Retention of three endodontic posts cemented with five dental cements

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 79, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 520-525

  Cohen, Brett I ^a   Pagnillo, Mark K ^a   Newman, Ira ^a   Musikant, Barry Lee ^a   Deutsch, Allan S ^a  

^a Essential Dental Laboratories   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVANCE CEMENT; DUET CEMENT; FLECKS; FLEXI FLOW CEMENT; FLEXI-FLOW CEMENT; GLASS IONOMER; KETAC CEM; KETAC-CEM; MAGNESIUM OXIDE; POLYCARBOXYLATE CEMENT; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; TOOTH CEMENT; ZINC OXIDE; ZINC PHOSPHATE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEMENTATION; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MAGNESIUM OXIDE; MATERIALS TESTING; POLYCARBOXYLATE CEMENT; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; ZINC OXIDE; ZINC PHOSPHATE CEMENT;

EID: 0032065643     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70172-6     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Trabert K.C., Caputo A.A., and Abou-Ross M. Tooth fracture-a comparison of endodontic and restorative treatments. J Endodont 4 (1987) 341-345
2. Guzy G.E., and Nicholls JI. In vitro comparison of intact endodontically treated teeth with and without endo-post reinforcement. J Prosthet Dent 42 (1979) 39-44
3. Millstein P.L., Yu H., Hsu C.S., and Nathanson D. Effects of cementing on retention of a prefabricated screw post. J Prosthet Dent 57 (1987) 171-174
4. Cohen B.I., Condos S., Musikant B.L., and Deutsch AS. Retentive properties of threaded split-shaft posts with titanium-reinforced composite cement. J Prosthet Dent 68 (1992) 910-912
5. Burgess J.O., Summitt J.B., and Robbins JW. The resistance to tensile, compression, and torsional forces provided by four post systems. J Prosthet Dent 68 (1992) 899-903
6. Robbins JW. Guidelines for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 120 (1990) 558-566
7. Cooney J.P., Caputo A.A., and Trabert KC. Retention and stress distribution of tapered-end endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent 55 (1986) 540-546
8. Standlee J.P., Caputo A.A., and Hanson EC. Retention of endodontic dowels: effects of cement, dowel length, diameter, and design. J Prosthet Dent 39 (1978) 400-405
9. Johnson J.K., and Sakumura JS. Dowel form and tensile force. J Prosthet Dent 40 (1978) 645-649
10. Assif D., and Bleicher S. Retention of serrated endodontic posts with a composite luting agent: effect of cement thickness. J Prosthet Dent 56 (1986) 689-691
11. Cohen B.I., Pagnillo M., Condos S., and Deutsch AS. Comparison of the torsional forces at failure for seven endodontic post systems. J Prosthet Dent 74 (1995) 350-357
12. Keyf F., and Sahin E. Retentive properties of three post-core systems. Aust Dent J 39 (1994) 20-24
13. Cohen B.I., Pagnillo M., Musikant B.L., and Deutsch AS. Split-shank threaded posts and threaded posts: tensile properties and stress levels. J Esthet Dent 7 (1995) 174-178
14. Burns D.R., Douglas H.B., and Moon PC. Comparison of the retention of endodontic posts after preparation with EDTA. J Prosthet Dent 69 (1993) 262-266
15. Deutsch A.S., Musikant B.L., Cavallari J., and Bernardi S. Retentive properties of a new post and core system. J Prosthet Dent 53 (1985) 12-14
16. Brown J.D., and Mitchem JC. Retentive properties of dowel post systems. Oper Dent 12 (1987) 15-19
17. Deutsch A.S., Musikant B.L., Cavallari J., and Lepley JB. Prefabricated dowels: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 49 (1983) 498-503
18. Cohen B.I., Musikant B.L., and Deutsch AS. Comparison of retentive properties of four post systems. J Prosthet Dent 68 (1992) 264-268
19. Cohen B.I., Condos S., Musikant B.L., and Deutsch AS. Retention properties of a split-shaft threaded post: cut at different apical lengths. J Prosthet Dent 68 (1992) 894-898
20. Cohen B.I., Deutsch A.S., and Musikant BL. Cyclic fatigue testing of six endodontic post systems. J Prosthodont 2 (1993) 28-32
21. Newburg R.E., and Pameijer CH. Retentive properties of post and core systems. J Prosthet Dent 36 (1976) 636-643
22. Tjan A.H., and Miller GD. Comparison of retentive properties of dowel forms after application of intermittent torsional forces. J Prosthet Dent 52 (1984) 238-242
23. Kahn F.H., Rosenberg P.A., Schulman A., and Pines M. Comparison of fatigue for three prefabricated threaded post systems. J Prosthet Dent 75 (1996) 148-153
24. Ross R.S., Nicholls J.I., and Harrington GW. A comparison of strains generated during placement of five endodontic posts. J Endodont 17 (1991) 450-456
25. Cohen B.I., Musikant B.L., and Deutsch AS. Comparison of the photoelastic stress for a split-shank threaded post versus a threaded post. J Prosthodont 3 (1994) 53-55
26. Greenfeld R.S., Roydhouse R.H., Marshall F.J., and Schoner B. A comparison of two post systems under applied compressive-shear loads. J Prosthet Dent 61 (1989) 17-24
27. Boyarsky H., and Davis R. Root fracture with dentin-retained posts. Am J Dent 5 (1992) 11-14
28. Chalfin H.E., and Goldberger R.S. Management of post-induced radicular fractures in the coronal one third. PP&A 5 (1991) 33-35
29. Milot P., and Stein RS. Root fracture in endodontically treated teeth related to post selection and crown design. J Prosthet Dent 68 (1992) 428-435
30. Cohen B.I., Condos S., Musikant B.L., and Deutsch AS. Pilot study comparing the photoelastic stress distribution for four endodontic post systems. J Oral Rehabil 23 (1996) 679-685
31. Cohen B.I., Musikant B.L., and Deutsch AS. Comparison of the retentive properties of two hollow-tube post systems to those of a solid post design. J Prosthet Dent 70 (1993) 234-238
32. Ricker J.B., Lautenschlager E.P., and Greener EH. Mechanical properties of post and core systems. Dent Mater 2 (1986) 63-66
33. Earl M.S., and Ibbetson RJ. The clinical disintegration of a glass-ionomer cement. Br Dent J 161 (1986) 287-291
34. O'Brien W.J. Dental materials, properties and selection (1989), Quintessence, Chicago 231-233
35. Deutsch A.S., Cavallari J., Musikant B.L., Silberstein L., Lepley J., and Petroni G. Root fracture and the design of prefabricated posts. J Prosthet Dent 53 (1985) 637-640
36. Deutsch A.S., Musikant B.L., Cavallari J., Silverstein L., Lepley J., Ohlen K., et al. Root fracture during insertion of prefabricated posts related to root size. J Prosthet Dent 53 (1985) 786-789
37. Burgess J., Norling B., and Summitt J. Resin ionomer restorative materials: The new generation. J Esthetic Dent 6 (1994) 207-215
38. Knoblach L., and Kerby RE. Flexural strength of composite resin and glass ionomer core materials. J Dent Res 71 (1992) 136 (Abstract 245)
39. Lattner M.J., Burgess J.O., and Robbins JW. Fracture resistance of four pin-retained core materials. J Dent Res 71 (1992) 178-182
40. Cohen B.I., Deutsch A.S., Condos S., Musikant B.L., and Scherer W. Compressive and diametral tensile strength of titanium-reinforced composites. J Esthetic Dent 4 (1992) 50-55
41. Kovarik R.E., Breeding L.C., and Caughman WF. Fatigue life of three core materials under simulated chewing conditions. J Prosthet Dent 68 (1992) 584-590
42. Ziebert A.J., and Dhuru VB. The fracture toughness of various core materials. J Prosthodont 4 (1995) 33-37
43. Cattani-Lorente M.A., Godin C., and Meyer JM. Early strength of glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater 9 (1993) 57-62
44. Forss H., Seppä L., and Lappalainen R. In vitro abrasion resistance and hardness of glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater 7 (1991) 36-39
45. Hunt PR. Glass ionomers: the next generation. A summary of the current situation. J Esthet Dent 6 (1994) 192-194