From fold to function

Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 384-389

  Moult, John ^a   Melamud, Eugene ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BIOTECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BINDING SITE; ENZYME MECHANISM; HUMAN; LIGAND BINDING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW;

EID: 0034038150     PISSN: 0959440X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-440X(00)00101-9     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Burley S.K., Almo S.C., Bonanno J.B., Capel M., Chance M.R., Gaasterland T., Lin D., Sali A., Studier F.W. Structural genomics: beyond the human genome project. Nat Genet. 23:1999;151-157.
2. Genomes Online Database on World Wide Web URL: http://igweb.integratedgenomics.com/GOLD/.
3. Shapiro L., Harris T. Finding function through structural genomics. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 11:2000;31-35. A recent review that also discusses methods of deriving function from structure.
4. Skolnick J.F., Kolinski J.S.A. Structural genomics and its importance for gene function analysis. Nat Biotech. 18:2000;283-287. Another recent review that discusses methods of deriving function from structure.
5. Bork P., Dandekar T., Diaz-Lazcoz Y., Eisenhaber F., Huynen M., Yuan Y. Predicting function: from genes to genomes and back. J Mol Biol. 283:1998;707-725.
6. Schultz G.E., Schimer R.H. Principles of Protein Function. 1979;Springer-Verlag, New York.
7. Brent R. Genomic biology. Cell. 100:2000;169-183.
8. Eisen M.B., Spellman P.T., Brown P.O., Botstein D. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 95:1998;14863-14868.
9. Uetz P., Giot L., Cagney G., Mansfield T.A., Judson R.S., Knight J.R., Lockshon D., Narayan V., Srinivasan M., Pochart P.et al. A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature. 403:2000;623-627.
10. Ross-Macdonald P., Coelho P.S., Roemer T., Agarwal S., Kumar A., Jansen R., Cheung R.H., Sheehan A., Symoniatis D., Umansky L.et al. Large-scale analysis of the yeast genome by transposon tagging and gene disruption. Nature. 402:1999;413-418.
11. Russell R.B., Saqi M.A., Bates P.A., Sayle R.A., Sternberg M.J. Recognition of analogous and homologous protein folds - assessment of prediction success and associated alignment accuracy using empirical substitution matrices. Protein Eng. 11:1998;1-9.
12. Murzin A.G., Brenner S.E., Hubbard T., Chothia C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol. 247:1995;536-540.
13. Colovos C., Cascio D., Yeates T.O. The 1.8 Å crystal structure of the ycaC gene product from Escherichia coli reveals an octameric hydrolase of unknown specificity. Structure. 6:1998;1329-1337. An example of fold similarity revealing information about the function of an enzyme.
14. Orengo C.A., Jones D.T., Thornton J.M. Protein superfamilies and domain superfolds. Nature. 372:1994;631-634.
15. Holm L., Sander C. Dali: a network tool for protein structure comparison. Trends Biochem Sci. 20:1995;478-480.
16. Gibrat J.F., Madej T., Bryant S.H. Surprising similarities in structure comparison. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 6:1996;377-385.
17. Shindyalov I.N., Bourne P.E. Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension (CE) of the optimal path. Protein Eng. 11:1998;739-747.
18. Szustakowski J.D., Weng Z. Protein structure alignment using a genetic algorithm. Proteins. 38:2000;428-440.
19. Laskowski R.A., Luscombe N.M., Swindells M.B., Thornton J.M. Protein clefts in molecular recognition and function. Protein Sci. 5:1996;2438-2452.
20. Honig B., Nicholls A. Classical electrostatics in biology and chemistry. Science. 268:1995;1144-1149.
21. Zhang H.H., Li K., Banajei Z., Fisher L., Grishin K., Eisenstein N.V.E., Herzberg O. Crystal structure of YbaK protein from Haemophilus influenzae at 1.8 Angstrom resolution: functional implications. Proteins. 11:2000;25-30.
22. Briem H., Kuntz I.D. Molecular similarity based on DOCK-generated fingerprints. J Med Chem. 39:1996;3401-3408.
23. Eisen M.B., Wiley D.C., Karplus M., Hubbard R.E. HOOK: a program for finding novel molecular architectures that satisfy the chemical and steric requirements of a macromolecule binding site. Proteins. 19:1994;199-221.
24. Einsphar H., Bugg C.E. Calcium and its role in biology. Sigel H. Metal Ions in Biological Systems, vol 17. 1984;51-97 Marcel Dekker Inc, New York.
25. Christiansen D.W. Structural biology of zinc. Adv Protein Chem. 42:1991;281-355.
26. Yamashita M.M., Wesson L., Eisenman G., Eisenberg D. Where metal ions bind in proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 87:1990;5648-5652.
27. Zhu Z.Y., Karlin S. Clusters of charged residues in protein three-dimensional structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 93:1996;8350-8355.
28. Jones S., Thornton J.M. Protein-protein interactions: a review of protein dimer structures. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 63:1995;31-65.
29. Jones S., Thornton J.M. Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using patch analysis. J Mol Biol. 272:1997;133-143.
30. SPIN-PP: Surface Properties of Interfaces on World Wide Web URL: http://trantor.bioc.columbia.edu/cgi-bin/SPIN/.
31. Lichtarge O., Bourne H.R., Cohen F.E. An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. J Mol Biol. 257:1996;342-358.
32. Lichtarge O., Bourne H.R., Cohen F.E. Evolutionarily conserved G-alpha-beta-gamma binding surfaces support a model of the G protein-receptor complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 93:1996;7507-7511.
33. Herzberg O., Moult J. Penicillin binding and degrading enzymes. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1:1991;946-953.
34. Hofmann K., Bucher P., Falquet L., Bairoch A. The PROSITE database. its status in Nucleic Acids Res. 1999:1999;27. 215-219.
35. Wallace A.C., Laskowski R.A., Thornton J.M. Derivation of 3D coordinate templates for searching structural databases: application to Ser-His-Asp catalytic triads in the serine proteinases and lipases. Protein Sci. 5:1996;1001-1013.
36. Brenner S.E. Errors in genome annotation. Trends Genet. 15:1999;132-133.
37. Zhang X., Smith T.F. The challenges of genome sequence annotation or 'the Devil is in the Details'. Nat Biotech. 15:1997;1222-1223.
38. Bork P., Bairoch A. Go hunting in sequence databases but watch out for the traps. Trends Genet. 12:1996;425-427.
39. Casari G., Sander C., Valencia A. A method to predict functional residues in proteins. Nat Struct Biol. 2:1995;171-178.
40. Supplement: Third meeting on the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction. Proteins, 1999, 37(suppl 3):1-239.
41. Moult J. Predicting protein three-dimensional structure. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 10:1999;583-588.
42. Murzin A.G. Structure classification-based assessment of CASP3 predictions for the fold recognition targets. Proteins. 37:1999;88-103.
43. Rychlewski L., Zhang B., Godzik A. Functional insights from structural predictions: analysis of the Escherichia coli genome. Protein Sci. 8:1999;614-624.
44. Jones D.T. GenTHREADER: an efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences. J Mol Biol. 287:1999;797-815.
45. Fischer D., Eisenberg D. Predicting structures for genome proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 9:1999;208-211.
46. Venclovas C., Zemla A., Fidelis K., Moult J. Some measures of comparative performance in the three CASPs. Proteins. 37(suppl 3):1999;231-237.
47. Chothia C., Lesk A.M. The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. EMBO J. 5:1986;823-826.
48. Jones T.A., Kleywegt G.J. CASP3 comparative modeling evaluation. Proteins. 37:1999;30-46.
49. Kleywegt G.J., Bergfors T., Senn H., Le Motte P., Gsell B., Shudo K., Jones T.A. Crystal structures of cellular retinoic acid binding proteins I and II in complex with all-trans-retinoic acid and a synthetic retinoid. Structure. 2:1994;1241-1258.
50. Xu L.Z., Sanchez R., Sali A., Heintz N. Ligand specificity of brain lipid-binding protein. J Biol Chem. 271:1996;24711-24719.
51. NIGMS Structural Genomics Target Workshop on World Wide Web URL: http://www.nih.gov/nigms/news/meetings/structural_genomics_targets.html . A report describing plans for structural genomics, which will have a large impact on the field of function analysis of structure.
52. Orengo C.A., Bray J.E., Hubbard T., LoConte L., Sillitoe I. Analysis and assessment of ab initio three-dimensional prediction, secondary structure, and contacts prediction. Proteins. 37:1999;149-170.
53. Fetrow J.S., Skolnick J. Method for prediction of protein function from sequence using the sequence-to-structure-to-function paradigm with application to glutaredoxins/thioredoxins and T1 ribonucleases. J Mol Biol. 281:1998;949-968.