A review and critique of context-based physics instruction and assessment

Educational Research Review

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 155-167

  Taasoobshirazi, Gita ^a   Carr, Martha ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

College; Context based instruction; High school; Physics

Indexed keywords

EID: 52949085492     PISSN: 1747938X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2008.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Anzai Y. Learning and use of representations for physics expertise. In: Anders K.A., and Smith J. (Eds). Toward a general theory of expertise (1991), Cambridge University Press, New York 64-92
2. Astin C., Fisher N., and Taylor B. Finding physics in the real world: How to teach physics effectively with visits. Physics Education 37 (2002) 18-24
3. Barber, M. (2001). A comparison of NEAB and Salters A-level Chemistry: Student views and achievements. Unpublished MA Thesis, University of York, UK.
4. Barker, V., & Millar, R. (1996). Differences between Salters' and traditional A-level chemistry students' understanding of basic chemical ideas. Science Education Research Paper 96/05. York, UK: University of York.
5. Bassok M. Two types of reliance on correlations between content and structure in reasoning about word problems. In: English L. (Ed). Mathematical reasoning: Analogies, metaphors, and images (1997), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 221-246
6. Benbow C.P., and Minor L.L. Mathematically talented males and females and achievement in the high school sciences. American Educational Research Journal 23 (1986) 425-436
7. Benckert, S. (1997). Context and conversation in physics education. Unpublished study.
8. Bennett J., Grasel C., Parchmann I., and Waddington D. Context-based and conventional approaches to teaching chemistry: Comparing teachers' views. International Journal of Science Education 27 (2005) 1521-1547
9. Bloom R.D.S., and Halpin R.J. Integrating pharmacology topics in high school biology and chemistry classes improves performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40 (2003) 922-938
10. Briscoe C., and Prayaga C.S. Teaching future K-8 teachers the language of Newton: A case study of collaboration and change in university physics teaching. Science Education 88 (2004) 947-969
11. Buck G., Latta M.A.M., and Leslie-Pelecky D. Learning how to make inquiry into electricity and magnetism discernible to middle level teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education 18 (2007) 377-397
12. Burton W.G., Holman J.S., Pilling G.M., and Waddington D.J. Salters advanced chemistry: A revolution in pre-college chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education 72 (1995) 227-230
13. Chang C.Y., and Mao S.L. Comparison of Taiwan's students' outcomes with inquiry-group versus traditional instruction. Journal of Educational Research 92 (1999) 340-346
14. Cognition and Technology Group Vanderbilt. The Jasper series as an example of anchored instruction: Theory, program, description, and assessment data. Educational Psychologist 27 (1992) 291-315
15. Colicchia G. Sit up straight! It's good physics. Physics Education 40 (2005) 365-369
16. Cooper S., Yeo S., and Zadnik M. Australian students' views on nuclear issues: Does teaching alter prior beliefs?. Physics Education 38 (2003) 123-129
17. Crawford M., Souders J., Pedrotti L., Carter N., Rinard B., Westbrook L., et al. Physics in context (2001), Cord Communications, Waco, TX
18. Dufresne R.J., Gerace W.J., Leonard W.J., Mestre J.P., and Wenk L. Classtalk: A classroom communication system for active learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 7 (1996) 3-47
19. Enghag, M. (2004). Miniprojects and context rich problems: Case studies with analysis of motivation, learner ownership and competence in small group work in physics. Unpublished Thesis, Linköping University, Sweden.
20. Featonby D. Toys and physics. Physics Education 40 (2005) 537-543
21. Finkelstein, N. (2001). Context in the context of physics and learning. Unpublished study.
22. Finkelstein N. Learning physics in context: A study of student learning about electricity and magnetism. International Journal of Science Education 27 (2005) 1187-1209
23. Glynn S., and Koballa T.R. The contextual teaching and learning instructional approach. In: Yager R.E. (Ed). Exemplary science: Best practices in professional development (2005), National Science Teachers Association Press, Arlington, VA 75-84
24. Gomez M., Pozo J., and Sanz A. Students' ideas on conservation of matter: Effects of expertise and context variables. Science Education 79 (1995) 77-93
25. Greeno J.G. The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist 53 (1998) 5-22
26. Hake R.R. Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics 66 (1998) 64-74
27. Harp S.F., and Mayer R.E. How seductive details do their damage: A theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 90 (1998) 414-434
28. Heller P., and Hollabaugh M. Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups. American Journal of Physics 60 (1992) 637-644
29. Hestenes D. Towards a modeling theory of physics instruction. American Journal of Physics 55 (1987) 440-454
30. Holman J. A new look at A-level chemistry. Chemistry in Britain 27 (1991) 813-814
31. Jones G., Howe A., and Rua M.J. Gender differences in students' experiences, interests, and attitudes toward science and scientists. Science Education 84 (2000) 180-192
32. Kang N., and Wallace C.S. Secondary science teachers' use of laboratory activities: Linking epistemological beliefs, goals, and practices. Science Education 89 (2005) 140-165
33. Kaschalk R. Physics-Why bother? ... that's why!. Contextual Teaching Exchange 1 (2002) 1-8
34. King C., and Kennett P. Earth science contexts for teaching physics. Part 1: Why teach physics in an Earth science context?. Physics Education 37 (2002) 467-469
35. Kittleson J.M., and Southerland S.A. The role of discourse in group knowledge construction: A case study of engineering students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41 (2004) 267-293
36. Larkin J.H., McDermott J., Simon H., and Simon D. Models of competence in solving physics problems. Cognitive Science 4 (1980) 317-345
37. Larkin J.H., McDermott J., Simon H., and Simon D. Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science 208 (1980) 1335-1342
38. Lave J. Cognition in practice. Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life (1988), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England
39. Lemke J.L. Talking science: Language, learning and values (1990), Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ
40. Leonard W.J., Dufresne R.J., and Mestre J.P. Using qualitative problem-solving strategies to highlight the role of conceptual knowledge in solving problems. American Journal of Physics 64 (1996) 1495-1503
41. Linder C., Fraser D., and Pang M.F. Using a variation approach to enhance physics learning in a college classroom. The Physics Teacher 44 (2006) 589-592
42. Lye H., Fry M., and Hart C. What does it mean to teach physics in context: A first case study. Australian Science Teachers Journal 48 (2001) 16-22
43. McCarthy J.P., and Anderson L. Active learning techniques versus traditional teaching styles: Two experiments from history and political science. Innovative Higher Education 24 (2000) 279-294
44. McDermott L.C. What we teach and what is learned-Closing the gap. American Journal of Physics 59 (1991) 301-315
45. Mestre J.P., Dufresne R.J., Gerace W.J., Hardiman P.T., and Touger J. Promoting skilled problem-solving behavior among beginning physics students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30 (1993) 303-317
46. Meyer D.K., and Turner J.C. Using instructional discourse analysis to study the scaffolding of student self-regulation. Educational Psychologist 37 (2002) 17-25
47. Michael, V. (2005). Six flags for teachers. http://www.slapt.org/. Retrieved November 7, 2005 from St. Louis area physics teachers.
48. Murphy P., Lunn S., and Jones L. The impact of authentic learning on students' engagement with physics. The Curriculum Journal 17 (2006) 229-246
49. Murphy, P., & Whitelegg, E. (2006). Girls in the physics classroom: A review of the research into the participation of girls in physics. Institute of Physics Report.
50. National Research Council. National science educational standards (1996), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
51. Neto, A. J., & Valente, M. O. (2005). Problem solving in physics: Towards a synergetic metacognitively developed approach. Unpublished study.
52. Neumann K., and Welzel M. A new labwork course for physics students: Devices, methods, and research projects. European Journal of Physics 28 (2007) 61-69
53. Ng W., and Nguyen V.T. Investigating the integration of everyday phenomena and practical work in physics teaching in Vietnamese high schools. International Education Journal 7 (2006) 36-50
54. Park J., and Lee L. Analyzing cognitive and non-cognitive factors involved in the process of physics problem-solving in an everyday context. International Journal of Science Education 29 (2004) 1577-1595
55. Pendrill A.M., and Williams G. Swings and slides. Physics Education 40 (2005) 427-533
56. Perkins K., Adams W., Dubson M., Finkelstein N., Reid S., Wieman C., et al. PhET interactive simulations for teaching and learning physics. The Physics Teacher 44 (2006) 18-23
57. Priest A.G., and Lindsay R.O. New light on novice-expert differences in physics problem solving. The British Psychological Society 83 (1992) 389-405
58. Prince M. Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education 93 (2004) 223-231
59. Rayner, A. (2005). Reflections on context based science teaching: A case study of physics students for physiotherapy. Poster presented at the annual UniServe Science Blended Learning Symposium Proceedings, Sydney, Australia.
60. Redish E.F. Teaching physics with the physics suite (2003), Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
61. Redish E.F., Saul J.M., and Steinberg R.N. Student expectations in introductory physics. American Journal of Physics 66 (1998) 212-224
62. Reigosa C., and Jimenez-Aleixandre M. Scaffolded problem solving in the physics and chemistry laboratory: Difficulties hindering students' assumption of responsibility. International Journal of Science Education 29 (2007) 307-329
63. Renkl A., Mandl H., and Gruber H. Inert knowledge: Analyses and remedies. Educational Psychologist 31 (1996) 115-121
64. Rennie L.J., and Parker L.H. Placing physics problems in real-life context: Students' reactions and performance. Australian Science Teachers Journal 42 (1996) 55-59
65. Rogers M. An inquiry-based course using physics in cartoons and movies. The Physics Teacher 45 (2007) 38-41
66. Shaffer P.S., and McDermott L.C. A research-based approach to improving student understanding of the vector nature of kinematical concepts. American Journal of Physics 73 (2005) 921-931
67. Shiu-sing, T. (2005). Some reflections on the design of contextual learning and teaching materials. http://resources.emb.gov.hk/cphysics/. Retrieved November 4, 2005 from Contextual Physics in Ocean Park.
68. Taasoobshirazi G., Zuiker S., Anderson K., and Hickey D.T. Enhancement of inquiry and achievement in an astronomy multimedia learning environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology 15 (2006) 383-395
69. Taconis R., Ferguson-Hessler M.G.M., and Broekkamp H. Teaching science problem solving: An overview of experimental work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38 (2001) 442-468
70. Taylor B.A.P., and Turner R.C. Rollercoasters in the classroom. Physics Education 40 (2005) 512-513
71. Turner R.C., and Taylor B.A.P. Physics fair in the classroom: Relative motion with toy cars. Physics Education 40 (2005) 513-515
72. Viennot L. Spontaneous reasoning in elementary dynamics. Science Education 1 (1979) 205-221
73. Volkmann M.J., and Zgagacz M. Learning to teach physics through inquiry: The lived experience of a graduate teaching assistant. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41 (2004) 584-602
74. Waltner C., Weisner H., and Rachel A. Physics in context-A means to encourage student interest in physics. Physics Education 42 (2007) 502-507
75. Watts D.M. Some alternative views of energy. Physics Education 18 (1983) 213-217
76. Whitelegg E., and Edwards C. Beyond the laboratory: Learning physics using real-life contexts. In: Behrendt H., Dahncke H., Duit R., Graber W., Komorec M., Kross A., and Reiska P. (Eds). Research in science education: Past, present, and future (2001), Kluwer, Dorderecht 337-342
77. Whitelegg E., and Parry M. Real-life contexts for learning physics: Meanings, issues, and practice. Physics Education 34 (1999) 68-72
78. Wierstra R.F.A., and Wubbels T. Student perception and appraisal of the learning environment: Core concepts in the evaluation of the PLON physics curriculum. Studies in Educational Evaluation 20 (1994) 437-455
79. Wilkinson J.W. The contextual approach to teaching physics. Australian Science Teachers Journal 45 (1997) 43-50
80. Wilkinson J.W. Teachers' perceptions of the contextual approach to teaching VCE physics. Australian Science Teachers Journal 45 (1999) 58-65
81. Yam, H. (2005). What is contextual learning and teaching in physics? http://resources.emb.gov.hk/cphysics. Retrieved November 4, 2005 from Contextual Physics in Ocean Park.