A risk-based classification scheme for genetically modified foods I: Conceptual development

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 208-222

  Chao, Eunice ^a   Krewski, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Concern level; Genetically modified foods; Premarket assessment; Regulatory oversight; Risk based classification

Indexed keywords

RECOMBINANT DNA;

ALLERGENICITY; ARTICLE; DNA MODIFICATION; FOOD SAFETY; GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; TRANSGENIC PLANT;

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY; FOOD INDUSTRY; FOOD, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; GENETIC ENGINEERING; HUMANS; LEGISLATION, FOOD; PUBLIC HEALTH; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY MANAGEMENT; TOXICITY TESTS;

EID: 56049091241     PISSN: 02732300     EISSN: 10960295     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.08.006     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Aalberse R.C. Structural biology of allergens. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 106 (2000) 228-238
2. Akkerdaas J.H., Wensing M., Asero R., Fernandez Rivas M., Knulst A.C., Bolhaar S., Hefle S.L., Aalberse R.C., and van Ree R. IgE binding to pepsin-digested food extracts. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 138 3 (2005) 203-208
3. Bannon G.A., Goodman R.E., Leach J.N., Rice E., Fuchs R.L., and Astwood J.D. Digestive stability in the context of assessing the potential allergenicity of food proteins. Comments Toxicol. 8 3 (2002) 271-285
4. Birch R.G. Plant transformation: problems and strategies for practical application. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 48 (1997) 297-326
5. Björklund A., Soeria-Atmadja D., Zorzet A., Hammerling U., and Gustafsson M.G. Supervised identification of allergen-representative peptides for in silico detection of potentially allergenic proteins. Bioinformatics 21 (2005) 39-50
6. Brar D.S., and Jain S.M. Somaclonal variation: mechanism and applications in crop improvement. In: Jain S.M., Brar D.S., and Ahloowalia B.S. (Eds). Somaclonal Variation and Induced Mutations in Crop Improvement (1998), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston 15-38
7. Brock W.J., Rodricks J.V., Rulis A., Dellarco V.L., Gray G.M., and Lane R.W. Food safety: risk assessment methodology and decision-making criteria. Int. J. Toxicol. 22 (2003) 435-451
8. Cellini F., Chesson A., Colquhoun I., Constable A., Davies H.V., Engel K.H., Gatehouse A.M.R., Kärenlampi S., Kok E.J., Leguay J.J., Lehesranta S., Noteborn H.P.J.M., Pedersen J., and Smith M. Unintended effects and their detection in genetically modified crops. Food Chem. Toxicol. 42 (2004) 1089-1125
9. Chahal G.S., and Gosal S.S. Principles and Procedures of Plant Breeding: Biotechnological and Conventional Approaches (2002), Alpha Science International Ltd., Pangbourne, UK
10. Chao E. A Risk-Based Classification Scheme for Genetically Modified Foods: Establishing Levels of Concern to Guide Testing Requirements (2007), Doctoral Dissertation, University of Ottawa
11. Chao E., and Krewski D. A risk-based classification scheme for genetically modified foods II: Graded testing. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 52 (2008) 223-234
12. Cheeke, P.R., 1998. Toxins intrinsic to forages. In: Natural Toxicants in Feeds, Forages, and Poisonous Plants. Interstate Publishers, Inc., Danville, IL, pp. 275-324.
13. Codex Alimentarius, 2003. Guideline for the Conduct of Food Safety Assessment of Foods Derived From Recombinant-DNA Plants. CAC/GL 45-2003. Food and Agriculture Organization, Codex Alimentarius Commission, Rome.
14. Conner A.J., and Jacobs J.M.E. Genetic engineering of crops as potential source of genetic hazard in the human diet. Mutat. Res. (Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagenesis) 443 (1999) 223-234
15. Croteau R., Kutchan T.M., and Lewis N.G. Natural products (secondary metabolites). In: Buchanan B., Gruissem W., and Jones R. (Eds). Biochemistry & Molecular Biology of Plants (2000), American Society of Plant Physiologists, Rockville, MD 1250-1318
16. Davey M.R., Anthony P., Power J.B., and Lowe K.C. Plant protoplasts: status and biotechnological perspectives. Biotechnol. Adv. 23 (2005) 131-171
17. Defernez M., Gunning Y.M., Parr A.J., Shepherd L.V.T., Davies H.V., and Colquhoun I.J. NMR and HPLC-UV profiling of potatoes with genetic modifications to metabolic pathways. J. Agric. Food Chem. 52 (2004) 6075-6085
18. EFSA. Guidance document of the scientific panel on genetically modified organisms for the risk assessment of genetically modified plants and derived food and feed. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). EFSA J. 99 (2004) 1-94
19. El Ouakfaoui S., and Miki B. The stability of the Arabidopsis transcriptome in transgenic plants expressing the marker genes nptII and uidA. Plant J. 41 (2005) 791-800
20. Ellis, B., 2001. All about substantial equivalence. In: Gallaugher, P, Wood, L. (Eds.), An Edited Proceedings from the Workshop on Food of the Future? Comparing Conventional with Genetically Modified Food Crops: Understanding and Managing the Risks. Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, May 2-4. Vancouver, Canada, pp. 141-152.
21. European Commission. Guidance Document for the Risk Assessment of Genetically Modified Plants and Derived Food and Feed (2003), European Commission, Health & Consumer Protection Directorate-General, Brussels, Belgium
22. Facchini P.J., Bird D.A., and St Pierre B. Can Arabidopsis make complex alkaloids?. Trends Plant Sci. 9 (2004) 116-122
23. FAO. Draft Guidelines for Assessment of Ecological Hazards of Herbicide and Insect Resistant Crops (2001), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Plant Production and Protection Division, Rome
24. FAO/WHO, 2001. Evaluation of allergenicity of genetically modified foods. In: Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Allergenicity of Foods Derived from Biotechnology. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/World Health Organization (FAO/WHO), January 22-25, Rome, Italy.
25. FDA. Toxicological Principles for the Safety Assessment of Direct Food Additives and Color Additives Used in Food (2003), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Washington, DC
26. FIFRA SAP, 2004. Product characterization, human health risk, ecological risk, and insect resistance management for Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) cotton products. Meeting report. In: SAP Report No. 2004-05. US Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act Scientific Advisory Panel (FIFRA SAP). June 8-10, Arlington, Virginia.
27. Finely J.W., Sigrid-Keck A., Robbins R.J., and Hintze K.J. Selenium enrichment of broccoli: interactions between selenium and secondary plant compounds. J. Nutr. 135 (2005) 1236-1238
28. Firn R.D., and Jones C.G. Natural products-a simple model to explain chemical diversity. Nat. Prod. Rep. 20 (2003) 382-391
29. Gold L.S., Slone T.H., and Ames B.N. Natural and synthetic chemicals in the diet: a critical analysis of possible cancer hazards. In: Hester R.E., and Harrison R.M. (Eds). Food Safety and Food Quality (2001), Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK 95-128
30. Goodman R.E., and Hefle S.L. Gaining perspective on the allergenicity assessment of genetically modified food crops. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 1 (2005) 561-578
31. Goodman R.E., Hefle S.L., Taylor S.L., and van Ree R. Assessing genetically modified crops to minimize the risk of increased food allergy: a review. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 137 2 (2005) 153-156
32. Goodman R.E., Vieths S., Sampson H.A., Hill D., Ebisawa M., Taylor S.L., and van Ree R. Allengenicity assessment of genetically modified crops-what makes sense?. Nat. Biotechnol. 26 1 (2008) 73-81
33. Gupta P.K. Chromosomal basis of somaclonal variation in plants. In: Jain S.M., Brar D.S., and Ahloowalia B.S. (Eds). Somaclonal Variation and Induced Mutations in Crop Improvement (1998), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston 149-168
34. Hadacek F. Secondary metabolites as plant traits: current assessment and future perspectives. CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 21 (2002) 273-322
35. Hancock J.F. A framework for assessing the risk of transgenic crops. Bioscience 53 (2003) 512-519
36. Hanin M., and Paszkowski J. Plant genome modification by homologous recombination. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 6 2 (2003) 157-162
37. Haslberger A.G. GM food: the risk assessment of immune hypersensitivity reactions covers more than allergenicity. Food Agric. Environ. 1 (2003) 42-45
38. Health Canada, 2006. Guidelines for the Safety Assessment of Novel Foods. Available from: (accessed 28.03.08).
39. Helm, R.M., 2001. Stability of known allergens (digestive and heat stability). In: Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Foods Derived From Biotechnology. Working Documents Topic 5 (Biotech 01/07). World Health Organization, January 22-25, Geneva.
40. IFBC. Biotechnologies and food: assuring the safety of foods produced by genetic modification. Report prepared by the International Food Biotechnology Council. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 12 (1990) S1-S186
41. ILSI. Nutritional and safety assessments of foods and feeds nutritionally improved through biotechnology. International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI). Comp. Rev. Food Sci Food Safety 3 (2004) 1-104
42. IPCS, 1999. Principles and Methods for Assessing Allergic Hypersensitization Associated With Exposure to Chemicals. World Health Organization, International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS).
43. In: Jain S.M., Brar D.S., and Ahloowalia B.S. (Eds). Somaclonal Variation and Induced Mutations in Crop Improvement (1998), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston
44. Jensen-Jarolim E., and Untersmayr E. Food safety: in vitro digestion tests are non-predictive for allergenic potential of food in stomach insufficiency. Immunol. Lett. 102 (2006) 118-119
45. Jones C.G., and Firn R.D. On the evolution of plant secondary chemical diversity. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 333 (1991) 273-280
46. Jørgensen K., Rasmussen A.V., Morant M., Nielsen A.H., Bjarnholt N., Zagrobelny M., Bak S., and Møller B.L. Metabolon formation and metabolic channeling in the biosynthesis of plant natural products. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 8 (2005) 280-291
47. Kaeppler S.M., Phillips R.L., and Olhoft P. Molecular basis of heritable tissue culture-induced variation in plants. In: Jain S.M., Brar D.S., and Ahloowalia B.S. (Eds). Somaclonal Variation and Induced Mutations in Crop Improvement (1998), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston 481-483
48. Kleter G.A., and Peijnenburg A.A.C.M. Presence of potential allergy-related linear epitopes in novel proteins from conventional crops and the implication for the safety assessment of these crops with respect to the current testing of genetically modified crops. Plant Biotechnol. J. 1 (2003) 371-380
49. Koivisto R.A., Tormakangas K.M., and Kauppinen V.S. Hazard identification and risk assessment procedure for genetically modified plants in the field-GMHAZID. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 9 (2002) 110-116
50. König A., Cockburn A., Crevel R.W.R., Debruyne E., Grafstroem R., Hammerling U., Kimber I., Knudsen I., Kuiper H.A., Peijnenburg A.A.C.M., Penninks A.H., Poulsen M., Schauzu M., and Wal J.M. Assessment of the safety of foods derived from genetically modified (GM) crops. Food Chem. Toxicol. 42 (2004) 1047-1088
51. Kristensen C., Morant M., Olsen C.E., Ekstrøm C.T., Galbraith D.W., Møller B.L., and Bak S. Metabolic engineering of dhurrin in transgenic Arabidopsis plants with marginal inadvertent effects on the metabolome and transcriptome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102 (2005) 1779-1784
52. Kuiper H.A., Kleter G.A., Noteborn H.P.J.M., and Kok E.J. Assessment of the food safety issues related to genetically modified foods. Plant J. 27 (2001) 503-528
53. Larkin P.J. Introduction. In: Jain S.M., Brar D.S., and Ahloowalia B.S. (Eds). Somaclonal Variation and Induced Mutations in Crop Improvement (1998), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston 3-14
54. Le Gall G., Colquhoun I.J., Davis A.L., Collins G.J., and Verhoeyen M.E. Metabolite profiling of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) using 1H NMR spectroscopy as a tool to detect potential unintended effects following a genetic modification. J. Agric. Food Chem. 51 (2003) 2447-2456
55. Lee M., and Phillips R.L. The chromosomal basis of somaclonal variation. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 39 (1988) 413-437
56. Liu J., Xu X., and Deng X. Intergeneric somatic hybridization and its application to crop genetic improvement. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 82 (2005) 19-44
57. LSRO, 1999. Report on Alternative and Traditional Models for Safety Regulation of Food Ingredients. Prepared for the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, US Food and Drug Administration. Contract No. 223-92-2185. American Society for Nutritional Sciences, Life Sciences Research Office (LSRO), Bethesda, MD.
58. Madsen K.H., Holm P.B., Lassen J., and Sandoe P. Ranking genetically modified plants according to familiarity. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 15 (2002) 267-278
59. Mendelsohn M., Kough J., Vaituzis Z., and Matthews K. Are Bt crops safe?. Nat. Biotechnol. 21 (2003) 1003-1009
60. Metcalfe D.D., Astwood J.D., Townsend R., Sampson H.A., Taylor S.L., and Fuchs R.L. Assessment of the allergenic potential of foods derived from genetically engineered crop plants. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 36 Suppl. (1996) S165-S186
61. Mills E.N.C., Madsen C., Shewry P.R., and Wichers H.J. Food allergens of plant origin-their molecular and evolutionary relationships. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 14 (2003) 145-156
62. Mohan Jain S. Tissue culture-derived variation in crop improvement. Euphytica 118 (2001) 153-166
63. Molinier J., Oakeley E.J., Niederhauser O., Kovalchuk I., and Hohn B. Dynamic response of plant genome to ultraviolet radiation and other genotoxic stresses. Mutat. Res. 571 (2005) 235-247
64. Nielsen K.M. Transgenic organisms - time for conceptual diversification?. Nat. Biotechnol. 21 (2003) 227-228
65. NRC. Carcinogens and Anticarcinogens in the Human Diet. National Research Council (NRC) (1996), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
66. NRC. Genetically Modified Pest-Protected Plants: Science and Regulation. National Research Council (NRC) (2000), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
67. NRC. Safety of Genetically Engineered Foods: Approaches to Assessing Unintended Health Effects. National Research Council (NRC) (2004), The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
68. OECD, 2002. Consensus Document on Compositional Considerations for New Varieties of Maize (Zea Mays): Key Food and Feed Nutrients. Antinutrients and Secondary Plant Metabolites. Series on the Safety of Novel Foods and Feed, No. 6. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris.
69. Osbourn A.E., Qi X., Townsend B., and Qin B. Dissecting plant secondary metabolism-constitutive chemical defences in cereals. New Phytol. 159 (2003) 101-108
70. Phillips R.L., Kaeppler S.M., and Olhoft P. Genetic instability of plant tissue cultures: breakdown of normal controls. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91 12 (1994) 5222-5226
71. Potrykus I. Gene transfer to plants: assessment of published approaches and results. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 42 (1991) 205-225
72. Poulsen L.K. Allergy assessment of foods or ingredients derived from biotechnology, gene-modified organisms, or novel foods. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 48 (2004) 413-423
73. Predieri S. Mutation induction and tissue culture in improving fruits. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 64 (2001) 185-210
74. Schnable P.S., Hsia A.P., and Nikolau B.J. Genetic recombination in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 1 2 (1998) 123-129
75. Schouten H.J., Krens F.A., and Jacobsen E. Cisgenic plants are similar to traditionally bred plants. EMBO Rep. 7 (2006) 750-753
76. Spök A., Gaugitsch H., Laffer S., Pauli G., Saito H., Sampson H., Sibanda E., Thomas W., Van Hage M., and Valenta R. Suggestions for the assessment of the allergenic potential of genetically modified organisms. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 137 (2005) 167-180
77. Stirn, S., Beusmann, V., 2003. Risk assessment of genetically modified and conventionally bred food crops: the case of potatoes [Vergleich der Sicherheitsabschätzung gentechnisch veränderter und konventionell gezüchteter Lebensmittel am Beispiel der Kartoffel]. Dtsch. Lebensmitt. Rundsch. 99, 395-403+III.
78. Strauss S.H. Genetic technologies - genomics, genetic engineering, and domestication of crops. Science 300 (2003) 61-62
79. Tattersall D.B., Bak S., Jones P.R., Olsen C.E., Nielsen J.K., Hansen M.L., Høj P.B., and Møller B.L. Resistance to an herbivore through engineered cyanogenic glucoside synthesis. Science 293 (2001) 1826-1828
80. Taylor S.L., and Hefle S.L. Will genetically modified foods be allergenic?. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 107 (2001) 765-771
81. Taylor S.L., Hefle S.L., Bindslev-Jensen C., Bock S.A., Burks J., Christie L., Hill D.J., Host A., Hourihane J.O., Lack G., Metcalfe D.D., Moneret-Vautrin D.A., Vadas P.A., Rance F., Skrypec D.J., Trautman T.A., Yman I.M., and Zeiger R.S. Factors affecting the determination of threshold doses for allergenic foods: how much is too much?. J. Allergy Clin Immunol. 109 1 (2002) 24-30
82. Teuber S.S. Hypothesis: the protein body effect and other aspects of food matrix effects. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 964 (2002) 111-116
83. The Royal Society. 2003. GM Science Review. First Report. Prepared by the GM Science Review Panel. Available from:
84. Traynor P.L., Adair D., and Irwin R. A Practical Guide to Containment: Greenhouse Research with Transgenic Plants and Microbes (2001), Information Systems for Biotechnology, Blacksburg, VA
85. van den Eede G., Aarts H., Buhk H.J., Corthier G., Flint H.J., Hammes W., Jacobsen B., Midtvedt T., van der Vossen J., Von Wright A., Wackernagel W., and Wilcks A. The relevance of gene transfer to the safety of food and feed derived from genetically modified (GM) plants. Food Chem Toxicol. 42 7 (2004) 1127-1156
86. van Harten A.M. Mutation Breeding: Theory and Practical Applications (1998), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
87. van Ree R., Cabanes-Macheteau M., Akkerdaas J., Milazzo J.P., Loutelier-Bourhis C., Rayon C., Villalba M., Koppelman S., Aalberse R., Rodriguez R., Faye L., and Lerouge P. β(1,2)-Xylose and α(1,3)-fucose residues have a strong contribution in IgE binding to plant glycoallergens. J. Biol. Chem. 275 (2000) 11451-11458
88. van Wijk F., Nierkens S., Hassing I., Feijen M., Koppelman S.J., de Jong G.A.H., Pieters R., and Knippels L.M.J. The effect of food matrix on in vivo immune responses to purified peanut allergens. Toxicol. Sci. 86 2 (2005) 333-341
89. Wal J.-M. Thermal processing and allergenicity of foods. Allergy 58 8 (2003) 727-729
90. WHO, 1995. Application of the principles of substantial equivalence to the safety evaluation of foods or food components from plants derived by modern biotechnology. In: Report of a WHO Workshop. World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva. Oct. 31-Nov. 4, Copenhagen, Denmark.
91. Wilson A., Latham J., and Steinbrecher R. Gene Scrambling - Myth or Reality? Transformation-Induced Mutations in Transgenic Crop Plants (2004), EcoNexus, Brighton, UK
92. Zhong G.Y. Genetic issues and pitfalls in transgenic plant breeding. Euphytica 118 (2001) 137-144