In vitro comparison of the fracture resistance and failure mode of fiber, ceramic, and conventional post systems at various stages of restoration

Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 26-36

  Cormier, Clarence J ^a   Burns, David R ^a   Moon, Peter ^a  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CARBON; EPOXY RESIN; GLASS; GLASS FIBER; GOLD ALLOY; PALLADIUM; SILICON DIOXIDE; TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; ENDODONTICS; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; STATISTICS; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BICUSPID; CARBON; CERAMICS; CROWNS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL VENEERS; EPOXY RESINS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; GLASS; GOLD ALLOYS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; PALLADIUM; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; QUARTZ; ROOT CANAL THERAPY; STATISTICS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TITANIUM; TOOTH PREPARATION; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 0035294362     PISSN: 1059941X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/jpro.2001.23777     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Goodacre GJ, Spolnik KJ: The prosthodontic management of endodontically treated teeth: A literature review. Part 1. Success and failure data, treatment concepts. J Prosthodont 1994;3:243-250
2. Ruemping DR, Lund MR, Schnell RJ: Retention of dowels subjected to tensile and torsional forces. J Prosthet Dent 1979;41:159-162
3. Kurer HG, Combe EC, Grant AA: Factors influencing the retention of dowels. J Prosthet Dent 1977;38:515-525
4. Johnson JK, Sakumura JS: Dowel form and tensile force. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40:645-649
5. Walton JN, Gardner FM, Agar JR: A survey of crown and fixed partial denture failures: Length of service and reasons for replacement. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56: 416-421
6. Turner CH: Post retained crown failure: A survey. Dent Update 1982;9:193-202
7. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Holcomb JP: The dentatus screw: Comparative stress analysis with endodontic dowels designs. J Oral Rehabil 1982;9:23-33
8. Standlee JP, Caputo AA: The retentive and stress distributing properties of split threaded endodontic dowels. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:436-442
9. Trabert KC, Caputo AA, Abou-Rass M: Tooth fracture - A comparison of endodontic and restorative treatments. J Endod 1978;4:341-345
10. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JF: Clinically significant factors in dowel design. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:28-35
11. Dallari A, Rovatti L: Six years of in vitro/in vivo experience with Composipost. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1996;17: S57-S63 (suppl 20)
12. Pissis P: Fabrication of a metal-free ceramic restoration utilizing the monobloc technique. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1995;7:83-93
13. Paul SJ, Scharer P: Post and core reconstruction for fixed prosthodontic restoration. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1997;9:513-520
14. Nash RW: The use of posts for endodontically treated teeth. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998;19:1054-1062
15. Freedman G: The carbon fibre post: Metal-free, post-endodontic rehabilitation. Oral Health 1996;86:23-30
16. Standford JW, Weigel KV, Paffenberg GC, et al: Compressive properties of hard tooth tissue. J Am Dent Assoc 1960; 60:746-756
17. Duret B, Duret F, Reynaud M: Long-life physical property preservation and postendodontic rehabilitation with the Composipost™. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1996;17:S50-S56 (suppl 20)
18. Fusayama T: Factors and prevention of pulp irritation by adhesive composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 1987;18:633-641
19. Bertolotti RL: Acid etching of dentin. Quintessence Int 1990;21:77-78
20. Kanka J: Resin bonding to wet substrate. Bonding to dentin. Quintessence Int 1992;23:39-41
21. Burns DR, Douglas HB, Moon PC: Comparison of the retention of endodontic posts after preparation with EDTA. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:262-266
22. Sakkal S: Carbon fiber post removal technique. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1996;17:S86 (suppl 20)
23. O'Brien RG: A general ANOVA method for robust tests of additive models for variances. J Am Stat Assoc 1979;74:877-880
24. Welch BL: On the comparison of several mean values, an alternative approach. Biometrika 1951;38:330-336
25. Kramer CY: Extension of multiple range tests to group means with unequal numbers of replications. Biometrics 1956;12:309-310
26. Assif D, Bitenski A, Pilo R, et al: Effect of post design on resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth with complete crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:36-40
27. Dean JP, Jeansonne BG, Sarkar N: In vitro evaluation of carbon fiber post. J Endod 1998;24:807-810
28. Saupe WA, Gluskin AH, Radke RA: A comparative study of fracture resistance between morphologic dowel and cores and a resin-reinforced dowel system in the intraradicular restoration of structurally compromised roots. Quintessence Int 1996;27:483-491
29. Sorensen JA, Engelinan MJ: Ferrule design and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:529-536
30. Martinez-Insua A, Da Silva L, Rilo B, et al: Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon-fiber post with a composite core. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:527-532
31. Mendoza DB, Eakle WS, Kahl EA: Root reinforcement with a resin-bonded preformed post. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78: 10-15