Properties of packable dental composites

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 216-226

  Choi, Kyoung Kyu ^a   Ferracane, Jack L ^b   Hilton, Thomas J ^c   Charlton, David ^c  

^a Kyung Hee University   (South Korea)

^b OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Brooks AFB   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; ALERT COMPOSITE RESIN; COMPOSITE DENTAL RESIN; CONTRAST MEDIUM; HELIOMOLAR; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POLYMER; POLYURETHAN; PYRAMID PACKABLE COMPOSITE; RESIN; SILICON DIOXIDE; SILUX PLUS; SOLITAIRE; SUREFIL PACKABLE COMPOSITE; Z100 COMPOSITE RESIN; ZIRCONIUM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; ELASTICITY; EVALUATION; HARDNESS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; PLIABILITY; VISCOSITY;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; ELASTICITY; HARDNESS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; PLIABILITY; POLYMERS; POLYURETHANES; SILICON DIOXIDE; VISCOSITY; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 0034574920     PISSN: 14964155     EISSN: 17088240     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00224.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Clinical Research Associate. Product use survey: 1995. CRA Newsletter 1995; 19:1–4.
2. Jokstad A, Mjör IAV Qvist V. The age of restorations in situ. Acta Odontol Scand 1994; 52:234–242.
3. Roulet JF. Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coiored alternatives to amalgam. J Dent 1997; 25:459–473.
4. Leinfelder KF, Radz GM, Nash RW. A report on a new condensable composite resin. Compendium 1998; 19:230–237.
5. Condensable composites. The Dental Advisor 1998; 15:2–4.
6. Ferracane JL. Current trends in dental composites. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1995;6:302–318.
7. Li Y, Swartz ML, Phillips RW, Moore BK, Roberts RW. Effects of filler content and size on properties of composites. J Dent Res 1985; 64:1396–1401.
8. Braem M, Finger W, Lambrechts P, Van Dorcn V, Vanherle G. Mechanical properties and filler fraction of dental composites. Dent Mater 1989; 5:346–349.
9. Braem M, Lambrechts P, Van Doren V, Vanherle G. The impact of composite structure on its elastic response. J Dent Res 1986; 65:648–653.
10. Munksgaard EC, Hansen EK, Kato H. Wall-to-wall polymerization contraction of composite resins versus filler content. Scand J Dent Res 1987; 95:526–531.
11. Iga M, Takeshige F, Tsuchitani Y, Ui T, Torii M. The relationship between polymerization shrinkage measured by a modified dilatometer and the inorganic filler content of light-cured composites. Dent Mater J 1991; 10:38–45.
12. Ferracane JL, Antonio RC, Matsumoto H. Variables affecting the fracture toughness of dental composites. J Dent Res 1987; 66:1140–1145.
13. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. In vitro wear of composite with varied cure, filler level, and filler treatment. J Dent Res 1997; 76:1405–1411.
14. Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Celis JP, Vanherle G. A classification of dental composites according to their morphological and mechanical characteristics. Dent Mater 1992;8:310–319.
15. Ferracane JL, Choi KK, Condon JR. In vitro wear of packable dental composites. Compendium 1999; 20(Suppl):60–66.
16. Manhart J, Kunzelmann K-H, Chen HY, Hickel R. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater 2000; 16:33–40.
17. Perry R, Kugel G, Leinfelder K. One-year clinical evaluation of SureFil packable composite. Compendium 1999; 20:544–553.
18. Ferracane JL, Mitchem JC. Properties of posterior composites: round robin testing for a specification. Dent Mater 1994; 10:92–99.
19. Penn RW. A recording dilatometer for measuring polymerization shrinkage. Dent Mater 1986;2:78–79.
20. Ferracane JL, Berge HX, Condon JR. In vitro aging of dental composites in water: effect of degree of conversion, filler volume, and filler-matrix coupling. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 42:465–472.
21. Kim KH, Park JH, Imai Y, Kishi T. Fracture toughness and acoustic emission behavior of dental composite resins. Eng Fract Mech 1991; 40:811–819.
22. Xu HH. Dental composite resins containing silica-fused ceramic single-crystalline whiskers with various filler levels. 1999; J Dent Res 78:1304–1311.
23. Lange FF, Radford KC. Fracture energy of an epoxy composite system. J Mater Sci 1971;6:1197–1203.
24. Kcrby R, Berlin J, Seghi R. Fracture toughness of posterior condensable composite resins. J Dent Res 1999; 73:156. (Abstr).
25. Kelsey WP, Latta MA, Barkmeier WW. Physical properties of high density composite restorative materials. J Dent Res 1999; 78:207. (Abstr).
26. Ruddell DE, Thompson JY, Stamatiades PJ, Ward JC, Baync SC, Shellard FR. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of condensable composites. J Dent Res 1999; 78:156. (Abstr).
27. MacGregor KM, Cobb DS, Vargas MA. Physical properties of condensable versus conventional composites. J Dent Res 1999; 78:157. (Abstr).
28. Braem M. An in-vitro investigation into the physical durability of dental composites. PhD Thesis, Leuven, Belgium: Catholic University of Leuven, 1985.
29. Kerby R, Lee J, Knobloch L, Seghi R. Hardness and degree of conversion of posterior condensable composite resins. J Dent Res 1999; 78:156. (Abstr).
30. Aw TC, Nicholls II. Polymerization shrinkage of condensable composite resins. J Dent Res 1999; 78:370. (Abstr).
31. Leinfelder KF, Bayne SC, Swift EJ Jr. Packable composites: overview and technical considerations. I Esthet Dent 1999; 11:234–249.
32. USAF Dental Investigation Service. Dental items of significance (Solitaire). 1999; 56:16.
33. USAF Dental Investigation Service. Dental items of significance (Surefil High Density Posterior Restorative). 1999; 58:1116.