Clinical and SEM evaluation of all-ceramic chair-side CAD/CAM-generated partial crowns

European Journal of Oral Sciences

Volumn 111, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 163-169

  Bindl, Andreas ^a   Mörmann, Werner H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Adhesive placement; All ceramic partial crowns; Chairside CAD CAM; Marginal adaptation; Marginal fit

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CERAMIC PROSTHESIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; COMPUTER; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PREMOLAR TOOTH; PREVALENCE; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOMIZATION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TOOTH COLOR; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEMENTATION; CERAMICS; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; ENDODONTICS; EVALUATION; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS;

CEREC; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; RESIN CEMENT; SYNTAC DENTINE ADHESIVE;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEMENTATION; CERAMICS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CROWNS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FITTING; RESIN CEMENTS;

EID: 0038790497     PISSN: 09098836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2003.00022.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. MÖRMANN WH, BRANDESTINI M. The fundamental inventive principles of Cerec CAD/CIM and other CAD/CAM methods. In: MÖRMANN WH. ed. CAD/CIM in aesthetic dentistry. Berlin: Quintessence, 1996; 81-110.
2. MÖRMANN WH, BINDL A. The new creativity in ceramic restorations: dental CAD-CIM. Quintessence Int 1996; 27: 821-828.
3. MÖRMANN WH, BINDL A. The Cerec 3 - a quantum leap for computer-aided restorations: initial clinical results. Quintessence Int 2000; 31: 699-712.
4. RICHTER B, MÖRMANN WH. Cerec 3 full-ceramic CAD/CAM inlays and partial crowns. In: MÖRMANN, WH, ed. CAD-CIM Library, 4. Zürich: Foundation for the Advancement of Computer-Assisted Dentistry (FCAD), 2001; 10-44.
5. REISS B, WALTHER W. Clinical long-term results and 10-year Kaplan-Meier analysis of Cerec restorations. Int J Comp Dent 2000; 3: 9-23.
6. HEYMANN HO, BAYNE SC, STURDEVANT JR, WILDER AD, ROBERSON TM. The clinical performance of CAD-CAM-generated ceramic inlays - a four year study. J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127: 1171-1180.
7. SJÖGREN G, MOLIN M, VAN DIJKEN JWV. A 5-year clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with a dual cured or chemically cured resin composite luting agent. Acta Odontol Scand 1998; 56: 263-267.
8. MARTIN N, JEDYNAKIEWICZ NM. Clinical performance of CEREC ceramic inlays: a systematic review. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 54-61.
9. STURDEVANT JR, BAYNE SC, HEYMANN HO. Margin gap size of ceramic inlays using second-generation CAD/CAM equipment. J Esthet Dent 1999; 11: 206-214.
10. HICKEL R, MANHART J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhesive Dent 2001; 3: 45-64.
11. Restaurative Zahnmedizin. In: CHWEIZERISCHE ZAHNÄRZTE GESELLSCHAFT SSO, ed. Qualitätsleitlinien in der Zahnmedizin. Vol 1. Bern: Schweizerische Zahnärzte Gesellschaft SSO 2000. 75-103.
12. PRÖBSTER L. Sind vollkeramische Kronen und Brücken wissenschaftlich anerkannt? Gemeinsame Stellungnahme von DGZMK und DGZPW. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 2001; 56: 575-576.
13. JENSEN ME, REDFORD DA, WILLIAMS BT, GARDNER F. Posterior etched-porcelain restorations: an in vitro study. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1987; 7: 615-622.
14. MÖRMANN WH, BlNDL A, LÜTHY H, RATHKE A. Effects of preparation and luting system on all-Ceramic computer-generated crowns. Int J Prosthod 1998; 11: 333-339.
15. TSOTSOS S. Single-appointment, all-ceramic anterior restorations. Int J Comp Dent 2001; 4: 263-272.
16. PFEIFFER J. The character of Cerec 2. In: MÖRMANN WH, ed. CAD/CIM in aesthetic dentistry: Cerec 10 year anniversary symposium. Berlin: Quintessence, 1996; 255-265.
17. MÖRMANN WH, SCHUG J. Grinding precision an accuracy of fit. J Am Dent Assoc 1997; 128: 47-53.
18. RYGE G, SNYDER M. Evaluating the clinical quality of restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1973; 87: 369-377.
19. MÖRMANN WH, KREJCI I. Computer-designed inlays after 5 years in situ: clinical performance and scanning electron microscopic evaluation. Quintessence Int 1992; 23: 109-115.
20. BENZ C, BENZ B, EL MAHDY K, HICKEL R. Clinical evaluation of the CEREC II system in comparison to CEREC I. In: MÖRMANN WH, ed. CAD/CIM in aesthetic dentistry: Cerec 10 year anniversary symposium. Berlin: Quintessence 1996; 519-524.
21. SALIGER G. Designing a CEREC crown. In: MÖRMANN, WH, ed. CAD/CIM in Aesthetic Dentistry: Cerec 10 Year Anniversary Symposium. Berlin: Quintessence, 1996; 427-440.
22. BERG NG, DÉRAND T. A 5-year evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec). Swed Dent J 1997; 21: 121-127.
23. ISENBERG BP, ESSIG ME, LEINFELDER KF. Three years clinical evaluation of CAD/CAM restorations. J Esthetic Dent 1992; 4: 173-176.
24. MUNACK J, GEURTSEN W. Marginal adaptation and fit of Cerec I/II and Empress overlays. In: MÖRMANN, WH, ed. CAD/CIM in aesthetic dentistry: Cerec 10 rear anniversary symposium. Berlin: Quintessence, 1996; 571-579.
25. DENISSEN H, DOZIC A, VAN DER ZEL J, VAN WAAS M. Marginal fit and short-term clinical performance of porcelain-veneered CICERO, CEREC, and Procera onlays. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84: 506-513.
26. SJÖGREN G, BERMAN M, MOLIN M, BESSING CH. A clinical examination of ceramic (Cerec) inlays. Acta Odontol Scand 1992; 50: 171-178.
27. ROULET J-F, NOACK MJ. Tooth colored conventional and Cerec restorations - claim and reality. In: MÖRMANN WH, ed. International symposium on computer restorations. Chicago: Quintessence. 1991; 233-243.
28. SERTGÖZ A. GEMALMAZ D, ALKUMRU H, YORUÇ B. Luting composite thickness of two ceramic inlay systems. Eur J Prosthodont Rest Dent 1995; 3: 151-154.
29. ZUELLIG-SINGER R, BRYANT RW. Three-year evaluation of computer machined ceramic inlays: influence of luting agent. Quintessence Int 1998; 29: 573-582.
30. SCHMALZ G, FEDERLIN M, REICH E. Effect of dimension of luting space and luting composite on marginal adaptation of a class II ceramic inlay. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73: 392-399.
31. MJÖR IA, MOORHEMD JE. Reasons for replacement of restorations in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Int Dent J 2000; 50: 361-366.
32. CHADWICK B, TREASURE E, DUMMER P, DUNSTAN F. GILMOUR A, JONES R, PHILIPS C, STEVENS J, REES J, RICHMOND S. Challenges with studies investigating longevity of dental restorations - a critique of a systematic review. J Dent 2001; 29: 155-161.
33. DEDMON HW. Ability to evaluate nonvisible margin with an explorer. Oper Dent 1985; 10: 6-11.
34. ROLLET JF. Longevity of glass ceramic inlays and amalgam - results up to 6 years. Clin Oral Invest 1997; 1: 40-46.
35. FELDEN A, SCHMALZ G, FEDERLIN M, HILLER KA. Retrospective clinical investigation and survival analysis on ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: results up to 7 years. Clin Oral Invest 1998; 2: 161-167.