Utility of rodent models for evaluating protein allergenicity

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

Volumn 54, Issue 3 SUPPL., 2009, Pages

  Bowman, Christal C ^a   Selgrade, MaryJane K ^a  

^a U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

Allergenicity; Animal model; Biotechnology; Digestibility; Food allergy; Genetically modified food; Oral tolerance

Indexed keywords

CHOLERA TOXIN; FOOD ALLERGEN; IMMUNOGLOBULIN E; PEPSIN A; VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

ALLERGENICITY; ALLERGIC REACTION; ALLERGY TEST; ARTICLE; DIGESTION; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; EXPERIMENTAL RAT; FOOD ALLERGY; GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD; IMMUNOGLOBULIN PRODUCTION; IMMUNOLOGICAL TOLERANCE; NONHUMAN; PEANUT ALLERGY; PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROVOCATION TEST; SENSITIZATION;

ALLERGENS; ANIMALS; DIGESTION; FEMALE; FOOD HYPERSENSITIVITY; MICE; MICE, INBRED C3H; MODELS, ANIMAL; PROTEINS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ANIMALIA; ARACHIS HYPOGAEA; BERTHOLLETIA EXCELSA; RODENTIA; SPINACIA OLERACEA;

EID: 64849085966     PISSN: 02732300     EISSN: 10960295     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Adel-Patient K., et al. Peanut- and cow's milk-specific IgE, Th2 cells and local anaphylactic reaction are induced in Balb/c mice orally sensitized with cholera toxin. Allergy 60 (2005) 658-664
2. Akiyama H., et al. Examination of oral sensitization with ovalbumin in Brown Norway rats and three strains of mice. Immunol. Lett. 78 (2001) 1-5
3. American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology, 2005. The Allergy Report. vol. 3.
4. Astwood J.D., et al. Stability of food allergens to digestion in vitro. Nat. Biotechnol. 14 (1996) 1269-1273
5. Betts C.J., et al. Intradermal exposure of BALB/c strain mice to peanut protein elicits a type 2 cytokine response. Food Chem. Toxicol. 42 (2004) 1589-1599
6. Borja J.M., et al. Anaphylaxis from Brazil nut. Allergy 54 (1999) 1007-1008
7. Bowman C.C., and Selgrade M.K. Differences in allergenic potential of food extracts following oral exposure in mice reflect differences in digestibility: potential approaches to safety assessment. Toxicol. Sci. 102 (2008) 100-109
8. Bucchini L., and Goldman L.R. Starlink corn: a risk analysis. Environ. Health Perspect. 110 (2002) 5-13
9. CAC, Codex Alimentarius Commission's Report of the Fourth Session of the Codex ad hoc Intergovernmental Task Force on Foods Derived from Biotechnology. Yokohama, Japan, 2003a.
10. CAC, Codex Alimentarius Guideline for Conduct of Food Safety Assessments of Foods Derived from Recombinant-DNA Plants; Appendix IV: Annex on Assessment of Possible Allergenicity. Joint FAO/WHO Food Standard Programme, Rome Italy, 2003b, pp. 47-60.
11. Christensen H.R., et al. Low-dose oral tolerance due to antigen in the diet suppresses differentially the cholera toxin-adjuvantized IgE, IgA and IgG response. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 132 (2003) 248-257
12. Dearman R.J., and Kimber I. Determination of protein allergenicity: studies in mice. Toxicol. Lett. 120 (2001) 181-186
13. Dearman R.J., et al. Induction of IgE antibody responses by protein allergens: inter-laboratory comparisons. Food Chem. Toxicol. 41 (2003) 1509-1516
14. Food and Agricultural Organization of the UN and the World Health Organization (FAO/WHO), 2001. Report of a joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Allergenicity of Foods Derived from Biotechnology. Rome, Italy.
15. Fischer R., et al. Oral and nasal sensitization promote distinct immune responses and lung reactivity in a mouse model of peanut allergy. Am. J. Pathol. 167 (2005) 1621-1630
16. Flanagan M., et al. Breaking of oral tolerance by an encapsulated antigen. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 778 (1996) 373-375
17. Fu T.J. Digestion stability as a criterion for protein allergenicity assessment. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 964 (2002) 99-110
18. Fu T.J., et al. Digestibility of food allergens and nonallergenic proteins in simulated gastric fluid and simulated intestinal fluid-a comparative study. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50 (2002) 7154-7160
19. Gaudry P.A., et al. Murine IgE and IgG antibody responses to allergenic and non-allergenic foods: potential model for allergenicity assessment of foods in man (abstract). J. Allergy. Clin. Immunol. 113 Suppl. (2004) 234 (Abstract)
20. Herman R.A., et al. Digestion assays in allergenicity assessment of transgenic proteins. Environ. Health Perspect. 114 (2006) 1154-1157
21. Hilton J., et al. Characteristics of antibody responses induced in mice by protein allergens. Food Chem. Toxicol. 35 (1997) 1209-1218
22. Jain S.L., et al. Activation patterns of murine B cells after oral administration of an encapsulated soluble antigen. Vaccine 14 (1996) 42-48
23. Jain S.L., et al. Activation patterns of murine T cells after oral administration of an enterocoated soluble antigen. Cell Immunol. 167 (1996) 170-175
24. Kimber I., et al. Assessment of the allergenic potential of proteins. Toxicol. Lett. 140-141 (2003) 297-302
25. Knippels L.M., et al. An oral sensitization model in Brown Norway rats to screen for potential allergenicity of food proteins. Methods 19 (1999) 78-82
26. Knippels L.M., et al. Oral sensitization to food proteins: a Brown Norway rat model. Clin. Exp. Allergy 28 (1998) 368-375
27. Koppelman, S.J., Hefle, S.L., 2006. Detecting Allergens in Food. CRC Press.
28. Kroghsbo S., et al. Experimental parameters differentially affect the humoral response of the cholera-toxin-based murine model of food allergy. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 131 (2003) 256-263
29. Li X.M., et al. A murine model of IgE-mediated cow's milk hypersensitivity. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 103 (1999) 206-214
30. Li X.M., et al. A murine model of peanut anaphylaxis: T- and B-cell responses to a major peanut allergen mimic human responses. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 106 (2000) 150-158
31. Marinaro M., et al. Mucosal adjuvant effect of cholera toxin in mice results from induction of T helper 2 (Th2) cells and IL-4. J. Immunol. 155 (1995) 4621-4629
32. Morafo V., et al. Genetic susceptibility to food allergy is linked to differential TH2-TH1 responses in C3H/HeJ and BALB/c mice. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 111 (2003) 1122-1128
33. Moreno F.J., et al. Stability of the major allergen Brazil nut 2S albumin (Ber e 1) to physiologically relevant in vitro gastrointestinal digestion. FEBS J. 272 (2005) 341-352
34. Navuluri L., et al. Allergic and anaphylactic response to sesame seeds in mice. identification of Ses i 3 and basic subunit of 11s globulins as allergens. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 140 (2006) 270-276
35. NIAID, Report of the NIH Expert Panel on Food Allergy Research. National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Disease, 2006.
36. Pastorello E.A., et al. Sensitization to the major allergen of Brazil nut is correlated with the clinical expression of allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 102 (1998) 1021-1027
37. Reese G., et al. Reduced allergenic potency of VR9-1, a mutant of the major shrimp allergen Pen a 1 (tropomyosin). J. Immunol. 175 (2005) 8354-8364
38. Saklayen M.G., et al. Kinetics of oral tolerance. Study of variables affecting tolerance induced by oral administration of antigen. Int. Arch. Allergy Appl. Immunol. 73 (1984) 5-9
39. Sicherer S.H., et al. Prevalence of peanut and tree nut allergy in the United States determined by means of a random digit dial telephone survey: a 5-year follow-up study. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 112 (2003) 1203-1207
40. Snider D.P., et al. Production of IgE antibody and allergic sensitization of intestinal and peripheral tissues after oral immunization with protein Ag and cholera toxin. J. Immunol. 153 (1994) 647-657
41. Thomas K., et al. Evaluation of mouse models for assessing the allergenic potential of proteins. The Toxicologist (2005) 84S1
42. van Wijk F., et al. Mixed antibody and T cell responses to peanut and the peanut allergens Ara h 1, Ara h 2, Ara h 3 and Ara h 6 in an oral sensitization model. Clin. Exp. Allergy 34 (2004) 1422-1428
43. van Wijk F., et al. The effect of the food matrix on in vivo immune responses to purified peanut allergens. Toxicol. Sci. 86 (2005) 333-341