Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs

Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 155-163

  Akbar, Jaber Hussain ^a,b   Petrie, Cynthia S ^c,e   Walker, Mary P ^c   Williams, Karen ^d   Eick, J David ^c  

^a MINISTRY OF HEALTH   (Kuwait)

^b KUWAIT UNIVERSITY   (Kuwait)

^c Department of Restorative Dentistry ^*

^d Clinical Research Center

^e UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Chamfer; Composite milling blocks; Marginal gap; Paradigm MZ100; SEM; Shoulder

Indexed keywords

ALLOY; CEREC; PARADIGM MZ100; RESIN; ZIRCONIUM;

ARTICLE; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; EVALUATION; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

CERAMICS; COMPOSITE RESINS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CROWNS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); METAL CERAMIC ALLOYS; MOLAR, THIRD; TOOTH PREPARATION, PROSTHODONTIC; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 33646228872     PISSN: 1059941X     EISSN: 1532849X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00095.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Mormann WH Curilovic Z CEREC(R) CAD-CAM ceramic restorations. A case report after 5 years in place Acta Stomatol Croat 1991 25 3 10
2. Mormann W Krejci I Computer-designed inlays after 5 years in situ: Clinical performance and scanning electron microscopic evaluation Quintessence Int 1992 23 109 115
3. Apholt W Bindl A Luthy H et al Flexural strength of Cerec 2 machined and jointed InCeram-Alumina and InCeram-Zirconia bars Dent Mater 2001 17 260 267
4. Mormann W The right step to Cerec 3 Int J Comput Dent 2000 3 3 4
5. Schneider W Cerec 3 Int J Comput Dent 2000 3 33 40
6. Cvar JF Ryge G Criteria for the Clinical Evaluation of Dental Restorative Materials San Franscisco Government Printing Office 1971
7. Bindl A Mormann WH Clinical evaluation of adhesively placed Cerec endo-crowns after 2 years - preliminary results J Adhes Dent 1999 1 255 265
8. Felden A Schmalz G Federlin M et al Retrospective clinical investigation and survival analysis on ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: Results up to 7 years Clin Oral Investig 1998 2 161 167
9. Chadwick RG McCabe JF Walls AW et al Comparison of a novel photogrammetric technique and modified USPHS criteria to monitor the wear of restorations J Dent 1991 19 39 45
10. Otto T De Nisco S Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: A 10-year prospective clinical study of Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays Int J Prosthodont 2002 15 122 128
11. Haselton DR Diaz-Arnold AM Hillis SL Clinical assessment of high-strength all-ceramic crowns J Prosthet Dent 2000 83 396 401
12. Pallesen U van Dijken JW An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glass ceramic inlays processed by the Cerec CAD/CAM system Eur J Oral Sci 2000 108 239 246
13. Sjogren G Marginal and internal fit of four different types of ceramic inlays after luting. An in vitro study Acta Odontol Scand 1995 53 24 28
14. Sturdevant JR Bayne SC Heymann HO Margin gap size of ceramic inlays using second-generation CAD/CAM equipment J Esthet Dent 1999 11 206 214
15. Bindl A Mormann WH Clinical and SEM evaluation of all-ceramic chair-side CAD/CAM-generated partial crowns Eur J Oral Sci 2003 111 163 169
16. Kawai K Hayashi M Torii M et al Marginal adaptability and fit of ceramic milled inlays J Am Dent Assoc 1995 126 1414 1419
17. Sato K Matsumura H Atsuta M Relation between cavity design and marginal adaptation in a machine-milled ceramic restorative system J Oral Rehabil 2002 29 24 27
18. Denissen H Dozic A van der Zel J et al Marginal fit and short-term clinical performance of porcelain-veneered CICERO, CEREC, and Procera onlays J Prosthet Dent 2000 84 506 513
19. Nakamura T Dei N Kojima T et al Marginal and internal fit of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns Int J Prosthodont 2003 16 244 248
20. Hembree JH Jr.. Comparisons of fit of CAD-CAM restorations using three imaging surfaces Quintessence Int 1995 26 145 147
21. Molin MK Karlsson SL Kristiansen MS Influence of film thickness on joint bend strength of a ceramic/resin composite joint Dent Mater 1996 12 245 249
22. Belser UC MacEntee MI Richter WA Fit of three porcelain-fused-to-metal marginal designs in vivo: A scanning electron microscope study J Prosthet Dent 1985 53 24 29
23. Byrne G Influence of finish-line form on crown cementation Int J Prosthodont 1992 5 137 144
24. Syu JZ Byrne G Laub LW et al Influence of finish-line geometry on the fit of crowns Int J Prosthodont 1993 6 25 30
25. Holmes JR Bayne SC Holland GA et al Considerations in measurement of marginal fit J Prosthet Dent 1989 62 405 408
26. Baldissara P Baldissara S Scotti R Reliability of tactile perception using sharp and dull explorers in marginal opening identification Int J Prosthodont 1998 11 591 594
27. Groten M Girthofer S Probster L Marginal fit consistency of copy-milled all-ceramic crowns during fabrication by light and scanning electron microscopic analysis in vitro J Oral Rehabil 1997 24 871 881
28. Schmalz G Federlin M Reich E Effect of dimension of luting space and luting composite on marginal adaptation of a class II ceramic inlay J Prosthet Dent 1995 73 392 399
29. Mormann WH Bindl A Luthy H et al Effects of preparation and luting system on all-ceramic computer-generated crowns Int J Prosthodont 1998 11 333 339
30. Fasbinder DJ Restorative material options for CAD/CAM restorations Compend Contin Educ Dent 2002 23 911 916 918 920 passim; quiz 924