The effect of post type and length on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 101, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 174-182

  McLaren, John D ^a   McLaren, Charles I ^a   Yaman, Peter ^a   Bin Shuwaish, Mohammed S ^b   Dennison, Joseph D ^a   McDonald, Neville J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLASS; GLASS FIBER; RESIN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; INJURY; INSTRUMENTATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH PULP DISEASE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BICUSPID; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; GLASS; HUMANS; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; TOOTH FRACTURES; TOOTH, NONVITAL;

EID: 60449098648     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60024-X     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Fredriksson M., Astbäck J., Pamenius M., and Arvidson K. A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent 80 (1998) 151-157
2. Ferrari M., Vichi A., and García-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent 13 Spec No (2000) 15B-18B
3. Ferrari M., Vichi A., Mannocci F., and Mason P.N. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent 13 (2000) 9B-13B
4. Segerström S., Astbäck J., and Ekstrand K.D. A retrospective long term study of teeth restored with prefabricated carbon fiber reinforced epoxy resin posts. Swed Dent J 30 (2006) 1-8
5. Goodacre C.J., Bernal G., Rungcharassaeng K., and Kan J.Y. Clinical complications in fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 90 (2003) 31-41
6. Mannocci F., Ferrari M., and Watson T. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber posts and composite cores after cyclic loading: a confocal microscopic study. J Prosthet Dent 85 (2001) 284-291
7. Duncan J.P., and Pameijer C.H. Retention of parallel-sided titanium posts cemented with six luting agents: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 80 (1998) 423-428
8. Cohen B.I., Pagnillo M.K., Newman I., Musikant B.L., and Deutsch A.S. Retention of three endodontic posts cemented with five dental cements. J Prosthet Dent 79 (1998) 520-525
9. Love R.M., and Purton D.G. Retention of posts with resin, glass ionomer and hybrid cements. J Dent (1998) 599-602
10. Drummond J.L. In vitro evaluation of endodontic posts. Am J Dent 13 Spec No (2000) 5B-8B
11. Gallo III J.R., Miller T., Xu X., and Burgess J.O. In vitro evaluation of the retention of composite fiber and stainless steel posts. J Prosthodont 11 (2002) 25-29
12. El-Mowafy O., and Milenkovic M. Retention of ParaPosts cemented with dentin-bonded resin cements. Oper Dent 19 (1994) 176-182
13. Ferrari M., and Mannocci F. A 'one-bottle' adhesive system for bonding a fibre post into a root canal: an SEM evaluation of the post-resin interface. Int Endod J 33 (2000) 397-400
14. Mannocci F., Innocenti M., Ferrari M., and Watson T.F. Confocal and scanning electron microscopic study of teeth restored with fiber posts, metal posts, and composite resins. J Endod 25 (1999) 789-794
15. Saupe W.A., Gluskin A.H., and Radke Jr. R.A. A comparative study of fracture resistance between morphologic dowel and cores and a resin-reinforced dowel system in the intraradicular restoration of structurally compromised roots. Quintessence Int 27 (1996) 483-491
16. Mendoza D.B., Eakle W.S., Kahl E.A., and Ho R. Root reinforcement with a resin-bonded preformed post. J Prosthet Dent 78 (1997) 10-14
17. Newman M.P., Yaman P., Dennison J., Rafter M., and Billy E. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts. J Prosthet Dent 89 (2003) 360-367
18. Nissan J., Dmitry Y., and Assif D. The use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced post length. J Prosthet Dent 86 (2001) 304-308
19. Cohen B.I., Condos S., Musikant B.L., and Deutsch A.S. Retention properties of a split-shaft threaded post: cut at different apical lengths. J Prosthet Dent 68 (1992) 894-898
20. Love R.M., and Purton D.G. The effect of serrations on carbon fibre posts-retention within the root canal, core retention, and post rigidity. Int J Prosthodont 9 (1996) 484-488
21. Isidor F., Brøndum K., and Ravnholt G. The influence of post length and crown ferrule length on the resistance to cyclic loading of bovine teeth with prefabricated titanium posts. Int J Prosthodont 12 (1999) 78-82
22. Torbjörner A., Karlsson S., Syverud M., and Hensten-Pettersen A. Carbon fiber reinforced root canal posts. Mechanical and cytotoxic properties. Eur J Oral Sci 104 (1996) 605-611
23. Mannocci F., Sherriff M., and Watson T.F. Three-point bending test of fiber posts. J Endod 27 (2001) 758-761
24. Asmussen E., Peutzfeldt A., and Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 27 (1999) 275-278
25. Purton D.G., and Love R.M. Rigidity and retention of carbon fibre versus stainless steel root canal posts. Int Endod J 29 (1996) 262-265
26. Martínez-Insua A., da Silva L., Rilo B., and Santana U. Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon-fiber post with a composite core. J Prosthet Dent 80 (1998) 527-532
27. Sidoli G.E., King P.A., and Setchell D.J. An in vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber-based post and core system. J Prosthet Dent 78 (1997) 5-9
28. Sirimai S., Riis D.N., and Morgano S.M. An in vitro study of the fracture resistance and the incidence of vertical root fracture of pulpless teeth restored with six post-and-core systems. J Prosthet Dent 81 (1999) 262-269
29. Akkayan B., and Gülmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 87 (2002) 431-437
30. Cormier C.J., Burns D.R., and Moon P. In vitro comparison of the fracture resistance and failure mode of fiber, ceramic, and conventional post systems at various stages of restoration. J Prosthodont 10 (2001) 26-36
31. Rosentritt M., Fürer C., Behr M., Lang R., and Handel G. Comparison of in vitro fracture strength of metallic and tooth-coloured posts and cores. J Oral Rehabil 27 (2000) 595-601
32. Pegoretti A., Fambri L., Zappini G., and Bianchetti M. Finite element analysis of a glass fibre reinforced composite endodontic post. Biomaterials 23 (2002) 2667-2682
33. Yang H.S., Lang L.A., Molina A., and Felton D.A. The effects of dowel design and load direction on dowel-and-core restorations. J Prosthet Dent 85 (2001) 558-567
34. Huysmans M.C., Peters M.C., Plasschaert A.J., and van der Varst P.G. Failure characteristics of endodontically treated premolars restored with a post and direct restorative material. Int Endod J 25 (1992) 121-129
35. Mullaney T.P. Instrumentation of finely curved canals. Dent Clin North Am 23 (1979) 575-592
36. Alodeh M., Doller R., and Dummer P. Shaping of simulated root canals in resin blocks using the step-back technique with K-files manipulated in a simple in/out filing motion. Int Endod J 22 (1989) 107-117
37. Hsu Y.B., Nicholls J.I., Phillips K.M., and Libman W.J. Effect of core bonding on fatigue failure of compromised teeth. Int J Prosthodont 15 (2002) 175-178
38. Reagan S.E., Fruits T.J., Van Brunt C.L., and Ward C.K. Effects of cyclic loading on selected post-and-core systems. Quintessence Int 30 (1999) 61-67
39. Stockton L.W. Factors affecting retention of post systems: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 81 (1999) 380-385