Ranking the lacunary (Bu 4N) 9{H[α 2- P 2W 17 O61]} polyoxometalate's stabilizing ability for Ir(0)n nanocluster formation and stabilization using the five-criteria method plus necessary control experiments

Langmuir

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 1327-1336

  Graham, Christopher R ^a   Ott, Lisa Starkey ^a   Finke, Richard G ^a  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADDITIONAL CONTROLS; AGGLOMERATION RATES; ANIONIC CHARGE DENSITIES; BASIC STRUCTURES; CATALYTIC ACTIVITIES; CLEAN PRODUCTS; CONTROL EXPERIMENTS; DEGREE OF PROTONATION; DIRECT MEASUREMENTS; ELEMENTAL ANALYSIS; GOLD STANDARDS; INHERENT ERRORS; LACUNARY; NANOCLUSTER FORMATIONS; NB-CONTAINING; POLYOXOMETALATE; POLYOXOMETALATES; PROTONATED; PROTONATION STATE; SOLVENT-SOLUBLE; TETRABUTYLAMMONIUM SALTS; TETRADENTATE; WELLS-DAWSON;

ACETONE; AGGLOMERATION; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; COMPLEXATION; IRIDIUM; NIOBIUM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PROTONATION; RATE CONSTANTS; STABILIZATION; WELLS;

NANOCLUSTERS;

EID: 62149092882     PISSN: 07437463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/la8025254     Document Type: Article

References (116)

1. Reviews ot nanoclusters (see also): (a) Burda, C; Chen, x.; Narayanan, R.; El-Sayed, M. A. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 1025.
2. (b) Murphy, C. J.; Sau, T. K.; Gole, A. M.; Orendorff, C. J.; Gao, J.; Gou, L.; Hunyadi, S. E.; Li, T. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 13857.
3. (c) Green, M. Chem. Commun. 2005, 24, 3002.
4. (d) Narayanan, R.; El-Sayed, M. A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 12663.
5. (e) Shenhar, R.; Rotello, V. M. Ace. Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 549.
6. (f) Roucoux, A.; Schulz, J.; Patin, H. Chem Rev. 2002, 102, 3757.
7. (g) Králik, M.; Bifñs, A. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2001, 177, 113.
8. (h) Rao, C. N. R.; Kulkarni, G. U.; Thomas, P. J.; Edwards, P. P. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2000, 29, 27.
9. (i) Fendler, J. H., Ed. Nanoclusters and Nanostructured Films; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 1998.
10. (j) Fürstner, A., Ed. Active Metals: Preparation, Characterization, and Applications; VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 1996.
11. (k) Bradley, J. S. In Clusters and Colloids. From Theory to Applications; Schmid, G., Ed.; VCH: New York, 1994; pp 459-544.
12. (l) Schmid, G. Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 1709.
13. (m) A superb series of papers is available in: Faraday Discussions 1991, 92, 1 -300.
14. (n) Schmid, G. In Aspects of Homogeneous Catalysis; Ugo, R., Ed.; Kluwer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1990; Chapter 1.
15. (o) Andres, R. P.; Averback, R. S.; Brown, W. L.; Brus, L. E.; Goddard, W. A., IΠ; Kaldor, A.; Louie, S. G.; Moscovits, M.; Peercy, P. S.; Riley, S. J.; Siegel, R. W.; Spaepen, F.; Wang, Y. J. Mater. Res. 1989, 4, 704.
16. (p) Henglein, A. Chem Rev. 1989, 89, 1861.
17. (q) Thomas, J. M. Pure Appl. Chem.1988, 60, 1517.
18. (r) Jena, P.; RaoB. K.; Khanna, S. N. Physics and Chemistry of Small Clusters; Plenum: New York, 1987.
19. Schmid, G.; Chi, L. Adv. Mater. 1998, 10, 515.
20. Schmid, G.; Baumle, M; Geerkens, M.; Heim, I.; Osemann, C; Sawitowski, T. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1999, 28, 179.
21. Aiken, J. D., IH; Finke, R. G. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 1999, 145, 1.
22. Roucoux, A.; Schulz, J.; Patin, H. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 3757.
23. Cushing, B. L.; Kolesnichenko, V. L.; O'Connor, C. J. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 3893.
24. Astruc, D.; Lu, F.; Aranzes, J. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 7852.
25. Ott, L. S.; Finke, R. G. Coord. Chem Rev. 2007, 251, 1075.
26. Simon, U.; Schön, G.; Schmid, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1993, 32, 250.
27. Elghanian, R.; Storhoff, J. J.; Mucic, R. C; Letsinger, R. L.; Mirkin, C. A. Science 1997, 277, 1078.
28. Reetz, M. T.; Winter, M.; Dumpich, G.; Lohau, J.; Friedrichowski, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, /99, 4539.
29. Lin, Y.; Finke, R. G. J. Am Chem Soc. 1994, 116, 8335.
30. Lin, Y.; Finke, R. G. Inorg. Chem. 1994, 33, 4891.
31. Bönnemann, H.; Nagabhushana, K. S. Colloidal Nanoparticles in Catalysis. In Surface and Nanomoleculr Catalysis; Richards, R., Ed.; CRC: Boca Raton, FL, 2006; pp 63-93.
32. Özkar, S.; Finke, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 5796.
33. Özkar, S.; Finke, R. G. Langmuir 2002, 18, 7653.
34. Turkevich, J.; Kim, G. Science 1970, 169, 873.
35. Chaudret, B.; Vidoni, O.; Philippot, K.; Amiens, C; Balmes, O.; Malm, J.-O.; Bovin, J.-O.; Senocq, F.; Casanove, M.-J. Angew. Chem.. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 3736.
36. Collier, P. J.;Iggo,J. A.; Whyman, R. J. Λío/. Catal. A: Chem. 1999, 146,149.
37. Shiraishi, Y.; Arakawa, D.; Toshima, N. Eur. Phys. J. E 2002, 8, 377.
38. Romero-Cano, M. S.; Martin-Rodriguez, A.; de las Nieves, F. J. Langmuir2001, 17, 3505.
39. Kim, A. Y.; Berg, J. C. Langmuir 2002, 18, 3418.
40. Fritz, G.; Schadler, V.; Willenbacher, N.; Wagner, N. J. Langmuir2002, 18, 6381.
41. Crooks, R. M.; Zhao, M.; Sun, L.; Chechik, V.; Yeung, L. K. Ace. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 181.
42. Dagani, R. Chem. Eng. News 1999, 77, 33.
43. Balogh, L.; Tomalia, D. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 7355.
44. Chauhan, B. P. S.; Rathore, J. S.; Chauhan, M.; Krawichz, A. /. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 2876.
45. Petit, C; Lixon, P.; Pileni, M. P. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 12974.
46. Dupont, J.; Fonseca, G. S.; Umpierre, A. P.; Fichtner, P. F. P.; Teixeira, S. R /. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 4228.
47. Itoh, H.; Naka, K.; Chujo, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 3026.
48. Cassol, C. C; Umpierre, A. P.; Machado, G.; Wolke, S. I.; Dupont, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 3298.
49. Balasubramanian, R.; Beomseok, K.; Tripp, S. L.; Wang, X.; Lieberman, M.; Wei, A. Langmuir 2002, 18, 3676.
50. Tripp, S.L.;Pusztay,S. V.;Ribbe, A. E.; Wei, A.J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 7914.
51. Colloidal/nanocluser stability is often discussed at least initially in terms of DLVO (Derjaugin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek) theory in which that stabilization is achieved through a delicate balance of interparticle Coulombic repulsion opposing van der Waals attraction. Hence, DLVO theory predicts that anions adsorbed on the coordinatively unsaturated, electrophilic nanocluster surface are a key to stability, providing the Coulombic repulsion component opposing van der Waals attraction between the nanoclusters (accordingly, DLVO-type stabilization is also commonly referred to as " electrostatic" stabilization). In addition, anions are a component of the diffuse layer of ions surrounding and stabilizing nanoclusters. This diffuse layer is the Debye layer (denoted by \lκ; values are typically in ran). Steric, as well as "electrosteric" stabilization of colloidal/ nanocluster particles is also known (ref 8).
52. (b) Verwey, E. J. W.; Overbeek, J. T. G. Theory of the Stability ofLyophobic Colloids, 2nd ed.; Dover Publications, Inc.: Mineola, NY, 1999.
53. Watzky, M. A.; Finke, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 10382.
54. Zsigmondy, R. Z. Anal. Chem. 1901, 697.
55. Thiele, H.; von Levern, H. S. J. Colloid Sci. 1965, 20, 679.
56. Özkar, S.; Finke, R. G. Langmuir 2003, 19, 6247.
57. Ott, L. S.; Finke, R. G. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 8382.
58. Ott, L. S.; Hornstein, B. J.; Finke, R. G. Langmuir 2006, 22, 9357.
59. 9- appear to be preferred and lead to superior stabilization (ref 46); (iv) that the traditionally weakly coordinating anion BRΓ provides for considerable nanocluster stability in high dielectric constant solvents (ref 39), even in the presence of the steric stabilizer poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) (ref 40); (v) that the observed nanocluster stabilization by tridentate species should translate in at least a general way to other tridentate anions or ligand systems as well as to other metals including Rh, Pt, Au, and Cu (ref 40).
60. Finke, R. G.; Özkar, S. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2004, 248, 135.
61. (a) Troupis, A.; Hiskia, A.; Papaconstantinou, E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed2002, 41, 1911.
62. (b) Mandal, S.; Selvakannan, P. R.; Pasricha, R.; Sastry, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 8440.
63. (c) Keita, B.; Mbomekalle, I.; Nadjo, L.; Haut, C. Electrochem. Commun. 2004, 6, 978.
64. (d) Zhang, J.; Keita, B.; Nadjo, L.; Mbomekalle, I. M.; Liu, T. LangmuirUm, 24, 5277.
65. (e) Kang, Z.; Tsang, C. H. A.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, M.; Womg, N.; Zapien, J. A.; Shan, Y.; Lee, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 5326.
66. (f) Shanmugam, S.; Viswanathan, B.; Varadarajan, T. K. J. Moi. Catal. A: Chem. 2005, 241, 52.
67. (g) Maayan, G.; Neumann, R. Chem. Commun. 2005, 4595.
68. (h) Izumi, Y.; Konishi, K.; Tsukahara, M.; Obaid, D. M.; Aika, K. /. Phys. Chem. C 2007, ;//, 10073.
69. (i) Boujday, S.; Blanchard, J.; Villanneau, R.; Krafft, M.; Geantet, C; Louis, C; Breysse, M.; Proust, A. ChemPhysChem 2007, 8, 2636.
70. (j) Qi, W.; Li, H.; Wu, L. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 8257.
71. (a) Kogan, V.; Aizenshtat, Z.; Neumann, R. New J. Chem. 2002, 26, 272.
72. (b) Lica, G. C; Browne, K. P.; Tong, Y. J. Cluster Sci. 2006, 17, 349.
73. (c) Gordeev, A. V.; Ershov, B. G. High Energy Chem. 1999, 33, 218.
74. (d) Maksimov, G. M; Zaikovskii, V. I.; Mateev, K. I.; Likholobov, V. A. Kinet. Catal. 2000, 41, 844.
75. (e) Kogan, V.; Aizenshtat, Z.; Popovitz-Biro, R.; Neumann, R. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3529.
76. (f) Gordeev, A. V.; Kartashev, N. I.; Ershov, B. G. High Energy Chem.2002, 36, 102.
77. (g) Maksimova, G. M.; Chuvilin, A. L.; Moroz, E. M.; Likholobov, V. A.; Matveev, K. I. Kinet. Catal. 2004, 45, 870.
78. Pope, M. T. Polyoxo Anions: Synthesis and Structure. In Comprehensive Coordination Chemistry; McCleverty, J., Meyer, T. J., Eds.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, U.K., 2004; Vol. 4, pp 635-678.
79. 9- and how they can match with different metal lattices (ref 48).
80. Martel, D.; Kuhn, A.; Kulesza, P. J.; Galkowski, M. T.; Malik, M. A. Electrochim. Acta 2001, 46, 4197.
81. (a) Finney, E. E.; Finke, R. G. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 1956-1970.
82. (b) Besson, C; Finney, E. E.; Finke, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 8179.
83. (c) Besson, C; Finney, E. E.; Finke, R. G. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 4925.
84. Ott, L. S.; Finke, R. G. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2008, 8, 1551-1556.
85. Aiken, J. D., ΠI; Finke, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 9545.
86. Ott, L. S.; Finke, R. G. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 2592-2601.
87. Bartis, J.; Sukal, S.; Dankova, M.; Kraft, E.; Kronzon, R.; Blumenstein, M.; Francesconi, L. C. J. Chem. Soc, Dalton Trans. 1997, 1937.
88. Radkov, E.; Beer, R. H. Tetrahedron 1995, 14, 2139.
89. Gamelas, J. A.; Couto, F. A. S.; Trovão, M. C. N.; Cavaleίro, A. M. V.; Cavaleiro, J. A. S.; Pedrosa de Jesus, J. D. Thermochim. Acta 1999, 326, 165.
90. Gamelas, J. A, F.; Soares, M. R.; Ferreira, A.; Cavaleiro, A. M. V. Inorg. Chim Acta 2003, 342, 16.
91. Hornstein, B. J.; Fiπke, R. G. Inorg. Chem 2002, 41, 2720.
92. This work is based primarily on the M.S. Thesis work of Christopher R. Graham, Colorado State University, Fall, 2008.
93. Watzky, M. A.; Finke, R. G. Chem. Mater. 1997, 9, 3083.
94. (a) Homstein, B. J.; Finke, R. G. Chem. Mater. 2003, 15, 899
95. (b) Since our original 2002 paper detailing the five criteria, we have published a study of scaled-up, isolated nanoclusters (ref 59a) which reveals that the precise method of isolation matters considerably (probably due to surface chemistry/modifications happening on the nanoclusters (ref 59)), with results from isolation experiments in acetone (as is the case for the present studies) being less reproducible than those in propylene carbonate, for example, ref 59. In that regard, the activity after isolation from acetone (the solvent used in the original five-criteria study (ref 15)) yields larger error bars (ca. a factor of 3 is seen in the Table 1 data in the present paper), inherent error that one needs to be aware of when interpreting criteria 3 in Table 1.
96. Watzky, M. A.; Finke, R. G. Chem. Mater. 1997, 9, 3083.
97. Aiken, J. D., IΠ; Finke, R. G. Chem. Mater. 1999, 11, 1035.
98. Widegren, J. A.; Aiken, J. D., ΓΠ; Özkar, S.; Finke, R. G. Chem. Mater.2001, 13, 312.
99. Hornstein, B. J.; Finke, R. G. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 139.
100. Widegren, J. A.; Finke, R. G. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 1558.
101. (a) Mizuno, N.; Weiner, N.; Finke, R. G. J. Moi Catal. 1996, 114, 15-28.
102. (b) Weiner, H.; Trovarelli, A.; Finke, R. G. J. Moi. Catal. 2003, 191, 253-279.
103. Nagata, T.; Pohl, M.; Weiner, H.; Finke, R. G. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 36,1366.
104. (8x)-" complex. And, synthetically, the more easily and quickly prepared in situ complex is preferred. For these latter two reasons, as well as the success of the in situ control reported in the main text, we emphasized the in situ generated precatalysts in the present study,
105. (b) See ref 15 and Table 1, p 6253 ("Controls Generating the Ir(Õ) Nanoclusters via the In-Situ Precursors. .") and Figures S12 and S13 of the Supporting Information in ref 16.
106. Pohl, M; Lyon, D. K.; Mizuno, N.; Nomiya, K.; Finke, R. G. Inorg. Chem. 1995, 34, 1413.
107. Reproducibility in transition-metal nanocluster syntheses implies control over the underlying steps of especially nucleation but also growth and agglomeration (refs 35, 48, 49). Reproducibility approaching a small molecule-like ±15% in catalytic activity, for example, is now achievable in cases such as the present nanoclusters (see also Bradley's dramatic example of the ±500% effects of HC1 byproduct from nanocluster syntheses from metal halides (ref 70). Such reproducibility requires careful control over variables such the nanocluster precursor, the amount of stabilizer and the byproducts of the synthesis that are present, the solvent purity (ref 13), the water (refs 13, 35) and oxygen content, the temperature, and the order of addition of reagents (ref 15).
108. Kohler, J. U.; Bradley, J. S. Langmuir 1998, 14, 2730.
109. 10-.
110. Green, M.; Kuc, T. A.; Taylor, S. H. J. Chem. Soc. A 1971, 2334.
111. 2/ki criterion more difficult and open to misinterpretation.
112. Homstein, B. J.; Finke, R. G. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 2720.
113. Pohl, M.; Finke, R. G. Organometallics 1993, 12, 1453.
114. 9- system, and that, too, can inflate the TTO value. In short, the range of errors seen for entries 1 -4 in Table 1 indicated that TTO values should probably differ by more than a factor of 2 before too much interpretation is given those TTO values.
115. 4 is a weak stabilizer compared to basic POMs (although it is surprisingly effective as a stabilizer in high dielectric constant solvents vs neutral ligand such as PVP polymer or solvents alone that are claimed to be stabilizers (refs 8, 39, 40)).
116. 2/h without PS). The final product is again bulk lr(0) metal.