Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin-based composites for posterior restorations in permanent teeth: Results at 12 months

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volumn 134, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 1581-1589

  Yip, Kevin H K ^a   Poon, Belinda K M ^b   Chu, Frederick C S ^b   Poon, Eric C M ^b,c   Kong, Fiona Y C ^b,c   Smales, Roger J ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^c University of Adelaide ^*

^d UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RESIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; FEMALE; GINGIVA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; TOOTH COLOR; TOOTH FILLING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0346970895     PISSN: 00028177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0103     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Hondrum SO. The longevity of resin-based composite restorations in posterior teeth. Gen Dent 2000;48:398-404.
2. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:45-64.
3. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Asscherickx K, et al. Do condensable composites help to achieve better proximal contacts? Dent Mater 2001;17:533-41.
4. Ferracane JL, Choi KK, Condon JR. In vitro wear of packable dental composites. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1999;25(supplement): S60-6.
5. Cobb DS, MacGregor KM, Vargas MA, Denehy GE. The physical properties of packable and conventional posterior resin-based composites: a comparison. JADA 2000;131:1610-5.
6. Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Chen HY, Hickel R. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater 2000;16:33-40.
7. Kelsey WP, Latta MA, Shaddy RS, Stanislav CM. Physical properties of three packable resin-composite restorative materials. Oper Dent 2000;25:331-5.
8. Choi KK, Ferracane JL, Hilton TJ, Charlton D. Properties of packable dental composites. J Esthet Dent 2000;12:216-26.
9. Manhart J, Chen HY, Hickel R. The suitability of packable resin-based composites for posterior restorations. JADA 2001;132:639-45.
10. Bonilla ED, Mardirossian G, Caputo AA. Fracture toughness of posterior resin composites. Quintessence Int 2001;32:206-10.
11. Aw TC, Nicholls JI. Polymerization shrinkage of densely-filled resin composites. Oper Dent 2001;26:498-504.
12. Pearson J, Bouschlicher MR. Polymerization contraction force of packable composites. Gen Dent 2001;49:643-7.
13. Prime & Bond NT technical manual. Konstanz, Germany: Dentsply DeTrey; 1998.
14. NRC technical manual. Konstanz, Germany: Dentsply DeTrey; 1998.
15. Christensen GJ. Preventing postoperative tooth sensitivity in Class I, II and V restorations. JADA 2002;133:229-31.
16. Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Kugel G, Garcia-Godoy F. Standardized microscopic evaluation of the bonding mechanism of NRC/Prime & Bond NT. Am J Dent 1999;12:77-83.
17. Sunico MC, Shinkai K, Medina VO 3rd, Shirono M, Tanaka N, Katoh Y. Effect of surface conditioning and restorative material on the shear bond strength and resin-dentin interface of a new one-bottle nanofilled adhesive. Dent Mater 2002;18:535-42.
18. Bouillaguet S, Gysi P, Wataha JC, et al. Bond strength of composite to dentin using conventional, one-step, and self-etching adhesive systems. J Dent 2001;29:55-61.
19. Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Microtensile bond strengths of seven dentin adhesive systems. Dent Mater 2000;16:180-7.
20. Jang KT, Mejia FA, Garcia-Godoy F. Dentin bond strength of packable composites using one-bottle adhesives. Am J Dent 2000;13:308-10.
21. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 1980;30:347-58.
22. Mühlemann HR, Son S. Gingival sulcus bleeding: a leading symptom in initial gingivitis. Helv Odontol Acta 1971;15:107-13.
23. American Dental Association Council on Dental Materials, Instruments and Equipment. Revised American Dental Association Acceptance program guidelines for dentin and enamel adhesive materials. Chicago: American Dental Association; January 1994.
24. Oberlander H, Hiller KA, Thonemann B, Schmalz G. Clinical evaluation of packable composite resins in Class-II restorations. Clin Oral Investig 2001;5:102-7.
25. Brackett WW, Covey DA. Resistance to condensation of 'condensable' resin composites as evaluated by a mechanical test. Oper Dent 2000;25:424-6.
26. Burgess JO, Walker R, Davidson JM. Posterior resin-based composite: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent 2002;24:465-79.
27. Roeder LB, Tate WH, Powers JM. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of packable composites. Oper Dent 2000;25:534-43.
28. Burrow MF, Nopnakeepang U, Phrukkanon S. A comparison of microtensile bond strengths of several dentin bonding systems to primary and permanent dentin. Dent Mater 2002;18:239-45.
29. Rosa BT, Perdigao J. Bond strengths of nonrinsing adhesives. Quintessence Int 2000;31:353-8.
30. Loguercio AD, Reis A, Rodrigues Filho LE, Busato AL. One-year clinical evaluation of posterior packable resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2001;26:427-34.
31. Perry R, Kugel G, Leinfelder K. One-year clinical evaluation of SureFil packable composite. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1999;20:544-53.
32. Perry RD, Kugel G. Two-year clinical evaluation of as high-density posterior restorative material. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2000;21:1067-76.
33. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987;66:1636-9.
34. Chen HY, Manhart J, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Polymerization contraction stress in light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater 2001;17:253-9.
35. Opdam NJ, Roeters JJ, Joosten M, Veeke O. Porosities and voids in Class I restorations placed by six operators using a packable or syringable composite. Dent Mater 2002;18:58-63.
36. Tung FF, Estafan D, Scherer W. Microleakage of a condensable resin composite: an in vitro investigation. Quintessence Int 2000;31:430-4.
37. Leevailoj C, Cochran MA, Matis BA, Moore BK, Platt JA. Microleakage of posterior packable resin composites with and without flowable liners. Oper Dent 2001;26:302-7.
38. Neme AM, Maxson BB, Pink FE, Aksu MN. Microleakage of Class II packable resin composites lined with flowables: an in vitro study. Oper Dent 2002;27:600-5.
39. Loguercio AD, Bauer JR, Reis A, Rodrigues Filho LE, Busato AL. Microleakage of a packable composite associated with different materials. J Clin Dent 2002;13:111-5.
40. Leinfelder KF, Bayne SC, Swift EJ Jr. Packable composites: overview and technical considerations. J Esthet Dent 1999;11:234-49.
41. Yap AU, Teoh SH, Chew CL. Effects of cyclic loading on occlusal contact area wear of composite restoratives. Dent Mater 2002;18:149-58.
42. Hse KM, Wei SH. Clinical evaluation of compomer in primary teeth: 1-year results. JADA 1997;128:1088-96.
43. Bryant RW. Comparison of three standards for quantifying occlusal loss of composite restorations. Dent Mater 1990;6:60-2.
44. Klein F, Keller AK, Staehle HJ, Dörfer CE. Proximal contact formation with different restorative materials and techniques. Am J Dent 2002;15:232-5.
45. Denehy GE, Cobb DS, Bouschlicher MB, Vargas MA. Clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer/adhesive in posterior composites (abstract 340). J Dent Res 2000;79(special issue):186.