A child-responsive model of giftedness

Conceptions of Giftedness: Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 38-51

  Callahan, Carolyn M ^a   Miller, Erin M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 63049112633     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511610455.004     Document Type: Chapter

References (45)

1. Amabile, T. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
2. Benbow, C. P., & Lubinski, D. (1997). Intellectually talented children: How can we best meet their needs? In N. Colangelo and G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education(2nd ed., pp. 155-169). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
3. Butterfield, E. C., & Ferretti, R. P. (1987). Toward a theoretical integration of cognitive hypotheses about intellectual differences among children. In J. G. Borkowski &J.D. Day(Eds.), Cognition in special children: Comparative approaches to retardation, learning disabilities, and giftedness(pp. 195-233). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
4. Clark, B. (1992). Growing up gifted(4th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
5. Coleman, E. B., & Shore, B. (1991). Problem-solving processes of high and average performers in physics. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 366-379.
6. Collins, M. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1999). Motivation and creativity. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity(pp. 297-312).NewYork: Cambridge University Press.
7. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: HarperCollins.
8. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.
9. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Wolfe, R. (2000). New conceptions and research approaches to creativity: Implications of a systems perspective for creativity in education. In K. Heller, F. Monks, R. Sternberg, & R. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent(2nd ed., pp. 81-93). New York: Elsevier.
11. Dawis, R. V., & Lofquist, L. H. (1984). A psychological theory of work adjustment. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
12. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
13. Gardner, H. (1991). The unschooled mind: How children think, how schools should teach. New York: Basic Books.
14. Gardner, H. (1993). Creating Minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi. New York: Basic Books.
15. Getzels, J.W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York: Wiley.
16. Hoover, S.M.(1994). Scientific problem finding in gifted fifth-grade students. Roeper Review, 16, 156-159.
17. Kanevsky, L. (1990). Pursuing qualitative difference in the flexible use of problemsolving strategy by young children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13, 115-140.
18. Kanevsky, L. S. (1992). The learning game. In P. Klein & A. J. Tannenbaum, To be young and gifted(pp. 204-241). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
19. Kaplan, S. N. (1986). The grid: A model to construct differentiated curriculum for the gifted. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented(pp. 182-193). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
20. Kaplan, S. N. (2001). Layering differentiated curriculum for the gifted and talented. In F. A. Karnes & S. M. Bean (Eds.), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted(pp. 133-158). Waco, TX: Prufrock.
21. Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2000). States of excellence. American Psychologist, 55, 137-150.
22. Porath, M. (1991). Stage and structure in the development of children with various types of “giftedness.” In R. Case (Ed.), The mind’s staircase: Exploring the conceptual underpinnings of children’s thought and knowledge(pp. 303-317). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
24. Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness: Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180-184, 261.
25. Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness(pp. 53-92). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. N. (1985). The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
27. Renzulli, J. S., & Smith, L. H. (1978). The compactor. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
28. Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657-687.
29. Shavinina, L. V., & Kholodnaja, M. A. (1996). The cognitive experience as a psychological basis of intellectual giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20(1), 3-35.
30. Shore, B. M. (2000). Metacognition and flexibility: Qualitative difference in how gifted children think. In R. C. Friedman & B. M. Shore (Eds.), Talents unfolding: Cognition and development.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
31. Stanley, J. C., & Benbow, C. P. (1986). Youths who reason exceptionally well mathematically. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness(pp. 361-387). New York: Cambridge University Press.
32. Sternberg, R. J. (1981).Acomponential theory of intelligence. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25, 86-93.
33. Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
34. Sternberg, R. J. (1986).Atriarchic theory of intellectual giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg &J. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness(pp. 223-243). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
35. Sternberg, R. J. (1995).Atriarchic approach to giftedness. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
36. Sternberg, R. J. (2000a). Identifying and developing creative giftedness. Roeper Review, 23, 60-64.
37. Sternberg, R. J. (2000b). Giftedness as developing expertise. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent(2nd ed., pp. 55-66). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
38. Sternberg, R. J., & Horvath, J. A. (1998). Cognitive conceptions of expertise and their relations to giftedness. In R. C. Friedman & K. B. Rogers (Eds.), Talent in context: Historical and social perspectives on giftedness(pp. 177-191). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
39. Tannenbaum, A. J. (1986). Giftedness: A psychosocial approach. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness(pp. 21-52). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
40. Tannenbaum, A. J. (1997). The meaning and making of giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.) Handbook of gifted education(2nd ed., pp. 27-42). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
41. Tannenbaum, A. J. (2000). Giftedness: The ultimate instrument for good and evil. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent(2nd ed.). New York: Elsevier.
42. Tomlinson, C. A., Kaplan, S. N., Renzulli, J. S., Purcel, J., Lappein, J., & Burns, D. (2002). The parallel curriculum: A design to develop high potenial and challenge high-ability learners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
43. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
44. Winner, E. (1997). Exceptionally high intelligence and schooling. American Psychologist, 52, 1070-1081.
45. Winner, E. (2000). The origins and ends of giftedness. American Psychologist, 55, 159-169.