Function diversity within folds and superfamilies

From Protein Structure to Function with Bioinformatics

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 143-166

  Dessailly, Benoit H ^a   Orengo, Christine A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 65549140036     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9058-5_6     Document Type: Chapter

References (78)

1. Adams MA, Suits MD, Zheng J, et al. (2007) Piecing together the structure-function puzzle: experiences in structure-based functional annotation of hypothetical proteins. Proteomics 7:2920-2932
2. Andreeva A, Murzin AG (2006) Evolution of protein fold in the presence of functional constraints. Curr Opin Struct Biol 16:399-408
3. Andreeva A, Howorth D, Chandonia JM, et al. (2008) Data growth and its impact on the SCOP database: new developments. Nucleic Acids Res 36:D419-D425
4. Aravind L, Anantharaman V, Koonin EV (2002) Monophyly of class I aminoacyl tRNA synthetase, USPA, ETFP, photolyase, and PP-ATPase nucleotide-binding domains: implications for protein evolution in the RNA. Proteins 48:1-14
5. Bashton M, Chothia C (2007) The generation of new protein functions by the combination of domains. Structure 15:85-99
6. Bashton M, Nobeli I, Thornton JM (2006) Cognate ligand domain mapping for enzymes. J Mol Biol 364:836-852
7. Bashton M, Nobeli I, Thornton JM (2008) PROCOGNATE: a cognate ligand domain mapping for enzymes. Nucleic Acids Res 36:D618-D622
8. Brudler R, Hitomi K, Daiyasu H, et al. (2003) Identification of a new cryptochrome class. Structure, function, and evolution. Mol Cell 11:59-67
9. Burroughs AM, Allen KN, Dunaway-Mariano D, et al. (2006) Evolutionary genomics of the HAD superfamily: understanding the structural adaptations and catalytic diversity in a superfamily of phosphoesterases and allied enzymes. J Mol Biol 361:1003-1034
10. Colovos C, Cascio D, Yeates TO (1998) The 1.8 A crystal structure of the ycaC gene product from Escherichia coli reveals an octameric hydrolase of unknown specificity. Structure 6:1329-1337
11. Dessailly BH, Lensink MF, Orengo CA, et al. (2008) LigASite-a database of biologically relevant binding sites in proteins with known apo-structures. Nucleic Acids Res 36:D667-D673
12. Devos D, Valencia A (2000) Practical limits of function prediction. Proteins 41:98-107
13. Devos D, Valencia A (2001) Intrinsic errors in genome annotation. Trends Genet 17:429-431
14. Dolinski K, Botstein D (2007) Orthology and functional conservation in eukaryotes. Annu Rev Genet 41:465-507
15. Favia AD, Nobeli I, Glaser F, et al. (2008) Molecular docking for substrate identification: the short-chain dehydrogenases/reductases. J Mol Biol 375:855-874
16. Furukawa H, Singh SK, Mancusso R, et al. (2005) Subunit arrangement and function in NMDA receptors. Nature 438:185-192
17. Gerlt JA, Babbitt PC (2001) Divergent evolution of enzymatic function: mechanistically diverse superfamilies and functionally distinct suprafamilies. Annu Rev Biochem 70:209-246
18. Glasner ME, Gerlt JA, Babbitt PC (2006) Evolution of enzyme superfamilies. Curr Opin Chem Biol 10:492-497
19. Goldstein RA (2008) The structure of protein evolution and the evolution of protein structure. Curr Opin Struct Biol 18:170-177
20. Greene LH, Lewis TE, Addou S, et al. (2007) The CATH domain structure database: new protocols and classification levels give a more comprehensive resource for exploring evolution. Nucleic Acids Res 35:D291-D297
21. Grishin NV (2001) Fold change in evolution of protein structures. J Struct Biol 134:167-185
22. Harrison A, Pearl F, Mott R, et al. (2002) Quantifying the similarities within fold space. J Mol Biol 323:909-926
23. Harrison PM, Gerstein M (2002) Studying genomes through the aeons: protein families, pseudogenes and proteome evolution. J Mol Biol 318:1155-1174
24. Hegyi H, Gerstein M (2001) Annotation transfer for genomics: measuring functional divergence in multi-domain proteins. Genome Res 11:1632-1640
25. Holliday GL, Almonacid DE, Bartlett GJ, et al. (2007) MACiE (Mechanism, Annotation and Classification in Enzymes): novel tools for searching catalytic mechanisms. Nucleic Acids Res 35:D515-D520
26. Holm L, Sander C (1993) Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J Mol Biol 233:123-138
27. Holm L, Sander C (1996a) Mapping the protein universe. Science 273:595-603
28. Holm L, Sander C (1996b) The FSSP database: fold classification based on structure-structure alignment of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 24:206-209
29. Horowitz NH (1945) On the evolution of biochemical syntheses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 31:153-157
30. Jeffery CJ (2003) Moonlighting proteins: old proteins learning new tricks. Trends Genet 19:415-417
31. Jiang H, Blouin C (2007) Insertions and the emergence of novel protein structure: a structurebased phylogenetic study of insertions. BMC Bioinformatics 8:444
32. Kanehisa M, Araki M, Goto S, et al. (2008) KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment. Nucleic Acids Res 36:D480-D484
33. Khersonsky O, Roodveldt C, Tawfik DS (2006) Enzyme promiscuity: evolutionary and mechanistic aspects. Curr Opin Chem Biol 10:498-508
34. Kolodny R, Koehl P, Levitt M (2005) Comprehensive evaluation of protein structure alignment methods: scoring by geometric measures. J Mol Biol 346:1173-1188
35. Kolodny R, Petrey D, Honig B (2006) Protein structure comparison: implications for the nature of 'fold space', and structure and function prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 16:393-398
36. Kraulis PJ (1991) Molscript: a program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures. J Appl Cryst 24:946-950
37. Krissinel E, Henrick K (2004) Secondary-structure matching (SSM), a new tool for fast protein structure alignment in three dimensions. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 60:2256-2268
38. Lee D, Grant A, Marsden RL, et al. (2005) Identification and distribution of protein families in 120 completed genomes using Gene3D. Proteins 59:603-615
39. Lee D, Redfern O, Orengo C (2007) Predicting protein function from sequence and structure. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8:995-1005
40. Lopez G, Valencia A, Tress M (2007) FireDB-a database of functionally important residues from proteins of known structure. Nucleic Acids Res 35:D219-D223
41. Marsden RL, Ranea JA, Sillero A, et al. (2006) Exploiting protein structure data to explore the evolution of protein function and biological complexity. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 361:425-440
42. Martin AC, Orengo CA, Hutchinson EG, et al. (1998) Protein folds and functions. Structure 6:875-884
43. Merritt EA, Bacon DJ (1997) Raster3d version 2: photorealistic molecular graphics. Method Enzymol 277:505-524
44. Moult J, Melamud E (2000) From fold to function. Curr Opin Struct Biol 10:384-389
45. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, et al. (1995) SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 247:536-540
46. Nagano N (2005) EzCatDB: the Enzyme Catalytic-mechanism Database. Nucleic Acids Res 33:D407-D412
47. Nagano N, Orengo CA, Thornton JM (2002) One fold with many functions: the evolutionary relationships between TIM barrel families based on their sequences, structures and functions. J Mol Biol 321:741-765
48. Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Webb EC (1992) Enzyme Nomenclature: Recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology on the Nomenclature and Classification of Enzymes. Academic, San Diego, CA
49. O'Boyle NM, Holliday GL, Almonacid DE, et al. (2007) Using reaction mechanism to measure enzyme similarity. J Mol Biol 368:1484-1499
50. Ojha S, Meng EC, Babbitt PC (2007) Evolution of function in the "Two Dinucleotide Binding Domains" flavoproteins. PLoS Comput Biol 3(7):e121
51. Orengo CA (1999) CORA-topological fingerprints for protein structural families. Protein Sci 8:699-715
52. Orengo CA, Taylor WR (1996) SSAP: sequential structure alignment program for protein structure comparison. Method Enzymol 266:617-635
53. Orengo CA, Jones DT, Thornton JM (1994) Protein superfamilies and domain superfolds. Nature 372:631-634
54. Orengo CA, Michie AD, Jones S, et al. (1997) CATH-a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure 5:1093-1108
55. Pegg SC, Brown SD, Ojha S, et al. (2006) Leveraging enzyme structure-function relationships for functional inference and experimental design: the structure-function linkage database. Biochemistry 45:2545-2555
56. Piatigorsky J, Kantorow M, Gopal-Srivastava R, et al. (1994) Recruitment of enzymes and stress proteins as lens crystallins. EXS 71:241-250
57. Porter CT, Bartlett GJ, Thornton JM (2004) The Catalytic Site Atlas: a resource of catalytic sites and residues identified in enzymes using structural data. Nucleic Acids Res 32:D129-D133
58. Redfern OC, Harrison A, Dallman T, et al. (2007) CATHEDRAL: a fast and effective algorithm to predict folds and domain boundaries from multidomain protein structures. PLoS Comput Biol 3(11):e232
59. Reeves GA, Dallman TJ, Redfern OC, et al. (2006) Structural diversity of domain superfamilies in the CATH database. J Mol Biol 360:725-741
60. Reid AJ, Yeats C, Orengo CA (2007) Methods of remote homology detection can be combined to increase coverage by 10% in the midnight zone. Bioinformatics 23:2353-2360
61. Rison SC, Thornton JM (2002) Pathway evolution, structurally speaking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 12:374-382
62. Rost B (2002) Enzyme function less conserved than anticipated. J Mol Biol 318:595-608
63. Ruepp A, Zollner A, Maier D, et al. (2004) The FunCat, a functional annotation scheme for systematic classification of proteins from whole genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 32:5539-5545
64. Russell RB, Saqi MA, Sayle RA, et al. (1997) Recognition of analogous and homologous protein folds: analysis of sequence and structure conservation. J Mol Biol 269:423-439
65. Russell RB, Sasieni PD, Sternberg MJ (1998) Supersites within superfolds. Binding site similarity in the absence of homology. J Mol Biol 282:903-918
66. Sangar V, Blankenberg DJ, Altman N, et al. (2007) Quantitative sequence-function relationships in proteins based on gene ontology. BMC Bioinformatics 8:294
67. Shakhnovich BE, Koonin EV (2006) Origins and impact of constraints in evolution of gene families. Genome Res 16:1529-1536
68. Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE (1998) Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension (CE) of the optimal path. Protein Eng 11:739-747
69. Takahashi H, Inagaki E, Kuroishi C, et al. (2004) Structure of the Thermus thermophilus putative periplasmic glutamate/glutamine-binding protein. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 60:1846-1854
70. Tatusov RL, Koonin EV, Lipman DJ (1997) A genomic perspective on protein families. Science 278:631-637
71. The Gene Ontology Consortium (2000) Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet 25:25-29
72. Tian W, Skolnick J (2003) How well is enzyme function conserved as a function of pairwise sequence identity? J Mol Biol 333:863-882
73. Todd AE, Orengo CA, Thornton JM (2001) Evolution of function in protein superfamilies, from a structural perspective. J Mol Biol 307:1113-1143
74. Todd AE, Orengo CA, Thornton JM (2002) Sequence and structural differences between enzyme and nonenzyme homologs. Structure 10:1435-1451
75. Whisstock JC, Lesk AM (2003) Prediction of protein function from protein sequence and structure. Q Rev Biophys 36:307-340
76. Wilson D, Madera M, Vogel C, et al. (2007) The SUPERFAMILY database in 2007: families and functions. Nucleic Acids Res 35:D308-D313
77. Ye Y, Godzik A (2004) FATCAT: a web server for flexible structure comparison and structure similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Res 32:W582-W585
78. Yeats C, Lees J, Reid A, et al. (2008) Gene3D: comprehensive structural and functional annotation of genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 36:D414-D418