Learning how to make inquiry into electricity and magnetism discernible to middle level teachers

Journal of Science Teacher Education

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 377-397

  Buck, Gayle A ^a   MacIntyre Latta, Margaret A ^b   Leslie Pelecky, Diandra L ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249689650     PISSN: 1046560X     EISSN: 15731847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10972-007-9053-8     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. A case of drawing to learn. Performanetics Video Production. Amherst, MA.
2. Clift, R., & Brady, P. (2005). Research on methods courses and field experiences. In M. Cochran-Smith & Zeichner K. (Eds.), Studying teacher education (pp. 309-424). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Cohen, D., & Hill, C. (1998). State policy and classroom performance: Mathematics reform in California. CPRE Policy Briefs, RB, 23, 1-10.
4. Crawford, B. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916-937.
5. Greenwood, D., & Levin, M. (1998). Introduction to action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Hogan, K., & Berkowitz, A. (2000). Teachers as inquiry learners. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11(1), 1-25.
7. Keys, C., & Bryan, L. (2001). Co-constructing inquiry-based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), 631-645.
8. Keys, C., & Kennedy, V. (1999). Understanding inquiry science teaching in context: A case study of an elementary teacher. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10(4), 315-333.
9. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory action research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Levin, M., & Greenwood, D. (2002). Pragmatic action research and the struggle to transform universities into learning communities. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P., Love, P., & Stiles, K. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Luft, J. (1999). Assessing science teachers as they implement inquiry lessons: The Extended Inquiry Observational Rubric. Science Education, 8(1), 9-18.
13. Lunsford, S. (2002). In-service inquiry. The Science Teacher, 69(2), 54-56.
14. National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
15. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16. Norlander-Case, K., Campbell, P., Reagan, T., & Case, C. (1998). The role of collaborative inquiry and reflective practice in teacher preparation. The Professional Educator, 27(1), 1-14.
17. Shepard, L. (2001). The role of classroom assessment in teaching, learning. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
18. Supovitz, J., & Turner, H. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 963-980.