The electronic mirror: Human-computer interaction and change in self-appraisals

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 43-59

  De Laere, Kevin H ^a   Lundgren, David C ^b   Howe, Steven R ^b  

^a 5000 Arlington Centre   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Human computer interaction; Reflected appraisal; Self appraisal

Indexed keywords

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; USER INTERFACES;

ANTHROPOMORPHISM;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 0031626191     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0747-5632(97)00031-9     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Albertson, L. M. (1986). Personalized feedback and cognitive achievement in computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 13, 55-57.
2. Baumgardner, A. H., Kaufman, C. M., & Levy, P. E. (1989). Regulating affect interpersonally: When low esteem leads to greater enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 907-921.
3. Burns, R. B. (1979). The self-concept: Theory, measurement, development and behaviour. New York: Longman.
4. Burns, B., & Hagerman, A. (1989). Computer experience, self-concept and problem-solving: The effects of LOGO on children's ideas of themselves as learners. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 199-212.
5. Cook, J., & Salvendy, G. (1989). Perception of computer dialogue personality: An exploratory study. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 31, 717-728.
6. Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribners.
7. Dambrot, F. H. (1985). Correlates of sex differences in attitudes toward and involvement with computers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 27, 71-86.
8. Felson, R. B. (1980). Communication barriers and the reflected appraisal process. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 223-233.
9. Felson, R. B. (1981). Self- and reflected appraisal among football players: A test of the Meadian hypothesis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 116-126.
10. Felson, R. B. (1989). Parents and the reflected appraisal process: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 965-971.
11. Felson, R. B. (1990). Comparison processes in parents' and children's appraisals of academic performance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53, 264-273.
12. Friedman, B. (1995). It's the computer's fault: Reasoning about computers as moral agents. CHI '95 Conference Companion, 226-227.
13. Fuller, R. (1994). Human-computer-human interaction: How computers affect interpersonal communication. The Arachnet: Electronic Journal on Virtual Culture [On-line]. Available: GOPHER to gopher.cic.net 70
14. Gecas, V., & Burke, P. J. (1995). Self and identity. In K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine, & J. S. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp. 41-67). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
15. Ichyama, M. (1993). The reflected appraisal process in small-group interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 56, 87-99.
16. Jussim, L., Soffin, S., Brown, R., & Ley, J. (1992). Understanding reactions to feedback by integrating ideas from symbolic interactionism and cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 402-421.
17. Kinch, J. W. (1963). A formalized theory of the self-concept. American Journal of Sociology, 68, 481-486.
18. Levin, T., & Gordon, C. (1989). Effect of gender and experience on attitudes toward computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 69-88.
19. Lewis, C. H. (1990). A research agenda for the nineties in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 5, 125-143.
20. Lundgren, D. C., Jergens, V. H., & Gibson, J. L. (1982). Husbands' and wives' appraisals of self and other as a function of marital power, roles, and solidarity. Sociological Inquiry, 52, 33-51.
21. Nass, C., Moon, Y., Fogg, B. J., Reeves, B., & Dryer, C. (1995). Can computer personalities be human personalities? CHI '95 Conference Companion, 228-229.
22. Orcutt, J. D., & Anderson, R. E. (1974). Human-computer relationships: Interactions and attitudes. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 6, 2-222.
23. Orcutt, J. D., & Anderson, R. E. (1977). Social interaction, dehumanization and the "computerized other". Sociology and Social Research, 61, 380-397.
24. Quintanar, L. R., Crowell, C. R., Pryor, J. B., & Adamopoulos, J. (1982). Human-computer interaction: A preliminary social psychological analysis. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 14, 210-220.
25. Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1994). Social responses to communication technology: Where social psychology meets interface design [On-line]. Available: http://msresearch/persona/related works
26. Resnik, P. V., & Lammers, H. B. (1985). The influence of self-esteem on cognitive responses to machine-like versus human-like computer feedback. Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 761-769.
27. Schafer, R. B., & Keith, P. M. (1985). Effects of marital role problems and the self-concept on wives' depressed mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 541-543.
28. Shrauger, J. S., & Schoeneman, T. J. (1979). Symbolic interactionist view of self-concept: Through the looking-glass darkly. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 549-573.
29. Stryker, S., & Statham, A. (1985). Symbolic interaction and role theory. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 311-378). Hillsdale, NJ: Random House.
30. Wenger, M. J. (1991). On the rhetorical contract in human-computer interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 245-262.
31. Wylie, R. C. (1979). The self-concept: Theory and research on selected topics (Vol. 2, Rev. ed.). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.