A comparative study of fracture resistance between morphologic dowel and cores and a resin-reinforced dowel system in the intraradicular restoration of structurally compromised roots

Quintessence International

Volumn 27, Issue 7, 1996, Pages 483-491

  Saupe, William A ^a   Gluskin, Alan H ^a   Radke Jr , Ryle A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RESIN; RESIN CEMENT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; INCISOR; INJURY; INSTRUMENTATION; LIGHT; MATERIALS TESTING; MAXILLA; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH PULP DISEASE; TOOTH ROOT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; HUMANS; INCISOR; LIGHT; MATERIALS TESTING; MAXILLA; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; RESIN CEMENTS; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; TOOTH FRACTURES; TOOTH ROOT; TOOTH, NONVITAL;

EID: 0030185312     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Wagnild GW, Mueller KI. The restoration of the endodontically treated tooth. In: Cohen S, Burns RC (eds). Pathways of the Pulp, ed 6. St Louis: Mosby-Year Book, 1994:604-631.
2. Robbins JW. Guidelines for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;120:558-566.
3. Kahn FH. Selecting a post system. J Am Dent Assoc 1991; 122:70-71.
4. Gluskin AH, Radke RA, Frost SL, Watanabe LG. The mandibular incisor: Rethinking guidelines for post and core design. J Endod 1995;21:33-37.
5. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Hanson EC. Retention of endodontic dowels: Effects of cement, dowel length, diameter and design. J Prosthet Dent 1978;39:400-405.
6. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ. Effect of post adaptation on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 64:419-424.
7. Freedman G, Novak IM, Serota KS, Glassman GD. Intra-radicular rehabilitation: A clinical approach. Practical Periodont Aesthet Dent 1994;6(5):33-39.
8. Lui JL. Composite resin reinforcement of flared canals using light-transmitting plastic posts. Quintessence Int 1994;25:313-319.
9. Bowen RL, Cobb EN. Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues: Improvement in bond strength to dentin. J Dent Res 1982;61:1070-1076.
10. Bowen RL, Cobb EN. A method for bonding to dentin and enamel. J Am Dent Assoc 1983;107:734-736.
11. Freedman G, Classman CD, Serota KS. Endo-Aesthetics. Part I. Intra-radicular rehabilitation. Ontario Dent 1992;69:28-31.
12. Broome JC, Duke FS, Norling BK. Shear bond strengths of composite resins with three dentin adhesives [abstract 622]. J Dent Res 1985;64:244.
13. Gross JD, Retief DH, Bradley EL. Tensile bond strengths of dentin bonding agents to dentin [abstract 621]. J Dent Res 1985;64:244.
14. Reinhardt J, Chan D, Boyer D. Shear strengths of proprietary dentin bonding agents [abstract 622]. J Dent Res 1986;65:238.
15. Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD. Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics, ed 2. Chicago: Quintessence, 1981:150-155.
16. Tjan AHL, Whang SB. Resistance to root fracture of dowel channels with various thicknesses of buccal dentin walls. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:496-500.
17. Trabert KC, Caputo AA, Abou-Rass M. Tooth fracture - a comparison of endodontic and restorative treatments. J Endod 1978;4:341-345.
18. Assif D, Ferber A. Retention of dowels using a composite resin as a cementing medium. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:292-296.
19. Goldman M, deVitre R, Pier M. Effect of the smear layer on tensile strength of cemented posts. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:485-488.
20. El-Mowafy OM, Milenkovic M. Retention of paraposts cemented with dentin-bonded resin cements. Oper Dent 1994;19:176-182.
21. Lui JL. Depth of composite polymerization within simulated root canals using light-transmitting posts. Oper Dent 1994;19:165-168.
22. Trope M, Maltz DO, Tronstad L. Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 1985; 1:108-111.
23. Craig RG, O'Brien WJ, Powers JM. Dental Materials, ed 4. St Louis: Mosby, 1987:10-27.