Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through concept-oriented reading instruction

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 96, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 403-423

  Guthrie, John T ^a   Wigfield, Allan ^a   Barbosa, Pedro ^a   Perencevich, Kathleen C ^a   Taboada, Ana ^a   Davis, Marcia H ^a   Scafiddi, Nicole T ^a   Tonks, Stephen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4544274322     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.403     Document Type: Review

References (83)

1. Alvermann, D., & Earle, J. (2003). Comprehension instruction, In A. P. Sweet & C. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 12-30). New York: Guilford Press.
2. Ames, C. (1992). Achievement goals and the classroom motivational climate. In D. Schunk & J. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 327-349). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Armbruster, B. B., Anderson, T. H., & Meyer, J. L. (1991). Improving content-area reading using instructional graphics. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 393-416.
4. Armbruster, B. B., Anderson, T. H., & Ostertag, J. (1987). Does text structure/summarization instruction facilitate learning from expository text? Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 331-346.
5. Baker, L., & Zimlin, L. (1989). Instructional effects on children's use of two levels of standards for evaluating their comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 340-346.
6. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
7. Barbosa, P., & Alexander, L. (2004). Science inquiry in the CORI frame-work. In J. T. Guthrie, A. Wigfield, & K. C. Perencevich (Eds.), Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction (pp. 113-142). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Berliner, D. C. (1979). Tempus educare. In P. L. Peterson & H J. Walber (Eds.), Research on teaching (pp. 120-135). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
9. Block, C. C., & Pressley, M. (Eds.). (2002). Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices. New York: Guilford Press.
10. Blumenfeld, P. C., & Meece, J. L. (1988). Task factors, teacher behavior, and students' involvement and use of learning Strategies in science. Elementary School Journal, 88, 235-250.
11. Bogner, K., Raphael, L., & Pressley, M. (2002). How Grade 1 teachers motivate literate activity by their students. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 135-165.
12. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
13. Britton, B. K., & Gulgoz, S. (1991). Using Kintsch's computational model to improve instructional text: Effects of repairing inference calls on recall and cognitive structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 329-345.
14. Brown, R., Pressley, M., Van Meter, P., & Schuder, T. (1996). A quasi-experimental validation of transactional strategies instruction with low-achieving second-grade readers, Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 18-37.
15. Byrk, A., Raudenbush, S., & Congdon, R. (1996). HLM: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling with the HLM/2L and HLM/3L programs. Chicago: SSI International.
16. Davis, M. H., Guthrie, J. T., & Scafiddi, N. T. (2003, April). Use of a computer task to measure knowledge acquired during reading. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
17. Davis, M. H., & Tonks, S. (2004). Diverse texts and technology for reading. In J. T. Guthrie, A. Wigfield, & K. C. Perencevich (Eds.), Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction (pp. 143-172). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
19. Dole, J. A., Valencia, S. W., Greer, E. A., & Wardrop, I L. (1991). Effects of two types of prereading instruction on the comprehension of narrative and expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 142-159.
20. Dolezal, S. E., Welsh, L. M., Pressley, M., & Vincent, M. M. (2003). How nine third-grade teachers motivate student academic engagement. Elementary School Journal, 103, 239-267.
21. Dreher, M. J., & Brown, R. (1993). Planning prompts and indexed terms in textbook search tasks. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 662-669.
22. Duke, N. K., & Pearson, D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 205-242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
23. Fitzgerald, J., & Spiegel, D. L. (1983). Enhancing children's reading comprehension through instruction in narrative structure. Journal of Reading Behavior, 75(2), 1-17.
24. Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 148-162.
25. Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Williams, J. P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 279-320.
26. Gottfried, A. E. (1985). Academic intrinsic motivation in elementary and junior high school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 631-645.
27. Gottfried, A. E. (1990). Academic intrinsic motivation in young elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 525-538.
28. Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). Autonomy in children's learning: An experimental and individual differences investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 890-898.
29. Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Differentiating instruction for struggling readers within the CORI classroom. In J. T. Guthrie, A. Wigfield, & K. C. Perencevich (Eds.), Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction (pp. 1-24). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Guthrie, J. T. (in press). Teaching for literacy engagement. Journal of Literacy Research.
31. Guthrie, J. T., & Alao, S. (1997). Designing contexts to increase motivations for reading. Educational Psychologist, 32, 95-107.
32. Guthrie, J. T., & Humenick, N. M. (in press). Motivating students to read: Evidence for classroom practices that increase reading motivation and achievement. In P. McCardle (Ed.), The voice of evidence: Bringing research to classroom educators. New York: Brookes Publishing.
33. Guthrie, J. T., & Scafiddi, N. T. (2004). Reading comprehension for information text: Theoretical meanings, developmental patterns, and benchmarks for instruction. In J. T. Guthrie, A. Wigfield, & K. C. Perencevich (Eds.), Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction (pp. 225-248). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Guthrie, J. T., Schafer, W. D., & Huang, C. W. (2001). Benefits of opportunity to read and balanced instruction on the NAEP. Journal of Educational Research, 94, 145-162.
35. Guthrie, J. T., Van Meter, P., Hancock, G. R., McCann, A., Andersen, E., & Alao, S. (1998). Does Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction increase strategy use and conceptual learning from text? Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 261-278.
36. Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Reading research handbook (Vol. 3, pp. 403-424). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Metsala, J. L., & Cox, K. E. (1999). Motivational and cognitive predictors of text comprehension and reading amount. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 231-256.
38. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & Perencevich, K. C. (Eds.), (2004). Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & VonSecker, C. (2000). Effects of integrated instruction on motivation and strategy use in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 331-341.
40. Hays, W. L. (1988). Statistics. Chicago: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
41. Hedges, L., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.
42. Hiebert, E. H., & Raphael, T. E. (1996). Psychological perspectives on literacy and extensions to educational practice. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 550-602). New York: Simon & Schuster/Macmillan.
43. Johnson, P. J., Goldsmith, T. E., & Teague, K. W. (1994). Locus of the predictive advantage in Pathfinder-based representations of classroom knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 617-626.
44. Kirsch, I., de Jong, J., LaFontaine, D., McQueen, J., Mendelovits, J., & Monseur, C. (2002). Reading for change: Performance and engagement across countries. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
45. Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., & Schumm, J. S. (1998). Collaborative strategic reading during social studies in heterogeneous fourth-grade classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 99, 3-22.
46. Kuhn, M. R., & Stahl, S. A. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 3-21.
47. MacGinitie, W. H., MacGinitie, R. K., Maria, K., & Dreyer, L. G. (2000). Gates-MacGinitie Reading Comprehension Tests: Level 3 Form S (4th ed.). Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
48. Many, J. E., Fyfe, R., Lewis, G., & Mitchell, E. (1996). Traversing the topical landscape: Exploring students' self-directed reading-writingresearch processes. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 12-35.
49. Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (1990). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A. model comparison perspective. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
50. Meece, J. L., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Hoyle, R. H. (1988). Students' goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 514-523.
51. Meece, J., & Miller, S. (1999). Changes in elementary school children's achievement goals for reading and writing: Results of a longitudinal and an intervention study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 207-229.
52. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
53. Ozgungor, S., & Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Interactions among elaborative interrogation, knowledge, and interest in the process of constructing knowledge from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 437-443.
54. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 117-175.
55. Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmelkin, L. P. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdaie, NJ: Erlbaum.
56. Pressley, M., Wharton-McDonald, R., Mistretta-Hampston, J., & Echevarria, M. (1998), Literacy instruction in 10 fourth- and fifth-grade classrooms in upstate New York. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 159-194.
57. Pressley, M., Wood, E., Woloshyn, V. E., Martin, V., King, A., & Menke, D. (1992). Encouraging mindful use of prior knowledge: Attempting to construct explanatory answers facilitates learning. Educational Psychologist, 27, 91-110.
58. Reynolds, P. L., & Symons, S. (2001). Motivational variables and children's text search. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 14-23.
59. Romance, N. R., & Vitale, M. R. (1992). A curriculum strategy that expands time for in-depth elementary science instruction by using science-based reading strategies: Effects of a year-long study in grade four. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 545-554.
60. Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66, 181-221.
61. Ross, J. A. (1988). Controlling variables: A meta-analysis of training studies. Review of Educational Research, 58, 405-437.
62. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67.
63. Saunders, W. M., & Goldenberg, C. (1999). Effects of instructional conversations and literature logs on limited- a ad fluent-English-proficient students' story comprehension and thematic understanding. Elementary School Journal, 99, 279-300.
64. Schiefele, U. (1999). Interest and learning from text. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 257-279.
65. Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2002). The development of academic self-efficacy. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 16-32). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
66. Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1997) Developing self-efficacious readers and writers; The role of social and self-regulatory processes. In L. Baker, M. J. Dreher, & J. T. Guthrie (Eds.), Reading engagement: Motivating readers through integrated instruction (pp. 34-50), Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
67. Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571-581.
68. Skinner, E. A., Wellborn, J. G., & Connell, J. P. (1990). What it takes to do well in school and whether I've got it: A process model of perceived control and children's engagement and achievement in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 22-32.
69. Snow, C. E. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
70. Stipek, D. (1996). Motivation and instruction. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 85-113). New York: Simon & Schuster/Macmillan.
71. Stipek, D. (2002). Good instruction is motivating. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 309-332). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
72. Swan, E. A. (2003) Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction: Engaging classrooms, lifelong learners. New York: Guilford Press.
73. Sweet, A. P., Guthrie, J. T., & Ng, M. M. (1998). Teacher perceptions and student reading motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 210-223.
74. Sweet, A. P., & Snow, C. E. (2003). Rethinking reading comprehension. New York: Guilford Press.
75. Taboada, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Growth of cognitive strategies for reading comprehension. In J. T. Guthrie, A. Wigfield, & K. C. Perencevich (Eds.), Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction (pp. 273-306). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
76. Taylor, B. M., Pearson, P. D., Clark, K., & Walpole, S. (2000). Effective schools and accomplished teachers: Lessons about primary-grade reading instruction in low-income schools. Elementary School Journal, 101, 121-165.
77. Trabasso, T., & Bouchard, E. (2002). Teaching readers how to comprehend text strategically. In C. C. Collins & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 176-200). New York: Guilford Press.
78. Webb, N. M., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841-873), New York: Simon Schuster/Macmillan.
79. Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of children's motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 420-432.
80. Wigfield, A., & Tonks, S. (2004). The development of motivation for reading and how it is influenced by CORI. In J. T. Guthrie, A. Wigfield, & K. C. Perencevich (Eds.), Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction (pp. 249-272). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
81. Williams, J. P., Lauer, K. D., Hall, K. M., Lord, K. M., Gugga, S. S., & Bak, S. J. (2002). Teaching elementary school students to identify story themes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 235-248.
82. Yolen, J. (1987). Owl moon. New York: Philomel Books.
83. Zahorik, J. (1996). Elementary and secondary teachers' reports of how they make learning interesting. Elementary School Journal, 96, 551-564.