Managers' motivation for using information technology

Industrial Management and Data Systems

Volumn 98, Issue 7, 1998, Pages 338-342

  De Souza Dias, Donaldo ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRITICAL PATH ANALYSIS; INDUSTRY; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MICROCOMPUTERS; SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL;

COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL;

MOTIVATION;

EID: 0542374624     PISSN: 02635577     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/02635579810230153     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Adams, D., Nelson, R. and Todd, P. (1992), "Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 227-47.
2. Bailey, J. and Pearson, S. (1983), "Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction", Management Science, Vol. 29 No. 5, pp. 519-29.
3. Blalock, H. (1972), Social Statistics, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, pp. 468-77.
4. Davis, F. (1986), "A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end user information systems: theory and results", unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Boston, MA.
5. Davis, F. (1989), "Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of computer technology", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 319-40.
6. Davis, F., Bagozzi, R. and Warshaw, P. (1992), "Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace", Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 22, pp. 1111-32.
7. Deci, E. (1975), Intrinsic Motivation, Plenum, New York, NY
8. Dias, D. (1986), "Information systems requirements definition: key factors and situation in Brazilian companies", 10th World Computer Congress, IFIP, Dublin, pp. 1009-13.
9. Freud, S. (1974), Complete Works (in Portuguese), Imago, Rio de Janeiro, Vol. 14, pp. 185-233.
10. Freud, S. (1976a), Complete Works (in Portuguese), Imago, Rio de Janeiro, Vol. 22, pp. 75-102.
11. Freud, S. (1976b), Complete Works (in Portuguese), Imago, Rio de Janeiro, Vol. 20, pp. 95-201.
12. Gatian, A. (1994), "Is user satisfaction a valid measure of systems effectiveness?", Information & Management, Vol. 26, pp. 119-31.
13. Igbaria, M. and Tan, M. (1997), "The consequences of information technology acceptance on subsequent (on subsequent) individual performance", Information & Management, Vol. 32, pp. 113-21.
14. Igbaria, M., Iivari, J. and Maragahh, H. (1995), "Why do individuals use computer technology? A Finnish case study", Information & Management, Vol. 29, pp. 227-38.
15. Igbaria, M., Parasuraman, S. and Baroudi, J.J. (1996), "A motivational model of microcomputer usage", Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 127-43.
16. Iivari, J. and Ervasti, I. (1994), "User information satisfaction: IS implementability and effectiveness", Information & Management, Vol. 27, pp. 205-20.
17. Ives, B., Olson, M. and Baroudi, J. (1983), "The measurement of user information satisfaction", Communications of ACM, Vol. 26 No. 10, pp. 785-93.
18. Jenkins, M. and Ricketts, J. (1985), "Development of an MIS satisfaction questionnaire: an instrument for evaluating user satisfaction with turnkey decision support systems", Indiana University Discussion Paper No. 296.
19. Kappelman, L. and McLean, E. (1992), "Promoting information systems success", Journal of Information Technology Management, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 1-12.
20. Moore, G. and Benbasat, I. (1991), "Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation", Information Systems Research, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 192-222.
21. Neumann, S. and Segev, E. (1979), "A case study of user evaluation of information characteristics for systems improvement", Information & Management, Vol. 2, pp. 271-78.
22. Schwartz, H. (1983), "A theory of deontic work motivation", The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 204-14.
23. Yaverbaum, G. and Nosek, J. (1992), "Effects of information systems education and training on user satisfaction", Information & Management, Vol. 22, pp. 217-25.