B. VISTAL - a new 2D visualization tool of protein 3D structural alignments. Bioinformatics 2006; 22:2166-7.
63. Wako H, Scheraga HA. Visualization of the nature of protein folding by a study of a distance constraint approach in two-dimensional models. Biopolymers 1982;21:611-32.
64. Konvicka K, Campagne F, Weinstein H. Interactive construction of residue-based diagrams of proteins: The RbDe web service. Protein Eng 2000;13:395-6.
65. Campagne F, Bettler E, Vriend G, et al. Batch mode generation of residue-based diagrams of proteins. Bioinformatics 2003;19 1854-5.
66. Skrabanek L, Campagne F, Weinstein H. Building protein diagrams on the web with the residue-based diagram editor RbDe. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:3856-8.
67. Kannan N, Schneider TD, Vishveshwara S. Logos for amino-acid preferences in different backbone packing density regions of protein structural classes. Acta Cryst 2000; D56:1156-65.
68. Connolly ML. Solvent-accessible surfaces of proteins and nucleic-acids. Science 1983;221:709-13.
69. Sanner MF, Olson AJ, Spehner JC. Reduced surface: An efficient way to compute molecular surfaces. Biopolymers 1996;38:305-20.
70. Hubbard SJ, Thornton, JM. NACCESS. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University College London, UK.
71. Pearlman RS, Skell JM. SAVOL3. College of Pharmacy, University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA.
72. Ahmad S, Wang J-Y, Gromiha MM, et al. Development of residue look-up tables and graphical representation of solvent accessibility in proteins. Genome Informatics 2003;14: 482-3.
73. Ahmad S, Gromiha M, Fawareh H, et al. ASAView: Database and tool for solvent accessibility representation in proteins. BMC Bioinformatics 2004;5:51.
74. Schneider TD, Stephens MR. Sequence logos: A new way to display consensus sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 1990;18: 6097-100.
75. Henikoff S, Henikoff JG, Alford WJ, et al. Automated construction and graphical presentation of protein blocks from unaligned sequences. Gene 1995;163:GC17-26.
76. Crooks GE, Hon G, Chandonia J-M, et al. WebLogo: A sequence logo generator. Genome Res 2004;14:1188-90.
77. Pérez-Bercoff Å, Koch J, Bürglin TR. LogoBar: Bar graph visualization of protein logos with gaps. Bioinformatics 2006; 22:112-4.
78. Hutchinson EG, Thornton JM. HERA - a program to draw schematic diagrams of protein secondary structures. Proteins 1990;8:203-12.
79. Tiwari A, Tiwari V. HBNG: Graph theory based visualization of hydrogen bond networks in protein structures. Bioinformation 2007;2 28-30.
80. Kikuchi T, Nemethy G, Scheraga H. Spatial geometric arrangements of disulfide-crosslinked loops in proteins. J Comput Chem 1986;7 61-88.
81. Kikuchi T, Nemethy G, Scheraga H. Spatial geometric arrangements of disulfide-crosslinked loops in non-planar proteins. J Comput Chem 1989;10:287-94.
82. Boisbouvier J, Blackledge M, Sollier A, et al. Simultaneous determination of disulphide bridge topology and three-dimensional structure using ambiguous intesulphur distance restraints: Possibilities and limitations. J Biomol NMR 2000;16:197-208.
83. Li X, Zou G, Yuan W, et al. Defining the native disulfide topology in the somatomedin B domain of human vitronectin. J Biol Chem 2007;282:5318-26.
84. Mao B. Molecular topology of multiple-disulfide polypeptide chains. J Am Chem Soc 1989;111:6132-6.
85. Benham CJ, Jafri MS. Disulfide bonding patterns and protein topologies. Protein Sci 1993;2:41-54.
86. Mao B, Chou K, Maggiora G. Topological analysis of hydrogen bonding in protein structure. Eur J Biochem 1990; 188:361-5.
87. Rossmann MG, Palmenberg AC. Conservation of the putative receptor attachment site in picornaviruses. Virology 1988;164:373-82.
88. Chapman MS. Mapping the surface properties of macro-molecules. Protein Sci 1993;2:459-69.
89. Stahl M, Taroni C, Schneider G. Mapping of protein surface cavities and prediction of enzyme class by a self-organizing neural network. Protein Eng 2000;13:83-8.
90. Lee W-P, Tzou W-S. Molecular surface directionality of the DNA-binding protein surface on the earth map. Genet Mol Biol 2006;29 408-12.
91. Gabdoulline RR, Wade RC, Walther D. MolSurfer: A macromolecular interface navigator. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31:3349-51.
92. Byrne B, Iwata S. Membrane protein complexes. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002;12:239-43.
93. Campagne F, Weinstein H. Schematic representation of residue-based protein context-dependent data: An application to transmembrane proteins. J Mol Graph Model 1999;17: 207-13.
94. Horn F, Weare J, Beukers MW, et al. GPCRDB: An information system for G protein-coupled receptors. Nucleic Acids Res 1998;26 275-9.
95. Campagne F, Jestin R, Reversat JL, et al. Visualisation and integration of G protein-coupled receptor related information help the modelling: Description and applications of the Viseur program. J Comput Aid Mol Des 1999;13: 625-43.
96. Lin W-J, Hwang M-J. VHMPT: A graphical viewer and editor for helical membrane protein topologies. Bioinformatics 1998;14:866-8.
97. Spyropoulos IC, Liakopoulos TD, Bagos PG, et al. TMRPres2D: High quality visual representation of transmembrane protein models. Bioinformatics 2004;20: 3258-60.
98. Johns SJ. TOPO2. University of California. San Francisco, USA.
99. Beitz E. TEXtopo: Shaded membrane protein topology plots in LATEX2ε. Bioinformatics 2000;16:1050-1.
100. Rost B. PHD: Prediction one-dimensional protein structure by profile based neural networks. Meth Enzymol 1996;266:525-39.
101. Bairoch A, Apweiler R. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence data bank and its supplement TREMBL. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25:31-6.
102. Helt GA, Lewis S, Loraine AE, et al. BioViews: Java-based tools for genomic data visualization. Genome Res 1998;8: 291-305.
103. Kashuk C, SenGupta S, Eichler E, et al. viewGene: A graphical tool for polymorphism visualization and characterization. Genome Res 2002;12:333-8.
104. Hu Z, Frith M, Niu T, et al. SeqVISTA: A graphical tool for sequence feature visualization and comparison. BMC Bioinformatics 2003;4:1.
105. Workman CT, Yin Y, Corcoran DL, et al. enoLOGOS: A versatile web tool for energy normalized sequence logos. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:W389-92.
106. Schneider TD. Sequence walkers: A graphical method to display how binding proteins interact with DNA or RNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25:4408-15.
107. Leong PM, Morgenthaler S. Random walk and gap plots of DNA sequences. Comput Appl Biosci 1995;11:503-7.
108. Berger JA, Mitra SK, Carli M, et al. Visualization and analysis of DNA sequences using DNA walks. J Franklin Institute 2004;341 37-53.
109. Kim MA, Lee EJ, Cho HG, et al. A visualization technique for DNA walk plot using κ-convex hull. Proc Fifth Int Conf Central Europe Comput Graph Visualization 1997; 10-14.
110. Randić R, Vračko M, Nandy A, et al. On 3-D graphical representation of DNA primary sequences and their numerical characterization. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2000;40: 1235-44.
111. Thomas JM, Horspool D, Brown G, et al. GraphDNA: A Java program for graphical display of DNA composition analyses. BMC Bioinformatics 2007;8:21.
112. Bierkandt K, Bierkandt J. DNA rainbow. [http://www.dna-rainbow.org] (21 March 2008, date last accessed).
113. Roy A, Raychaudhury C, Nandy A. Novel techniques of graphical representation and analysis of DNA sequences - a review. J Biosci 1998;23:55-65.
114. Han K, Kim D, Kim H-J. A vector-based method for drawing RNA secondary structure. Bioinformatics 1999;15: 286-97.
115. Lapalme G, Cedergren RJ, Sankoff D. An algorithm for the display of nucleic acid secondary structure. Nucleic Acids Res 1982;20 8351-6.
116. Shapiro BA, Maizel J, Lipkin LE, et al. Generating non-overlapping displays of nucleic acid secondary structure. Nucleic Acids Res 1984;12:75-88.
117. Bruccoleri RE, Heinrich G. An improved algorithm for nucleic acid secondary structure display. Comput Appl Biosci 1988;4 167-73.
118. Gautheret D, Major F, Cedergren R. Computer modeling and display of RNA secondary and tertiary structures. Methods Enzymol 1990;183 318-30.
119. Perochon-Dorisse J, Chetouani F, Aurel A, et al. RNA◇: A computer program for editing and display of RNA secondary structures. Comput Appl Biosci 1995;11:101-9.
120. Chetouani F, Monestié P, Thébault P, et al. ESSA: An integrated and interactive computer tool for analysing RNA secondary structure. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25:3514-22.
121. Muller G, Gaspin C, Etienne A, et al. Automatic display of RNA secondary structures. Comput Appl Biosci 1993;9: 551-61.
122. Auber D, Delest M, Domenger JP, et al. Efficient drawing of RNA secondary structure. J Graph Algorithms Appl 2006; 10:329-51.
123. Martinez HM. An RNA secondary structure workbench. Nucleic Acids Res 1988;16:1789-98.
124. Han K, Lee Y, Kim W. PseudoViewer: Automatic visualization of RNA pseudoknots. Bioinformatics 2002;18: S321-8.
125. Han K, Byun Y. PseudoViewer2: Visualization of RNA pseudoknots of any type. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31: 3432-40.
126. Yang H, Jossinet F, Leontis N, et al. Tools for the automatic identification and classification of RNA base pairs. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:3450-60.
127. Leontis N, Westhof E. Geometric nomenclature and classification of RNA base pairs. RNA 2001;7:499-512.
128. Leontis N, Westhof E. The annotation of RNA motifs. Comp Funct Genom 2002;3:518-24.
129. Jossinet F, Westhof E. Sequence to structure (S2S): Display, manipulate and interconnect RNA data from sequence to structure. Bioinformatics 2005;21:3320-1.
130. Gendron P, Lemieux S, Major F. Quantitative analysis of nucleic acid three-dimensional structures. J Mol Biol 2001; 308:919-36.
131. Wiese KC, Glen E, Vasudevan A. jViz.Rna - a Java tool for RNA secondary structure visualization. IEEE Trans Nanobiosci 2005;4:212-8.
132. Wallace AC, Laskowski RA, Thornton JM. LIGPLOT: A program to generate schematic diagrams of protein-ligand interactions. Protein Eng 1995;8:127-34.
133. McDonald IK, Thornton JM. Satisfying hydrogen bonding potential in proteins. J Mol Biol 1994;238:777-93.
134. Clark AM, Labute P. 2D depiction of protein-ligand complexes. J Chem Inf Model 2007;47:1933-44.
135. Stierand K, Maaß PC, Rarey M. Molecular complexes at a glance: automated generation of two-dimensional complex diagrams. Bioinformatics 2006;22:1710-6.
136. Stierand K, Rarey M. From modeling to medicinal chemistry: Automatic generation of two-dimensional complex diagrams. ChemMedChem 2007;2:853-60.
137. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, et al. UCSF Chimera - A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 2004;25:1605-12.
138. Luscombe NM, Laskowski RA, Thornton JM. NUCPLOT: A program to generate schematic diagrams of protein-nucleic acid interactions. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25: 4940-5.
139. Salerno WJ, Seaver SM, Armstrong BR, et al. MONSTER: Inferring non-covalent interactions in macromolecular structures from atomic coordinate data. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32:W566-8.
140. Finn RD, Marshall M, Bateman A. iPfam: Visualization of protein-protein interactions in PDB at domain and amino acid resolutions. Bioinformatics 2005;21:410-2.
141. Fischer TB, Hohnes JB, Miller IR, et al. Assessing methods for identifying pair-wise atomic contacts across binding interfaces. J Struct Biol 2006;153:103-12.
142. Zhou P, Tian F, Shang Z. 2D depiction of nonbonding interactions for protein complexes. J Comput Chem, 2009;30:940-51.