Effects of cyclic loading on selected post-and-core systems

Quintessence International

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 61-67

  Reagan, Stephen E ^a   Fruits, Terry J ^a   Van Brunt, Corbyn L ^a   Ward, Christopher K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

Amalgam; Cast post and core; Core buildup; Endodontically treated tooth; Fatigue testing; Prefabricated post; Resin composite

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; RESIN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MANDIBLE; MATERIALS TESTING; PREMOLAR TOOTH; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH CROWN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BICUSPID; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL AMALGAM; HUMANS; MANDIBLE; MATERIALS TESTING; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 0032609499     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Kovarik RE, Breeding LC, Caughman WF. Fatigue life of three post and core materials. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68:584-590.
2. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Spyridon C, Deutsch AS. Four different core materials measured for fracture strength in combination with five different designs of endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:487-495.
3. Ziebert AJ, Virendra BD. The fracture toughness of various core materials. J Prosthodont 1995;4(1):33-37.
4. Vermilyea SG, Gardner FM, Moergeli JR. Composite dowels and cores: Effect of moisture on the fit of cast restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58:429-431.
5. Huysman MCDNJM, Peters MCRB, Van Der Varst PGT, Plasschaert AJM. Failure behavior of fatigue-tested post and cores. Int Endod J 1993;26:294-300.
6. Hoag EP, Dwyer TG. A comparative evaluation of three post and core techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:177-181.
7. Sorenson JA, Martinoff JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: A study of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:780-784.