3-Year clinical evaluation of posterior packable composite resin restorations

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 144-151

  Loguercio, A D ^a,c   Reis, A ^a   Hernandez, P A G ^b   Macedo, R P ^b   Busato, A L S ^b  

^a University of Oeste of Santa Catarina   (Brazil)

^b Luterana University of Brazil   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSIDADE DO OESTE DE SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

3 year clinical evaluation; Clinical evaluation; Composite resin; Packable composite; Posterior tooth restoration

Indexed keywords

ACETONE; ALERT COMPOSITE RESIN; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; BOND 1 ADHESIVE; BOND-1 ADHESIVE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; EPOXIDE; FILTEK P60 COMPOSITE RESIN; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PRIME & BOND NT; PRIME AND BOND 2.1; RESIN; SINGLE BOND; SOLID BOND; SOLITAIRE; SUREFIL PACKABLE COMPOSITE; TPH SPECTRUM;

ARTICLE; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; EVALUATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; PREMOLAR TOOTH; PROSTHESIS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACETONE; BICUSPID; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; EPOXY COMPOUNDS; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); METHACRYLATES; MOLAR; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; PROSTHESIS COLORING; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33645379115     PISSN: 0305182X     EISSN: 13652842     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01539.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Brunthaler A König F Lucas T Sperr W Schedle A. Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2003 7 63 70.
2. Manhart J Chen HY Hamm G Hickel R. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent. 2004 29 481 508.
3. Leinfelder KF Bayne SC Swift EJ Jr.. Packable composites: overview and technical considerations. J Esthet Dent. 1999 11 234 249.
4. Ferracane JL Choi KK Condon JR. In vitro wear of packable dental composites. Compendium. 1999 20 Suppl. S60 S66.
5. Manhart J Kunzelmann K-H Chen HY Hickel R. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater. 2000 16 33 40.
6. Choi KK Ferracane JL Hilton TJ Charlton D. Properties of packable dental composites. J Esthet Dent. 2000 12 216 226.
7. Cobb DS MacGregor KM Vargas MA Denehy GE. The physical properties of packable and conventional posterior resin-based composites: a comparison. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000 131 1610 1615.
8. Kelsey WP Latta MA Shaddy RS Stanislav CM. Physical properties of three packable resin-composite restorative materials. Oper Dent. 2000 25 331 335.
9. Manhart J Chen HY Hickel R. The suitability of packable resin-based composites for posterior restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001 132 639 645.
10. Abe Y Lambretchs P Inoue S et al. Dynamic elastic modulus of 'packable' composites. Dent Mater. 2001 17 520 525.
11. Cunningham J. Posterior composites: evaluations without trials? J Dent. 1989 17 18 21.
12. Bryant RW Hodge K-LV. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations. Aust Dent J. 1994 39 77 81.
13. Wilson NH Smith GA Wilson MA. A clinical trial of a visible light cured posterior composite resin restorative material: three-year results. Quintessence Int. 1986 17 643 653.
14. Leinfelder KF. Wear patterns and rates of posterior composite resins. Int Dent J. 1987 37 152 157.
15. Cvar JF Ryge G. Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. US Public Health Services Publication. No. 790-244. San Francisco US Government Printing Office 1971.
16. Barnes DM Blank LW Gingell JC Gilner PP. A clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer restorative material. J Am Dent Assoc. 1995 126 1245 1253.
17. Wendt SL Leinfelder KF. Clinical evaluation of a posterior resin composite: 3-year results. Am J Dent. 1994 7 207 211.
18. Siegel S. Nonparametric statistics. New York McGraw Hill Book Company Inc. 1996.
19. Marghalani HY Al-Jabab AS. Compressive creep and recovery of light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater. 2004 20 600 610.
20. Oberländer H Hiller K-A Thonemann B Schmalz G. Clinical evaluation of packable composite resins in Class-II restorations. Clin Oral Investig. 2001 5 102 107.
21. Braun AR Krankenberger R Kramer N. Clinical performance and margin analysis of ariston pHc versus Solitaire I as posterior restorations after 1 year. Clin Oral Investig. 2001 5 139 147.
22. Ernst CP Martin M Stuff S Willershausen B. Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for posterior teeth after 3 years. Clin Oral Investig. 2001 5 148 155.
23. Bayne SC Taylor DF Heymann HO. Protection hypothesis for composite wear. Dent Mater. 1992 8 305 309.
24. Clelland NL Villarroel SC Knobloch LA Seghi RR. Simulated oral wear of packable composites. Oper Dent. 2003 28 830 837.
25. Perry R Kugel G. Two-year clinical evaluation of a high-density posterior restorative material. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2000 21 1067 1072 1074 1076 1080.
26. Suzuki M Davidson D Stockton L. 4-year clinical evaluation of a packable composite resin in posterior dentition. J Dent Res. 2003 81 Spec. Iss. A Abstract no. 2362 ( http://www.dentalresearch.org )
27. Korkmaz Y Kiremitci A. Clinical performance of Surefil packable composite restorations after three years. J Dent Res. 2003 81 Spec. Iss. A Abstract no. 1474 ( http://www.dentalresearch.org ).
28. Kiremitci A. Three-year clinical evaluation of Filtek P-60 packable composite restorations. J Dent Res. 2003 81 Spec. Iss. A Abstract no. 1466 ( http://www.dentalresearch.org ).
29. Wilder AD Jr. Bayne SC Perdigão J Heymann H Swift EJ. 5-year clinical performance of packable posterior composite. J Dent Res. 2004 82 Spec. Iss. A Abstract no. 550 ( http://www.dentalresearch.org ).
30. Loguercio AD Reis A Rodrigues Filho LE Busato ALS. One-year clinical evaluation of posterior packable resin composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2001 26 427 434.
31. Yip KH Poon BK Chu FC Poon EC Kong FY Smales RJ. Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin-based composites for posterior restorations in permanent teeth: results at 12 months. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003 134 1581 1589.
32. Perry RD Kugel G Habib CM McGarry P Setembrini L. A two-year clinical evaluation of TPH for restoration of class II carious lesions in permanent teeth. Gen Dent. 1997 45 344 349.
33. Türkün LS Aktener BO. Twenty-four-month clinical evaluation of different posterior composite resin materials. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001 132 196 203.
34. Reis AF Giannini M Lovadino JR Ambrosano GM. Effects of various finishing systems on the surface roughness and staining susceptibility of packable composite resins. Dent Mater. 2003 19 12 18.
35. Ryba TM Dunn WJ Murchison DF. Surface roughness of various packable composites. Oper Dent. 2002 27 243 247.
36. Borges AB Marsílio AL Pagani C Rodrigues JR. Surface roughness of packable composite resins polished with various systems. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2004 16 42 47.
37. Jung M Voit S Klimek J. Surface geometry of three packable and one hybrid composite after finishing. Oper Dent. 2003 28 53 59.
38. Frazier KB Browning W Callan R Blalock J Brackett M. Evaluation of two packable composites at 18 months. J Dent Res. 2004 82 Spec. Iss. A Abstract no. 548 ( http://www.dentalresearch.org ).
39. Fagundes TC Bresciani E Barata THE Lauris JRP Navarro MFL. Clinical evaluation of two packable posterior composite: two-year follow-up. J Dent Res. 2004 82 Spec. Iss. A Abstract no. 549 ( http://www.dentalresearch.org ).
40. Iazzetti G Burgess JO Gardiner D Ripps A. Color stability of fluoride-containing restorative materials. Oper Dent. 2000 25 520 525.
41. Asmussen E Hansen K. Surface discoloration of restorative resins in relation to surface softening and oral hygiene. Scand J Dent Res. 1986 94 174 177.
42. Lopes LG Cefaly DFG Franco EB et al. Clinical evaluation of two 'packable' posterior composite resins. Clin Oral Investig. 2002 6 79 83.
43. Say EC Civelek A Nobecourt A Ersoy M Guleryuz C. Wear and microhardness of different resin composite materials. Oper Dent. 2003 28 628 634.
44. Burke FJ Crisp RJ Bell TJ et al. Clinical evaluation of Solitaire-2 restorations placed in United Kingdom general dental practices: 1-year report. Quintessence Int. 2003 34 594 599.
45. Dall'orologio GD Lorenzi R D'alanno M. Clinical evaluation of Solitaire 2 in class II restorations over 30 months. J Dent Res. 2003 81 Spec. Iss. B Abstract no. 251 ( http://www.dentalresearch.org ).
46. Perdigão J Lopes M. Dentin bonding: questions for the new millennium. J Adhes Dent. 1999 1 191 209.
47. Tanamiharja M Burrow MF Tyas MJ. Microtensile bonds strengths of seven dentin adhesive systems. Dent Mater. 2000 16 180 187.