A model of user adoption of interface agents for email notification

Interacting with Computers

Volumn 20, Issue 4-5, 2008, Pages 461-472

  Serenko, Alexander ^a  

^a LAKEHEAD UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Email; Interface agents; Partial Least Squares; Technology Acceptance Model; User adoption

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; ELECTRONIC MAIL; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS;

INTERFACE AGENT; KEY INFLUENCING FACTORS; PARTIAL LEAST SQUARE (PLS); PERCEIVED EASE OF USE; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; PERSONAL INNOVATIVENESS; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; USER ADOPTIONS;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 53149106620     PISSN: 09535438     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.intcom.2008.04.004     Document Type: Article

References (147)

1. Adams D.A., Nelson R.R., and Todd P.A. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication. MIS Quarterly 16 2 (1992) 227-247
2. Agarwal R., and Karahanna E. Time flies when you're having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly 24 4 (2000) 665-694
3. Agarwal R., and Prasad J. The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision Sciences 28 3 (1997) 557-582
4. Agarwal R., and Prasad J. A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research 9 2 (1998) 204-215
5. Agarwal R., Sambamurthy V., and Stair R.M. Research report: the evolving relationship between general and specific computer self-efficacy - an empirical assessment. Information Systems Research 11 4 (2000) 418-430
6. Anandarajan M., Simmers C., and Igbaria M. An exploratory investigation of the antecedents and impact of internet usage: an individual perspective. Behaviour & Information Technology 19 1 (2000) 69-85
7. Anderson J.C., and Gerbing D.W. Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 103 3 (1988) 411-423
8. Atkinson M., and Kydd C. Individual characteristics associated with World Wide Web use: an empirical study of playfulness and motivation. Communications of the ACM 28 2 (1997) 53-62
9. Bergman, R., Griss, M., Staelin, C., 2002. A Personal email Assistant. Technical Report HPL-2002-236. Hewlett-Packard Company.
10. Blythe M., Hassenzahl M., and Wright P. More funology. Interactions 11 5 (2004) 36-37
11. Brzezinski J., and Dain M. MEME - a society of virtual characters in an adaptive information sharing system. Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Melbourne, Vic., Australia (2001), IEEE
12. Burgoon J.K., Bonito J.A., Bengtsson B., Cederberg C., Lundeberg M., and Allspach L. Interactivity in human-computer interaction: a study of credibility, understanding, and influence. Computers in Human Behavior 16 6 (2000) 553-574
13. Caplan F., and Caplan T. The Power of Play (1973), Anchor Press, NY
14. Carlson, J.R., Zmud, R.W., 1994. Channel expansion theory: a dynamic view of media and information richness perceptions. In: Moore, D.P. (Ed.), Academy of Management: Best Papers Proceedings. Dallas, TX, pp. 280-284.
15. Carlson J.R., and Zmud R.W. Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Academy of Management Journal 42 2 (1999) 153-170
16. Chau P.Y.K., and Hu P.J. Examining a model of information technology acceptance by individual professionals: an exploratory study. Journal of Management Information Systems 18 4 (2002) 191-229
17. Chin W.W. Issues and opinion on Structural Equation Modeling. MIS Quarterly 22 1 (1998) vii-xvi
18. Chin W.W. The Partial Least Squares approach for Structural Equation Modeling. In: Marcoulides G.A. (Ed). Modern Methods for Business Research (1998), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 295-336
19. Chin, W.W., 2001. PLS-Graph User's Guide, Version 3.0. Soft Modeling Inc.
20. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (1988), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
21. In: Corsini R.J. (Ed). Concise Encyclopedia of Psychology (1987), John Wiley and Sons, New York
22. Cronbach L.J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16 3 (1951) 297-334
23. Csikszentmihalyi M. Beyond Boredom and Anxiety (1975), Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA
24. Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience (1990), Harper & Row, New York
25. Daft R.L., and Lengel R.H. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science 32 5 (1986) 554-571
26. Daft R.L., Lengel R.H., and Trevino L.K. Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: implications for information systems. MIS Quarterly 11 3 (1987) 355-366
27. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13 3 (1989) 319-340
28. Davis F.D. User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 38 3 (1993) 475-487
29. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., and Warshaw P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35 8 (1989) 982-1003
30. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., and Warshaw P.R. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in workplace. Journal of Applied and Social Psychology 22 14 (1992) 1111-1132
31. de Laere K.H., Lundgren D.C., and Howe S.R. The electronic mirror: human-computer interaction and change in self-appraisals. Computers in Human Behavior 14 1 (1998) 43-59
32. de Souza Dias D. Managers' motivation for using information technology. Industrial Management & Data Systems 98 7 (1998) 338-342
33. Dehn D.M., and van Mulken S. The impact of animated interface agents: a review of empirical research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 52 1 (2000) 1-22
34. Detlor B. Towards Knowledge Portals: From Human Issues to Intelligent Agents (2004), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
35. Dijkstra J.J. User agreement with incorrect expert system advice. Behaviour & Information Technology 18 6 (1999) 399-411
36. Dillman D.A. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (1999), John Wiley & Sons, New York
37. Dimmick J., Kline S., and Stafford L. The gratification niches of personal e-mail and telephone. Communication Research 27 2 (2000) 227-248
38. Dishaw M.T., and Strong D.M. Extending the technology acceptance model with task - technology fit constructs. Information & Management 36 1 (1999) 9-21
39. Dow K., Serenko A., Turel O., and Wong J. Antecedents and consequences of user satisfaction with e-mail systems. International Journal of e-Collaboration 2 2 (2006) 46-64
40. Ducheneaut N., and Bellotti V. E-mail as habitat: an exploration of embedded personal information management. Interactions 8 5 (2001) 30-38
41. Duffy B.R. Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42 3-4 (2003) 177-190
42. Dykstra-Erickson E. Interview: Ben Shneiderman and Allison Druin. Interactions 7 2 (2000) 59-65
43. Ellis M.J. Why People Play? (1973), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
44. English H.B., and English A.C. A Comprehensive Dictionary of Psychological and Psychoanalytical Terms: A Guide to Usage (1958), David McKay Company, New York
45. Fornell C., and Larcker D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18 1 (1981) 39-50
46. Frohlich M.T. Techniques for improving response rates in OM survey research. Journal of Operations Management 20 1 (2002) 53-62
47. Fulk J. Social construction of communication technology. Academy of Management Journal 36 5 (1993) 921-950
48. Fulk J., Schmitz J., and Steinfield C.W. A social influence model for technology use. In: Fulk J., and Steinfield C.W. (Eds). Organizations and Communications Technologies (1990), Sage Publications, Newbury Park 117-140
49. Geary W.R. The creation of RICO: law as a knowledge diffusion process. Crime, Law and Social Change 33 4 (2000) 329-367
50. Gebhard P., Kipp M., Klesen M., and Rist T. Interfaces: authoring scenes for adaptive, interactive performances. Proceedings of the Second International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2003), The ACM Press, Melbourne, Australia
51. Gefen D., and Keil M. The impact of developer responsiveness on perceptions of usefulness and ease of use: an extension of the technology acceptance model. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems 29 2 (1998) 35-49
52. Gefen D., and Straub D. The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: a study of e-commerce adoption. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 1 8 (2000) 1-28
53. Gefen D., Straub D., and Boudreau M.-C. Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 4 7 (2000) 1-77
54. Glynn M.A., and Webster J. The adult playfulness scale: an initial assessment. Psychological Reports 71 1 (1992) 83-103
55. Gulz A. Benefits of virtual characters in computer based learning environments: claims and evidence. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 14 (2004) 313-334
56. Hackbarth G., Grover V., and Yi M.Y. Computer playfulness and anxiety: positive and negative mediators of the system experience effect on perceived ease of use. Information & Management 40 3 (2003) 221-232
57. Harman H.H. Modern Factor Analysis (1967), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
58. Hatcher L. A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling (1994), SAS Publishing, Cary, NC
59. Hendrickson A.R., Massey P.D., and Cronan T.P. On the test-retest reliability of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use scales. MIS Quarterly 17 2 (1993) 227-230
60. Igbaria M., Iivari J., and Maragahh H. Why do individuals use computer technology? A Finnish case study. Information & Management 29 5 (1995) 227-238
61. Igbaria M., Zinatelli N., Cragg P., and Cavaye A.L.M. Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: a structural equation model. MIS Quarterly 21 3 (1997) 279-302
62. Johnson W.L., Rickel J.W., and Lester J. Animated pedagogical agents: face-to-face interaction in interactive learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 11 (2000) 47-78
63. Karahanna E., Ahuja M., Srite M., and Galvin J. Individual differences and relative advantage: the case of GSS. Decision Support Systems 32 4 (2002) 327-341
64. Karahanna E., and Straub D.W. The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use. Information & Management 35 4 (1999) 237-250
65. Keeble R.J., and Macredie R.D. Assistant agents for the world wide web intelligent interface design challenges. Interacting with Computers 12 4 (2000) 357-381
66. Kiesler S., Sproull L., and Waters K. A prisoner's dilemma experiment on cooperation with people and human-like computers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 1 (1996) 47-65
67. King W.J., and Ohya J. The representation of agents: a study of phenomena in virtual environments. Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication, Tokyo, Japan (1995), IEEE
68. King W.J., and Ohya J. The representation of agents: anthropomorphism, agency, and intelligence. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (1996), The ACM Press, Vancouver, BC, Canada
69. King W.R., and He J. A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management 43 6 (2006) 740-755
70. Koda T., and Maes P. Agents with faces: the effect of personification. Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication, Tsukuba, Japan (1996), IEEE
71. Lashkari Y., Metral M., and Maes P. Collaborative interface agents. Proceedings of the 12th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1994), AAAI Press, Seattle, Washington
72. Lee W.J., Kim T.U., and Chung J.-Y. User acceptance of the mobile Internet. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Mobile Business, Athens, Greece (2002), Mobiforum
73. Legris P., Ingham J., and Collerette P. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management 40 3 (2003) 191-204
74. Lester J.C., Converse S.A., Kahler S.E., Barlow S.T., Stone B.A., and Bhoga R.S. The persona effect: affective impact of animated pedagogical agents. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (1997), The ACM Press, Atlanta, Georgia
75. Lester J.C., Voerman J.L., Towns S.G., and Callaway C.B. Deictic believability: coordinated gesture, locomotion, and speech in lifelike pedagogical agents. Applied Artificial Intelligence 13 4-5 (1999) 383-414
76. Levy J. Play Behavior (1978), John Wiley & Sons, Toronto, Canada
77. Lewis Jr., W., 1999. Technology Beliefs, Belief Antecedents, and IT Usage: A Study of the World Wide Web. Doctoral Dissertation. College of Business, Department of Information and Management Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
78. Lieberman H., and Selker T. Agents for the user interface. In: Bradshaw J.M. (Ed). Handbook of Agent Technology (2003), The MIT Press
79. Lieberman H., and Wagner E. End-user debugging for electronic commerce. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (2003), The ACM Press, Miami Beach
80. Limayem M., Khalifa M., and Frini A. What makes consumers buy from Internet? a longitudinal study of online shopping. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 30 4 (2000) 421-432
81. Maes P. Agents that reduce work and information overload. Communications of the ACM 37 7 (1994) 31-40
82. Maes P., and Kozierok R. Learning interface agents. Proceedings of the 11th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1993), The MIT Press, Washington, DC
83. Markus M.L. Toward a 'Critical Mass' theory of interactive media. In: Fulk J., and Steinfield C.W. (Eds). Organizations and Communications Technologies (1990), Sage Publications, Newbury Park 194-218
84. Martocchio J.J., and Webster J. Effects of feedback and playfulness on performance in microcomputer software training. Personnel Psychology 45 3 (1992) 553-578
85. McBreen H.M., and Jack M.A. Evaluating humanoid synthetic agents in e-retail applications. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 31 5 (2001) 394-405
86. McKnight D.H., Choudhury V., and Kacmar C. Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology. Information Systems Research 13 3 (2002) 334-359
87. Moon J.-W., and Kim Y.-G. Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & Management 38 4 (2001) 217-230
88. Murphy J., and Tan I. Journey to nowhere? E-mail customer service by travel agents in Singapore. Tourism Management 24 5 (2003) 543-550
89. Nass C., Fogg B.J., and Moon Y. Can computers be teammates?. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 45 6 (1996) 669-678
90. Nass C., Steuer J., Henriksen L., and Dryer D.C. Machines, social attributions, and ethopoeia: performance assessments of computers subsequent to 'self-' or 'other-' evaluations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 40 3 (1994) 543-559
91. Nass C., Steuer J., Tauber E., and Reeder H. Anthropomorphism, agency, and ethopoeia: computers as social actors. Proceedings of the Joint International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction and Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference (1993), The ACM Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
92. Nelson R.R. Project retrospectives: evaluating project success, failure, and everything else in between. MIS Quarterly Executive 4 3 (2005) 361-372
93. Ngwenyama O.K. Communication richness in electronic mail: critical social theory and the contextuality of meaning. MIS Quarterly 21 2 (1997) 145-167
94. Nunnally J.C. Psychometric Theory (1978), McGraw-Hill, New York
95. Orlikowski W.J. The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science 3 3 (1992) 398-427
96. Orlikowski W.J., Yates J., Okamura K., and Fujimoto M. Shaping electronic communication: the metastructuring of technology in the context of use. Organization Science 6 4 (1995) 423-444
97. Parise S., Kiesler S., Sproull L., and Waters K. Cooperating with life-like interface agents. Computers in Human Behavior 15 2 (1999) 123-142
98. Payne T.R., and Edwards P. Interface agents that learn: an investigation of learning issues in a mail agent interface. Applied Artificial Intelligence 11 1 (1997) 1-32
99. Perry E.L., and Ballou D.J. The role of work, play, and fun in microcomputer software training. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems 28 2 (1997) 93-112
100. Person N.K., Craig C., Price P., Hu X., Gholson B., and Greasser A.C. Incorporating human-like conversational behaviors into AutoTutor. Proceedings of the Workshop on Achieving Human-like Behavior in the Interactive Animated Agents at the Agents 2000 Conference, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain (2000), The ACM Press
101. Podsakoff P.M., MacKenzie S.B., Lee J.-Y., and Podsakoff N.P. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 5 (2003) 879-903
102. Podsakoff P.M., and Organ D.W. Self-report in Organizational Research: problems and prospects. Journal of Management 12 4 (1986) 531-544
103. Potosky D. A field study of computer efficacy beliefs as an outcome of training: the role of computer playfulness, computer knowledge, and performance during training. Computers in Human Behavior 18 3 (2002) 241-255
104. Raymond L. Organizational characteristics and MIS success in the context of small business. MIS Quarterly 9 1 (1985) 37-52
105. Rice R. Media appropriateness: using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organization media. Human Communication Research 19 4 (1993) 451-484
106. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of Innovations (1995), Free Press, New York
107. Segal R.B., and Kephart J.O. MailCat: an intelligent assistant for organizing e-mail. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents (1999), The ACM Press, New York
108. Segal R.B., and Kephart J.O. Incremental learning in SwiftFile. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Machine Learning (2000), Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Stanford, CA
109. Serenko, A., 2005. User Adoption of Interface Agents for email. Doctoral Dissertation. DeGroote School of Business, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
110. Serenko A. The importance of interface agent characteristics from the end-user perspective. International Journal of Intelligent Information Technologies 2 2 (2006) 48-59
111. Serenko A. The use of interface agents for email notification in critical incidents. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64 11 (2006) 1084-1098
112. Serenko A. Are interface agents scapegoats? Attributions of responsibility in human-agent interaction. Interacting with Computers 19 2 (2007) 293-303
113. Serenko A. The development of an instrument to measure the degree of animation predisposition of agent users. Computers in Human Behavior 23 1 (2007) 478-495
114. Serenko A., Bontis N., and Detlor B. End-user adoption of animated interface agents in everyday work applications. Behaviour & Information Technology 26 2 (2007) 119-132
115. Serenko A., and Detlor B. Agent toolkit satisfaction and use in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 15 1 (2003) 65-88
116. Serenko A., and Detlor B. Intelligent agents as innovations. AI & Society 18 4 (2004) 364-381
117. Serenko A., Ruhi U., and Cocosila M. Unplanned effects of intelligent agents on Internet use: Social Informatics approach. AI & Society 21 1-2 (2007) 141-166
118. Serenko A., and Turel O. Are MIS research instruments stable? An exploratory reconsideration of the Computer Playfulness Scale. Information & Management 44 8 (2007) 657-665
119. Sharon T., Lieberman H., and Selker T. Searching the Web with a little help from your friends. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (2002), The ACM Press, New Orleans
120. Steffen, T.H., 1998. A positive approach to measuring attitudes towards computers: microcomputer playfulness and computer efficacy in an industrial setting. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Sarasota, Sarasota, FL.
121. Straub D.W. Validating instruments in MIS research. MIS Quarterly 13 2 (1989) 147-169
122. Subramanian G.H. A replication of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use measurement. Decision Sciences 25 5,6 (1994) 863-874
123. Sun H., and Zhang P. The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64 2 (2006) 53-78
124. Suzuki N., Ishii K., and Okada M. Talking Eye: autonomous creature as accomplice for human. Proceedings of the 3rd Asia Pacific Conference on Computer Human Interaction, Shonan Village Center, Japan (1998), IEEE Computer Society
125. Szajna B. Software evaluation and choice: predictive validation of the technology acceptance instrument. MIS Quarterly 18 3 (1994) 319-324
126. Szajna B. Empirical evaluation of the revised Technology Acceptance Model. Management Science 42 1 (1996) 85-92
127. Takeuchi A., and Nagao K. Communicative facial displays as a new conversational modality. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (1993), The ACM Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
128. Takeuchi A., and Naito T. Situated facial displays: towards social interaction. Proceedings of the Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems (1995), The ACM Press, Denver, Colorado
129. Thatcher J.B., and Perrewe P.L. An empirical examination of individual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. MIS Quarterly 26 4 (2002) 381-396
130. Trevino L.K., Daft R.L., and Lengel R.H. Understanding managers' media choices: a symbolic interactionist perspective. In: Fulk J., and Steinfield C.W. (Eds). Organizations and Communications Technologies (1990), Sage Publications, Newbury Park 71-94
131. Venkatesh V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Information Systems Research 11 4 (2000) 342-365
132. Venkatesh V., and Davis F.D. A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test. Decision Sciences 27 3 (1996) 451-481
133. Venkatesh V., and Davis F.D. A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 46 2 (2000) 186-204
134. Venkatesh V., and Morris M.G. Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly 24 1 (2000) 115-139
135. Venkatesh V., Morris M.G., Davis G.B., and Davis F. User acceptance of information technology: towards a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27 3 (2003) 425-478
136. Walker J.H., Sproull L., and Subramani R. Using a human face in an interface. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Celebrating Interdependence (1994), The ACM Press, New York
137. Wang W., and Benbasat I. Trust in and adoption of online recommendation agents. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 6 3 (2005) 72-101
138. Webster J. Making computer tasks at work more playful: implications for systems analysts and designers. Proceedings of the ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Personnel Research Annual Conference on Management of Information Systems Personnel (1988), The ACM Press, New York
139. Webster J., and Ho H. Audience engagement in multimedia presentations. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems 28 2 (1997) 63-77
140. Webster J., and Martocchio J.J. Microcomputer playfulness: development of a measure with workplace implications. MIS Quarterly 16 2 (1992) 201-226
141. Webster J., and Martocchio J.J. Turning work into play: implications for microcomputer software training. Journal of Management 19 1 (1993) 127-146
142. Woszczynski, A.B., 2000. Exploring the theoretical foundations of playfulness in computer interactions. Doctoral Dissertation. College of Business & Behavioral Studies, Clemson University, Clemson, CA.
143. Woszczynski A.B., and Whitman M.E. The problem of common method variance in IS research. In: Whitman M.E., and Woszczynski A.B. (Eds). The Handbook of Information Systems Research (2004), Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA 66-77
144. Xiao J., Stasko J., and Catrambone R. An empirical study of the effect of agent competence on user performance and perception. Proceedings of the 3rd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2004), The ACM Press, New York
145. Yager S.E., Kappelman L.A., Maples G.A., and Prybutok V.R. Microcomputer playfulness: stable or dynamic trait?. Communications of the ACM 28 2 (1997) 43-52
146. Yates J., and Orlikowski W.J. Genres of organizational communication: a structurational approach to studying communication and media. The Academy of Management Review 17 2 (1992) 299-326
147. Zmud R.W. Individual differences and MIS success: a review of the empirical literature. Management Science 25 10 (1979) 966-979