Youths who reason exceptionally well mathematically and/or verballyl using the MVT: D4 model to develop their talents

Conceptions of Giftedness: Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 20-37

  Brody, Linda E ^a   Stanley, Julian C ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 22544487444     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511610455.003     Document Type: Chapter

References (72)

1. Achter, J. A., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Eftekhari-Sanjani, H. (1999). Assessing vocational preferences among gifted adolescents adds incremental validity to abilities:Adiscriminant analysis of educational outcomes over a 10-year interval. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 777-789.
2. Albert, R. S. (1975). Toward a behavioral definition of genius. American Psychologist, 30(2), 140-151.
3. Barnett, L. B., & Juhasz, S. E. (2001). The Johns Hopkins University talent searches today. Gifted and Talented International, 16, 96-99.
4. Bayley, N. (1955). On the growth of intelligence. American Psychologist, 10, 805-818.
5. Bayley, N. (1970). Development of mental abilities. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 1163-2109). New York: Wiley.
6. Bell, E. T. (1937). Men of mathematics. New York: Simon & Schuster.
7. Benbow, C.P. (1992). Academic achievement in mathematics and science of students between ages 13 and 23: Are there differences among students in the top one percent of mathematical ability? Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 51-61.
8. Benbow, C. P., Lubinski, D., Shea, D. L., & Eftekhari-Sanjani, H. (2000). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: Their status 20 years later. Psychological Science, 11, 474-480.
9. Benbow, C. P., Lubinski, D., & Suchy, B. (1996). Impact of the SMPY model and programs from the perspective of the participant. In C. P. Benbow & D. Lubinski (Eds.), Intellectual talent: Psychometric and social issues(pp. 266-300). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
10. Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (Eds.) (1983). Academic precocity: Aspects of its development. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
11. Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1996). Inequity in equity: How “equity” can lead to inequity for high-potential students. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 249-292.
12. Bloom, B. S. (Ed.) (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook I. The cognitive domain. New York: McKay.
13. Brody, L. E. (2001). The talent search model for meeting the academic needs of gifted and talented students. Gifted and Talented International, 16, 99-102.
14. Brody, L. E. (2004). Meeting the diverse needs of gifted students through individualized educational plans. In D. Boothe & J. C. Stanley (Eds.), In the eyes of the beholder: Critical issues for diversity in gifted education(pp. 129-138). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
15. Brody, L. E., & Blackburn, C. C. (1996). Nurturing exceptional talent: SET as a legacy of SMPY. In C. P. Benbow & D. Lubinski (Eds.), Intellectual talent: Psychometric and social issues(pp. 246-265). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
16. Brody, L. E. & Mills, C. J. (1997). Gifted children with learning disabilities:Areview of the issues. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30 (3), 282-296.
17. Brody, L. E., Muratori, M. C., & Stanley, J. C. (2004). Early college entrance: Academic, social, and emotional considerations. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, & M. U. M. Gross (Eds.), The Templeton National Report on Acceleration, Vol. II. Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation.
18. Cox, C. M. (1926). Genetic studies of genius: Vol. 2. The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
19. Durden, W. G., & Tangherlini, A. E. (1993). Smart kids. Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.
20. Fox, L. H. (1974). A mathematics program for fostering precocious achievement. In J. C. Stanley, D. P. Keating, & L. H. Fox (Eds.), Mathematical talent: Discovery, description, and development(pp. 101-125). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
21. Friedenberg, E. Z. (1966). The dignity of youth and other atavisms(pp. 119-135). Boston: Beacon.
22. George, W. C., Cohn, S. J., & Stanley, J. C. (Eds.) (1979). Educating the gifted: Acceleration and enrichment. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
23. George, W. C., & Denham, S. A. (1976). Curriculum experimentation for the mathematically gifted. In D. P. Keating (Ed.), Intellectual talent: Research and development(pp. 103-131). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
24. Gilheany, S. (2001). The Irish Centre for Talented Youth-An adaptation of the Johns Hopkins talent search model. Gifted and Talented International, 16, 102-104.
25. Gustin, W. C. (1985a). The development of exceptional research mathematicians. In B. S. Bloom (Ed.), Developing talent in young people(pp. 270-331). New York: Ballantine.
26. Gustin, W. C. (1985b). One mathematician: Hal Foster.” In B. S. Bloom (Ed.), Developing talent in young people(pp. 332-347). New York: Ballantine.
27. Hilgard, E. R., & Bower, G. H. (1974). Theories of learning (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28. Hollingworth, L. S. (1942). Children above 180 IQ Stanford-Binet: Origin and development. Yonkers, NY: World Book.
29. Hunt, J. M. (1961). Intelligence and experience. New York: Ronald Press.
30. Keating, D. P. (Ed.) (1976). Intellectual talent: Research and development. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
31. Keating, D. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1972). Extreme measures for the exceptionally gifted in mathematics and science. Educational Researcher, 1(9), 3-7.
32. Kornhaber, M. L. (2004). Using multiple intelligences to overcome cultural barriers to identification for gifted education. In D. Boothe&J. C. Stanley (Eds.), In the eyes of the beholder: Critical issues for diversity in gifted education(pp. 215-225). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
33. Kramer, E. A. (1974). Nature and growth of modern mathematics. New York: Fawcett World Library.
34. Lehman, H. C. (1953). Age and achievement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35. Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2000). States of excellence. American Psychologist, 55, 137-150.
36. Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., Shea, D. L., Eftekhari-Sanjani, H., & Halvorson, M. B. J. (2001). Men and women at promise for scientific excellence: Similarity not dissimilarity. Psychological Science, 12, 309-317.
37. Lubinski, D., Webb, R. M., Morelock, M. J., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Top 1 in 10,000: A 10-year follow-up of the profoundly gifted. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 718-729.
38. Lupkowski-Shoplik, A, Benbow, C. P., Assouline, S. G., & Brody, L. E. (2003). Talent searches: Meeting the needs of academically talented youth. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education, 3rd edition (pp. 204-218). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
39. McGinn, P. V. (1976). Verbally gifted youth. In D. P. Keating (Ed.), Intellectual talent: Research and development(pp. 160-182). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
40. Muratori, M., Colangelo, N., & Assouline, S. (2003). Early-entrance students: Impressions of their first semester of college. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 219-238.
41. Olszewski-Kubilius, P (2004). Talent search: Purposes, rationale, and role in gifted education. In D. Boothe & J. C. Stanley (Eds.), In the eyes of the beholder: Critical issues for diversity in gifted education(pp. 251-262). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
42. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2004). Curriculum compacting: A research-based differentiation strategy for culturally diverse talented students. In D. Boothe & J. C. Stanley (Eds.), In the eyes of the beholder: Critical issues for diversity in gifted education(pp. 87-100).Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
43. Robinson, H. B. (1983). A case for radical acceleration: Programs of the Johns Hopkins University and the University of Washington. In C. P. Benbow & J. C. Stanley (Eds.), Academic promise: Aspects of its development(pp. 139-159). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
44. Robinson, N. M., & Robinson, H. B. (1982). The optimal match: Devising the best compromise for the highly gifted student. In D. Feldman (Ed.), New directions for child development: Developmental approaches to giftedness and creativity(pp. 79-94). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
45. Roe, A. (1951). A psychological study of eminent physical scientists. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 43, 121-239.
46. Sethna, B. N., Wickstrom, C. D., Boothe, D., & Stanley, J. C. (2001). The Advanced Academy of Georgia: Four years as a residential early-college-entrance program. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 13, 11-21.
47. Shea, D. L., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents:A20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 604-614.
48. Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York: Guilford.
49. Southern, W. T., Jones, E. D., & Stanley, J. C. (1993). Acceleration and enrichment: The content and development of program options. In E. A. Keller, F. K. Monks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent(pp. 387-409). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
50. Stanley, J. C. (1974). Intellectual precocity. In J. C. Stanley, D. P. Keating, & L. H. Fox (Eds.), Mathematical talent: Discovery, description, and development(pp. 1-22). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
51. Stanley, J. C. (1976). Special fast-math classes taught by college professors to fourththrough twelfth-graders. In D. P. Keating (Ed.), Intellectual talent: Research and development(pp. 132-159). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
52. Stanley, J. C. (1977). Rationale of the Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY) during its first five years of promoting educational acceleration. In J. C. Stanley, W. C. George, & C. H. Solano (Eds.), The gifted and the creative: A fifty-year perspective(pp. 75-112). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
53. Stanley, J. C. (1979). The study and facilitation of talent for mathematics. In A. H. Passow (Ed.), The gifted and the talented: Their education and development. The seventy-eighth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education(pp. 169-185). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54. Stanley, J. C. (1980). Manipulate important educational variables. Educational Psychologist, 15(3), 164-171.
55. Stanley, J. C. (1990). Leta Hollingworth’s contributions to above-level testing of the gifted. Roeper Review, 12(3), 166-171.
56. Stanley, J. C. (1991). A better model for residential high schools for talented youths. Phi Delta Kappan, 72(6), 471-473.
57. Stanley, J. C. (1993). Boys and girls who reason well mathematically. In G. Bock & K. Ackrill (Eds.), The origins and development of high ability(pp. 119-138). New York:Wiley.
58. Stanley, J. C. (1994). Mechanical aptitude: Neglected undergirding of technological expertise. The Journal Portfolio (Article 7). Evanston, IL: Illinois Association for Gifted Children.
59. Stanley, J. C. (1996). In the beginning: The Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth. In C. P. Benbow & D. Lubinski (Eds.), Intellectual talent: Psychometric and social issues(pp. 225-235). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
60. Stanley, J. C. (1997). Varieties of intellectual talent. Journal of Creative Behavior, 31(2), 93-119. Commentaries by Howard Gardner and Joyce VanTassel-Baska, 120-130.
61. Stanley, J. C. (2000). Helping students learn only what they don’t already know. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6(1), 216-222.
62. Stanley, J. C., & Benbow, C. P. (1986). Youths who reason extremely well mathematically. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness(pp. 361-387). New York: Cambridge University Press.
63. Stanley, J. C., & Brody, L. E. (2001). History and philosophy of the talent search model. Gifted and Talented International, 16, 94-96.
64. Stanley, J. C., George, W. C., & Solano, C. H. (1977). The gifted and the creative. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
65. Stanley, J. C., Keating, D., & Fox, L. H. (Eds.) (1974). Mathematical talent: Discovery, description, and development. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
66. Stanley, J. C., & Stanley, B. S. K. (1986). High school biology, chemistry, or physics learned well in three weeks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 237-250.
67. Stumpf, H., & Mills, C. J. (1997). The computerized CTY Spatial Test Battery (STB): Findings from the first two test administrations. (Technical Report 16). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Center for Talented Youth.
68. Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius: Vol. I. Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
69. Touron, J. (2001). School and College Ability Test (SCAT) validation in Spain: Overview of the process and some results. Gifted and Talented International, 16, 104-107.
70. Wallach, M. A. (1978). Care and feeding of the gifted. Contemporary Psychology, 23, 616-617.
71. Weiner, N. (1953). Ex-prodigy: My childhood and youth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
72. Zuckerman, H. (1977). Scientific elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States. New York: Free Press.