Exploring associations between agronomic and chemical composition traits for barley improvement

Cereal Research Communications

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 111-119

  Vigier, B J ^a   Choo, T M ^a   Fregeau Reid, J ^a  

^a OTTAWA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

ADF; Barley; Kernel weight; Starch; Test weight; Total glucan

Indexed keywords

HORDEUM; HORDEUM VULGARE SUBSP. VULGARE;

EID: 61849153866     PISSN: 01333720     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1556/CRC.37.2009.1.13     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. AACC. 2000. Approved methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists, Tenth Edition. American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc., St. Paul, MN.
2. Atlin, G.N., McRae, K.B., Lu, X. 2000. Genotype x region interaction for two-row barley yield in Canada. Crop Sci. 40:1-6.
3. Andersson, A.M., Elfverson, C., Andersson, R., Regnér, S., Åman, P. 1999. Chemical and physical characteristics of different barley samples. J. Sci. Food Agric. 79:979-986.
4. Bowman, J.G.P., Blake, T.K., Surber, L.M.M., Habernicht, D.K., Bockelman, H. 2001. Feed-quality variation in the barley core collection of the USDA National Small Grains Collection. Crop Sci. 41:863-870.
5. Choo, T.M., Ho, K.M., Konishi, T., Martin, R.A. 1992. Tests for randomness among doubled-haploid lines derived by the bulbosum method in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). SABRAO J. 24:87-92.
6. Choo, T.M., Ho, K.M., Martin, R.A. 2001. Genetic analysis of a hulless x covered cross of barley using double-haploid lines. Crop Sci. 41:1021-1026.
7. Elfversson, C., Andersson, A.A., Åman, P., Regnér, S. 1999. Chemical composition of barley cultivars fractionated by weighing, pneumatic classification, sieving, and sorting on a specific gravity table. Cereal Chem. 76:434-438.
8. Engstrom, D.F., Mathison, G.W., Goonewardene, L.A. 1992. Effect of β-glucan, starch, and fibre content and steam vs. dry rolling of barley grain on its degradability and utilisation by steers. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 47:33-46.
9. Fairbairn, S.L., Patience, J.F., Classen, H.L., Zijlstra, R.T. 1999. The energy content of barley fed to growing pigs: characterizing the nature of its variability and developing prediction equations for its estimation. J. Anim. Sci. 77:1502-1512.
10. Frégeau-Reid, J., Choo, T.M., Ho, K.M., Martin, R.A., Konishi, T. 2001. Comparisons of two-row and six-row barley for chemical composition using doubled-haploid lines. Crop Sci. 41:1737-1743.
11. Gabriel, K.R. 1971. The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika 58:453-467.
12. Güler, M. 2003. Barley grain β-glucan content as affected by nitrogen and irrigation. Field Crops Res. 84:335-340.
13. Holtekjolen, A.K., Uhlen, A.K., Brathen, E., Sahlstrom, S., Knutsen, S.H. 2006. Contents of starch and non-starch polysaccharides in barley varieties of different origin. Food Chem. 94:348-358.
14. Hunt, C.W. 1996. Factors affecting the feeding quality of barley for ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 62:37-48.
15. Jui, P.Y., Choo, T.M., Ho, K.M., Konishi, T., Martin, R.A. 1997. Genetic analysis of a two-row x six-row cross of barley using doubled-haploid lines. Theor. Appl. Genet. 94:549-556.
16. Kjær, B., Jensen, J. 1996. Quantitative trait loci for grain yield components in a cross between a six-rowed and a two-rowed barley. Euphytica 90:39-48.
17. Kong, D., Choo, T.M., Jui, P., Ferguson, T., Therrien, M.C., Ho, K.M., May, K.W., Narasimhalu, P. 1994. Genetic variation and adaptation of 76 Canadian barley cultivars. Can. J. Plant Sci. 74:737-744.
18. Kong, D., Choo, T.M., Jui, P., Ferguson, T., Therrien, M.C., Ho, K.M., May, K.W., Narasimhalu, P. 1995. Variation in starch, protein, and fibre of Canadian barley cultivars. Can. J. Plant Sci. 75:865-870.
19. Li, J.Z., Huang, Q., Heinrichs, F., Ganal, M.W., Röder, M.S. 2005. Analysis of QTLs for yield, yield components, and malting quality in a BC3-DH population if spring barley. Theor. Appl. Genet. 110:356-363.
20. McCleary, B.V., Glennie-Holmes, M. 1985. Enzymatic quantification of TBG in barley and malt. J. Inst. Brew. 91:285-295.
21. McCleary, B.V., Gibson, T.S., Solah, V. 1992. A rapid procedure for total starch measurement in cereal grains and products. In: Humphrey-Taylor, V.J. (ed), Proc. 42nd RACI Cereal Chem. Conf. Christchurch, New Zealand, pp. 304-312.
22. McQueen, R.E., Nicholson, J.W.G. 1979. Modification of the neutral-detergent fibre procedure for cereals and vegetables by using alpha-amylase. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 62:676-680.
23. Molina-Cano, J.L., Francesch, M., Perez-Vendrell, A.M., Ramo, T., Voltas, J., Brufau, J. 1997. Genetic and environmental variation in malting and feed quality of barley. J. Cereal Sci. 25:37-47.
24. Narasimhalu, P., Kong, D., Choo, T.M., Ferguson, T., Therrien, M.C., Ho, K.M., May, K.W., Jui, P. 1995. Effects of environment and cultivar on total mixed-linkage β-glucan content in eastern and western Canadian barleys (Hordeum vulgare L.). Can. J. Plant Sci. 75:371-376.
25. Oscarsson, M., Andersson, R., Salomonsson, A.C., Åman, P. 1996. Chemical composition of barley samples focusing on dietary fibre components. J. Cereal Sci. 24:161-170.
26. Oscarsson, M., Andersson, R., Åman, P., Olofsson, S., Jonsson, A. 1998. Effects of cultivar, nitrogen, fertilization rate and environment on yield and grain quality of barley. J. Sci. Food Agric. 78:359-366.
27. SAS Institute, SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 6, 4th Ed. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
28. Tinker, N.A., Mather, D.E., Rossnagel, B.G., Kasha, K.J., Kleinhofs, A., Hayes, P.M., Falks, D.E., Ferguson, T., Shugar, L.P., Legge, W.G., Irvine, R.B., Choo, T.M., Briggs, K.G., Ullrich, S.E., Franckowiak, J.D., Blake, T.K., Graf, R.J., Dofing, S.M., Saghai Maroof, M.A., Scoles, G.J., Hoffman, D., Dahleen, L.S., Kilian, A., Chen, F., Biyashev, R.M., Kudrna, D.A., Steffenson, B.J. 1996. Regions of the genome that affect agronomic performance in two-row barley. Crop Sci. 36:1053-1062.
29. Yan, W., Rajcan, I. 2002. Biplot evaluation of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Sci. 42:11-20.
30. Yan, W., Kang, M.S. 2003. GGE biplot Analysis: A graphical tool for breeders, geneticists, and agronomists. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 213 pp.
31. Yan, W., Kang, M.S., Ma, B., Woods, S., Cornelius, P.L. 2007. GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype- by-environment data. Crop Sci. 47:643-655.