Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 13, Issue 2 SPEC. ISS., 2000, Pages

  Ferrari, Marco ^a,b   Vichi, Alessandro ^b   García Godoy, Franklin ^c  

^a Tufts University ^*  (Italy)

^b TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALL BOND 2; ALL-BOND 2; ALLOY; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; BORON DERIVATIVE; CARBON; CARBON FIBER; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; DENTIN BONDING AGENTS; EPOXY RESIN; GOLD ALLOY; GUTTA PERCHA; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; METHACRYLIC ACID METHYL ESTER; RESIN; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIAL; SUPER BOND; SUPER-BOND; ZINC PHOSPHATE;

ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CHEMISTRY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; ENDODONTICS; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INJURY; INSTRUMENTATION; LIFE TABLE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH ROOT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTUARIAL ANALYSIS; BORON COMPOUNDS; CARBON; CEMENTATION; COMPOSITE RESINS; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; CROWNS; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; EPOXY RESINS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GOLD ALLOYS; GUTTA-PERCHA; HUMAN; LIFE TABLES; METAL CERAMIC ALLOYS; METHACRYLATES; METHYLMETHACRYLATES; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIALS; ROOT CANAL THERAPY; STATISTICS; TOOTH FRACTURES; TOOTH ROOT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ZINC PHOSPHATE CEMENT;

EID: 0034189185     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Gutman JL. The dentin-root complex: Anatomic and biologic considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67: 458-467.
2. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Condos S et al. Four materials measured for fracture strength in combination with five designs of endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:487-495.
3. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ. Effect of post adaptation on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:419-424.
4. Trabert KC, Cooney JP. The endodontically treated tooth. Restorative concepts and techniques. Dent Clin N Am 1984;28:923-951.
5. Lewis R, Smith BG. A clinical survey of failed post retained crowns. Br Dent J 1988; 165:95-97.
6. Morgano SM, Milot P. Clinical success of cast metal posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:11-16.
7. Goodacre CJ, Spolnik KJ. The prosthodontic management of endodontically treated teeth: A literature review. Part I. Success and failure data, treatment concepts. J Prosthodont 1994;3:243-250.
8. Torbjoner A, Karlsson S, Odman PA. Survival rate and failure characteristics for two post designs. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:439-444.
9. Hatziriakos AH, Reisis GI, Tsingos N. A 3 year postoperative evaluation of posts and cores beneath existing crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67: 454-458.
10. Stockton LW. Factors affecting retention of post systems: A literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:380-385.
11. Lin LM, Langeland K. Vertical root fracture. J Endod 1982;8:558-621.
12. Trope M, Maltz DO, Tronstadt L. Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 1985;1:108-111.
13. Duret B, Reynaud M, Duret F. Un nouveau concept de reconstitution corono-radiculaire: Le composiposte (1) Chirurg Dent France 1990; 540:131-141.
14. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 1999;27:275-278.
15. Fredriksson M, Astback J, Pamenius M, et al. A retrospective study on 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:151-157.
16. Dallari A, Rovatti L. Six years of in vitro/in vivo experience with Composipost. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998;20 (Suppl):S57-S63.
17. Mannocci F, Vichi A, Ferrari M. Carbon fiber versus cast post: A two years' recall study. J Dent Res 1998;77:1259 (Abstr 419).
18. Guzy GE, Nicholls JI. In vitro comparison on intact endodontically treated teeth with and without endo-post refinforcement. J Prostht Dent 1979;42:39-44.
19. Rud J, Omnell KA. Root fractures due to corrosion. Diagnostic aspects. Scand J Dent Res 1970;78:397-403.
20. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: A study of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 51:780-784.
21. Abou-Rass M. Post and core restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Curr Opin Dent 1992;2:99-107.
22. Morgano SM. Restoration of pulpless teeth: Application of traditional principles in present and future contexts. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:375-380.
23. Weine FS, Wax AH, Wenckus P, et al. Retrospective study of tapered, smooth post systems in place for 10 years or more. J Endod 1991;17: 293-297.
24. Mentik AG, Meenwisser R, Kayser AF, et al. Survival rate and failure characteristics of the all metal post and core restoration. J Oral Rehabil 1993;20:455-461.
25. Martínez-Insua A, Da Silva L, Rilo B, et al. Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon-fiber post with a composite core. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 527-532.
26. Purton DG, Payne JA. Comparison of carbon fiber and stainless steel root canal posts. Quintessence Int 1996; 27: 93-97.
27. Viguie G, Malquarti G, Vincent B, et al. Epoxy/carbon composite resins in dentistry: Mechanical properties related to fiber reinforcements. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:245-249.
28. Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Cagidiaco MC, et al. Bonding to root canal: Structural characteristics of the substrate. Am J Dent, In press.
29. Titley K, Chernecky R, Chen A, et al. The composition and ultrastructure of resin tags in etched dentin. Am J Dent 1995;8:224-230.
30. Mjör IA, Nordahl I. The density and branching of dentinal tubules in human teeth. Archs Oral Biol 1996;41:401-412.
31. Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Hybridization of dental hard tissue. Berlin: Quintessence, 1998.
32. Ferrari M, Mannocci F. A "one-bottle" adhesive system for bonding a fibre post into a root canal: An SEM evaluation of the post-resin interface. Int Endod J, in press.
33. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Hansson EC. Retention of endodontic dowels: Effects of cement, dowel length, diameter and design. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40:645-649.
34. Kurer HG, Come EC, Grant AA. Factors influencing the retention of dowels. J Prosthet Dent 1977;38:515-525.