Physical properties of different composites

Dental Materials Journal

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 278-283

  Ersoy, Mustafa ^a   Civelek, Arzu ^a   L'Hotelier, Estelle ^b   Say, Esra Can ^a   Soyman, Mubin ^a  

^a YEDITEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b 3M COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

Composite; Physical property

Indexed keywords

APPARATUS; ARTICLE; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; POLYMERIZATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 10044256642     PISSN: 02874547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4012/dmj.23.278     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Baratieri LN. Esthetics: Direct adhesive restorations on fractured anterior teeth. Quintessence Pub 1998, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
2. Meiers JC, Kazemi R, Meiers CD. Microleakage of packable composite resins. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 121-126.
3. Technical Product Profile 3M ESPE, Filtek P-60 Universal Restorative System, Dental products laboratory St Paul, 1998.
4. Lee BB, White GE. Chamfered margin effects on occlusal microleakage of primary molar Class I composite resin restorations in vitro. J Clin Ped Dent 1998; 22(2): 113-116.
5. Perry R, Kugel G, Kunzelmann KH, Flessa PH, Estafan D. Composite restoration wear analysis: Conventional methods vs. three-dimensional laser digitizer. J of Amer Dent Assoc 2000; 131: 1472-1477.
6. Cobb DS, Macregor KM, Marcos AV, Denehy GE. The physical properties of packable and conventional posterior resin based composites: A comparison. J Amer Dent Assoc 2000; 131: 1610-1615.
7. Nash RW, Lowe RA, Leinfelder K. Using packable composites for direct posterior placement. J Ameri Dent Assoc 2001; 132: 1099-1104.
8. Technical Product Profile 3M ESPE, Filtek Z-250 Universal Restorative System, Dental products laboratory St Paul, 1998.
9. ISO 4049 Dentistry - Polymer-based filling, restorative and luting materials, 3rd edition, 2000.
10. Tolidis K, Nobecourt A, Randall RC. Effect of a resin modified glass-ionomer liner on volumetric polymerization shrinkage of various composites. Dent Mater 1998; 14: 417-423.
11. Watts DC, Cash AJ. Determination of polymerization shrinkage kinetics in visible light-cured materials: Methods development. Dent Mater 1991; 7: 281-287.
12. Roulet JF, Degronge M. Adhesion. The Silent Revolution in Dentistry Quintessence Pub, Leibzig, Germany, 2000.
13. Manhart J, Kunzelman KH, Chen H, Hickel R. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 53(4): 353-361.
14. Hoffmann N, Hugo B, Schubert K, Kleibert K. Comparison between a plasma arc light source and conventional halogen light curing units regarding flexural strength, modulus, and hardness of photoactivated resin composites. Clin Oral Invest 2000; 4: 140-147.
15. Yap AUJ, Teoh SH. Comparison of flexural properties of composite restoratives using the ISO and miniflexural tests. J Oral Reh 2003; 30: 171-177.
16. Combe EC, Shaglouf AMS, Watts DC, Wilson NHF. Mechanical properties of direct core build-up materials. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 158-165.
17. Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, Pashley DH. A review of polymerization contraction - the influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent 1996; 21: 17-24.
18. Unterbrink GL, Lebenberg WH. Flowable resin composites as "filled adhesives" - Literature review and clinical recommendations. Quintessence International 1999; 30: 249-257.
19. Choi KK, Condon JR, Ferracane JL. The effect of adhesive thickness on polymerization contraction stress of composite. J Dent Res 2000; 79(3): 812-817.
20. Civelek A, Ersoy M, Hotelier EL, Soyman M, Say EC. Polymerization shrinkage and microleakage in Class II cavities of various resin composites. Oper Dent 2003; (5): 635-641.
21. Park SH. Consistency in the amount of linear polymerization shrinkage in syringe type composites. Dent Mater 1999; 5: 442-446.
22. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Curing contraction of composites and glass-ionomers cements. J Prosth Dent 1988; 59: 297-300.
23. Coob DS, Macgregor KM, Vargas MV, Denehy GE. The physical properties of packable and conventional posterior resin-based composites: A comparison. J Amer Dent Assoc 2000; 131: 1610-1615.
24. Lovell LG, Lu H, Elliot JE, Stansbury JW, Bowman CN. The effect of cure rate on mechanical properties of dental resins. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 504-511.
25. Mandikos MN, McGivney GP, Davis E, Bush PJ, Carter JM. A Comparison of wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins. J of Prosth Dent 2001; 85: 386-395.
26. Rudell DE, Malney MM, Thompson JY. Effect of novel filler particles on the mechanical and wear properties of dental composites. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 72-80.
27. Tanbirojn D, Versluis A, Cheng YS, Douglas WH. Fracture toughness and microhardness of a composite: Do they correlate?. J Dent 2003; 31: 89-95.