Impacts of comprehensive reading instruction on diverse outcomes of low- and high-achieving readers

Journal of Learning Disabilities

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 195-214

  Guthrie, John T ^a   McRae, Angela ^a   Coddington, Cassandra S ^a   Lutz Klauda, Susan ^a   Wigfield, Allan ^a   Barbosa, Pedro ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b Bldg 142   (United States)

Author keywords

Concept Oriented Reading Instruction; Intervention; Low achievers; Quasi experiment; Reading comprehension; Reading motivation; Strategy instruction; Word recognition

Indexed keywords

ACHIEVEMENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPREHENSION; CONCEPT FORMATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IN SERVICE TRAINING; LEARNING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOTIVATION; READING; TEACHING;

ACHIEVEMENT; CHILD; COMPREHENSION; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INSERVICE TRAINING; MALE; MOTIVATION; READING; REMEDIAL TEACHING; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 65349165095     PISSN: 00222194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022219408331039     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Anderson, R.C., & Pearson, P.D. (1984). A schematheoretic view of basic processes in reading. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255-291). New York: Longman.
2. Baker, L., & Wigfield, A. (1999). Dimensions of children's motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 452-477.
3. Barbosa, P., & Alexander, L. (2004). Science inquiry in the CORI framework. In J. T. Guthrie, A. Wigfield, & K. C. Perencevich (Eds.), Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction (pp. 113-141). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Bogner, K., Raphael, L., & Pressley, M. (2002). How Grade 1 teachers motivate literate activity in their students. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 135-165.
5. Chapman, J.W., & Tunmer, W.E. (1995). Development of young children's reading self-concepts: An examination of emerging subcomponents and their relationship with reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 154-167.
6. Chard, D.J., Vaughn, S., & Tyler, B. (2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 386-406.
7. Dreher, M.J. (2003). Motivating struggling readers by tapping the potential of information books. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 19, 25-38.
8. Foorman, B.R., Schatschneider, C., Eakin, M.N., Fletcher, J.M., Moats, L.C., & Francis, D.J. (2006). The impact of instructional practices in Grades 1 and 2 on reading and spelling achievement in high poverty schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 1-29.
9. Francis, D., Fletcher, J., Catts, H., & Tomblin, J. (2005). Dimensions affecting the assessment of reading comprehension. In S. Paris & S. Stahl (Eds.), Children's reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 369-394). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Gersten, R., Fuchs, L.S., Williams, J.P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 279-320.
11. Guthrie, J.T. (2004). Teaching for literacy engagement. Journal of Literacy Research, 36, 1-30.
12. Guthrie, J.T., & Humenick, N.M. (2004). Motivating students to read: Evidence for classroom practices that increase reading motivation and achievement. In P. McCardle & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 329-354). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
13. Guthrie, J.T., McRae, A., & Klauda, S. (2007). Contributions of Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction to knowledge about interventions for motivation in reading. Educational Psychologist, 43, 237-250.
14. Guthrie, J.T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Reading research handbook, Vol. III (pp. 403-424). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Guthrie, J.T., & Wigfield, A. (2005). Roles of motivation and engagement in reading comprehension assessment. In S. Paris & S. Stahl (Eds.), Children's Reading Comprehension and Assessment (pp. 187-213). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Guthrie, J.T., Wigfield, A., Barbosa, P., Perencevich, K.C., Taboada, A., Davis, M.H., et al. (2004). Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 403-423.
17. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & Perencevich, K. C. (Eds.). (2004). Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Hannon, B., & Daneman, M. (2001). A new tool for measuring and understanding individual differences in the component processes of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 103-128.
19. Juel, C., & Minden-Cupp, C. (2000). Learning to read words: Linguistic units and instructional strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 458-492.
20. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
21. Klauda, S.L., & Guthrie, J.T. (2008). Relationships of three components of reading fluency to reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 310-321.
22. Kuhn, M.R., & Stahl, S.A. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 3-21.
23. Ladsen-Billings, G. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African-American children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24. Lutz, S.L., Guthrie, J.T., & Davis, M.H. (2006). Scaffolding for engagement in elementary school reading instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 100, 3-20.
25. MacGinitie, W.H., MacGinitie, R.K., Maria, K., & Dreyer, L.G. (2000). Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
26. Manset-Williamson, G., & Nelson, J.M. (2005). Balanced, strategic reading instruction for upper-elementary and middle school students with reading disabilities: A comparative study of two approaches. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 59-74.
27. Mason, L.H. (2004). Explicit self-regulated strategy development versus reciprocal question among struggling readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 283-296.
28. Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., & Graetz, J.E. (2003). Reading comprehension instruction for secondary students: Challenges for struggling students and teachers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26, 103-116.
29. Meece, J.L., & Miller, S.D. (2001). A longitudinal analysis of elementary school students' achievement goals in literacy activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 454-480.
30. Moats, L.C. (2004). Efficacy of a structured, systematic language curriculum for adolescent poor readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 20, 145-159.
31. Morgan, P., & Fuchs, D. (2007). Is there a bidirectional relationship between children's reading skills and reading motivation ? Exceptional Children, 73, 165-183.
32. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Pub. No. 00-4769). Jessup, MD: National Institute for Literacy.
33. Pedhazur, E.J., & Schmelkin, L.P. (1991). Measurement, design and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Pinnell, G.S., Pikulski, J.J., Wixson, K.K., Campbell, J.R., Gough, P.B., & Beatty, A.S. (1995). Listening to children read aloud: Data from NAEP's Integrated Reading Performance Record (IRPR) at Grade 4 (NCES 95-726). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Center for Education Statistics.
35. Purcell-Gates, V., Duke, N.K., & Martineau, J.A. (2007). Learning to read and write genre-specific text: Roles of authentic experience and explicit teaching. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 8-45.
36. Romance, N.R., & Vitale, M.R. (2001). Implementing an in-depth, expanded science model in elementary schools: Multi-year findings, research issues, and policy implications. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 373-404.
37. Rubie, C.M., Townsend, M.A.R., & Moore, D.W. (2004). Motivational and academic effects of cultural experiences for indigenous minority students in New Zealand. Educational Psychology, 24, 143-160.
38. Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67.
39. Schrank, F.A., Mather, N., & Woodcock, R.W. (2004). Comprehensive manual: Woodcock-Johnson III Diagnostic Reading Battery. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
40. Schunk, D.H., & Zimmerman, B.J. (1997). Developing self-efficacious readers and writers: The role of social and self-regulatory processes. In J. T. Guthrie & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Reading engagement: Motivating readers through integrated instruction (pp. 34-50). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
41. Smolken, L.B., & Donovan, C.A. (2003). Supporting comprehension acquisition for emerging and struggling readers: The interactive information book read-aloud. Exceptionality, 11, 25-38.
42. Souvignier, E., & Mokhlesgerami, J. (2006). Using self-regulation as a framework for implementing strategy instruction to foster reading comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 16, 57-71.
43. Swanson, H.L. (1999). Reading research for students with LD: A meta-analysis of intervention outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 504-532.
44. Taylor, B.M., Pearson, P.D., Peterson, D.S., & Rodriguez, M.C. (2003). Reading growth in high-poverty classrooms: The influence of teacher practices that encourage cognitive engagement in literacy learning. Elementary School Journal, 104, 3-28.
45. Therrien, W.J. (2004). Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 252-261.
46. Thorkildsen, T.A. (2002). Literacy as a lifestyle: Negotiating the curriculum to facilitate motivation. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 18, 321-341.
47. Torgeson, J.K. (2004). Lessons learned from research on interventions for students who have difficulty learning to read. In P. McCardle & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 355-382). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
48. Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J.T. (1997). Motivation for reading: Individual, home, textual, and classroom perspective. Educational Psychologist, 32, 57-135.
49. Williams, J.P. (2003). Teaching test structure to improve reading comprehension. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 293-305). New York: Guilford.