In vitro evaluation of the retention of composite fiber and stainless steel posts

Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 25-29

  Gallo, John R ^a   Miller, Troy ^a   Xu, Xiaoming ^a   Burgess, John O ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dental cements; Prefabricated posts; Tensile resistance

Indexed keywords

BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; DENTAL ALLOY; FIBERKOR, SCULPTURE; GLASS; GLASS FIBER; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; STAINLESS STEEL; ZINC PHOSPHATE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICS; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BICUSPID; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CEMENTATION; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; GLASS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; RESIN CEMENTS; STAINLESS STEEL; STATISTICS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH PREPARATION, PROSTHODONTIC; ZINC PHOSPHATE CEMENT;

EID: 0036512259     PISSN: 1059941X     EISSN: 1532849X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/jpro.2002.31836     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Morgano SM: Restoration of pulpless teeth: Application of traditional principles in present and future contexts. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:375-380
2. Goodacre CJ, Spolnik KJ: The prosthodontic management of endodontically treated teeth: A literature review. Part 1. Success and failure data, treatment concepts. J Prosthodont 1994;3:243-250
3. Smith CT, Schuman NJ, Wasson W: Biomechanical criteria for evaluating prefabricated post-and-core systems: A guide for the restorative dentist. Quintessence Int 1998;29:305-312
4. Sivers JE, Johnson WT: Restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Dent Clin North Am 1992;36:631-648
5. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J: Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics (ed 2). St. Louis, MO, Mosby, 1995, pp 238-262
6. Schillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, et al: Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics (ed 3). Chicago, IL, Quintessence, 1997, pp 194-208
7. Anusavice KI: Science of Dental Materials (ed 10). Philadelphia, PA, Saunders, 1996, pp 555-580
8. Freno JP: Guidelines for using posts in the restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Gen Dent 1998;46:474-479
9. Johnson JK, Sakumura JS: Dowel form and tensile force. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40:645-649
10. Keyf F, Sahin E: Retentive properties of three post-core systems. Aust Dent J 1994;39:20-24
11. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Hanson EC: Retention of endodontic dowels: Effect of cement, dowel length, diameter, and design. J Prosthet Dent 1978;39:400-405
12. Hunter AJ, Feiglin B, Williams JF: Effects of post placement on endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:166-172
13. Goldstein GR, Hudis SI, Weintraub DE: Comparison of four techniques for the cementation of posts. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:209-211
14. Goldman M, DeVitre R, Tenca J: Cement distribution and bond strength in cemented posts. J Dent Res 1984;63:1392-1395
15. Anusavice KL: Dental cements for bonding applications, in Anusavice KJ (ed): Phillips Science of Dental Materials (ed 10). Philadelphia, PA, Saunders, 1996, pp 555-581
16. Mendoza DB, Eakle WS: Retention of posts cemented with various dentinal bonding cements. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:591-594
17. Hill GL, Zidan O, Duerst L: Retention of etched base metal dowels with resin cement and bonding agent. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:691-693
18. Gomes APM, Kubo CH, Santos RAB, et al: The influence of ultrasound on the retention of cast posts cemented with different agents. Int Endodont J 2001;34:93-99
19. Trope M, Maltz DO, Tronstad L: Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated teeth. Endodont Dent Traumatol 1985;1:108-111
20. Goldstein GR, Hudis SI, Weintraub DE: Comparison of four techniques for the cementation of posts. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:209-211
21. Mendoza DB, Eakle WS, Kahl EA, et al: Root reinforcement with a resin-bonded preformed post. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:10-14
22. Sidoli GE, King PA, Setchell DJ: An in vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber-based post and core system. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:5-9
23. Nakabayashi N, Ashizawa M, Nakamura M: Identification of a resin-dentin hybrid layer in vital human dentin created in vivo: Durable bonding to vital dentin. Quintessence Int 1992;23:135-141
24. Eick JD, Cobb CM, Chappell RP, et al: The dentinal surface: Its influence on dentinal adhesion. Part 1. Quintessence Int 1991;22:967-977
25. Eick JD, Robinson SJ, Cobb CM, et al: The dentinal surface: Its influence on dentinal adhesion. Part 2. Quintessence Int 1992;23:43-51
26. Eick JD, Robinson SJ, Chappell RP, et al: The dentinal surface: Its influence on dentinal adhesion. Part 3. Quintessence Int 1993b;24:571-582
27. Pashley DH, Horner JA, Brewer PD: Interactions of conditioners on the dentin surface. Oper Dent 1992;1(suppl 5):37-150
28. Schupbach P, Krejci I, Felix L: Dentin bonding: Effect of tubule orientation on hybrid layer formation. Eur J Oral Sci 1997;105:344-352
29. Yoshikawa T, Sano H, Burrow MF, et al: Effects of dentin depth and cavity configuration on bond strength. J Dent Res 1999;78:898-905
30. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SH: The overwet phenomenon: An optical, micromorphological study of surface moisture in the acid conditioned, resin-dentin interface. Am J Dent 1996;9:43-48
31. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SH: The overwet phenomenon: A scanning electron microscopic study of surface moisture in the acid conditioned, resin-dentin interface. Am J Dent 1996;9:109-114
32. Mitchem J, Terkla L, Gronos D: The bonding of resin dentin adhesives under simulated physiologic conditions. Dent Mater 1988;4:351-353
33. Titley KC, Chernecky R, Rossouw PE, et al: The effect of various storage methods and media on shear-bond strengths of dental composite resin to bovine dentine. Arch Oral Biol 1998;43:305-311