Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 89, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 360-367

  Newman, Marcela P ^b   Yaman, Peter ^a   Dennison, Joseph ^a   Rafter, Mary ^a   Billy, Edward ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b 1011 N University ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAMOND; RESIN CEMENT; STAINLESS STEEL; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; FIBERKOR, SCULPTURE; FLOWABLE HYBRID COMPOSITE; POLYETHYLENE DERIVATIVE; RESIN; RIBBOND;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INCISOR; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY; MACHINE; MAXILLA; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STUDENT T TEST; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH ROOT CANAL; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; INSTRUMENTATION; MECHANICAL STRESS; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICS; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PULP; TOOTH PULP DISEASE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PULP CAVITY; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; HUMANS; INCISOR; POLYETHYLENES; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; RESIN CEMENTS; STAINLESS STEEL; STATISTICS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TOOTH FRACTURES; TOOTH, NONVITAL;

EID: 0038505312     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2003.75     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Christensen GJ. Posts and cores: state of the art. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:96-7.
2. Morgano SM. Restoration of pulpless teeth: application of traditional principles in present and future contexts. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:375-80.
3. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:780-4.
4. Gutmann JL. The dentin-root complex: anatomic and biologic considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:458-67.
5. Chalifoux PR. Esthetic restoration of endodontically treated teeth: factors that affect prognosis. J Esthet Dent 1998;10:75-83.
6. Martinez-Insua A, da Silva L, Rilo B, Santana U. Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon-fiber post with a composite core. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:527-32.
7. King PA, Setchell DJ. An in vitro evaluation of a prototype CFRC prefabricated post developed for the restoration of pulpless teeth. J Oral Rehabil 1990;17:599-609.
8. Saupe WA, Gluskin AH, Radke RA Jr. A comparative study of fracture resistance between morphologic dowel and cores and a resin-reinforced dowel system in the intraradicular restoration of structurally compromised roots. Quintessence Int 1996;27:483-91.
9. Katebzadeh N, Dalton BC, Trope M. Strengthening immature teeth during and after apexification. J Endod 1998;24:256-9.
10. Mendoza DB, Eakle WS, Kahl EA, Ho R. Root reinforcement with a resin-bonded preformed post. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:10-4.
11. Sirimai S, Riis DN, Morgano SM. An in vitro study of the fracture resistance and the incidence of vertical root fracture of pulpless teeth restored with six post-and-core systems. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:262-69.
12. Sidoli GE, King PA, Setchell DJ. An in vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber-based post and core system. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:5-9.
13. Hornbrook DS, Hastings JH. Use of bondable reinforcement fiber for post and core build-up in an endodontically treated tooth: maximizing strength and aesthetics. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1995;7:33-42.
14. Kimmel SS. Restoration and reinforcement of endodontically treated teeth with a polyethylene ribbond and prefabricated fiberglass post. Gen Dent 2000;48:700-6.
15. Strassler HE, Hiatt J, Simon R, Behnia A. Using an esthetic post to restore and reinforce a maxillary incisor. Contemp Esthet Res Pract 2000;1:36-44.
16. Lui JL. Composite resin reinforcement of flared canals using light-transmitting plastic posts. Quintessence Int 1994;25:313-9.
17. Dietschi D, Romelli M, Goretti A. Adaptation of adhesive posts and cores to dentin after fatigue testing. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:498-507.
18. Craig RG, Peyton FA. Elastic and mechanical properties of human dentin. J Dent Res 1958;37:710-18.
19. Rosentritt M, Furer C, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G. Comparison of in vitro fracture strength of metallic and tooth-coloured posts and cores. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:595-601.
20. Stockton LW, Williams PT. Retention and shear bond strength of two post systems. Oper Dent 1999;24:210-16.
21. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 1999;27:275-78.
22. Martelli Roberto. Fourth-generation intraradicular posts for the aesthetic restoration of anterior teeth. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 2000;12:579-84.
23. Quintas AF, Dinato JC, Bottino MA. Aesthetic posts and cores for metal-free restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 2000;12:875-84.
24. Ahmad I. The versality and enhanced aesthetics of laboratory-fabricated composite resin restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 2000;12:285-92.
25. Blitz N. Adaptation of a fiber-reinforced restorative system to the rehabilitation of endodontically treated teeth. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1998;10:191-3.
26. Karna JC. A fiber composite laminate endodontic post and core. Am J Dent 1996;9:230-2.